Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgery 4/2018

06.03.2017 | Original Article

Indications and Outcomes of Re-Exploratory Laparotomy in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation—Single-Center Experience of 1352 Consecutive Liver Transplantations from Indian Subcontinent

verfasst von: Selvakumar Naganathan, Subash Gupta

Erschienen in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Liver transplantation (LT) is the gold standard for end-stage liver disease (Prince Postgrad Med J 78:135–141, 2002). LT is a technically demanding operation. It needs experienced surgical team along with good anesthesia and critical care support (David et al. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 17:1–18, 1988). Survival after LT is approximately 90% at 1 year. Unlike other organs, 1 and 10-year survival for liver transplantation are the same (Jain and Reyes Ann Surg 232(4):490–500, 2000). Complications after LT are classified into technical, infective, and immunological (Moon and Lee Gut Liver 3(3):145–165, 2009). Re-exploratory laparotomy (REL) is one of the surgical complications of LT. Our study was aimed at analyzing the indications and impact of REL on the patient outcomes after living donor liver transplantation in our center. Retrospective analysis of all LTs done at our center by the same surgical team from January 1 2011 to June 30 2016 was included in the study. Pediatric transplants, combined liver kidney transplants, cadaveric transplants, planned REL, and re-transplantations were excluded from the study. Re-explored patients (REL) were classified as study group, and non-re-explored (NREL) patients were used as controls for statistical comparison. Twenty-five parameters (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) between the two groups were studied. SPSS 22 statistical software was used for statistical analysis. The total number of LT during the study period was 1352. After exclusion, 1241 patients were in the study group. REL group had 111 patients. Out of 111 patients, 97 had one REL, 13 patients had two RELs, and 1 had three RELs. Hence, there were 126 RELs in 111 patients. NREL group had 1140 patients. REL rate in our series was 10.02%. On univariate analysis of 25 parameters analyzed between the two groups, age, graft weight, multiple bile ducts, and mortality were found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05). Preoperative total leucocyte count, model for end-stage liver disease, and warm ischemia time were statistically significant (P < 0.1). On subgroup analysis of REL, bleeding was the commonest indication followed by intraabdominal sepsis. Delayed non-function and small for size had high mortality rates. Multiple RELs were associated with higher mortality compared to single REL (P < 0.05). REL is associated with poor prognosis after adult living donor liver transplantation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Prince MI, Hudson M (2002) Liver transplantation for chronic liver disease: advances and controversies in an era of organ shortages. Postgrad Med J 78:135–141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prince MI, Hudson M (2002) Liver transplantation for chronic liver disease: advances and controversies in an era of organ shortages. Postgrad Med J 78:135–141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao G-Q, Song J-L, Shen S, Yang J-Y, Yan L-N (2014) Living donor liver transplantation does not increase tumor recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to deceased donor transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 20(31):10953–10959CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xiao G-Q, Song J-L, Shen S, Yang J-Y, Yan L-N (2014) Living donor liver transplantation does not increase tumor recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to deceased donor transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 20(31):10953–10959CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Park G-C, Song G-W, Moon D-B, Lee S-G (2016) A review of current status of living donor liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5(2):107–117PubMedPubMedCentral Park G-C, Song G-W, Moon D-B, Lee S-G (2016) A review of current status of living donor liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5(2):107–117PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamel MB, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Daley J (2005) Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(3):424–429CrossRefPubMed Hamel MB, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Daley J (2005) Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(3):424–429CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcus Bahra, Peter Neuhaus (2011) Liver transplantation in the high MELD era: a fair chance for everyone? Volume 396, Issue 4, pp 461–465 First online: 08 March 2011 Marcus Bahra, Peter Neuhaus (2011) Liver transplantation in the high MELD era: a fair chance for everyone? Volume 396, Issue 4, pp 461–465 First online: 08 March 2011
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang MF, Jin ZK, Chen DZ, Li XL, Zhao X, Fan H (2011) Risk factors of severe ischemic biliary complications after liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 10(4):374–379CrossRefPubMed Wang MF, Jin ZK, Chen DZ, Li XL, Zhao X, Fan H (2011) Risk factors of severe ischemic biliary complications after liver transplantation. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 10(4):374–379CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Salvalaggio PR, Whitington PF, Alonso EM, Superina RA (2005) Presence of multiple bile ducts in the liver graft increases the incidence of biliary complications in pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 11(2):161–166CrossRefPubMed Salvalaggio PR, Whitington PF, Alonso EM, Superina RA (2005) Presence of multiple bile ducts in the liver graft increases the incidence of biliary complications in pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 11(2):161–166CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JH, Ko GY, Sung KB (2008) Bile leak following living donor liver transplantation: clinical efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic treatment. Liver Transpl 14(8):1142–1149CrossRefPubMed Kim JH, Ko GY, Sung KB (2008) Bile leak following living donor liver transplantation: clinical efficacy of percutaneous transhepatic treatment. Liver Transpl 14(8):1142–1149CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Karimian N, op den Dries S, Robert J (2013) The origin of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: is it the amount of epithelial injury or insufficient regeneration that counts? Department of Surgery, Section of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen Karimian N, op den Dries S, Robert J (2013) The origin of biliary strictures after liver transplantation: is it the amount of epithelial injury or insufficient regeneration that counts? Department of Surgery, Section of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yanaga K, Shimada M, Robert D (1992) Pancreatic complications following orthotopic liver transplantation. Clin Transpl 6(2):126–130 Yanaga K, Shimada M, Robert D (1992) Pancreatic complications following orthotopic liver transplantation. Clin Transpl 6(2):126–130
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wahab MA, Shehta A, Hamed H, Elshobary M (2015) Hepatic venous outflow obstruction after living donor liver transplantation managed with ectopic placement of a foley catheter: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 10:65–68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wahab MA, Shehta A, Hamed H, Elshobary M (2015) Hepatic venous outflow obstruction after living donor liver transplantation managed with ectopic placement of a foley catheter: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 10:65–68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mourad MM, Liossis C, Gunson BK, Mergental H (2014) Etiology and management of hepatic artery thrombosis after adult liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 20(6):713–723CrossRefPubMed Mourad MM, Liossis C, Gunson BK, Mergental H (2014) Etiology and management of hepatic artery thrombosis after adult liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 20(6):713–723CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen MK, Campbell KM, Alonso MH (2013) Management and long-term consequences of portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation in children. Liver Transpl 19(3):315–321CrossRefPubMed Jensen MK, Campbell KM, Alonso MH (2013) Management and long-term consequences of portal vein thrombosis after liver transplantation in children. Liver Transpl 19(3):315–321CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahm F, Georgiev P, Clavien PA (2005) Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transplant 5(11):2605–2610CrossRefPubMed Dahm F, Georgiev P, Clavien PA (2005) Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transplant 5(11):2605–2610CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat David H, Thiel V, Makowka L, Starzl TE (1988) Liver transplantation: where it’s been and where it’s going. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 17:1–18 David H, Thiel V, Makowka L, Starzl TE (1988) Liver transplantation: where it’s been and where it’s going. Gastroenterol Clin N Am 17:1–18
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Jain A, Reyes J, Kashyap R (2000) Long-term survival after liver transplantation in 4,000 consecutive patients at a single center. Ann Surg 232(4):490–500CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jain A, Reyes J, Kashyap R (2000) Long-term survival after liver transplantation in 4,000 consecutive patients at a single center. Ann Surg 232(4):490–500CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Indications and Outcomes of Re-Exploratory Laparotomy in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation—Single-Center Experience of 1352 Consecutive Liver Transplantations from Indian Subcontinent
verfasst von
Selvakumar Naganathan
Subash Gupta
Publikationsdatum
06.03.2017
Verlag
Springer India
Erschienen in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Elektronische ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1606-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Indian Journal of Surgery 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Images in Surgery

Grey Turner’s Sign

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.