Skip to main content
main-content

16.05.2019 | Original Paper

Incidence and pattern of periprosthetic hip fractures around the stem in different stem geometry

Zeitschrift:
International Orthopaedics
Autoren:
Umberto Cottino, Federico Dettoni, Giorgia Caputo, Davide E. Bonasia, Paolo Rossi, Roberto Rossi
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00264-019-04336-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Background

The number of total hip arthroplasties (THA) is expected to increase worldwide; thus, complications are likely to increase at the same ratio. In this scenario, periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are an increasing concern. Identifying the predisposing factors is important in order to prevent as much as possible the risk of PFF in the future.

Patients and methods

The purpose of this study was to correlate the risk of periprosthetic femoral fractures to the most common patients’ comorbidities and stem geometry. We reviewed all THA for non-oncologic indications between 2004 and 2014 with a mean follow-up of six years (range, 2–12). Three thousand two hundred forty-eight patients (3593 implants) were enrolled in the study, and 45 PFF were registered during this time period. Two thousand five hundred seventy-seven implants (71%) were straight stems, and 1015 (28.3%) were anatomic stems. All X-rays were then analyzed and classified according to the modified Vancouver classification.

Results

Periprosthetic femoral fractures incidence was associated with anatomic stem geometry (p < 0.001, OR = 2.2), BMI (p < 0.001), and diabetes (p < 0.001, OR = 5.18). PFFs were not significantly associated with age, gender, and all the other variables. Fracture pattern was different between straight and anatomic stems. Clamshell fractures were more likely to occur in anatomic stems compared to straight stems (p < 0.005).

Conclusions

Periprosthetic femoral fractures are highly associated with obesity and osteoporosis. Anatomic stems reported a higher incidence of PPF than straight stems. The typical fracture type for anatomical stems is the clamshell pattern, while straight stems are more likely affected by type B fractures.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de. Zusätzlich können Sie eine Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl in gedruckter Form beziehen – ohne Aufpreis.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Zusatzmaterial
ESM 1 (PDF 295 kb)
264_2019_4336_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
ESM 2 (PDF 24 kb)
264_2019_4336_MOESM2_ESM.pdf
ESM 3 (PDF 314 kb)
264_2019_4336_MOESM3_ESM.pdf
ESM 4 (PDF 360 kb)
264_2019_4336_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
ESM 5 (PDF 439 kb)
264_2019_4336_MOESM5_ESM.pdf
ESM 6 (PDF 434 kb)
264_2019_4336_MOESM6_ESM.pdf
ESM 7 (PDF 433 kb)
264_2019_4336_MOESM7_ESM.pdf
ESM 8 (PDF 361 kb)
264_2019_4336_MOESM8_ESM.pdf
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel
  1. Sie können e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Mail Icon II Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Bildnachweise