Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 12/2019

11.09.2019 | Hepatobiliary

Incidentally detected biliary ductal dilatation on contrast-enhanced CT: what is the incidence of occult obstructing malignancy?

verfasst von: James S. Chalfant, Alton W. Skaggs, Thomas W. Loehfelm, Ghaneh Fananapazir, Michael T. Corwin

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 12/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of occult obstructing malignancy in the setting of asymptomatic biliary ductal dilatation incidentally detected and without identifiable cause on contrast-enhanced CT.

Methods

A retrospective search identified patients with biliary ductal dilatation on contrast-enhanced CT from March 30, 2007 to November 1, 2017. Patients with biliary symptomatology or clinical concern for an obstructing process, an explanation for biliary ductal dilatation on index CT, intrahepatic without extrahepatic biliary ductal dilatation, concurrent pancreatic ductal dilatation, and inadequate follow-up were excluded. A reference standard of at least 1 year of imaging follow-up or 2 years of clinical follow-up was used to exclude occult obstructing malignancy.

Results

156 patients were included; 120 patients met imaging follow-up criteria and 36 patients met clinical follow-up criteria. No cases of occult malignancy were identified as the source of biliary ductal dilatation (95% CI 0.0–1.9%). LFTs were available for 131 patients, of which 36 were elevated (27%). One case demonstrated a 1.2-cm ampullary adenoma on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (occult on follow-up MRI, normal LFTs at the time of the index CT).

Conclusion

Asymptomatic biliary ductal dilatation incidentally detected and without identifiable cause on contrast-enhanced CT is likely benign in patients with normal LFTs, and further workup may not be warranted.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkinson CJ, Lisanti CJ, Schwope RB, et al. Mild asymptomatic intrahepatic biliary dilation after cholecystectomy, a common incidental variant. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42(5):1408-1414CrossRef Atkinson CJ, Lisanti CJ, Schwope RB, et al. Mild asymptomatic intrahepatic biliary dilation after cholecystectomy, a common incidental variant. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42(5):1408-1414CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sebastian S, Araujo C, Neitlich JD, Berland LL. Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, Part 4: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on gallbladder and biliary findings. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10(12):953-956CrossRef Sebastian S, Araujo C, Neitlich JD, Berland LL. Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, Part 4: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on gallbladder and biliary findings. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10(12):953-956CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruno M, Brizzi RF, Mezzabotta L, et al. Unexplained common bile duct dilatation with normal serum liver enzymes: diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound and follow-up of this condition. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 48(8):e67-70CrossRef Bruno M, Brizzi RF, Mezzabotta L, et al. Unexplained common bile duct dilatation with normal serum liver enzymes: diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound and follow-up of this condition. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 48(8):e67-70CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Malik S, Kaushik N, Khalid A, et al. EUS yield in evaluating biliary dilatation in patients with normal serum liver enzymes. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52(2):508-512CrossRef Malik S, Kaushik N, Khalid A, et al. EUS yield in evaluating biliary dilatation in patients with normal serum liver enzymes. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52(2):508-512CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Lee DH, Jeong S, Cho SG. Determination of diameter and angulation of the normal common bile duct using multidetector computed tomography. Gut Liver 2009; 3(4):306-310CrossRef Park JS, Lee DH, Jeong S, Cho SG. Determination of diameter and angulation of the normal common bile duct using multidetector computed tomography. Gut Liver 2009; 3(4):306-310CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng R, Zhang L, Zhang XM, et al. Common bile duct diameter in an asymptomatic population: A magnetic resonance imaging study. World J Radiol 2015; 7(12):501-508CrossRef Peng R, Zhang L, Zhang XM, et al. Common bile duct diameter in an asymptomatic population: A magnetic resonance imaging study. World J Radiol 2015; 7(12):501-508CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Senturk S, Miroglu TC, Bilici A, et al. Diameters of the common bile duct in adults and postcholecystectomy patients: a study with 64-slice CT. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81(1):39-42CrossRef Senturk S, Miroglu TC, Bilici A, et al. Diameters of the common bile duct in adults and postcholecystectomy patients: a study with 64-slice CT. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81(1):39-42CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, et al. Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7(10):754-773CrossRef Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, et al. Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2010; 7(10):754-773CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JE, Lee JK, Lee KT, et al. The clinical significance of common bile-duct dilatation in patients without biliary symptoms or causative lesions on ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2001; 33(6):495-500CrossRef Kim JE, Lee JK, Lee KT, et al. The clinical significance of common bile-duct dilatation in patients without biliary symptoms or causative lesions on ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2001; 33(6):495-500CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Sharma V, Rao C, Gupta R, Singh K. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of unexplained common bile duct dilatation on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Ann Gastroenterol 2013; 26(1):66-70PubMedPubMedCentral Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Sharma V, Rao C, Gupta R, Singh K. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of unexplained common bile duct dilatation on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Ann Gastroenterol 2013; 26(1):66-70PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamir S, Braun M, Issachar A, Bachar GN, Benjaminov O. Yield of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the investigation of bile duct dilatation in asymptomatic patients. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5(3):408-414CrossRef Tamir S, Braun M, Issachar A, Bachar GN, Benjaminov O. Yield of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the investigation of bile duct dilatation in asymptomatic patients. United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5(3):408-414CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker HL, Caldwell DW. Lesions of the ampulla of Vater. Surgery 1947; 21(4):523-531.PubMed Baker HL, Caldwell DW. Lesions of the ampulla of Vater. Surgery 1947; 21(4):523-531.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato T, Konishi K, Kimura H, et al. Adenoma and tiny carcinoma in adenoma of the papilla of Vater–p53 and PCNA. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46(27):1959-1962PubMed Sato T, Konishi K, Kimura H, et al. Adenoma and tiny carcinoma in adenoma of the papilla of Vater–p53 and PCNA. Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46(27):1959-1962PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chini P, Draganov PV. Diagnosis and management of ampullary adenoma: The expanding role of endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 3(12): 241–247CrossRef Chini P, Draganov PV. Diagnosis and management of ampullary adenoma: The expanding role of endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 3(12): 241–247CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin JA, Haber GB. Ampullary adenoma: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003; 13(4):649-669CrossRef Martin JA, Haber GB. Ampullary adenoma: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003; 13(4):649-669CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chathadi KV, Khashab MA, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82(5):773-781CrossRef Chathadi KV, Khashab MA, Acosta RD, et al. The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82(5):773-781CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Espinel J, Pinedo E, Ojeda V, Del Rio MG. Endoscopic management of adenomatous ampullary lesions. World J Methodol 2015; 5(3):127-135CrossRef Espinel J, Pinedo E, Ojeda V, Del Rio MG. Endoscopic management of adenomatous ampullary lesions. World J Methodol 2015; 5(3):127-135CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh BM, Liu PS, Soto JA, Corvera CA, Hussain HK. MR imaging and CT of the biliary tract. Radiographics 2009; 29(6):1669-1688CrossRef Yeh BM, Liu PS, Soto JA, Corvera CA, Hussain HK. MR imaging and CT of the biliary tract. Radiographics 2009; 29(6):1669-1688CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Incidentally detected biliary ductal dilatation on contrast-enhanced CT: what is the incidence of occult obstructing malignancy?
verfasst von
James S. Chalfant
Alton W. Skaggs
Thomas W. Loehfelm
Ghaneh Fananapazir
Michael T. Corwin
Publikationsdatum
11.09.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 12/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02217-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2019

Abdominal Radiology 12/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Special Section: Urothelial Disease

CT urography: how to optimize the technique

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.