Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 5/2010

01.05.2010 | Breast

Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis—analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures

verfasst von: Fritz K. W. Schaefer, A. Waldmann, A. Katalinic, C. Wefelnberg, M. Heller, W. Jonat, I. Schreer

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the value of a breast ultrasound (US) examination in addition to mammography in cases of American College of Radiology (ACR) tissue pattern III and IV in symptomatic women and women at risk.

Materials and methods

A prospective cohort was initiated between 2001 and 2005 with a total of 59,514 patients and 102,744 mammograms. Documentation was available for 102,557 diagnostic procedures. Breast US was indicated in all women with ACR III and IV in addition to a suspicious clinical examination and in cases of masses and focal asymmetries in mammography.

Results

In total, 62,006 additional USs were performed, in which 116 mammographically and clinically occult breast cancers were diagnosed (detection rate: 1.9/1,000 examinations), while mammography alone (40,551 examinations) revealed 903 cancers (22.3/1,000). Of all 1,019 breast cancer findings, 12.8% were detected because of the combination of mammography and US. In the group with ACR III/IV, 15.9% of cancers were found by supplemental US compared with mammography alone.

Conclusion

The addition of US to mammography vs. mammography alone resulted in a significant (P < 0.01) increase in breast cancer detection rate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE (2002) Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomized trials. Lancet 359:909–919CrossRefPubMed Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE (2002) Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomized trials. Lancet 359:909–919CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R (1982) Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 69:349–355PubMed Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R (1982) Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 69:349–355PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabar L, Fagerberg C, Gad A, et al (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomized trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1:829–832CrossRefPubMed Tabar L, Fagerberg C, Gad A, et al (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomized trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1:829–832CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Roberts MM, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ et al (1990) Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet 335:241–246CrossRefPubMed Roberts MM, Alexander FE, Anderson TJ et al (1990) Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet 335:241–246CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184:613–617PubMed Bird RE, Wallace TW, Yankaskas BC (1992) Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. Radiology 184:613–617PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland R, Hendriks JH, Mravunac M (1983) Mammographically occult breast cancer: a pathologic and radiologic study. Cancer 52:1810–1819CrossRefPubMed Holland R, Hendriks JH, Mravunac M (1983) Mammographically occult breast cancer: a pathologic and radiologic study. Cancer 52:1810–1819CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF (1992) Case control study factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:781–785CrossRefPubMed Ma L, Fishell E, Wright B, Hanna W, Allan S, Boyd NF (1992) Case control study factors associated with failure to detect breast cancer by mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:781–785CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Radiology (1998) Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA American College of Radiology (1998) Illustrated Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 3rd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL et al (2007) Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:386–395CrossRefPubMed Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL et al (2007) Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:386–395CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Guo M, Martin LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–336CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF, Guo M, Martin LJ et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:227–336CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ et al (1999) Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer among subjects with a family history of this disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1404–1408CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ et al (1999) Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer among subjects with a family history of this disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1404–1408CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US – diagnostic yield and tumour characteristics. Radiology 207:191–199PubMed Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (1998) Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US – diagnostic yield and tumour characteristics. Radiology 207:191–199PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchberger W, De Koekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Düsner M (1999) Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:921–927PubMed Buchberger W, De Koekkoek-Doll P, Springer P, Obrist P, Düsner M (1999) Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:921–927PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan SS (2001) Clinical utility of bilateral whole breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221:641–649CrossRefPubMed Kaplan SS (2001) Clinical utility of bilateral whole breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue. Radiology 221:641–649CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Katalinic A, Bartel C, Raspe H, Schreer I (2007) Beyond mammography screening: quality assurance in breast cancer diagnosis (the QuaMaDi Project). Br J Cancer 96:157–161CrossRefPubMed Katalinic A, Bartel C, Raspe H, Schreer I (2007) Beyond mammography screening: quality assurance in breast cancer diagnosis (the QuaMaDi Project). Br J Cancer 96:157–161CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gotzsche PC, Olsen O (2000) Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 355:129–134CrossRefPubMed Gotzsche PC, Olsen O (2000) Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? Lancet 355:129–134CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001) Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358:1340–1342CrossRefPubMed Olsen O, Gotzsche PC (2001) Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography. Lancet 358:1340–1342CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731CrossRefPubMed Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA (2001) Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer 91:1724–1731CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175CrossRefPubMed Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH (2002) Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27825 patient evaluations. Radiology 225:165–175CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ (2003) Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:177–182PubMed Crystal P, Strano SD, Shcharynski S, Koretz MJ (2003) Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:177–182PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutter CM, Mandelson MT, Laya MB, Seger DJ, Talpin S (2001) Changes in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormonal replacement therapy. JAMA 285:171–176CrossRefPubMed Rutter CM, Mandelson MT, Laya MB, Seger DJ, Talpin S (2001) Changes in breast density associated with initiation, discontinuation, and continuing use of hormonal replacement therapy. JAMA 285:171–176CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al (2006) Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med (Torino) 111:440–448CrossRef Corsetti V, Ferrari A, Ghirardi M et al (2006) Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammographically occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts. Radiol Med (Torino) 111:440–448CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg W, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening US and mammography vs. mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299:2151–2163CrossRefPubMed Berg W, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening US and mammography vs. mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299:2151–2163CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis—analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures
verfasst von
Fritz K. W. Schaefer
A. Waldmann
A. Katalinic
C. Wefelnberg
M. Heller
W. Jonat
I. Schreer
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1641-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2010

European Radiology 5/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.