Background
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a serious problem in chemotherapy and is one of the main causes of poor outcome following cancer treatment. The MDR phenotype is often related to overexpression of drug-efflux pumps in cancer cells. P-glycoprotein (P-gp), a 170-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein encoded by the
MDR1 gene, is one of the best characterized drug efflux pumps [
1‐
3]. Overexpression of P-gp on the surface of tumor cells allows removal of cytotoxic drugs out of the cell in an energy-dependent manner, thereby reducing drug accumulation and increasing multidrug resistance. In addition, inhibition of the P-gp function or inhibition of its expression could prevent the P-gp-mediated MDR phenotype and improve the effectiveness of chemotherapy[
4]. However, there is accumulating evidence that P-gp-associated MDR cells develop other pathways instigating chemoresistance to P-gp-unrelated drugs such as cisplatin and 5-FU [
5‐
9].
Expression of P-gp has been reported to be regulated through transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms and by various endogenous and environmental stimuli that evoke stress responses [
10]. The transcriptional factor AP-1 has been shown to mediate P-gp expression [
11]. Regulation of the AP-1 pathway is highly complex and activation of certain signal pathways seems to stimulate the transcriptional activity of AP-1 [
12]. Simultaneous expression of P-gp and activation of several signal pathways has been found in some cancer cells. Moreover, these pathways have been reported to regulate the expression of P-gp in some multidrug-resistant cell lines [
13‐
15], and blocking these pathways with their specific inhibitors has also been found to reduce P-gp expression [
13,
16]. These studies suggest that signal pathways play a positive role in the regulation of P-gp expression
In the present study, we assessed p38-MAPK phosphorylation and AP-1 activity in drug-resistant and drug-sensitive gastric cancer cells. Furthermore, the effect of the p38-MAPK inhibitor SB202190 on the MDR1 gene expression and AP-1 activity was also tested.
Methods
Cell Culture and reagents
Drug-sensitive human gastric cancer cell SGC7901 and the corresponding vincristine-resistant cell SGC7901/VCR were kindly provided by the Institute of Digestive Diseases (Fourth Military Medical University). All cells were cultivated in RPMI1640 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum in a CO
2 incubator. To maintain the drug-resistance phenotype of SGC7901/VCR cells, vincristine (1.0 μg/ml) was also added to the medium. Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and epirubicin were purchased from QILU PHARMA (JiNan, Shandong, China). SB202190 was obtained from TOCRIS (Ballwin, MO, USA). The AP-1 luciferase report plasmid and the dominant-negative mutant p38 (DN-p38) plasmid were kind gifts from Dr Chuanshu Huang [
17,
18].
Cell Viability Assay
A total of 4,000 SGC7901/VCR and SGC7901 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate. After 24 hours, cells were treated with different concentrations of 5-FU, cisplatin, or epirubicin. After 72 hours, the MTT assay was performed to evaluate cell viability.
Luciferase assay
Cells were cultured in a twenty four-well plate until they reached 85–90% confluence. In all, total 0.8–1 μg plasmid DNA (DN-p38 plasmid mixed with AP-1 luciferase report plasmid) and 2.5 μl LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) mixed together were used to transfect each well in the absence of serum. After 4–6 h, the medium was replaced with 10% fetal calf serum RPMI1640. Approximately 36 h after the beginning of the transfection, cells were lysed and Luciferase assays were performed using the Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, WI, USA). A Renilla luciferase plasmid was also cotransfected in each experiment as an internal control for transfection efficiency. The relative luciferase activity reported here is the mean of three replicate experiments.
RT-PCR Amplification
RNA was extracted from cells using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized using MMLV reverse transcriptase(Promega, WI, USA) and 2 μg total RNA and oligo dT
18-primers. Two-microliter aliquots of cDNA were used for PCR amplification and primers were as follows: sense 5'-AAGCTTAGTACCAAAGAGGCTCTG-3' and antisense 5'-GGCTAGAAACAATAGTGAAAACAA-3' for MDR-1 [
19]; sense 5'-TGACGGGGTCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTA-3' and antisense 5'-CTAGAAGCATTGCGGTGGACGATGGAGGG-3') for β-actin [
20]. PCR used 32 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 45 seconds at 58°C, and 30 seconds at 72°C for MDR1 and β-actin. PCR products were separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and bands were visualized under ultraviolet (UV) radiation after staining with ethidium bromide. Gels were photographed and bands were analyzed by computerized densitometry.
Western-blot analysis
Protein extracts were prepared using a nuclear extract kit (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Protein samples (30 μg) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were incubated at 4°C overnight with various primary antibodies against P-gp (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA), β-actin, and phosphorylated or non-phosphorylated extracellular kinase receptor kinases (ERKs), Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs) and p38 kinase (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). The resulting immunoblots were visualized with horseradish peroxidase-coupled goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse immunoglobulin using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate system (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA).
Apoptosis analysis with annexin V-PI dual staining
Cells (2 × 105 per well) were cultured in six-well plates to 70%–80% confluence. Cells were then treated with the indicated concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents, with or without SB202190 (10 μM), for 24 hours. Cells were collected and the annexin V-PI dual-staining assay was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions ((Nanjing Keygen Biotech, China). Collected cells were briefly washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice and resuspended in 300 μl 1 × binding buffer containing 5 μl Annexin V and 5 μl Propidium iodide (PI) for 30 minutes at room temperature in the dark. After incubation; the cells were analyzed using a FACS Aria cytometer (Becton Dickinson; San Jose, CA).
FACS analysis for MAP-kinase
Cells were collected and resuspended in 0.5–1 ml PBS and formaldehyde was added to a final concentration of 2–4%. The cells were fixed for 10 minutes at 37°C and then chilled on ice for 1 minute. For permeabilization, pre-chilled cells were centrifuged and resuspended in 90% ice-cold methanol. Cells were then incubated for 30 minutes on ice. Permeabilized cells (1 × 106) were mixed with 100 μl 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/PBS containing 2 μg/ml phospho-ERK, phospho-p38 MAPK, or phospho-JNK-specific antibody and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Cells were then washed with 0.1% BSA/PBS followed by incubation with goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated antibodies (50 μg/ml, KPL) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Cells were washed again with 0.1% BSA/PBS, then resuspended in 0.5 ml PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Accumulation and efflux of Rh123 was measured by flow cytometry
The measurement of Rh123 accumulation was performed. Briefly, cells (5 × 105 per sample) were incubated with 1 μg/mL of Rh123 in the dark at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 120 min. SB202190 was added to cultures at the same time as Rh123. Following Rh123 accumulation, cells were washed twice with ice-cold Hanks' Balanced Salt (HBSS) (without phenol red), placed in HBSS with 10% fetal bovine serum on ice. The green fluorescence of Rh123 was measured by flow cytometry. For determination of Rh123 efflux, cells were loaded for 120 min with Rh123 in the absence of SB202190, and then the medium was replaced with Rh123-free medium containing SB202190, or the vehicle. Following efflux intervals of 60 min, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed twice with ice-cold HBSS and prepared for flow cytometry as described earlier.
Statistical analysis
Values were expressed as means ± standard deviation (S.D.). Differences were analyzed using the Student's t-test. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
Discussion
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a phenomenon by which tumor cells develop cross-resistance to a range of structurally and functionally unrelated drugs [
33]. MDR is one of the main obstacles to successful cancer therapy [
34]. Many different mechanisms have been suggested to explain the development of a MDR phenotype in cancer cells, one of the extensively studied form of these mechanisms is overexpression of several energy dependent drug efflux pumps that belong to the ATP-binding cassette family of transporters, such as the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and the MDR-associated proteins (MRPs) [
33]. P-gp is a product of the
MDR1 gene. Overexpression of
MDR1 has often been reported in primary gastric adenocarcinoma [
35,
36]. However, there are some reports showing that P-gp-associated MDR cells develop other mechanisms to acquire chemoresistance to P-gp-unrelated drugs [
5‐
9]. In this study, we found that constitutive overexpression of the
MDR1 gene in drug-resistant human gastric cancer SGC7901/VCR cells is dependent on phosphorylation of p38 and the activity of AP-1. Inhibition of p38-MAPK could restore the sensitivity of these cells to P-gp-related drug and P-gp-unrelated drugs.
Cultured tumor cells, when selected for resistance to an anti-neoplastic agent, often acquire cross-resistance to others. In this study, we showed that vincristine-rsistant SGC7901/VCR is a multidrug-resistant cancer cell line, which was resistant to P-gp-related drug (eprubicin) and P-gp-unrelated drugs (5-FU and cisplatin). Vincristine and epirubicin are known substrates of P-glycoprotein, and it is now increasingly evident that P-gp-associated MDR cells were conferred a cross-resistance to P-gp-unrelated drugs [
8,
9]. We then examined and compared the levels of
MDR1 gene expression in SGC7901/VCR and SGC7901 cells, and showed SGC7901/VCR cells have increased expression levels of P-gp protein and MDR1 mRNA than SGC7901. But cisplatin or 5-FU treatment could not induce MDR1 gene expression in SGC7901 cells. Taken together, these results suggested SGC7901/VCR cells may develop P-gp-related or unrelated mechanism to acquire chemoresistance. Thus, P-gp-associated MDR cell line-SGC7901/VCR has ability to crossresist against P-gp-related drug (eprubicin) and P-gp-unrelated drugs (5-FU and cisplatin). Our results was in agreement with previous findings that the P-gp-prominent MDR cell was cross-resistant to 5-FU and cisplatin[
37].
It has previously been reported that the human
MDR1 promoter contains an AP-1-binding site [
38], and increased AP-1 binding [
39] has been observed in several multidrug-resistant cell lines whereas reduced AP-1 binding has been associated with increased drug sensitivity in others [
11,
40]. In this study, we observed increased AP-1 activity in SGC7901/VCR cells compared with the drug-sensitive parental SGC7901 cells. This result indicates that increased activity of AP-1 is correlated with increased drug resistance in SGC7901/VCR cells.
Recently, increasing evidence indicates that anticancer drugs activate many signal pathways, some of which are connected to the development of drug resistance of tumor cells [
41]. The MAP kinase pathway is an important signal-transduction pathway activated by many different stimuli. Previous reports have shown that modulators of the MAP kinase pathway can affect drug transport activity of P-gp in certain multidrug-resistant cell lines [
42,
43]. We investigated the role of the MAP kinase signal pathway in drug-resistant and drug-sensitive cell lines. As shown in Fig.
3B and
3C, phosphorylation of p38 was increased in SGC7901/VCR cells, but there were no differences in phosphorylation of JNKs and ERKs between drug-resistant and drug-sensitive cell lines. Meanwhile, AP-1 activity was significant attenuated by SB202190 or after cotransfection with the DN-p38 plasmid. We also observed that inhibition of p38 by SB202190 markedly decreased levels of P-gp, MDR1 mRNA and function of P-gp. Moreover, the function of P-gp can also be repressed by SB202190 (Fig.
3D) in SGC7901/VCR cells. Furthermore, incubation with cisplatin for 24 h can also induce p38 phosphorylation in SGC7901 cells; this result is supported by previous report that p38 MAPK was preferentially activated by cisplatin in several cell lines [
44]. Thus, these results suggest that the p38-MAPK/AP-1 signal pathway is involved in regulation of the
MDR1 gene in SGC7901/VCR cells, and may contribute to chemoresistantce. Our results were in line with previous report that the specific p38-MAPK inhibitor SB203580 blocked both c-fos and c-jun expression in response to UV irradiation and anisomycin [
45]. Although p38-MAPK does not phosphorylate or activate c-Jun, several lines of evidence however, support the idea that p38 can contribute to AP-1 activity. p38 can contribute to c-jun gene induction mediated by the AP-1 binding site in the c-jun promoter. In addition to the AP-1 site, the c-jun gene can be regulated by MEF2 family of transcription factors (consisting of MEF2 A-D) [
46]. The MEF2 site is critical for induction of the c-jun promoter by LPS in macrophages, and that this induction requires functional p38 and transcription factor MEF2C. Furthermore, MEF2C was shown to be directly phosphorylated and activated by p38 [
47]. Thus, p38 can potentially regulate c-Jun transcriptional activity by regulating transcription factors that bind to the AP-1 site as well as the MEF2 site.
It has been previously reported in other cell lines that p38-MAPK does not affect P-gp and MDR1 mRNA expression [
48,
49]. In this study, we demonstrated that inhibition of p38-MAPK by SB202190 significantly attenuated the activity of AP-1 and
MDR1 gene expression. As AP-1 is the important transcription factor for
MDR1 gene expression, we suggest that SB202190 inhibited
MDR1 gene expression by reducing the activity of transcription factor AP-1. Thus, the effect of p38-MAPK on
MDR1 gene expression is cell type dependent.
Previous reports have showed that increased expression of
c-
Jun contributed to cisplatin resistance, and 5-FU can induce
c-Jun phosphorylation and activate AP-1-specific transcription [
31,
32]. Meanwhile, we have demonstrated that the activity of Ap-1 was upregulated in SGC7901/VCR cells and inhibition of p38-MAPK by SB202190 can reduce the activity of AP-1 and inhibit
MDR1 gene expression. Therefore, we investigated the effect of SB202190 on the multidrug-resistant phenotype of drug-resistant SGC7901/VCR cells. As shown in Fig. 6, SB202190 significantly increased the sensitivity of drug-resistant SGC7901/VCR cells to chemotherapeutic agents, which indicates that SB202190 may reverse the multidrug-resistant phenotype in SGC7901/VCR cells. Our results were consistent with previous reports that pharmaceutical inhibition of p38 by SB203580 reversed the multidrug resistance of L1210/VCR cells [
42]. It has also been reported that the p38 MAPK pathways play an important role in cellular resistance against photodynamic therapy with hypericin in HeLa cells [
50]. Therefore, it could be suggested from our results that drug resistance in SGC7901/VCR cells is attributed at least in part to the activation of p38-MAPK/AP-1 signal pathway, and downregulation of this pathway appears to confer on MDR cells sensitivity to P-gp-unrelated drugs as well as P-gp-related drug. Several reports have showed that specific inhibitors of signal pathway can reverse P-gp-mediated multidrug resistance [
42,
43,
51,
52]. Thus, interrupting signal-transduction pathways that mediate the expression of multidrug transporters might be an effective approach to prevent multidrug resistance and increase sensitivity to chemotherapy in human cancers. Taken together, our data indicate that the p38-MAPK signal pathway affects
MDR1 gene expression, and provide a possible new mechanism for cross-resistance in drug-resistant human gastric cancer cells. These results further our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms involved in
MDR1 gene expression and may provide new strategies for reversal of multidrug resistance in human gastric cancer cells.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
XLG and NNM carried out the molecular genetic studies, participated in the sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript. JW, JRS and XXB carried out the immunoassays. YC participated in the sequence alignment. KS and HYX carried out cellular studies. GCJ and BHZ participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. MCW and LXW conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.