Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 1/2018

07.07.2017 | Urogenital

Incremental diagnostic value of targeted biopsy using mpMRI-TRUS fusion versus 14-fragments prostatic biopsy: a prospective controlled study

verfasst von: Guilherme C. Mariotti, Priscila M. Falsarella, Rodrigo G. Garcia, Marcos R. G. Queiroz, Gustavo C. Lemos, Ronaldo H. Baroni

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the incremental diagnostic value of targeted biopsy using real-time multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasound (mpMRI-TRUS) fusion to conventional 14-cores biopsy.

Patients and Methods

Uni-institutional, institutional review board (IRB) approved prospective blinded study comparing TRUS-guided random and targeted biopsy using mpMRI-TRUS fusion, in 100 consecutive men. We included men with clinical-laboratorial suspicious for prostate cancer and Likert score ≥ 3 mp-MRI. Patients previously diagnosed with prostate cancer were excluded. All patients were submitted to 14-cores TRUS-guided biopsy (mpMRI data operator-blinded), followed by targeted biopsy using mpMRI-TRUS fusion.

Results

There was an overall increase in cancer detection rate, from 56% with random technique to 62% combining targeted biopsy using mpMRI-TRUS fusion; incremental diagnosis was even more relevant for clinically significant lesions (Gleason ≥ 7), diagnosing 10% more clinically significant lesions with fusion biopsy technique. Diagnosis upgrade occurred in 5 patients that would have negative results in random biopsies and had clinically significant tumours with the combined technique, and in 5 patients who had the diagnosis of significant tumours after fusion biopsy and clinically insignificant tumours in random biopsies(p=0.0010).

Conclusions

Targeted biopsy using mpMRI-TRUS fusion has incremental diagnostic value in comparison to conventional random biopsy, better detecting clinically significant prostate cancers.

Key Points

mpMRI-TRUS targeted biopsy increases overall cancer detection rate, but not statistically significant.
mpMRI-TRUS targeted biopsy actually improves the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa.
There was no evidence to acquire the mpMRI-TRUS fusion cores alone.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas GP, Delongchamps N, Brawley OW, Wang CY et al (2008) The worldwide epidemiology of prostate cancer: perspectives from autopsy studies. Can J Urol 15:3866–3871PubMedPubMedCentral Haas GP, Delongchamps N, Brawley OW, Wang CY et al (2008) The worldwide epidemiology of prostate cancer: perspectives from autopsy studies. Can J Urol 15:3866–3871PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK et al (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71–74CrossRefPubMed Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Terris MK et al (1989) Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol 142:71–74CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Portalez D, Mozer P, Cornud F et al (2012) Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. Eur Urol 62:986–996CrossRefPubMed Portalez D, Mozer P, Cornud F et al (2012) Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. Eur Urol 62:986–996CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Puech P, Rouviere O, Renard-Penna R et al (2013) Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy--prospective multicenter study. Radiology 268:461–469CrossRefPubMed Puech P, Rouviere O, Renard-Penna R et al (2013) Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy--prospective multicenter study. Radiology 268:461–469CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonn GA, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ et al (2013) Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. J Urol 189:86–91CrossRefPubMed Sonn GA, Natarajan S, Margolis DJ et al (2013) Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. J Urol 189:86–91CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG et al (2012) Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol 62(5):902–909CrossRefPubMed Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG et al (2012) Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. Eur Urol 62(5):902–909CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP et al (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269:482–492CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Kim S, Lim RP et al (2013) Prostate cancer localization using multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and Likert scales. Radiology 269:482–492CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Costa DN, Lotan Y, Rofsky NM et al (2016) Assessment of Prospectively Assigned Likert Scores for Targeted MR Imaging-Transrectal US Fusion Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer. J Urol 195(1):80–87CrossRefPubMed Costa DN, Lotan Y, Rofsky NM et al (2016) Assessment of Prospectively Assigned Likert Scores for Targeted MR Imaging-Transrectal US Fusion Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer. J Urol 195(1):80–87CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Dirk B, Axel W, Bernd H et al (2005) MR Imaging–guided Prostate Biopsy with a Closed MR Unit at 1.5 T: Initial Results. Radiology 234(2):576–5CrossRef Dirk B, Axel W, Bernd H et al (2005) MR Imaging–guided Prostate Biopsy with a Closed MR Unit at 1.5 T: Initial Results. Radiology 234(2):576–5CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiard G, Hohn N, Descotes JL et al (2013) Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer: initial clinical experience with real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance and magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. Urology 81:1372–1378CrossRefPubMed Fiard G, Hohn N, Descotes JL et al (2013) Targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer: initial clinical experience with real-time 3-dimensional transrectal ultrasound guidance and magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound image fusion. Urology 81:1372–1378CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol 64:713–719CrossRefPubMed Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H et al (2013) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy. Eur Urol 64:713–719CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S et al (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. Eur Urol 64:544–552CrossRefPubMed Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, Eggener S et al (2013) Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. Eur Urol 64:544–552CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, Egevad L, Grading Committee ISUP (2005) The 2005 International Society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, Egevad L, Grading Committee ISUP (2005) The 2005 International Society of urological pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB (1994) Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 271:368–374CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB (1994) Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 271:368–374CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B et al (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313:390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B et al (2015) Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA 313:390–397CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Presti JCJ, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW (2003) Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 169:125–129CrossRefPubMed Presti JCJ, O'Dowd GJ, Miller MC, Mattu R, Veltri RW (2003) Extended peripheral zone biopsy schemes increase cancer detection rates and minimize variance in prostate specific antigen and age related cancer rates: results of a community multi-practice study. J Urol 169:125–129CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright JL, Ellis WJ (2006) Improved prostate cancer detection with anterior apical prostate biopsies. Urol Oncol 24:492–495CrossRefPubMed Wright JL, Ellis WJ (2006) Improved prostate cancer detection with anterior apical prostate biopsies. Urol Oncol 24:492–495CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A et al (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):126–131CrossRefPubMed Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A et al (2010) Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 28(1):126–131CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bul M (2012) vanden Bergh RC, Zhu X, et al. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110(11):1672–1677CrossRefPubMed Bul M (2012) vanden Bergh RC, Zhu X, et al. Outcomes of initially expectantly managed patients with low or intermediate risk screen-detected localized prostate cancer. BJU Int 110(11):1672–1677CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Incremental diagnostic value of targeted biopsy using mpMRI-TRUS fusion versus 14-fragments prostatic biopsy: a prospective controlled study
verfasst von
Guilherme C. Mariotti
Priscila M. Falsarella
Rodrigo G. Garcia
Marcos R. G. Queiroz
Gustavo C. Lemos
Ronaldo H. Baroni
Publikationsdatum
07.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4939-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

European Radiology 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.