Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Diabetologia 12/2017

25.10.2017 | Position statement

Improving the clinical value and utility of CGM systems: issues and recommendations

A joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group

verfasst von: John R. Petrie, Anne L. Peters, Richard M. Bergenstal, Reinhard W. Holl, G. Alexander Fleming, Lutz Heinemann

Erschienen in: Diabetologia | Ausgabe 12/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The first systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) became available over 15 years ago. Many then believed CGM would revolutionise the use of intensive insulin therapy in diabetes; however, progress towards that vision has been gradual. Although increasing, the proportion of individuals using CGM rather than conventional systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose on a daily basis is still low in most parts of the world. Barriers to uptake include cost, measurement reliability (particularly with earlier-generation systems), human factors issues, lack of a standardised format for displaying results and uncertainty on how best to use CGM data to make therapeutic decisions. This scientific statement makes recommendations for systemic improvements in clinical use and regulatory (pre- and postmarketing) handling of CGM devices. The aim is to improve safety and efficacy in order to support the advancement of the technology in achieving its potential to improve quality of life and health outcomes for more people with diabetes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann L, Freckmann G (2015) CGM versus FGM; or, continuous glucose monitoring is not flash glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol 9:947–950CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heinemann L, Freckmann G (2015) CGM versus FGM; or, continuous glucose monitoring is not flash glucose monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol 9:947–950CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kropff J, Choudhary P, Neupane S et al (2017) Accuracy and longevity of an implantable continuous glucose sensor in the PRECISE study: a 180-day, prospective, multicenter, pivotal trial. Diabetes Care 40:63–68CrossRefPubMed Kropff J, Choudhary P, Neupane S et al (2017) Accuracy and longevity of an implantable continuous glucose sensor in the PRECISE study: a 180-day, prospective, multicenter, pivotal trial. Diabetes Care 40:63–68CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann L, Fleming GA, Petrie JR, Holl RW, Bergenstal RM, Peters AL (2015) Insulin pump risks and benefits: a clinical appraisal of pump safety standards, adverse event reporting and research needs. A joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group. Diabetologia 58:862–870CrossRefPubMed Heinemann L, Fleming GA, Petrie JR, Holl RW, Bergenstal RM, Peters AL (2015) Insulin pump risks and benefits: a clinical appraisal of pump safety standards, adverse event reporting and research needs. A joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group. Diabetologia 58:862–870CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Bailey TS, Grunberger G, Bode BW et al (2016) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology 2016 outpatient glucose monitoring consensus statement. Endocr Pract 22:231–261CrossRefPubMed Bailey TS, Grunberger G, Bode BW et al (2016) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology 2016 outpatient glucose monitoring consensus statement. Endocr Pract 22:231–261CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Klonoff DC, Buckingham B, Christiansen JS et al (2011) Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2968–2979CrossRefPubMed Klonoff DC, Buckingham B, Christiansen JS et al (2011) Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:2968–2979CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters AL, Ahmann AJ, Battelino T et al (2016) Diabetes technology-continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy and continuous glucose monitoring in adults: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:3922–3937CrossRefPubMed Peters AL, Ahmann AJ, Battelino T et al (2016) Diabetes technology-continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy and continuous glucose monitoring in adults: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:3922–3937CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group (2008) Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 359:1464–1476 Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group (2008) Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 359:1464–1476
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K et al (2017) Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317:371–378CrossRefPubMed Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K et al (2017) Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317:371–378CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB et al (2016) Design and methods of a randomized trial of continuous glucose monitoring in persons with type 1 diabetes with impaired glycemic control treated with multiple daily insulin injections (GOLD Study). J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:754–761CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB et al (2016) Design and methods of a randomized trial of continuous glucose monitoring in persons with type 1 diabetes with impaired glycemic control treated with multiple daily insulin injections (GOLD Study). J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:754–761CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong JC, Foster NC, Maahs DM et al (2014) Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 37:2702–2709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wong JC, Foster NC, Maahs DM et al (2014) Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 37:2702–2709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Aleppo G, Ruedy KJ, Riddlesworth TD et al (2017) REPLACE-BG: a randomized trial comparing continuous glucose monitoring with and without routine blood glucose monitoring in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 40:538–545CrossRefPubMed Aleppo G, Ruedy KJ, Riddlesworth TD et al (2017) REPLACE-BG: a randomized trial comparing continuous glucose monitoring with and without routine blood glucose monitoring in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 40:538–545CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kröger J, Weitgasser R (2016) Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388:2254–2263CrossRefPubMed Bolinder J, Antuna R, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P, Kröger J, Weitgasser R (2016) Novel glucose-sensing technology and hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, non-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388:2254–2263CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Ehrhardt NM (2012) Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 35:32–38CrossRefPubMed Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Ehrhardt NM (2012) Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 35:32–38CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ehrhardt NM, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Fonda SJ, Vigersky RA (2011) The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5:668–675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ehrhardt NM, Chellappa M, Walker MS, Fonda SJ, Vigersky RA (2011) The effect of real-time continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5:668–675CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoo HJ, An HG, Park SY et al (2008) Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as a motivational device for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 82:73–79CrossRefPubMed Yoo HJ, An HG, Park SY et al (2008) Use of a real time continuous glucose monitoring system as a motivational device for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 82:73–79CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, Hermanns N, Riveline JP, Rayman G (2017) Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Ther 8:55–73CrossRefPubMed Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, Hermanns N, Riveline JP, Rayman G (2017) Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Ther 8:55–73CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat van Beers CA, DeVries JH, Kleijer SJ et al (2016) Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:893–902CrossRefPubMed van Beers CA, DeVries JH, Kleijer SJ et al (2016) Continuous glucose monitoring for patients with type 1 diabetes and impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia (IN CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, crossover trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:893–902CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Taleb N, Emami A, Suppere C et al (2016) Comparison of two continuous glucose monitoring systems, Dexcom G4 Platinum and Medtronic Paradigm Veo Enlite system, at rest and during exercise. Diabetes Technol Ther 18:561–567CrossRefPubMed Taleb N, Emami A, Suppere C et al (2016) Comparison of two continuous glucose monitoring systems, Dexcom G4 Platinum and Medtronic Paradigm Veo Enlite system, at rest and during exercise. Diabetes Technol Ther 18:561–567CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Agiostratidou G, Anhalt H, Ball D et al (2017) Standardizing clinically meaningful outcome measures beyond HbA1c for type 1 diabetes: a consensus report of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, the American Diabetes Association, the Endocrine Society, JDRF International, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the T1D Exchange. Diabetes Care https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1624 Agiostratidou G, Anhalt H, Ball D et al (2017) Standardizing clinically meaningful outcome measures beyond HbA1c for type 1 diabetes: a consensus report of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, the American Diabetes Association, the Endocrine Society, JDRF International, the Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the T1D Exchange. Diabetes Care https://​doi.​org/​10.​2337/​dc17-1624
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Maahs DM, Buckingham BA, Castle JR et al (2016) Outcome measures for artificial pancreas clinical trials: a consensus report. Diabetes Care 39:1175–1179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maahs DM, Buckingham BA, Castle JR et al (2016) Outcome measures for artificial pancreas clinical trials: a consensus report. Diabetes Care 39:1175–1179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnard KD, Kubiak T, Hermanns N, Heinemann L (2015) Patient-reported outcomes and continuous glucose monitoring: can we do better with artificial pancreas devices? Diabetes Care 38:e70CrossRefPubMed Barnard KD, Kubiak T, Hermanns N, Heinemann L (2015) Patient-reported outcomes and continuous glucose monitoring: can we do better with artificial pancreas devices? Diabetes Care 38:e70CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Polonsky WH, Peters AL, Hessler D (2016) The impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients 65 years and older. J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:892–897CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Polonsky WH, Peters AL, Hessler D (2016) The impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients 65 years and older. J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:892–897CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR (2014) Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 67:267–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR (2014) Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol 67:267–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandhi GY, Kovalaske M, Kudva Y et al (2011) Efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in improving glycemic control and reducing hypoglycemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5:952–965CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gandhi GY, Kovalaske M, Kudva Y et al (2011) Efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring in improving glycemic control and reducing hypoglycemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol 5:952–965CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Golicki DT, Golicka D, Groele L, Pankowska E (2008) Continuous glucose monitoring system in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 51:233–240CrossRefPubMed Golicki DT, Golicka D, Groele L, Pankowska E (2008) Continuous glucose monitoring system in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 51:233–240CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ (2011) Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ 343:d3805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pickup JC, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ (2011) Glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes during real time continuous glucose monitoring compared with self monitoring of blood glucose: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials using individual patient data. BMJ 343:d3805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Kyaw AM (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glucose control in diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr 5:39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Poolsup N, Suksomboon N, Kyaw AM (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) on glucose control in diabetes. Diabetol Metab Syndr 5:39CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Floyd B, Chandra P, Hall S et al (2012) Comparative analysis of the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 6:1094–1102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Floyd B, Chandra P, Hall S et al (2012) Comparative analysis of the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 6:1094–1102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Golden SH, Brown T, Yeh H-C, et al. (2012) Methods for insulin delivery and glucose monitoring: comparative effectiveness. Rockville, MD, US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available from www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22876370. Accessed 21 Sept 2017 Golden SH, Brown T, Yeh H-C, et al. (2012) Methods for insulin delivery and glucose monitoring: comparative effectiveness. Rockville, MD, US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available from www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​22876370. Accessed 21 Sept 2017
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh HC, Brown TT, Maruthur N et al (2012) Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 157:336–347CrossRefPubMed Yeh HC, Brown TT, Maruthur N et al (2012) Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 157:336–347CrossRefPubMed
33.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ly TT, Nicholas JA, Retterath A, Lim EM, Davis EA, Jones TW (2013) Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 310:1240–1247CrossRefPubMed Ly TT, Nicholas JA, Retterath A, Lim EM, Davis EA, Jones TW (2013) Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 310:1240–1247CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Garg SK et al (2013) Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med 369:224–232CrossRefPubMed Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Garg SK et al (2013) Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med 369:224–232CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann L, Hermanns N (2015) IQWiG reanalyzes and raises questions about an article by Ly et al which concluded low glucose suspend is very beneficial. J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:185–190CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heinemann L, Hermanns N (2015) IQWiG reanalyzes and raises questions about an article by Ly et al which concluded low glucose suspend is very beneficial. J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:185–190CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson SM, Raghinaru D, Pinsker JE et al (2016) Multinational home use of closed-loop control is safe and effective. Diabetes Care 39:1143–1150CrossRefPubMed Anderson SM, Raghinaru D, Pinsker JE et al (2016) Multinational home use of closed-loop control is safe and effective. Diabetes Care 39:1143–1150CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergenstal RM, Garg S, Weinzimer SA et al (2016) Safety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA 316:1407–1408CrossRefPubMed Bergenstal RM, Garg S, Weinzimer SA et al (2016) Safety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with type 1 diabetes. JAMA 316:1407–1408CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulcu E, Tamada JA, Reach G, Potts RO, Lesho MJ (2003) Physiological differences between interstitial glucose and blood glucose measured in human subjects. Diabetes Care 26:2405–2409CrossRefPubMed Kulcu E, Tamada JA, Reach G, Potts RO, Lesho MJ (2003) Physiological differences between interstitial glucose and blood glucose measured in human subjects. Diabetes Care 26:2405–2409CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegmund T, Heinemann L, Kolassa R, Thomas A (2017) Discrepancies between blood glucose and interstitial glucose-technological artifacts or physiology: implications for selection of the appropriate therapeutic target. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11:766–772CrossRefPubMed Siegmund T, Heinemann L, Kolassa R, Thomas A (2017) Discrepancies between blood glucose and interstitial glucose-technological artifacts or physiology: implications for selection of the appropriate therapeutic target. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11:766–772CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovatchev B, Cobelli C (2016) Glucose variability: timing, risk analysis, and relationship to hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 39:502–510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kovatchev B, Cobelli C (2016) Glucose variability: timing, risk analysis, and relationship to hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 39:502–510CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T et al (2013) Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP). Diabetes Technol Ther 15:198–211CrossRefPubMed Bergenstal RM, Ahmann AJ, Bailey T et al (2013) Recommendations for standardizing glucose reporting and analysis to optimize clinical decision making in diabetes: the Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP). Diabetes Technol Ther 15:198–211CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettus J, Edelman SV (2016) Use of glucose rate of change arrows to adjust insulin therapy among individuals with type 1 diabetes who use continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 18(Suppl. 2):S234–S242CrossRefPubMed Pettus J, Edelman SV (2016) Use of glucose rate of change arrows to adjust insulin therapy among individuals with type 1 diabetes who use continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 18(Suppl. 2):S234–S242CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Pettus J, Edelman SV (2016) Differences in use of glucose rate of change (ROC) arrows to adjust insulin therapy among individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes who use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:1087–1093CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pettus J, Edelman SV (2016) Differences in use of glucose rate of change (ROC) arrows to adjust insulin therapy among individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes who use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:1087–1093CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Gehr B, Holder M, Kulzer B et al (2017) SPECTRUM: a training and treatment program for continuous glucose monitoring for all age groups. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11:284–289CrossRefPubMed Gehr B, Holder M, Kulzer B et al (2017) SPECTRUM: a training and treatment program for continuous glucose monitoring for all age groups. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11:284–289CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodbard D (2016) Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of successes, challenges, and opportunities. Diabetes Technol Ther 18(Suppl. 2):S2–S13PubMedCentral Rodbard D (2016) Continuous glucose monitoring: a review of successes, challenges, and opportunities. Diabetes Technol Ther 18(Suppl. 2):S2–S13PubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinemann L, Franc S, Phillip M et al (2012) Reimbursement for continuous glucose monitoring: a European view. J Diabetes Sci Technol 6:1498–1502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heinemann L, Franc S, Phillip M et al (2012) Reimbursement for continuous glucose monitoring: a European view. J Diabetes Sci Technol 6:1498–1502CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Riemsma R, Corro Ramos I, Birnie R et al (2016) Integrated sensor-augmented pump therapy systems [the MiniMed® Paradigm™ Veo system and the Vibe™ and G4® PLATINUM CGM (continuous glucose monitoring) system] for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 20:v–xxxi 1–251CrossRefPubMed Riemsma R, Corro Ramos I, Birnie R et al (2016) Integrated sensor-augmented pump therapy systems [the MiniMed® Paradigm™ Veo system and the Vibe™ and G4® PLATINUM CGM (continuous glucose monitoring) system] for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 20:v–xxxi 1–251CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JM, Hirschfeld E, Wedding JA (2016) patient-designed do-it-yourself mobile technology system for diabetes: promise and challenges for a new era in medicine. JAMA 315:1447–1448CrossRefPubMed Lee JM, Hirschfeld E, Wedding JA (2016) patient-designed do-it-yourself mobile technology system for diabetes: promise and challenges for a new era in medicine. JAMA 315:1447–1448CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakamura K, Ebner E, Price DA (2016) Similar estimated A1c results reported between patients with diabetes using CGM whether on multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) (Abstract). Diabetes 65(Suppl. 1):A21 Nakamura K, Ebner E, Price DA (2016) Similar estimated A1c results reported between patients with diabetes using CGM whether on multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) (Abstract). Diabetes 65(Suppl. 1):A21
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Klonoff DC, Kleidermacher DN (2016) Now is the time for a cybersecurity standard for connected diabetes devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:623–626CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klonoff DC, Kleidermacher DN (2016) Now is the time for a cybersecurity standard for connected diabetes devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 10:623–626CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Zurück zum Zitat International Hypoglycaemia Study Group (2017) Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 60:155–157 International Hypoglycaemia Study Group (2017) Glucose concentrations of less than 3.0 mmol/l (54 mg/dl) should be reported in clinical trials: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 60:155–157
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckingham BA, Raghinaru D, Cameron F et al (2015) Predictive low-glucose insulin suspension reduces duration of nocturnal hypoglycemia in children without increasing ketosis [published correction appears in Diabetes Care 2015;38:1813]. Diabetes Care 38:1197–1204CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buckingham BA, Raghinaru D, Cameron F et al (2015) Predictive low-glucose insulin suspension reduces duration of nocturnal hypoglycemia in children without increasing ketosis [published correction appears in Diabetes Care 2015;38:1813]. Diabetes Care 38:1197–1204CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Improving the clinical value and utility of CGM systems: issues and recommendations
A joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group
verfasst von
John R. Petrie
Anne L. Peters
Richard M. Bergenstal
Reinhard W. Holl
G. Alexander Fleming
Lutz Heinemann
Publikationsdatum
25.10.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Diabetologia / Ausgabe 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-017-4463-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2017

Diabetologia 12/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.