Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016

12.09.2016 | Breast Oncology

Increasing Appropriate BRCA1/2 Mutation Testing: The Role of Family History Documentation and Genetic Counseling in a Multidisciplinary Clinic

verfasst von: Amar U. Kishan, MD, Caitlin L. Gomez, MD, Nicole A. Dawson, MD, Robyn Dvorak, MD, Nova M. Foster, MD, Anne Hoyt, MD, Sara A. Hurvitz, MD, Amy Kusske, MD, Erica L. Silver, MD, Charles Tseng, MD, Susan A. McCloskey, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Sonderheft 5/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Findings show that 5–10 % of women with a diagnosis of breast cancer (BCa) have actionable genetic mutations. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for testing to detect BRCA1/2 mutations include personal history (PH) variables such as age of 45 years or younger and a family history (FH) variables. Rates of FH documentation and overall rates of appropriate referral for genetic testing are low, ranging from about 30 to 60 %. The authors hypothesized that an upfront FH documentation and inclusion of a genetics counselor in a multidisciplinary clinic (MDC) setting would increase rates of appropriate referral for genetic testing.

Methods

The study enrolled 609 consecutive women with non-metastatic BCa seen in consultation between June 2012 and December 2015 at a multidisciplinary clinic. Rates of FH documentation and referral for genetic testing to detect BRCA1/2 mutations were assessed before and after inclusion of a genetic counselor in the MDC.

Results

The rates of FH documentation and appropriate referral were 100 and 89 %, respectively. Half (50 %) of the patients had only FH-based indications for testing. All the patients with PH-based indications were referred. The inclusion of a genetic counselor significantly increased appropriate referral rates among those with only FH-based indications (62 vs. 92 %) and overall (80 vs. 96 %) (p < 0.0001 for both). Among the 12 % of the patients with actionable mutations, 60 % were 45 years of age or younger, whereas 30 % had only FH-based testing indications.

Conclusions

This report shows substantially higher FH documentation and appropriate genetic testing rates than prior reports. Many patients with indications for genetic testing may have only FH-based indications for testing, and this subset may account for the sizable proportion of patients with newly diagnosed BCa who have actionable mutations.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lokich E, Stuckey A, Raker C, Wilbur JS, Laprise J, Gass J. Preoperative genetic testing affects surgical decision making in breast cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:326–33.CrossRefPubMed Lokich E, Stuckey A, Raker C, Wilbur JS, Laprise J, Gass J. Preoperative genetic testing affects surgical decision making in breast cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:326–33.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz GF, Hughes KS, Lynch HT, et al. Proceedings of the international consensus conference on breast cancer risk, genetics, & risk management, April 2007. Cancer. 2008;113:2627–37.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz GF, Hughes KS, Lynch HT, et al. Proceedings of the international consensus conference on breast cancer risk, genetics, & risk management, April 2007. Cancer. 2008;113:2627–37.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pharoah PD, Antoniou A, Bobrow M, Zimmern RL, Easton DF, Ponder BA. Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet. 2002;31:33–6.CrossRefPubMed Pharoah PD, Antoniou A, Bobrow M, Zimmern RL, Easton DF, Ponder BA. Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention. Nat Genet. 2002;31:33–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Moyer VA. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:271–81.PubMed Moyer VA. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:271–81.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:676–89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, et al. Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62:676–89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat NCCN. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian, v2.2016. NCCN. NCCN. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian, v2.2016. NCCN.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing in young women with breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:730–6.CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, et al. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing in young women with breast cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2016;2:730–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehl KL, Shen C, Litton JK, Arun B, Giordano SH. Rates of BRCA1/2 mutation testing among young survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;155:165–73.CrossRefPubMed Kehl KL, Shen C, Litton JK, Arun B, Giordano SH. Rates of BRCA1/2 mutation testing among young survivors of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;155:165–73.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson B, McLosky J, Wasilevich E, Lyon-Callo S, Duquette D, Copeland G. Barriers and facilitators for utilization of genetic counseling and risk assessment services in young female breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:11.CrossRef Anderson B, McLosky J, Wasilevich E, Lyon-Callo S, Duquette D, Copeland G. Barriers and facilitators for utilization of genetic counseling and risk assessment services in young female breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;2012:11.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cragun D, Bonner D, Kim J, et al. Factors associated with genetic counseling and BRCA testing in a population-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151:169–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cragun D, Bonner D, Kim J, et al. Factors associated with genetic counseling and BRCA testing in a population-based sample of young Black women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151:169–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Febbraro T, Robison K, Wilbur JS, et al. Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for referral to cancer genetic professionals. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138:109–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Febbraro T, Robison K, Wilbur JS, et al. Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for referral to cancer genetic professionals. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138:109–14.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy DE, Byfield SD, Comstock CB, et al. Underutilization of BRCA1/2 testing to guide breast cancer treatment: Black and Hispanic women particularly at risk. Genet Med. 2011;13:349–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Levy DE, Byfield SD, Comstock CB, et al. Underutilization of BRCA1/2 testing to guide breast cancer treatment: Black and Hispanic women particularly at risk. Genet Med. 2011;13:349–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy AM, Bristol M, Fredricks T, et al. Are physician recommendations for BRCA1/2 testing in patients with breast cancer appropriate? A population-based study. Cancer. 2013;119:3596–603.PubMed McCarthy AM, Bristol M, Fredricks T, et al. Are physician recommendations for BRCA1/2 testing in patients with breast cancer appropriate? A population-based study. Cancer. 2013;119:3596–603.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Powell CB, Littell R, Hoodfar E, Sinclair F, Pressman A. Does the diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer trigger referral to genetic counseling? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23:431–6.CrossRefPubMed Powell CB, Littell R, Hoodfar E, Sinclair F, Pressman A. Does the diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer trigger referral to genetic counseling? Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23:431–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood ME, Kadlubek P, Pham TH, et al. Quality of cancer family history and referral for genetic counseling and testing among oncology practices: a pilot test of quality measures as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:824–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wood ME, Kadlubek P, Pham TH, et al. Quality of cancer family history and referral for genetic counseling and testing among oncology practices: a pilot test of quality measures as part of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Oncology Practice Initiative. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:824–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Stuckey A, Febbraro T, Laprise J, Wilbur JS, Lopes V, Robison K. Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for referral of women with breast cancer to genetics professionals. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014;39:363–7.CrossRef Stuckey A, Febbraro T, Laprise J, Wilbur JS, Lopes V, Robison K. Adherence patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for referral of women with breast cancer to genetics professionals. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014;39:363–7.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Murff HJ, Byrne D, Syngal S. Cancer risk assessment: quality and impact of the family history interview. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:239–45.PubMed Murff HJ, Byrne D, Syngal S. Cancer risk assessment: quality and impact of the family history interview. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:239–45.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Flynn BS, Wood ME, Ashikaga T, Stockdale A, Dana GS, Naud S. Primary care physicians’ use of family history for cancer risk assessment. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Flynn BS, Wood ME, Ashikaga T, Stockdale A, Dana GS, Naud S. Primary care physicians’ use of family history for cancer risk assessment. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Grover S, Stoffel EM, Bussone L, Tschoegl E, Syngal S. Physician assessment of family cancer history and referral for genetic evaluation in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:813–9.CrossRefPubMed Grover S, Stoffel EM, Bussone L, Tschoegl E, Syngal S. Physician assessment of family cancer history and referral for genetic evaluation in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:813–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Acton RT, Burst NM, Casebeer L, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama’s primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics. Acad Med. 2000;75:850–2.CrossRefPubMed Acton RT, Burst NM, Casebeer L, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama’s primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics. Acad Med. 2000;75:850–2.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkins-Haug L, Erickson K, Hill L, Power M, Holzman GB, Schulkin J. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ opinions and attitudes on the role of genetics in women’s health. J Women Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9:873–9.CrossRef Wilkins-Haug L, Erickson K, Hill L, Power M, Holzman GB, Schulkin J. Obstetrician-gynecologists’ opinions and attitudes on the role of genetics in women’s health. J Women Health Gend Based Med. 2000;9:873–9.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Decker G, Murtz P, Gieseke J, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the prostate: dynamic ADC monitoring by DWI at 3.0 T. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113:115–20.CrossRefPubMed Decker G, Murtz P, Gieseke J, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the prostate: dynamic ADC monitoring by DWI at 3.0 T. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113:115–20.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Haidle JL . Important differences between a triage pedigree and risk assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3345–6.CrossRef Haidle JL . Important differences between a triage pedigree and risk assessment. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3345–6.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1117–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, et al. Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1117–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat NCCN. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer, v2.2016. NCCN. NCCN. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer, v2.2016. NCCN.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Brogan B, et al. Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1823–9.CrossRefPubMed Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Brogan B, et al. Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1823–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Weitzel JN, McCaffrey SM, Nedelcu R, MacDonald DJ, Blazer KR, Cullinane CA. Effect of genetic cancer risk assessment on surgical decisions at breast cancer diagnosis. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1323–8, (discussion 1329).CrossRefPubMed Weitzel JN, McCaffrey SM, Nedelcu R, MacDonald DJ, Blazer KR, Cullinane CA. Effect of genetic cancer risk assessment on surgical decisions at breast cancer diagnosis. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1323–8, (discussion 1329).CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Garcia C, Wendt J, Lyon L, et al. Risk management options elected by women after testing positive for a BRCA mutation. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132:428–33.CrossRefPubMed Garcia C, Wendt J, Lyon L, et al. Risk management options elected by women after testing positive for a BRCA mutation. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;132:428–33.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat King MC, Levy-Lahad E, Lahad A. Population-based screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2: 2014 Lasker Award. JAMA. 2014;312:1091–2.CrossRefPubMed King MC, Levy-Lahad E, Lahad A. Population-based screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2: 2014 Lasker Award. JAMA. 2014;312:1091–2.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Long EF, Ganz PA. Cost-effectiveness of universal BRCA1/2 screening: evidence-based decision making. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:1217–8.CrossRefPubMed Long EF, Ganz PA. Cost-effectiveness of universal BRCA1/2 screening: evidence-based decision making. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:1217–8.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan CP, Haas JS, Perez-Stable EJ, Des Jarlais G, Gregorich SE. Factors affecting breast cancer risk reduction practices among California physicians. Prev Med. 2005;41:7–15.CrossRefPubMed Kaplan CP, Haas JS, Perez-Stable EJ, Des Jarlais G, Gregorich SE. Factors affecting breast cancer risk reduction practices among California physicians. Prev Med. 2005;41:7–15.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Trivers KF, Baldwin LM, Miller JW, et al. Reported referral for genetic counseling or BRCA1/2 testing among United States physicians: a vignette-based study. Cancer. 2011;117:5334–43.CrossRefPubMed Trivers KF, Baldwin LM, Miller JW, et al. Reported referral for genetic counseling or BRCA1/2 testing among United States physicians: a vignette-based study. Cancer. 2011;117:5334–43.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Riel E, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, Verhoef S, Rutgers EJ, Ausems MG. BRCA testing of breast cancer patients: medical specialists’ referral patterns, knowledge, and attitudes to genetic testing. Eur J Cancer Care Engl. 2010;19:369–76.CrossRefPubMed Van Riel E, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, Verhoef S, Rutgers EJ, Ausems MG. BRCA testing of breast cancer patients: medical specialists’ referral patterns, knowledge, and attitudes to genetic testing. Eur J Cancer Care Engl. 2010;19:369–76.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlich-Bakker KJ, Ausems MG, Schipper M, Ten Kroode HF, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, van den Bout J. BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;109:507–14.CrossRefPubMed Schlich-Bakker KJ, Ausems MG, Schipper M, Ten Kroode HF, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, van den Bout J. BRCA1/2 mutation testing in breast cancer patients: a prospective study of the long-term psychological impact of approach during adjuvant radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;109:507–14.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schlich-Bakker KJ, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, van Echtelt J, van den Bout J, Ausems MG, ten Kroode HF. Short-term psychological distress in patients actively approached for genetic counselling after diagnosis of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2722–8.CrossRefPubMed Schlich-Bakker KJ, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, van Echtelt J, van den Bout J, Ausems MG, ten Kroode HF. Short-term psychological distress in patients actively approached for genetic counselling after diagnosis of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:2722–8.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Ralph J, Coates P. Counseling US women on BRCA testing, a new healthy people 2020 objective: findings from the national health interview survey, 2000–2005. Lansing, MI: Michigan. Department of Community Health Promoting Cancer Genomics Best Practives Steering Committee. 2010. Ralph J, Coates P. Counseling US women on BRCA testing, a new healthy people 2020 objective: findings from the national health interview survey, 2000–2005. Lansing, MI: Michigan. Department of Community Health Promoting Cancer Genomics Best Practives Steering Committee. 2010.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Christie J, Quinn GP, Malo T, et al. Cognitive and psychological impact of BRCA genetic counseling in before and after definitive surgery breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4003–11.CrossRefPubMed Christie J, Quinn GP, Malo T, et al. Cognitive and psychological impact of BRCA genetic counseling in before and after definitive surgery breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4003–11.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M, et al. Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:943–51.CrossRefPubMed Desmond A, Kurian AW, Gabree M, et al. Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:943–51.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Increasing Appropriate BRCA1/2 Mutation Testing: The Role of Family History Documentation and Genetic Counseling in a Multidisciplinary Clinic
verfasst von
Amar U. Kishan, MD
Caitlin L. Gomez, MD
Nicole A. Dawson, MD
Robyn Dvorak, MD
Nova M. Foster, MD
Anne Hoyt, MD
Sara A. Hurvitz, MD
Amy Kusske, MD
Erica L. Silver, MD
Charles Tseng, MD
Susan A. McCloskey, MD
Publikationsdatum
12.09.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe Sonderheft 5/2016
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5545-0

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 5/2016

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.