Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2013 | Study protocol | Ausgabe 1/2013 Open Access

Implementation Science 1/2013

Improving the implementation of tailored expectant management in subfertile couples: protocol for a cluster randomized trial

Zeitschrift:
Implementation Science > Ausgabe 1/2013
Autoren:
Noortje M van den Boogaard, Fleur AM Kersten, Mariëtte Goddijn, Patrick MM Bossuyt, Fulco van der Veen, Peter GA Hompes, Rosella PMG Hermens, Didi DM Braat, Ben Willem J Mol, Willianne LDM Nelen, for the Improvement Study Group
Wichtige Hinweise
Noortje M van den Boogaard, Fleur AM Kersten contributed equally to this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

BWJM, WLN, PGH, FvdV, DB, RH, FAMK, and NvdB were involved in conception and design of the study. NvdB, FAMK, and WLN drafted the first manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and are local investigators in the participating centers.

Abstract

Background

Prognostic models in reproductive medicine can help to identify subfertile couples who would benefit from fertility treatment. Expectant management in couples with a good chance of natural conception, i.e., tailored expectant management (TEM), prevents unnecessary treatment and is therefore recommended in international fertility guidelines. However, current implementation is not optimal, leaving room for improvement. Based on barriers and facilitators for TEM that were recently identified among professionals and subfertile couples, we have developed a multifaceted implementation strategy. The goal of this study is to assess the effects of this implementation strategy on the guideline adherence on TEM.

Methods/design

In a cluster randomized trial, 25 clinics and their allied practitioners units will be randomized between the multifaceted implementation strategy and care as usual. Randomization will be stratified for in vitro fertilization (IVF) facilities (full licensed, intermediate/no IVF facilities). The effect of the implementation strategy, i.e., the percentage guideline adherence on TEM, will be evaluated by pre- and post-randomization data collection. Furthermore, there will be a process and cost evaluation of the strategy. The implementation strategy will focus on subfertile couples and their care providers i.e., general practitioners (GPs), fertility doctors, and gynecologists. The implementation strategy addresses three levels: patient level: education materials in the form of a patient information leaflet and a website; professional level: audit and feedback, educational outreach visit, communication training, and access to a digital version of the prognostic model of Hunault on a website; organizational level: providing a protocol based on the guideline. The primary outcome will be the percentage guideline adherence on TEM. Additional outcome measures will be treatment-, patient-, and process-related outcome measures.

Discussion

This study will provide evidence about the effectiveness and costs of a multifaceted implementation strategy to improve guideline adherence on TEM.

Trial registration

http://​www.​trialregister.​nl NTR3405. This study is sponsored by ZonMW.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2013

Implementation Science 1/2013 Zur Ausgabe