Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Herz 7/2019

08.03.2018 | Original articles

In HFREF patients, sacubitril/valsartan, given at relatively low doses, does not lead to increased mortality or hospitalization

A retrospective cohort study

verfasst von: Dr. R. De Vecchis, MD, C. Ariano, G. Di Biase, M. Noutsias

Erschienen in: Herz | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

In heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFREF) patients, the dosage of sacubitril/valsartan is modulated according to a gradual increase regimen. Nevertheless, if patients exhibit tolerability problems, a provisional reduction of the dose of sacubitril/valsartan or even its interruption are recommended.

Material and methods

This study provides estimates of respective proportions of patients receiving minimum or intermediate doses of sacubitril/valsartan. In addition, a comparison was made to detect possible differences regarding all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization in patients treated with the recommended optimum dose compared to those receiving submaximum maintenance doses of sacubitril/valsartan.

Results

Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan in addition to beta-blocker and mineralocorticoid receptor blocker were 68. Among them, 20 patients (29.4%), were identified as having clinical features that were contraindications to the administration of sacubitril/valsartan at full dose. The subsequent decision was to maintain an intermediate dose in 11 patients and to reduce the dose to the minimum level allowed, i.e., 24 mg/26 mg twice daily in nine patients. After a median follow-up of 5.25 months, no differences were found concerning the risk of all-cause death by comparing patients treated with reduced versus those subjected to target doses of sacubitril/valsartan (odds ratio [OR] = 1.666; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.256–10.823; p = 0.6266). Patients taking reduced doses had a similar risk of heart failure hospitalizations when compared to patients treated with the target dose (OR = 0.789; 95% CI: 0.077–8.0808; p = 1.00).

Conclusion

During a median follow-up of 5.25 months, in the group of patients who had proven to be intolerant to the maximum dose of sacubitril/valsartan, use of reduced doses of the drug did not result in increased all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization compared to patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan at the target dose.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B et al (2016) 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update on new pharmacological therapy for heart failure: an update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practiceguidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(13):1476–1488CrossRef Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B et al (2016) 2016 ACC/AHA/HFSA focused update on new pharmacological therapy for heart failure: an update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practiceguidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. J Am Coll Cardiol 68(13):1476–1488CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 18(8):891–975CrossRef Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD et al (2016) 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 18(8):891–975CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS et al (2014) Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 371(11):993–1004CrossRef McMurray JJ, Packer M, Desai AS et al (2014) Angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition versus enalapril in heart failure. N Engl J Med 371(11):993–1004CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Lullo L, Ronco C, Bellasi A et al (2017) Neprilysin inhibition and chronic kidney disease. G Ital Nefrol 34(5):102–112 (Article in Italian)PubMed Di Lullo L, Ronco C, Bellasi A et al (2017) Neprilysin inhibition and chronic kidney disease. G Ital Nefrol 34(5):102–112 (Article in Italian)PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vardeny O, Claggett B, Packer M et al (2016) Efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril at lower than target doses in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail 18(10):1228–1234CrossRef Vardeny O, Claggett B, Packer M et al (2016) Efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril at lower than target doses in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the PARADIGM-HF trial. Eur J Heart Fail 18(10):1228–1234CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB et al (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 130(6):461–470CrossRef Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB et al (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 130(6):461–470CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat CONSENSUS Trial Study Group (1987) Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med 316(23):1429–1435CrossRef CONSENSUS Trial Study Group (1987) Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. Results of the Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study (CONSENSUS). N Engl J Med 316(23):1429–1435CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiel RG, Deedwania P (2015) The safety and tolerability of beta blockers in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: is the current underutilization of this evidence-based therapy justified? Expert Opin Drug Saf 12(14):1855–1863CrossRef Kiel RG, Deedwania P (2015) The safety and tolerability of beta blockers in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: is the current underutilization of this evidence-based therapy justified? Expert Opin Drug Saf 12(14):1855–1863CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
In HFREF patients, sacubitril/valsartan, given at relatively low doses, does not lead to increased mortality or hospitalization
A retrospective cohort study
verfasst von
Dr. R. De Vecchis, MD
C. Ariano
G. Di Biase
M. Noutsias
Publikationsdatum
08.03.2018
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Herz / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-9937
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-018-4690-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Herz 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.