Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 5/2018

05.03.2018 | Otology

Incomplete and false tract insertions in cochlear implantation: retrospective review of surgical and auditory outcomes

verfasst von: Ashish Vashishth, Andrea Fulcheri, Maurizio Guida, Antonio Caruso, Mario Sanna

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 5/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate incidence, demographics, surgical, and radiological correlates of incomplete and false tract electrode array insertions during cochlear implantation (CI). To evaluate outcomes in patients with incomplete electrode insertion (IEI).

Study design

Retrospective analysis.

Setting

Otology and skull base center.

Patients and methods

Charts of 18 patients (19 ears) with incomplete or false tract insertions of the electrode array were evaluated who underwent CI, with at least 1 year follow-up (from 470 cases). Demographic findings, etiologies, pre-operative radiologic findings, operative records, post-operative plain radiographic assessment for extent of electrode insertion, and switch-on mapping were evaluated. Audiological outcomes were evaluated using maximum and last recorded vowel, word, sentence, and comprehension scores for patients with IEI.

Results

Incidence of insertional abnormalities was 4.25% with 17 instances of incomplete and 2 cases of insertion into superior semicircular canal. Mean age and duration of deafness were 55.18 ± 4.62 and 22.12 ± 5.71 years. Etiologies in the IEI group were idiopathic, otosclerosis, meningitis, chronic otitis media (COM), temporal bone fractures, and Neurofibromatosis-2. 29.4% cases had cochlear luminal obstruction. Mean radiological and active electrophysiological length of insertion was 20.49 ± 0.66 and 19.49 ± 0.88 mm, respectively. No significant correlation was observed between audiological outcomes and insertional length except in time to achieve maximum word scores (p = 0.04). Age at implantation had significant correlations with last recorded word and comprehension scores at mean follow-up of 42.9 months, and with time to achieve maximum auditory scores.

Conclusions

IEI during cochlear implantation using straight electrodes can occur with or without cochlear luminal obstruction. Age plays an important role in the auditory rehabilitation in this patient subset.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Donnely MJ, Cohen LT, Clark GM (1995) Is deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array necessary and possible? Aust J Otolaryngol 1:79–81 Donnely MJ, Cohen LT, Clark GM (1995) Is deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array necessary and possible? Aust J Otolaryngol 1:79–81
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Welling DB, Hinojosa R, Gantz BJ, Lee TJ (1993) Insertional trauma of multichannel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 103:995–1001CrossRefPubMed Welling DB, Hinojosa R, Gantz BJ, Lee TJ (1993) Insertional trauma of multichannel cochlear implants. Laryngoscope 103:995–1001CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cosetti MK, Waltzman SB (2012) Outcomes in cochlear implantation: variables affecting performance in adults and children. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 45:155–171CrossRef Cosetti MK, Waltzman SB (2012) Outcomes in cochlear implantation: variables affecting performance in adults and children. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 45:155–171CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, Holden TA, Brenner C, Potts LG, Gotter BD, Vanderhoof SS, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner MW (2013) Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34:342–360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, Holden TA, Brenner C, Potts LG, Gotter BD, Vanderhoof SS, Mispagel K, Heydebrand G, Skinner MW (2013) Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34:342–360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tange RA, Grolman W, Maat A (2006) Intracochlear misdirected implantation of a cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngologica 126:650–652CrossRef Tange RA, Grolman W, Maat A (2006) Intracochlear misdirected implantation of a cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngologica 126:650–652CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ying YL, Lin JW, Oghalai JS, Williamson RA (2013) Cochlear implant electrode misplacement: incidence, evaluation and management. Laryngoscope 123:757–766CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ying YL, Lin JW, Oghalai JS, Williamson RA (2013) Cochlear implant electrode misplacement: incidence, evaluation and management. Laryngoscope 123:757–766CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Coombs A, Clamp PJ, Armstrong S, Robinson P, Hajioff D (2014) The role of post-opoerative imaging in cochlear implant surgery: a review of 220 adult cases. Cochlear Implants Int 15:264–271CrossRefPubMed Coombs A, Clamp PJ, Armstrong S, Robinson P, Hajioff D (2014) The role of post-opoerative imaging in cochlear implant surgery: a review of 220 adult cases. Cochlear Implants Int 15:264–271CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dirr F, Hempel JM, Krause E, Muller J, Berghaus A, Ertl-Wagner B, Braun T (2013) Value of routine plain X-ray position checks after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 34:1666–1669CrossRefPubMed Dirr F, Hempel JM, Krause E, Muller J, Berghaus A, Ertl-Wagner B, Braun T (2013) Value of routine plain X-ray position checks after cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 34:1666–1669CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zuniga MG, Rivas A, Hedley-Williams A, Gifford RH, Dwyer R, Dawant BM, Sunderhaus LW, Hovis KL, Wanna GB, Noble J, Labadie RF (2017) Tip fold-over in cochlear implantation: case series. Otol Neurotol 38:199–206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zuniga MG, Rivas A, Hedley-Williams A, Gifford RH, Dwyer R, Dawant BM, Sunderhaus LW, Hovis KL, Wanna GB, Noble J, Labadie RF (2017) Tip fold-over in cochlear implantation: case series. Otol Neurotol 38:199–206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Green KM, Bhatt YM, Saeed SR, Ramsden RT (2004) Complications following adult cochlear implantation: experience in Manchester. J Laryngol Otol 118:417–420CrossRefPubMed Green KM, Bhatt YM, Saeed SR, Ramsden RT (2004) Complications following adult cochlear implantation: experience in Manchester. J Laryngol Otol 118:417–420CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Roland JT Jr, Coelho DH, Pantelides H, Waltzman SB (2008) Partial and double-array implantation of the ossified cochlea. Otol Neurotol 29:1068–1075CrossRefPubMed Roland JT Jr, Coelho DH, Pantelides H, Waltzman SB (2008) Partial and double-array implantation of the ossified cochlea. Otol Neurotol 29:1068–1075CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Durisin M, Buchner A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Bartling S, Warnecke A, Lenarz T (2015) Cochlear implantation in children with bacterial meningitic deafness: the influence of the degree of ossification and obliteration on impedance and charge of the implant. Cochlear Implants Int 16:147–158CrossRefPubMed Durisin M, Buchner A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Bartling S, Warnecke A, Lenarz T (2015) Cochlear implantation in children with bacterial meningitic deafness: the influence of the degree of ossification and obliteration on impedance and charge of the implant. Cochlear Implants Int 16:147–158CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, Harding GW, Smith PG, Gates GA, Neely JG, Kleztker GR, Brunsden B, Blocker B (2002) CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 3:332–350CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, Harding GW, Smith PG, Gates GA, Neely JG, Kleztker GR, Brunsden B, Blocker B (2002) CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 3:332–350CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Khan AM, Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB Jr (2005) Is word recognition correlated with number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants? Laryngoscope 115:672–677CrossRefPubMed Khan AM, Handzel O, Burgess BJ, Damian D, Eddington DK, Nadol JB Jr (2005) Is word recognition correlated with number of surviving spiral ganglion cells and electrode insertion depth in human subjects with cochlear implants? Laryngoscope 115:672–677CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Nadol JB Jr, Eddington DK (2011) Factors associated with incomplete insertion of electrodes in cochlear implant surgery: a histopathologic study. Audiol Neurotol 16:69–81CrossRef Lee J, Nadol JB Jr, Eddington DK (2011) Factors associated with incomplete insertion of electrodes in cochlear implant surgery: a histopathologic study. Audiol Neurotol 16:69–81CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nadol JB Jr, Eddington DK (2004) Histologic evaluation of the tissue seal and biologic response around cochlear implant electrodes in the human. Otol Neurotol 25:257–262CrossRefPubMed Nadol JB Jr, Eddington DK (2004) Histologic evaluation of the tissue seal and biologic response around cochlear implant electrodes in the human. Otol Neurotol 25:257–262CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shpizner BA, Holliday RA, Roland JT, Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Shapiro WH (1995) Postoperative imaging of the multichannel cochlear implant. Am J Neuroradiol 16:1517–1524PubMed Shpizner BA, Holliday RA, Roland JT, Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Shapiro WH (1995) Postoperative imaging of the multichannel cochlear implant. Am J Neuroradiol 16:1517–1524PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Fishman AJ, Heman-Ackah SE (2014) Principles of cochlear implant imaging. In: Waltzman SB, Roland TJ Cochlear implants, 3rd edn. Thieme medical publishers, New York, pp 86–90 Fishman AJ, Heman-Ackah SE (2014) Principles of cochlear implant imaging. In: Waltzman SB, Roland TJ Cochlear implants, 3rd edn. Thieme medical publishers, New York, pp 86–90
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng J, Li S, Zhang F, Li Q, Qin S (2016) Cochlear size and shape variability and implications in cochlear implant insertion. Otol Neurotol 37:1307–1313CrossRefPubMed Meng J, Li S, Zhang F, Li Q, Qin S (2016) Cochlear size and shape variability and implications in cochlear implant insertion. Otol Neurotol 37:1307–1313CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rask-Anderson H, Liu W, Erixon E, Kinnefors A, Pfaller K, Schrott-Fischer A, Glueckert R (2012) Human cochlea: anatomical characteristics and their relevance for cochlear implantation. Anat Rec 295:1791–1811CrossRef Rask-Anderson H, Liu W, Erixon E, Kinnefors A, Pfaller K, Schrott-Fischer A, Glueckert R (2012) Human cochlea: anatomical characteristics and their relevance for cochlear implantation. Anat Rec 295:1791–1811CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Singla A, Sahni D, Gupta AK, Aggarwal A, Gupta T (2015) Surgical anatomy of the basal turn of the human cochlea as pertaining to cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 36:323–328CrossRefPubMed Singla A, Sahni D, Gupta AK, Aggarwal A, Gupta T (2015) Surgical anatomy of the basal turn of the human cochlea as pertaining to cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 36:323–328CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Verberne J, Risi F, Campbell L, Chambers S, O’Laeary S (2017) The effect of scala tympani morphology on basilar membrane contact with a straight electrode array: a human temporal bone study. Otol Neurotol 38:47–53CrossRefPubMed Verberne J, Risi F, Campbell L, Chambers S, O’Laeary S (2017) The effect of scala tympani morphology on basilar membrane contact with a straight electrode array: a human temporal bone study. Otol Neurotol 38:47–53CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin SH, Park S, Lee WS, Kim HN, Choi JY (2013) Revision cochlear implantation with different electrodes can cause incomplete insertion and poor speech performance. Otol Neurotol 34:549–553CrossRefPubMed Shin SH, Park S, Lee WS, Kim HN, Choi JY (2013) Revision cochlear implantation with different electrodes can cause incomplete insertion and poor speech performance. Otol Neurotol 34:549–553CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Eddington DK, Nadol JB (2011) The histopathology of revision cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurotol 16:336–346CrossRef Lee J, Eddington DK, Nadol JB (2011) The histopathology of revision cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurotol 16:336–346CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bettman RH, van Olphen AF, Zonneveld FW, Huizing EH (2003) Electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees estimated during surgery, on plain film radiographs and with electrode function testing. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 260:536–540CrossRefPubMed Bettman RH, van Olphen AF, Zonneveld FW, Huizing EH (2003) Electrode insertion depth in cochlear implantees estimated during surgery, on plain film radiographs and with electrode function testing. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 260:536–540CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Svirsky MA, Fitzgerald MB, Sagi E, Glassman EK (2015) Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: implications for the study of auditory plasticity. Acta Otolaryngol 135:354–363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Svirsky MA, Fitzgerald MB, Sagi E, Glassman EK (2015) Bilateral cochlear implants with large asymmetries in electrode insertion depth: implications for the study of auditory plasticity. Acta Otolaryngol 135:354–363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee J, Nadol JB, Eddington DK (2010) Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: a histopathologic study. Audiol Neurotol 15:323–331CrossRef Lee J, Nadol JB, Eddington DK (2010) Depth of electrode insertion and postoperative performance in humans with cochlear implants: a histopathologic study. Audiol Neurotol 15:323–331CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Incomplete and false tract insertions in cochlear implantation: retrospective review of surgical and auditory outcomes
verfasst von
Ashish Vashishth
Andrea Fulcheri
Maurizio Guida
Antonio Caruso
Mario Sanna
Publikationsdatum
05.03.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4924-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2018

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 5/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.