Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 3/2018

02.11.2017 | Original Paper

Influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vivo

verfasst von: Tobias Härle, Mareike Luz, Sven Meyer, Felix Vahldiek, Pim van der Harst, Randy van Dijk, Daan Ties, Javier Escaned, Justin Davies, Albrecht Elsässer

Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

An influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vitro was recently reported. We sought to analyze the influence of hydrostatic pressure, caused by the height difference between the distal and proximal pressure sensor after guidewire positioning in the interrogated vessel, on intracoronary pressure measurements in vivo.

Methods and results

In 30 coronary stenoses, intracoronary pressure measurements were performed in supine, left, and right lateral patient position. Height differences between the distal and proximal pressure sensor were measured by blinded observers. Measurement results of the position with the highest (“high”) and lowest height difference (“low”) were compared. In group “high”, all measured indices were higher: mean difference of fractional flow reserve (FFR) 0.045 (SD 0.033, 95% CI 0.033–0.057, p < 0.0001), of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) 0.043 (SD 0.04, 95% CI 0.029–0.057, p < 0.0001), and of resting Pd/Pa 0.037 (SD 0.034, 95% CI 0.025–0.049, p < 0.0001). Addition of the physically expectable hydrostatic pressure to the distal coronary pressures of the control group abolished the differences: corrected ∆FFR − 0.006 (SD 0.027, 95% CI − 0.015 to 0.004, p = 0.26), corrected ∆Pd/Pa − 0.008 (SD 0.03, 95% CI − 0.019 to 0.003, p = 0.18). Adjustment for hydrostatic pressure of FFR values in a standard supine position increased all values in anterior vessels and decreased all values in posterior vessels. The mean changes of FFR due to adjustment were: LAD − 0.048 (SD 0.016), CX 0.02 (SD 0.009), RCA 0.02 (SD 0.021). Dichotomous severity classification changed in 12.9% of stenoses.

Conclusions

The study demonstrates a relevant influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vivo, caused by the height differences between distal and proximal pressure sensor.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, el Gamal MI (1995) Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 92:3183–3193CrossRefPubMed Pijls NH, Van Gelder B, Van der Voort P, Peels K, Bracke FA, Bonnier HJ, el Gamal MI (1995) Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 92:3183–3193CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE (2012) Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (adenosine vasodilator independent stenosis evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1392–1402 Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE (2012) Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (adenosine vasodilator independent stenosis evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1392–1402
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Härle T, Bojara W, Meyer S, Elsässer A (2015) Comparison of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)—first real world experience. Int J Cardiol 199:1–7CrossRefPubMed Härle T, Bojara W, Meyer S, Elsässer A (2015) Comparison of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)—first real world experience. Int J Cardiol 199:1–7CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Härle T, Meyer S, Bojara W, Vahldiek F, Elsässer A (2017) Intracoronary pressure measurement differences between anterior and posterior coronary territories. Herz 42:395–402CrossRefPubMed Härle T, Meyer S, Bojara W, Vahldiek F, Elsässer A (2017) Intracoronary pressure measurement differences between anterior and posterior coronary territories. Herz 42:395–402CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Härle T, Luz M, Meyer S, Kronberg K, Nickau B, Escaned J, Davies J, Elsässer A (2017) Effect of coronary anatomy and hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:764–773CrossRefPubMed Härle T, Luz M, Meyer S, Kronberg K, Nickau B, Escaned J, Davies J, Elsässer A (2017) Effect of coronary anatomy and hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 10:764–773CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Härle T, Zeymer U, Hochadel M, Zahn R, Kerber S, Zrenner B, Schächinger V, Lauer B, Runde T, Elsässer A (2017) Real-world use of fractional flow reserve in Germany: results of the prospective ALKK coronary angiography and PCI registry. Clin Res Cardiol 106:140–150CrossRefPubMed Härle T, Zeymer U, Hochadel M, Zahn R, Kerber S, Zrenner B, Schächinger V, Lauer B, Runde T, Elsässer A (2017) Real-world use of fractional flow reserve in Germany: results of the prospective ALKK coronary angiography and PCI registry. Clin Res Cardiol 106:140–150CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Härle T, Meyer S, Vahldiek F, Elsässer A (2016) Differences between automatically detected and steady-state fractional flow reserve. Clin Res Cardiol 105:127–134CrossRefPubMed Härle T, Meyer S, Vahldiek F, Elsässer A (2016) Differences between automatically detected and steady-state fractional flow reserve. Clin Res Cardiol 105:127–134CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, Garg S, Huber K, James S, Knuuti J, Lopez-Sendon J, Marco J, Menicanti L, Ostojic M, Piepoli MF, Pirlet C, Pomar JL, Reifart N, Ribichini FL, Schalij MJ, Sergeant P, Serruys PW, Silber S, Sousa Uva M, Taggart D (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 31:2501–2555CrossRefPubMed Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, Garg S, Huber K, James S, Knuuti J, Lopez-Sendon J, Marco J, Menicanti L, Ostojic M, Piepoli MF, Pirlet C, Pomar JL, Reifart N, Ribichini FL, Schalij MJ, Sergeant P, Serruys PW, Silber S, Sousa Uva M, Taggart D (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 31:2501–2555CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Petraco R, Escaned J, Sen S, Nijjer S, Asrress KN, Echavarria-Pinto M, Lockie T, Khawaja MZ, Cuevas C, Foin N, Broyd C, Foale RA, Hadjiloizou N, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Sethi A, Kaprielian R, Baker CS, Lefroy D, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Khan MA, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Mayet J, Di Mario C, Redwood S, Davies JE (2013) Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry. EuroIntervention 9:91–101CrossRefPubMed Petraco R, Escaned J, Sen S, Nijjer S, Asrress KN, Echavarria-Pinto M, Lockie T, Khawaja MZ, Cuevas C, Foin N, Broyd C, Foale RA, Hadjiloizou N, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Sethi A, Kaprielian R, Baker CS, Lefroy D, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Khan MA, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Mayet J, Di Mario C, Redwood S, Davies JE (2013) Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry. EuroIntervention 9:91–101CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobayashi Y, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Yang HM, Lim HS, Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Investigators FS (2016) The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: insights from the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) trial. Int J Cardiol 204:206–210CrossRef Kobayashi Y, Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Yang HM, Lim HS, Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Investigators FS (2016) The impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on fractional flow reserve: insights from the FAME (fractional flow reserve versus angiography for multivessel evaluation) trial. Int J Cardiol 204:206–210CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinghofer-Szalkay H (1986) Method of high-precision microsample blood and plasma mass densitometry. J Appl Physiol (1985) 60:1082–1088CrossRef Hinghofer-Szalkay H (1986) Method of high-precision microsample blood and plasma mass densitometry. J Appl Physiol (1985) 60:1082–1088CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinghofer-Szalkay H (1985) Volume and density changes of biological fluids with temperature. J Appl Physiol (1985) 59:1686–1689CrossRef Hinghofer-Szalkay H (1985) Volume and density changes of biological fluids with temperature. J Appl Physiol (1985) 59:1686–1689CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hinghofer-Szalkay H, Greenleaf JE (1987) Continuous monitoring of blood volume changes in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 63:1003–1007CrossRef Hinghofer-Szalkay H, Greenleaf JE (1987) Continuous monitoring of blood volume changes in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985) 63:1003–1007CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Petraco R, Sen S, Nijjer S, Echavarria-Pinto M, Escaned J, Francis DP, Davies JE (2013) Fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization: practical implications of a diagnostic gray zone and measurement variability on clinical decisions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:222–225CrossRefPubMed Petraco R, Sen S, Nijjer S, Echavarria-Pinto M, Escaned J, Francis DP, Davies JE (2013) Fractional flow reserve-guided revascularization: practical implications of a diagnostic gray zone and measurement variability on clinical decisions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:222–225CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wunderlich W, Roehrig B, Fischer F, Arntz HR, Agrawal R, Morguet A, Schultheiss HP, Horstkotte D (1998) The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Card Imaging 14:217 – 27CrossRefPubMed Wunderlich W, Roehrig B, Fischer F, Arntz HR, Agrawal R, Morguet A, Schultheiss HP, Horstkotte D (1998) The impact of vessel and catheter position on the measurement accuracy in catheter-based quantitative coronary angiography. Int J Card Imaging 14:217 – 27CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Emerson RJ, Banasik JL (1994) Effect of position on selected hemodynamic parameters in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Am J Crit Care 3:289 – 99PubMed Emerson RJ, Banasik JL (1994) Effect of position on selected hemodynamic parameters in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Am J Crit Care 3:289 – 99PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Potger KC, Elliott D (1994) Reproducibility of central venous pressures in supine and lateral positions: a pilot evaluation of the phlebostatic axis in critically ill patients. Heart Lung 23:285–299 Potger KC, Elliott D (1994) Reproducibility of central venous pressures in supine and lateral positions: a pilot evaluation of the phlebostatic axis in critically ill patients. Heart Lung 23:285–299
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL (1993) Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 87:1354–1367CrossRefPubMed Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, De Bruyne B, Gould KL (1993) Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial, and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 87:1354–1367CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, Paulus WJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W (1994) Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation 89:1013–1022CrossRefPubMed De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, Paulus WJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W (1994) Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation 89:1013–1022CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Layland J, Wilson AM, Whitbourn RJ, Burns AT, Somaratne J, Leitl G, Macisaac AI (2013) Impact of right atrial pressure on decision-making using fractional flow reserve (FFR) in elective percutaneous intervention. Int J Cardiol 167:951–953CrossRefPubMed Layland J, Wilson AM, Whitbourn RJ, Burns AT, Somaratne J, Leitl G, Macisaac AI (2013) Impact of right atrial pressure on decision-making using fractional flow reserve (FFR) in elective percutaneous intervention. Int J Cardiol 167:951–953CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of hydrostatic pressure on intracoronary indices of stenosis severity in vivo
verfasst von
Tobias Härle
Mareike Luz
Sven Meyer
Felix Vahldiek
Pim van der Harst
Randy van Dijk
Daan Ties
Javier Escaned
Justin Davies
Albrecht Elsässer
Publikationsdatum
02.11.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-017-1174-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Clinical Research in Cardiology 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.