Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 8/2011

01.08.2011 | Leading Article

In Vivo-In Vitro-In Silico Pharmacokinetic Modelling in Drug Development

Current Status and Future Directions

verfasst von: Professor Olavi Pelkonen, Miia Turpeinen, Hannu Raunio

Erschienen in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Ausgabe 8/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Although clinical drug trials are indispensable in providing an appropriate background for dosage recommendations, they can provide mechanistic pharmacokinetic information only indirectly with the help of certain biomarkers for pathological, physiological and pharmacological determinants. Thus, to provide such mechanistic information of clinical value, various in vitro and in silico tests and approaches are increasingly employed in drug discovery and development. Integration of the results of these primarily preclinical studies has been made possible by various computational models, such as in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of hepatic clearance or physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling. In this article, the current status of these modelling approaches is surveyed and some examples are given, highlighting advantages and disadvantages in applying them at various phases of drug development. A new paradigm of model-based drug development is briefly described, and the importance of the approach of integrating all of the information coming from different investigations at all levels — be it in vivo, in vitro or in silico — is emphasized.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekins S, Honeycutt JD, Metz JT. Evolving molecules using multi-objective optimization: applying to ADME/Tox. Drug Discov Today 2010 Jun; 15(11-12): 451–60PubMedCrossRef Ekins S, Honeycutt JD, Metz JT. Evolving molecules using multi-objective optimization: applying to ADME/Tox. Drug Discov Today 2010 Jun; 15(11-12): 451–60PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Adler S, Basketter D, Creton S, et al. Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects — 2010. Arch Toxicol 2011 May; 85(5): 367–485PubMedCrossRef Adler S, Basketter D, Creton S, et al. Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects — 2010. Arch Toxicol 2011 May; 85(5): 367–485PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrett JS, Labbé L, Pfister M. Application and impact of population pharmacokinetics in the assessment of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44(6): 591–625PubMedCrossRef Barrett JS, Labbé L, Pfister M. Application and impact of population pharmacokinetics in the assessment of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy. Clin Pharmacokinet 2005; 44(6): 591–625PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van de Kerkhof EG, Ungell AL, Sjöberg AK, et al. Innovative methods to study human intestinal drug metabolism in vitro: precision-cut slices compared with Ussing chamber preparations. Drug Metab Dispos 2006 Nov; 34(11): 1893–902PubMedCrossRef van de Kerkhof EG, Ungell AL, Sjöberg AK, et al. Innovative methods to study human intestinal drug metabolism in vitro: precision-cut slices compared with Ussing chamber preparations. Drug Metab Dispos 2006 Nov; 34(11): 1893–902PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Heikkinen AT, Korjamo T, Mönkkönen J. Modelling of drug disposition kinetics in in vitro intestinal absorption cell models. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2010 Mar; 106(3): 180–8PubMedCrossRef Heikkinen AT, Korjamo T, Mönkkönen J. Modelling of drug disposition kinetics in in vitro intestinal absorption cell models. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2010 Mar; 106(3): 180–8PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Waters NJ, Jones R, Williams G, et al. Validation of a rapid equilibrium dialysis approach for the measurement of plasma protein binding. J Pharm Sci 2008 Oct; 97(10): 4586–95PubMedCrossRef Waters NJ, Jones R, Williams G, et al. Validation of a rapid equilibrium dialysis approach for the measurement of plasma protein binding. J Pharm Sci 2008 Oct; 97(10): 4586–95PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Culot M, Lundquist S, Vanuxeem D, et al. An in vitro blood-brain barrier model for high throughput (HTS) toxicological screening. Toxicol In Vitro 2008 Apr; 22(3): 799–811PubMedCrossRef Culot M, Lundquist S, Vanuxeem D, et al. An in vitro blood-brain barrier model for high throughput (HTS) toxicological screening. Toxicol In Vitro 2008 Apr; 22(3): 799–811PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rodgers T, Rowland M. Mechanistic approaches to volume of distribution predictions: understanding the processes. Pharm Res 2007 May; 24(5): 918–33PubMedCrossRef Rodgers T, Rowland M. Mechanistic approaches to volume of distribution predictions: understanding the processes. Pharm Res 2007 May; 24(5): 918–33PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelkonen O, Turpeinen M, Uusitalo J, et al. Prediction of drug metabolism and interactions on the basis of in vitro investigations. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005 Mar; 96(3): 167–75PubMedCrossRef Pelkonen O, Turpeinen M, Uusitalo J, et al. Prediction of drug metabolism and interactions on the basis of in vitro investigations. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005 Mar; 96(3): 167–75PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Riley RJ, Kenna JG. Cellular models for ADMET predictions and evaluation of drug-drug interactions. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2004 Jan; 7(1): 86–99PubMed Riley RJ, Kenna JG. Cellular models for ADMET predictions and evaluation of drug-drug interactions. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2004 Jan; 7(1): 86–99PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gómez-Lechón MJ, Castell JV, Donato MT. An update on metabolism studies using human hepatocytes in primary culture. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008 Jul; 4(7): 837–54PubMedCrossRef Gómez-Lechón MJ, Castell JV, Donato MT. An update on metabolism studies using human hepatocytes in primary culture. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008 Jul; 4(7): 837–54PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Houston JB, Galetin A. Methods for predicting in vivo pharmacokinetics using data from in vitro assays. Curr Drug Metab 2008 Nov; 9(9): 940–51PubMedCrossRef Houston JB, Galetin A. Methods for predicting in vivo pharmacokinetics using data from in vitro assays. Curr Drug Metab 2008 Nov; 9(9): 940–51PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelkonen O, Turpeinen M, Hakkola J, et al. Inhibition and induction of human cytochrome P450 enzymes: current status. Arch Toxicol 2008 Oct; 82(10): 667–715PubMedCrossRef Pelkonen O, Turpeinen M, Hakkola J, et al. Inhibition and induction of human cytochrome P450 enzymes: current status. Arch Toxicol 2008 Oct; 82(10): 667–715PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Soars MG, McGinnity DF, Grime K, et al. The pivotal role of hepatocytes in drug discovery. Chem Biol Interact 2007 May 20; 168(1): 2–15PubMedCrossRef Soars MG, McGinnity DF, Grime K, et al. The pivotal role of hepatocytes in drug discovery. Chem Biol Interact 2007 May 20; 168(1): 2–15PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Soars MG, Webborn PJ, Riley RJ. Impact of hepatic uptake transporters on pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions: use of assays and models for decision making in the pharmaceutical industry. Mol Pharm 2009 Nov-Dec; 6(6): 1662–7PubMedCrossRef Soars MG, Webborn PJ, Riley RJ. Impact of hepatic uptake transporters on pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions: use of assays and models for decision making in the pharmaceutical industry. Mol Pharm 2009 Nov-Dec; 6(6): 1662–7PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Klaassen CD, Lu H. Xenobiotic transporters: ascribing function from gene knockout and mutation studies. Toxicol Sci 2008 Feb; 101(2): 186–96PubMedCrossRef Klaassen CD, Lu H. Xenobiotic transporters: ascribing function from gene knockout and mutation studies. Toxicol Sci 2008 Feb; 101(2): 186–96PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Klaassen CD, Aleksunes LM. Xenobiotic, bile acid, and cholesterol transporters: function and regulation. Pharmacol Rev 2010 Mar; 62(1): 1–96PubMedCrossRef Klaassen CD, Aleksunes LM. Xenobiotic, bile acid, and cholesterol transporters: function and regulation. Pharmacol Rev 2010 Mar; 62(1): 1–96PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelkonen O, Turpeinen M. In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of hepatic clearance: biological tools, scaling factors, model assumptions and correct concentrations. Xenobiotica 2007 Oct-Nov; 37(10-11): 1066–89PubMedCrossRef Pelkonen O, Turpeinen M. In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of hepatic clearance: biological tools, scaling factors, model assumptions and correct concentrations. Xenobiotica 2007 Oct-Nov; 37(10-11): 1066–89PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Grime K, Riley RJ. The impact of in vitro binding on in vitro-in vivo extrapolations, projections of metabolic clearance and clinical drug-drug interactions. Curr Drug Metab 2006 Apr; 7(3): 251–64PubMedCrossRef Grime K, Riley RJ. The impact of in vitro binding on in vitro-in vivo extrapolations, projections of metabolic clearance and clinical drug-drug interactions. Curr Drug Metab 2006 Apr; 7(3): 251–64PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallifax D, Houston JB. Methodological uncertainty in quantitative prediction of human hepatic clearance from in vitro experimental systems. Curr Drug Metab 2009 Mar; 10(3): 307–21PubMedCrossRef Hallifax D, Houston JB. Methodological uncertainty in quantitative prediction of human hepatic clearance from in vitro experimental systems. Curr Drug Metab 2009 Mar; 10(3): 307–21PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Webborn PJ, Parker AJ, Denton RL, et al. In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of hepatic clearance involving active uptake: theoretical and experimental aspects. Xenobiotica 2007 Oct-Nov; 37(10-11): 1090–109PubMedCrossRef Webborn PJ, Parker AJ, Denton RL, et al. In vitro-in vivo extrapolation of hepatic clearance involving active uptake: theoretical and experimental aspects. Xenobiotica 2007 Oct-Nov; 37(10-11): 1090–109PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekins S, Mestres J, Testa B. In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling. Br J Pharmacol 2007 Sep; 152(1): 9–20PubMedCrossRef Ekins S, Mestres J, Testa B. In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling. Br J Pharmacol 2007 Sep; 152(1): 9–20PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekins S, Mestres J, Testa B. In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: applications to targets and beyond. Br J Pharmacol 2007 Sep; 152(1): 21–37PubMedCrossRef Ekins S, Mestres J, Testa B. In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: applications to targets and beyond. Br J Pharmacol 2007 Sep; 152(1): 21–37PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Boobis A, Gundert-Remy U, Kremers P, et al. In silico prediction of ADME and pharmacokinetics: report of an expert meeting organised by COST B15. Eur J Pharm Sci 2002 Dec; 17(4-5): 183–93PubMedCrossRef Boobis A, Gundert-Remy U, Kremers P, et al. In silico prediction of ADME and pharmacokinetics: report of an expert meeting organised by COST B15. Eur J Pharm Sci 2002 Dec; 17(4-5): 183–93PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat van de Waterbeemd H, Gifford E. ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise?. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003 Mar; 2(3): 192–204PubMedCrossRef van de Waterbeemd H, Gifford E. ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise?. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003 Mar; 2(3): 192–204PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lewis DF, Ito Y. Human cytochromes P450 in the metabolism of drugs: new molecular models of enzyme-substrate interactions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008 Sep; 4(9): 1181–6PubMedCrossRef Lewis DF, Ito Y. Human cytochromes P450 in the metabolism of drugs: new molecular models of enzyme-substrate interactions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008 Sep; 4(9): 1181–6PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Pelkonen O, Tolonen A, Korjamo T, et al. From known knowns to known unknowns: predicting in vivo drug metabolites. Bioanalysis 2009 May; 1(2): 393–414PubMedCrossRef Pelkonen O, Tolonen A, Korjamo T, et al. From known knowns to known unknowns: predicting in vivo drug metabolites. Bioanalysis 2009 May; 1(2): 393–414PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mostrag-Szlichtyng A, Worth A. Review of QSAR models and software tools for predicting biokinetic properties. Luxembourg: European Commission, 2010 Mostrag-Szlichtyng A, Worth A. Review of QSAR models and software tools for predicting biokinetic properties. Luxembourg: European Commission, 2010
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Norinder U, Bergström CA. Prediction of ADMET properties. ChemMed-Chem 2006 Sep; 1(9): 920–37CrossRef Norinder U, Bergström CA. Prediction of ADMET properties. ChemMed-Chem 2006 Sep; 1(9): 920–37CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J. Comprehensive assessment of ADMET risks in drug discovery. Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15(19): 2195–219PubMedCrossRef Wang J. Comprehensive assessment of ADMET risks in drug discovery. Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15(19): 2195–219PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hou T, Li Y, Zhang W, et al. Recent developments of in silico predictions of intestinal absorption and oral bioavailability. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2009 Jun; 12(5): 497–506PubMedCrossRef Hou T, Li Y, Zhang W, et al. Recent developments of in silico predictions of intestinal absorption and oral bioavailability. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 2009 Jun; 12(5): 497–506PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Metcalfe PD, Thomas S. Challenges in the prediction and modeling of oral absorption and bioavailability. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2010 Jan; 13(1): 104–10PubMed Metcalfe PD, Thomas S. Challenges in the prediction and modeling of oral absorption and bioavailability. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2010 Jan; 13(1): 104–10PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamei M, Dickinson GL, Rostami-Hodjegan A. A framework for assessing inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics using virtual human populations and integrating general knowledge of physical chemistry, biology, anatomy, physiology and genetics: a tale of ‘bottom-up’ vs ‘top-down’ recognition of covariates. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2009; 24(1): 53–75PubMedCrossRef Jamei M, Dickinson GL, Rostami-Hodjegan A. A framework for assessing inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics using virtual human populations and integrating general knowledge of physical chemistry, biology, anatomy, physiology and genetics: a tale of ‘bottom-up’ vs ‘top-down’ recognition of covariates. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2009; 24(1): 53–75PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Afzelius L, Arnby CH, Broo A, et al. State-of-the-art tools for computational site of metabolism predictions: comparative analysis, mechanistical insights, and future applications. Drug Metab Rev 2007; 39(1): 61–86PubMedCrossRef Afzelius L, Arnby CH, Broo A, et al. State-of-the-art tools for computational site of metabolism predictions: comparative analysis, mechanistical insights, and future applications. Drug Metab Rev 2007; 39(1): 61–86PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaz RJ, Zamora I, Li Y, et al. The challenges of in silico contributions to drug metabolism in lead optimization. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2010 Jul; 6(7): 851–61PubMedCrossRef Vaz RJ, Zamora I, Li Y, et al. The challenges of in silico contributions to drug metabolism in lead optimization. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2010 Jul; 6(7): 851–61PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Sui X, Sun J, Wu X, et al. Predicting the volume of distribution of drugs in humans. Curr Drug Metab 2008 Jul; 9(6): 574–80PubMedCrossRef Sui X, Sun J, Wu X, et al. Predicting the volume of distribution of drugs in humans. Curr Drug Metab 2008 Jul; 9(6): 574–80PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbott NJ, Dolman DE, Patabendige AK. Assays to predict drug permeation across the blood-brain barrier, and distribution to brain. Curr Drug Metab 2008 Nov; 9(9): 901–10PubMedCrossRef Abbott NJ, Dolman DE, Patabendige AK. Assays to predict drug permeation across the blood-brain barrier, and distribution to brain. Curr Drug Metab 2008 Nov; 9(9): 901–10PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Parrott N, Jones H, Paquereau N, et al. Application of full physiological models for pharmaceutical drug candidate selection and extrapolation of pharmacokinetics to man. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005 Mar; 96(3): 193–9PubMedCrossRef Parrott N, Jones H, Paquereau N, et al. Application of full physiological models for pharmaceutical drug candidate selection and extrapolation of pharmacokinetics to man. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2005 Mar; 96(3): 193–9PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Loizou G, Spendiff M, Barton HA, et al. Development of good modelling practice for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for use in risk assessment: the first steps. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2008 Apr; 50(3): 400–11PubMedCrossRef Loizou G, Spendiff M, Barton HA, et al. Development of good modelling practice for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models for use in risk assessment: the first steps. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2008 Apr; 50(3): 400–11PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamei M, Turner D, Yang J, et al. Population-based mechanistic prediction of oral drug absorption. AAPS J 2009 Jun; 11(2): 225–37PubMedCrossRef Jamei M, Turner D, Yang J, et al. Population-based mechanistic prediction of oral drug absorption. AAPS J 2009 Jun; 11(2): 225–37PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Barton HA, Chiu WA, Setzer W, et al. Characterizing uncertainty and variability in physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models: state of the science and needs for research and implementation. Toxicol Sci 2007 Oct; 99(2): 395–402PubMedCrossRef Barton HA, Chiu WA, Setzer W, et al. Characterizing uncertainty and variability in physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models: state of the science and needs for research and implementation. Toxicol Sci 2007 Oct; 99(2): 395–402PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouvier d’Yvoire M, Prieto P, Blaauboer BJ, et al. Physiologically-based kinetic modelling (PBK modelling): meeting the 3Rs agenda. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 63a. Altern Lab Anim 2007 Dec; 35(6): 661–71PubMed Bouvier d’Yvoire M, Prieto P, Blaauboer BJ, et al. Physiologically-based kinetic modelling (PBK modelling): meeting the 3Rs agenda. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 63a. Altern Lab Anim 2007 Dec; 35(6): 661–71PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Edginton AN, Theil FP, Schmitt W, et al. Whole body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models: their use in clinical drug development. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008; 4(9): 1143–52PubMedCrossRef Edginton AN, Theil FP, Schmitt W, et al. Whole body physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models: their use in clinical drug development. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008; 4(9): 1143–52PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Rostami-Hodjegan A, Tucker GT. Simulation and prediction of in vivo drug metabolism in human populations from in vitro data. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2007 Feb; 6(2): 140–8PubMedCrossRef Rostami-Hodjegan A, Tucker GT. Simulation and prediction of in vivo drug metabolism in human populations from in vitro data. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2007 Feb; 6(2): 140–8PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Lalonde RL, Kowalski KG, Hutmacher MM, et al. Model-based drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007 Jul; 82(1): 21–32PubMedCrossRef Lalonde RL, Kowalski KG, Hutmacher MM, et al. Model-based drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2007 Jul; 82(1): 21–32PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamei M, Marciniak S, Feng KR, et al. The Simcyp population-based ADME simulator. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2009 Feb; 5(2): 211–23PubMedCrossRef Jamei M, Marciniak S, Feng KR, et al. The Simcyp population-based ADME simulator. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2009 Feb; 5(2): 211–23PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Vicini P. Multiscale modeling in drug discovery and development: future opportunities and present challenges. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010 Jul; 88(1): 126–9PubMedCrossRef Vicini P. Multiscale modeling in drug discovery and development: future opportunities and present challenges. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2010 Jul; 88(1): 126–9PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
In Vivo-In Vitro-In Silico Pharmacokinetic Modelling in Drug Development
Current Status and Future Directions
verfasst von
Professor Olavi Pelkonen
Miia Turpeinen
Hannu Raunio
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2011
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Ausgabe 8/2011
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11592400-000000000-00000

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2011

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 8/2011 Zur Ausgabe