Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgery 4/2018

09.03.2017 | Original Article

Incidentally Detected Carcinoma Gallbladder in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy

verfasst von: Ajit Singh, S. S. Jaiswal

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Gall bladder carcinoma (GBC) is most prevalent in the northern and northeastern states of India. The term ‘Incidental gall bladder carcinoma’ (IGBC) refers to the diagnosis coming as a surprise finding upon histopathological examination of the cholecystectomy specimen and its incidence varies from 0.35–2%. The conventional practice of submitting all excised gall bladder specimens for histopathological examination has also been challenged by some authors who feel that a selective approach should be adopted, in order to save costs and time. Our experience in this respect, from a tertiary level teaching hospital in southwestern India, is presented here along with a review of literature. Data in respect of all patients who underwent cholecystectomy for benign disorders from 01 Dec 2012 to 30 Nov 2014 was collected prospectively. In addition, retrospective collation of data from hospital records for the previous 2 years was undertaken. Gall bladder wall thickness ≥ 4 mm, on USG examination, was taken as abnormal. All excised gall bladder specimens were opened and examined immediately after surgery in the operation theatre and then submitted for histopathological examination. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. A total of 1123 patients underwent cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder pathologies. IGBC was detected in seven (three male and four female) patients. Only one, out of these seven patients, had focal gallbladder wall thickening at the fundus while the other six cases did not have any macroscopic abnormality of the gallbladder wall or mucosa. The mean age of the patients with IGBC was 63.86 years and it was significantly higher as compared to those with benign histology (p value = 0.001). Furthermore, an age of more than 50 years was found to be significantly associated with IGBC (X 2 = 9.446, p value = 0.002). In this series, IGBC was present in 0.62% of patients undergoing cholecystectomy for benign gall bladder pathologies. A patient’s age of more than 50 years was significantly associated with IGBC and we did not find any correlation between the symptomatology, ultrasound findings and macroscopic appearance of the specimen and the presence of IGBC. Hence, we feel that the practice of routine submission of all excised gall bladders for HPE should continue.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Grobmyer SR, Lieberman MD, Daly JM (2004) Gallbladder cancer in the twentieth century: single institution’s experience. World J Surg 28:47–49CrossRefPubMed Grobmyer SR, Lieberman MD, Daly JM (2004) Gallbladder cancer in the twentieth century: single institution’s experience. World J Surg 28:47–49CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nandakumar A, Gupta PC, Gangadharn P, Visweswara RN, Parkin DM (2005) Geographic pathology revisited: development of an atlas of cancer in India. Int J Cancer 116:740–754CrossRefPubMed Nandakumar A, Gupta PC, Gangadharn P, Visweswara RN, Parkin DM (2005) Geographic pathology revisited: development of an atlas of cancer in India. Int J Cancer 116:740–754CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Consensus document for management of gall bladder cancer (2014) ICMR; 17 Consensus document for management of gall bladder cancer (2014) ICMR; 17
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N, Kitagawa Y et al (2005) Unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 12(5):391–398CrossRef Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N, Kitagawa Y et al (2005) Unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepato-Biliary-Pancreat Surg 12(5):391–398CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, Sen B (2009) Incidental carcinoma gall bladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease. Surg Endosc 23(9):2041–2046CrossRefPubMed Tantia O, Jain M, Khanna S, Sen B (2009) Incidental carcinoma gall bladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gall stone disease. Surg Endosc 23(9):2041–2046CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59(4):225–249CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59(4):225–249CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dhir V, Mohandas KM (1999) Epidemiology of digestive tract cancers in India IV, gall bladder and pancreas. Indian J Gastroenterol 18:24–28PubMed Dhir V, Mohandas KM (1999) Epidemiology of digestive tract cancers in India IV, gall bladder and pancreas. Indian J Gastroenterol 18:24–28PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wistuba II, Gazdar AF (2004) Gallbladder cancer: lessons from a rare tumour. Nat Rev Cancer 4(9):695–706CrossRefPubMed Wistuba II, Gazdar AF (2004) Gallbladder cancer: lessons from a rare tumour. Nat Rev Cancer 4(9):695–706CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Gulwani HV, Gupta S, Kaur S (2015) Incidental detection of carcinoma gall bladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy specimens: a thirteen year study of 23 cases and literature review. Indian J Surg Oncol 6(1):30–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gulwani HV, Gupta S, Kaur S (2015) Incidental detection of carcinoma gall bladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy specimens: a thirteen year study of 23 cases and literature review. Indian J Surg Oncol 6(1):30–35CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Royal College of Pathologists (2005) Histopathology of limited or no clinical value. Report of working group of the Royal College of Pathologists, 2nd edn. Royal College of Pathologists, London Royal College of Pathologists (2005) Histopathology of limited or no clinical value. Report of working group of the Royal College of Pathologists, 2nd edn. Royal College of Pathologists, London
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Darmas B, Mahmud S, Abbas A, Baker AL (2007) Is there any justification for the routine histological examination of straightforward cholecystectomy specimens? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(3):238–241CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Darmas B, Mahmud S, Abbas A, Baker AL (2007) Is there any justification for the routine histological examination of straightforward cholecystectomy specimens? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(3):238–241CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett CD, Barrett P, Gilliam AD, Mitchell AI (2015) Routine versus selective histological examination after cholecystectomy to exclude incidental gallbladder carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(7):526–529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Emmett CD, Barrett P, Gilliam AD, Mitchell AI (2015) Routine versus selective histological examination after cholecystectomy to exclude incidental gallbladder carcinoma. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 97(7):526–529CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamal K, Ratansingham K, Siddique M, Nehra D (2014) Routine histological analysis of a macroscopically normal gallbladder—a review of the literature. Int J Surg 12(9):958–962CrossRefPubMed Jamal K, Ratansingham K, Siddique M, Nehra D (2014) Routine histological analysis of a macroscopically normal gallbladder—a review of the literature. Int J Surg 12(9):958–962CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakai T, Shirai Y, Yokoyama N et al (2001) Early gallbladder carcinoma does not warrant radical resection. Br J Surg 88:675CrossRefPubMed Wakai T, Shirai Y, Yokoyama N et al (2001) Early gallbladder carcinoma does not warrant radical resection. Br J Surg 88:675CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Abramson MA, Pandharipande P, Ryan D, Gold JS, Whang EE (2009) Radical resection for T1b gallbladder cancer: a decision analysis. HPB (Oxford) 11(8):656–663CrossRef Abramson MA, Pandharipande P, Ryan D, Gold JS, Whang EE (2009) Radical resection for T1b gallbladder cancer: a decision analysis. HPB (Oxford) 11(8):656–663CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lundberg O, Kristoffersson A (1999) Port site metastases from gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of a Swedish surgery and review of published reports. Eur J Surg 165:215–222CrossRefPubMed Lundberg O, Kristoffersson A (1999) Port site metastases from gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Results of a Swedish surgery and review of published reports. Eur J Surg 165:215–222CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Darabos N, Stare R (2004) Gallbladder cancer: laparoscopic and classic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:144–147CrossRefPubMed Darabos N, Stare R (2004) Gallbladder cancer: laparoscopic and classic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 18:144–147CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schaeff B, Paolucci V, Thomopoulos J (1998) Port site recurrences after laparoscopic surgery. A review. Dig Surg 15:124–134CrossRefPubMed Schaeff B, Paolucci V, Thomopoulos J (1998) Port site recurrences after laparoscopic surgery. A review. Dig Surg 15:124–134CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fong Y, Brennan MF, Turnbull A, Colt DG, Blumgart LH (1993) Gallbladder cancer discovered during laparoscopic surgery. Potential for iatrogenic tumour dissemination. Arch Surg 128(9):1054–1056CrossRefPubMed Fong Y, Brennan MF, Turnbull A, Colt DG, Blumgart LH (1993) Gallbladder cancer discovered during laparoscopic surgery. Potential for iatrogenic tumour dissemination. Arch Surg 128(9):1054–1056CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Clair DJ, Lautz DB, Brooks DC (1993) Rapid development of umbilical metastases after laparoscopy cholecystectomy for unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma. Surgery 114:355 Clair DJ, Lautz DB, Brooks DC (1993) Rapid development of umbilical metastases after laparoscopy cholecystectomy for unsuspected gallbladder carcinoma. Surgery 114:355
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Maker AV, Butte JM, Oxenberg J et al (2012) Is port site resection necessary in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 19(2):409–417CrossRefPubMed Maker AV, Butte JM, Oxenberg J et al (2012) Is port site resection necessary in the surgical management of gallbladder cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 19(2):409–417CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Incidentally Detected Carcinoma Gallbladder in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy
verfasst von
Ajit Singh
S. S. Jaiswal
Publikationsdatum
09.03.2017
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1614-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Indian Journal of Surgery 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.