Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

18.05.2022 | Review Article

Increasing genomic discovery in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: defining disease biology and its correlation to risk

verfasst von: Patrick Hagen, Mark Sellin, Stephanie Berg, Jiwang Zhang

Erschienen in: Annals of Hematology | Ausgabe 7/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Our understanding of MM genomics has expanded rapidly in the past 5–10 years as a consequence of cytogenetic analyses obtained in routine clinical practice as well as the ability to perform whole-exome/genome sequencing and gene expression profiling on large patient data sets. This knowledge has offered new insights into disease biology and is increasingly defining high-risk genomic patterns. In this manuscript, we present a thorough review of our current knowledge of MM genomics. The epidemiology and biology of chromosomal abnormalities including both copy number abnormalities and chromosomal translocation are described in full with a focus on those most clinically impactful such as 1q amplification and del(17p) as well as certain chromosome 14 translocations. A review of our ever-expanding knowledge of genetic mutations derived from recent whole-genome/exome data sets is then reviewed including those that drive disease pathogenesis from precursor states as well as those that may impact clinical outcomes. We then transition and attempt to elucidate how both chromosomal abnormalities and gene mutations are evolving our understanding of disease risk. We conclude by offering our perspectives moving forward as to how we might apply whole-genome/exome-level data in addition to routine cytogenetic analyses to improve patient outcomes as well as further knowledge gaps that must be addressed.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cowan AJ et al (2020) The global state of hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: an analysis of the Worldwide Network of Blood and Marrow Transplantation Database and the Global Burden of Disease Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 26:2372–2377PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cowan AJ et al (2020) The global state of hematopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: an analysis of the Worldwide Network of Blood and Marrow Transplantation Database and the Global Burden of Disease Study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 26:2372–2377PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Costa LJ et al (2018) Recent trends in multiple myeloma incidence and survival by age, race, and ethnicity in the United States. Blood advances 1:282–287CrossRef Costa LJ et al (2018) Recent trends in multiple myeloma incidence and survival by age, race, and ethnicity in the United States. Blood advances 1:282–287CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Palumbo A et al (2015) Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol 33:2863–2869PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Palumbo A et al (2015) Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol 33:2863–2869PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chng WJ et al (2014) IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 28:269–277PubMedCrossRef Chng WJ et al (2014) IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 28:269–277PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajkumar S et al (1999) Abnormal cytogenetics predict poor survival after high-dose therapy and autologous blood cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 24:497–503PubMedCrossRef Rajkumar S et al (1999) Abnormal cytogenetics predict poor survival after high-dose therapy and autologous blood cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 24:497–503PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dewald GW et al (2005) Relationship of patient survival and chromosome anomalies detected in metaphase and/or interphase cells at diagnosis of myeloma. Blood 106:3553–3558PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dewald GW et al (2005) Relationship of patient survival and chromosome anomalies detected in metaphase and/or interphase cells at diagnosis of myeloma. Blood 106:3553–3558PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Greipp PR et al (2005) International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 23:3412–3420PubMedCrossRef Greipp PR et al (2005) International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 23:3412–3420PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Neben K et al (2010) Combining information regarding chromosomal aberrations t(4;14) and del(17p13) with the International Staging System classification allows stratification of myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 95:1150–1157PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Neben K et al (2010) Combining information regarding chromosomal aberrations t(4;14) and del(17p13) with the International Staging System classification allows stratification of myeloma patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 95:1150–1157PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd KD et al (2012) A novel prognostic model in myeloma based on co-segregating adverse FISH lesions and the ISS: analysis of patients treated in the MRC Myeloma IX trial. Leukemia 26:349–355PubMedCrossRef Boyd KD et al (2012) A novel prognostic model in myeloma based on co-segregating adverse FISH lesions and the ISS: analysis of patients treated in the MRC Myeloma IX trial. Leukemia 26:349–355PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones J et al (2019) Clonal evolution in myeloma: the impact of maintenance lenalidomide and depth of response on the genetics and sub-clonal structure of relapsed disease in uniformly treated newly diagnosed patients. Haematologica 104(7):1440–1450PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jones J et al (2019) Clonal evolution in myeloma: the impact of maintenance lenalidomide and depth of response on the genetics and sub-clonal structure of relapsed disease in uniformly treated newly diagnosed patients. Haematologica 104(7):1440–1450PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV (2018) The multiple myelomas - current concepts in cytogenetic classification and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15:409–421PubMedCrossRef Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV (2018) The multiple myelomas - current concepts in cytogenetic classification and therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15:409–421PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chng W et al (2006) Analysis of genetic abnormalities provides insights into genetic evolution of hyperdiploid myeloma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 45:1111–1120PubMedCrossRef Chng W et al (2006) Analysis of genetic abnormalities provides insights into genetic evolution of hyperdiploid myeloma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 45:1111–1120PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Manier, S. et al. (2017) Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol Manier, S. et al. (2017) Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pawlyn C et al (2015) Coexistent hyperdiploidy does not abrogate poor prognosis in myeloma with adverse cytogenetics and may precede IGH translocations. Blood 125:831–840PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pawlyn C et al (2015) Coexistent hyperdiploidy does not abrogate poor prognosis in myeloma with adverse cytogenetics and may precede IGH translocations. Blood 125:831–840PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker BA et al (2010) A compendium of myeloma-associated chromosomal copy number abnormalities and their prognostic value. Blood 116:e56–e65PubMedCrossRef Walker BA et al (2010) A compendium of myeloma-associated chromosomal copy number abnormalities and their prognostic value. Blood 116:e56–e65PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Varma A et al (2020) Outcome of multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q gain and 1p deletion after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: propensity score matched analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 26:665–671PubMedCrossRef Varma A et al (2020) Outcome of multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q gain and 1p deletion after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: propensity score matched analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 26:665–671PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Spruck C et al (2001) A CDK-independent function of mammalian Cks1: targeting of SCF(Skp2) to the CDK inhibitor p27Kip1. Mol Cell 7:639–650PubMedCrossRef Spruck C et al (2001) A CDK-independent function of mammalian Cks1: targeting of SCF(Skp2) to the CDK inhibitor p27Kip1. Mol Cell 7:639–650PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganoth, D. et al. (2001) The cell-cycle regulatory protein Cks1 is required for SCF(Skp2)-mediated ubiquitinylation of p27. Nat Cell Biol Ganoth, D. et al. (2001) The cell-cycle regulatory protein Cks1 is required for SCF(Skp2)-mediated ubiquitinylation of p27. Nat Cell Biol
22.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd KD et al (2011) The clinical impact and molecular biology of del(17p) in multiple myeloma treated with conventional or thalidomide-based therapy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 50:765–774PubMedCrossRef Boyd KD et al (2011) The clinical impact and molecular biology of del(17p) in multiple myeloma treated with conventional or thalidomide-based therapy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 50:765–774PubMedCrossRef
25.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MK et al (2012) Cell-type, dose, and mutation-type specificity dictate mutant p53 functions in vivo. Cancer Cell 22:751–764PubMedCrossRef Lee MK et al (2012) Cell-type, dose, and mutation-type specificity dictate mutant p53 functions in vivo. Cancer Cell 22:751–764PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat de Vries A et al (2002) Targeted point mutations of p53 lead to dominant-negative inhibition of wild-type p53 function. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:2948–2953PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef de Vries A et al (2002) Targeted point mutations of p53 lead to dominant-negative inhibition of wild-type p53 function. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:2948–2953PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Besse A et al (2018) Carfilzomib resistance due to ABCB1/MDR1 overexpression is overcome by nelfinavir and lopinavir in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 32:391–401PubMedCrossRef Besse A et al (2018) Carfilzomib resistance due to ABCB1/MDR1 overexpression is overcome by nelfinavir and lopinavir in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 32:391–401PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez D et al (2007) Immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Blood 110:3112–3121PubMedCrossRef Gonzalez D et al (2007) Immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Blood 110:3112–3121PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kalff A, Spencer A (2012) The t(4;14) translocation and FGFR3 overexpression in multiple myeloma: prognostic implications and current clinical strategies. Blood Cancer J 2:e89PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kalff A, Spencer A (2012) The t(4;14) translocation and FGFR3 overexpression in multiple myeloma: prognostic implications and current clinical strategies. Blood Cancer J 2:e89PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross FM et al (2010) The t(14;20) is a poor prognostic factor in myeloma but is associated with long-term stable disease in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. Haematologica 95:1221–1225PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ross FM et al (2010) The t(14;20) is a poor prognostic factor in myeloma but is associated with long-term stable disease in monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance. Haematologica 95:1221–1225PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Chesi M et al (1998) The t(4;14) translocation in myeloma dysregulates both FGFR3 and a novel gene, MMSET, resulting in IgH/MMSET hybrid transcripts. Blood 92:3025–3034PubMedCrossRef Chesi M et al (1998) The t(4;14) translocation in myeloma dysregulates both FGFR3 and a novel gene, MMSET, resulting in IgH/MMSET hybrid transcripts. Blood 92:3025–3034PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Keats JJ et al (2003) In multiple myeloma, t(4;14)(p16;q32) is an adverse prognostic factor irrespective of FGFR3 expression. Blood 101:1520–1529PubMedCrossRef Keats JJ et al (2003) In multiple myeloma, t(4;14)(p16;q32) is an adverse prognostic factor irrespective of FGFR3 expression. Blood 101:1520–1529PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufman GP et al (2016) Impact of cytogenetic classification on outcomes following early high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 30:633–639PubMedCrossRef Kaufman GP et al (2016) Impact of cytogenetic classification on outcomes following early high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 30:633–639PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Affer M et al (2014) Promiscuous MYC locus rearrangements hijack enhancers but mostly super-enhancers to dysregulate MYC expression in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 28:1725–1735PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Affer M et al (2014) Promiscuous MYC locus rearrangements hijack enhancers but mostly super-enhancers to dysregulate MYC expression in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 28:1725–1735PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker BA et al (2014) Translocations at 8q24 juxtapose MYC with genes that harbor superenhancers resulting in overexpression and poor prognosis in myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J 4:e191PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Walker BA et al (2014) Translocations at 8q24 juxtapose MYC with genes that harbor superenhancers resulting in overexpression and poor prognosis in myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J 4:e191PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuehl WM, Bergsagel PL (2002) Multiple myeloma: evolving genetic events and host interactions. Nat Rev Cancer 2:175–187PubMedCrossRef Kuehl WM, Bergsagel PL (2002) Multiple myeloma: evolving genetic events and host interactions. Nat Rev Cancer 2:175–187PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Leich E et al (2013) Multiple myeloma is affected by multiple and heterogeneous somatic mutations in adhesion- and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling molecules. Blood cancer journal. 3:e102PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Leich E et al (2013) Multiple myeloma is affected by multiple and heterogeneous somatic mutations in adhesion- and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling molecules. Blood cancer journal. 3:e102PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker BA et al (2015) APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun 6:6997PubMedCrossRef Walker BA et al (2015) APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun 6:6997PubMedCrossRef
46.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolli N et al (2014) Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun 5:2997PubMedCrossRef Bolli N et al (2014) Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun 5:2997PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Bolli N et al (2018) Analysis of the genomic landscape of multiple myeloma highlights novel prognostic markers and disease subgroups. Leukemia 32:2604–2616PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bolli N et al (2018) Analysis of the genomic landscape of multiple myeloma highlights novel prognostic markers and disease subgroups. Leukemia 32:2604–2616PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Stein CK et al (2017) The varied distribution and impact of RAS codon and other key DNA alterations across the translocation cyclin D subgroups in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 8:27854–27867PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Stein CK et al (2017) The varied distribution and impact of RAS codon and other key DNA alterations across the translocation cyclin D subgroups in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget 8:27854–27867PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Misiewicz-Krzeminska I et al (2016) Post-transcriptional modifications contribute to the upregulation of cyclin D2 in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 22:207–217PubMedCrossRef Misiewicz-Krzeminska I et al (2016) Post-transcriptional modifications contribute to the upregulation of cyclin D2 in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 22:207–217PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Chourhury S et al (2002) Multiple myeloma: evolving genetic events and host interactions. Nat Rev Cancer 2(3):175–187CrossRef Chourhury S et al (2002) Multiple myeloma: evolving genetic events and host interactions. Nat Rev Cancer 2(3):175–187CrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Landgren O et al (2009) Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood 113:5412–5417PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Landgren O et al (2009) Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood 113:5412–5417PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyle E et al (2020) BRAF and DIS3 mutations associate with adverse outcome in a long-term follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma. AACR 26(10):2422–2432 Boyle E et al (2020) BRAF and DIS3 mutations associate with adverse outcome in a long-term follow-up of patients with multiple myeloma. AACR 26(10):2422–2432
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaughnessy J et al (2005) Amplification and overexpression of CKS1B at chromosome band 1q21 is associated with reduced levels of p27Kip1 and an aggressive clinical course in multiple myeloma. Hematology 10(Suppl 1):117–126PubMedCrossRef Shaughnessy J et al (2005) Amplification and overexpression of CKS1B at chromosome band 1q21 is associated with reduced levels of p27Kip1 and an aggressive clinical course in multiple myeloma. Hematology 10(Suppl 1):117–126PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Samo AA et al (2018) MCL1 gene co-expression module stratifies multiple myeloma and predicts response to proteasome inhibitor-based therapy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 57:420–429PubMedCrossRef Samo AA et al (2018) MCL1 gene co-expression module stratifies multiple myeloma and predicts response to proteasome inhibitor-based therapy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 57:420–429PubMedCrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Teoh PJ et al (2018) Aberrant hyperediting of the myeloma transcriptome by ADAR1 confers oncogenicity and is a marker of poor prognosis. Blood 132:1304–1317PubMedCrossRef Teoh PJ et al (2018) Aberrant hyperediting of the myeloma transcriptome by ADAR1 confers oncogenicity and is a marker of poor prognosis. Blood 132:1304–1317PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Hurt EM et al (2004) Overexpression of c-maf is a frequent oncogenic event in multiple myeloma that promotes proliferation and pathological interactions with bone marrow stroma. Cancer Cell 5:191–199PubMedCrossRef Hurt EM et al (2004) Overexpression of c-maf is a frequent oncogenic event in multiple myeloma that promotes proliferation and pathological interactions with bone marrow stroma. Cancer Cell 5:191–199PubMedCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanamura I et al (2001) Ectopic expression of MAFB gene in human myeloma cells carrying (14;20)(q32;q11) chromosomal translocations. Japanese J Cancer Res 92:638–644CrossRef Hanamura I et al (2001) Ectopic expression of MAFB gene in human myeloma cells carrying (14;20)(q32;q11) chromosomal translocations. Japanese J Cancer Res 92:638–644CrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Keats JJ et al (2005) Overexpression of transcripts originating from the MMSET locus characterizes all t(4;14)(p16;q32)-positive multiple myeloma patients. Blood 105:4060–4069PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Keats JJ et al (2005) Overexpression of transcripts originating from the MMSET locus characterizes all t(4;14)(p16;q32)-positive multiple myeloma patients. Blood 105:4060–4069PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker BA et al (2013) Characterization of IGH locus breakpoints in multiple myeloma indicates a subset of translocations appear to occur in pregerminal center B cells. Blood 121:3413–3419PubMedCrossRef Walker BA et al (2013) Characterization of IGH locus breakpoints in multiple myeloma indicates a subset of translocations appear to occur in pregerminal center B cells. Blood 121:3413–3419PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Agostino M et al (2020) Early relapse risk in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma characterized by next-generation sequencing. Clin Cancer Res 26(18):4833–4841CrossRef D'Agostino M et al (2020) Early relapse risk in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma characterized by next-generation sequencing. Clin Cancer Res 26(18):4833–4841CrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashby C et al (2019) Poor overall survival in hyperhaploid multiple myeloma is defined by double-hit bi-allelic inactivation of TP53. Oncotarget 10:732–737PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ashby C et al (2019) Poor overall survival in hyperhaploid multiple myeloma is defined by double-hit bi-allelic inactivation of TP53. Oncotarget 10:732–737PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson JF et al (2019) Hyperhaploid plasma cell myeloma characterized by poor outcome and monosomy 17 with frequently co-occurring TP53 mutations. Blood Cancer J 9:20PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Peterson JF et al (2019) Hyperhaploid plasma cell myeloma characterized by poor outcome and monosomy 17 with frequently co-occurring TP53 mutations. Blood Cancer J 9:20PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Fonseca R et al (2001) Deletions of chromosome 13 in multiple myeloma identified by interphase FISH usually denote large deletions of the q arm or monosomy. Leukemia 15:981–986PubMedCrossRef Fonseca R et al (2001) Deletions of chromosome 13 in multiple myeloma identified by interphase FISH usually denote large deletions of the q arm or monosomy. Leukemia 15:981–986PubMedCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Avet-Loiseau H et al (1999) Monosomy 13 is associated with the transition of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Blood 94:2583–2589PubMedCrossRef Avet-Loiseau H et al (1999) Monosomy 13 is associated with the transition of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francophone du Myelome. Blood 94:2583–2589PubMedCrossRef
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiecchio L et al (2006) Deletion of chromosome 13 detected by conventional cytogenetics is a critical prognostic factor in myeloma. Leukemia 20:1610–1617PubMedCrossRef Chiecchio L et al (2006) Deletion of chromosome 13 detected by conventional cytogenetics is a critical prognostic factor in myeloma. Leukemia 20:1610–1617PubMedCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Jurczyszyn A et al (2018) The prognostic impact of t(14;16) in multiple myeloma: a multicenter retrospective study of 213 patients. Is it time to revise the revised ISS? Blood 132(suppl 1):4452CrossRef Jurczyszyn A et al (2018) The prognostic impact of t(14;16) in multiple myeloma: a multicenter retrospective study of 213 patients. Is it time to revise the revised ISS? Blood 132(suppl 1):4452CrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah V et al (2017) Prediction of outcome in newly diagnosed myeloma: a meta-analysis of the molecular profiles of 1905 trial patients. Leukemia 32:102–110PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shah V et al (2017) Prediction of outcome in newly diagnosed myeloma: a meta-analysis of the molecular profiles of 1905 trial patients. Leukemia 32:102–110PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Avet-Loiseau H et al (2011) Translocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor? Blood 117:2009–2011PubMedCrossRef Avet-Loiseau H et al (2011) Translocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor? Blood 117:2009–2011PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan H et al (2018) Single-center experience in treating patients with t(4;14) multiple myeloma with and without planned frontline autologous stem cell transplantation. CLML 18(3):225–234 Chan H et al (2018) Single-center experience in treating patients with t(4;14) multiple myeloma with and without planned frontline autologous stem cell transplantation. CLML 18(3):225–234
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Mikhael JR et al (2013) Mayo Clinic. Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines 2013 [published correction appears in Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(7):777]. Mayo Clin Proc 88(4):360–376PubMedCrossRef Mikhael JR et al (2013) Mayo Clinic. Management of newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma: updated Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus guidelines 2013 [published correction appears in Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(7):777]. Mayo Clin Proc 88(4):360–376PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Giri S et al (2019) Chromosome 1 abnormalities and clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. ASCO 37(15):suppl 8044 Giri S et al (2019) Chromosome 1 abnormalities and clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents. ASCO 37(15):suppl 8044
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker BA et al (2019) A high-risk, double-hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis. Leukemia 22:159–170CrossRef Walker BA et al (2019) A high-risk, double-hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis. Leukemia 22:159–170CrossRef
80.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Agostino M et al (2020) Impact of gain and amplification of 1q in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatment in the forte trial. Blood 136:38–40CrossRef D’Agostino M et al (2020) Impact of gain and amplification of 1q in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving carfilzomib-based treatment in the forte trial. Blood 136:38–40CrossRef
81.
Zurück zum Zitat An G et al (2015) The impact of clone size on the prognostic value of chromosome aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 21:2148–2156PubMedCrossRef An G et al (2015) The impact of clone size on the prognostic value of chromosome aberrations by fluorescence in situ hybridization in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 21:2148–2156PubMedCrossRef
82.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd KD et al (2011) Mapping of chromosome 1p deletions in myeloma identifies FAM46C at 1p12 and CDKN2C at 1p32.3 as being genes in regions associated with adverse survival. Clin Cancer Res 17(24):7776–7784PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Boyd KD et al (2011) Mapping of chromosome 1p deletions in myeloma identifies FAM46C at 1p12 and CDKN2C at 1p32.3 as being genes in regions associated with adverse survival. Clin Cancer Res 17(24):7776–7784PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Hebraud B et al (2014) Deletion of the 1p32 region is a major independent prognostic factor in young patients with myeloma: the IFM experience on 1195 patients. Leukemia 28(3):675–679PubMedCrossRef Hebraud B et al (2014) Deletion of the 1p32 region is a major independent prognostic factor in young patients with myeloma: the IFM experience on 1195 patients. Leukemia 28(3):675–679PubMedCrossRef
84.
Zurück zum Zitat Zojer N et al (2000) Deletion of 13q14 remains an independent adverse prognostic variable in multiple myeloma despite its frequent detection by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Blood 95(6):1925–1930PubMedCrossRef Zojer N et al (2000) Deletion of 13q14 remains an independent adverse prognostic variable in multiple myeloma despite its frequent detection by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Blood 95(6):1925–1930PubMedCrossRef
85.
Zurück zum Zitat Binder M et al (2017) Prognostic implications of abnormalities of chromosome 13 and the presence of multiple cytogenetic high-risk abnormalities in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 7:e600PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Binder M et al (2017) Prognostic implications of abnormalities of chromosome 13 and the presence of multiple cytogenetic high-risk abnormalities in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J 7:e600PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
86.
Zurück zum Zitat Tricot G et al (1995) Poor prognosis in multiple myeloma is associated only with partial or complete deletions of chromosome 13 or abnormalities involving 11q and not with other karyotype abnormalities. Blood 86:4250–4256PubMedCrossRef Tricot G et al (1995) Poor prognosis in multiple myeloma is associated only with partial or complete deletions of chromosome 13 or abnormalities involving 11q and not with other karyotype abnormalities. Blood 86:4250–4256PubMedCrossRef
87.
Zurück zum Zitat Perrot A et al (2019) Development and validation of a cytogenetic prognostic index predicting survival in multiple myeloma. JCO 37(19):1657–1665CrossRef Perrot A et al (2019) Development and validation of a cytogenetic prognostic index predicting survival in multiple myeloma. JCO 37(19):1657–1665CrossRef
88.
Zurück zum Zitat Corre J et al (2021) del(17p) without TP53 mutation confers a poor prognosis in intensively treated newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 137(9):1192–1195PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Corre J et al (2021) del(17p) without TP53 mutation confers a poor prognosis in intensively treated newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 137(9):1192–1195PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
89.
90.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuiper R, et al. (2015) Prediction of high- and low-risk multiple myeloma based on gene expression and the International Staging System. Blood; 126(17): 1996-2004 Kuiper R, et al. (2015) Prediction of high- and low-risk multiple myeloma based on gene expression and the International Staging System. Blood; 126(17): 1996-2004
91.
92.
Zurück zum Zitat Usmani S et al (2021) Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without elotuzumab in patients with untreated, high-risk multiple myeloma (SWOG-1211): primary analysis of a randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol 8:e45–e54PubMedCrossRef Usmani S et al (2021) Bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without elotuzumab in patients with untreated, high-risk multiple myeloma (SWOG-1211): primary analysis of a randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol 8:e45–e54PubMedCrossRef
93.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaughnessy JD Jr et al (2007) A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1. Blood 109:2276–2284PubMedCrossRef Shaughnessy JD Jr et al (2007) A validated gene expression model of high-risk multiple myeloma is defined by deregulated expression of genes mapping to chromosome 1. Blood 109:2276–2284PubMedCrossRef
94.
Zurück zum Zitat Szalat R et al (2016) Gene expression profiles in myeloma: ready for the real word? CCR 22(22):5434–5442 Szalat R et al (2016) Gene expression profiles in myeloma: ready for the real word? CCR 22(22):5434–5442
95.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuiper R et al (2012) A gene expression signature for high-risk multiple myeloma. Leukemia 26:2406–2413PubMedCrossRef Kuiper R et al (2012) A gene expression signature for high-risk multiple myeloma. Leukemia 26:2406–2413PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Increasing genomic discovery in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: defining disease biology and its correlation to risk
verfasst von
Patrick Hagen
Mark Sellin
Stephanie Berg
Jiwang Zhang
Publikationsdatum
18.05.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Annals of Hematology / Ausgabe 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0939-5555
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-022-04856-1

Kompaktes Leitlinien-Wissen Innere Medizin (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

Mit medbee Pocketcards schnell und sicher entscheiden.
Leitlinien-Wissen kostenlos und immer griffbereit auf ihrem Desktop, Handy oder Tablet.

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Wenn die Asthma-Therapie an die Nebenniere geht

Auch unter einer Therapie mit inhalativen Kortikosteroiden kann es zu einer Nebenniereninsuffizienz kommen, wie eine kanadische Kasuistik veranschaulicht.

Junge Brustkrebspatientinnen zum Durchhalten motivieren

Patientinnen, die in jungen Jahren an Hormonrezeptor-positivem Brustkrebs erkranken, neigen dazu, die adjuvante endokrine Therapie auszusetzen oder abzubrechen. Die schlechte Therapiepersistenz scheint die Rückkehr des Tumors zu begünstigen.

Mehr Nierenkrebs bei regelmäßiger Einnahme von NSAR?

In der Allgemeinbevölkerung ist die wiederholte Verordnung von nichtsteroidalen Antirheumatika (NSAR) mit einem leicht erhöhten Nierenkrebsrisiko assoziiert. Dieses Ergebnis einer schwedischen Registerstudie ist allerdings mit einigen Fragezeichen zu versehen. 

Hochrisiko-Spinaliom am besten mit der Mohs-Chirurgie entfernen

Die Mohs-Chirurgie ist zwar mit mehr Aufwand verbunden als die herkömmliche Exzision; für die Versorgung kutaner Hochrisiko-Plattenepithelkarzinome lohnt sich die zeitintensive Technik aber in jedem Fall. Laut einer aktuellen Studie sinkt im Vergleich das Sterberisiko.

EKG Essentials: EKG befunden mit System (Link öffnet in neuem Fenster)

In diesem CME-Kurs können Sie Ihr Wissen zur EKG-Befundung anhand von zwölf Video-Tutorials auffrischen und 10 CME-Punkte sammeln.
Praxisnah, relevant und mit vielen Tipps & Tricks vom Profi.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.