Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Radiological Physics and Technology 3/2019

25.07.2019

Influence of image noise and object size on segmentation accuracy of FDG-PET imaging: a phantom experiment

verfasst von: Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Tatsuya Tsuchitani, Noriko Kotoura, Kazuhiro Kitajima

Erschienen in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the influence of noise and object size on segmentation accuracy of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging. The scanned data of spherical phantoms were used. For the gradient method, 40% maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) method, and SUV of 2.5 threshold method, we evaluated the correlation between segmentation accuracy and background variability and that between segmentation accuracy and sphere diameters. For the gradient method, background variability did not affect segmentation accuracy, but sphere diameters had a small effect. As for the 40% SUVmax threshold method, both sphere diameters and background variability affected the segmentation accuracy. In the SUV of 2.5 threshold method, segmentation accuracy was affected by sphere diameters but not by background variability. With regard to segmentation accuracy of FDG-PET imaging, the gradient method may be more accurate and reliable compared to threshold methods when applied to images with varying noise or object size.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF. Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology. 2006;238:405–22.CrossRef von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF. Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology. 2006;238:405–22.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1773–82.CrossRefPubMed Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1773–82.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Basu S, Zaidi H, Holm S, Alavi A. Quantitative techniques in PET-CT imaging. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2011;7:216–33.CrossRef Basu S, Zaidi H, Holm S, Alavi A. Quantitative techniques in PET-CT imaging. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2011;7:216–33.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, Graham MM, Karp J, Lammertsma AA, et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1059–66.PubMed Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, Graham MM, Karp J, Lammertsma AA, et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1059–66.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugawara Y, Zasadny K, Neuhoff A, Wahl R. Re-evaluation of the standardized uptake value for FDG: variations with body weight and methods for correction. Radiology. 1999;213:521–5.CrossRefPubMed Sugawara Y, Zasadny K, Neuhoff A, Wahl R. Re-evaluation of the standardized uptake value for FDG: variations with body weight and methods for correction. Radiology. 1999;213:521–5.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaulieu S, Kinahan P, Tseng J, Dunnwald LK, Schubert EK, Pham P, et al. SUV varies with time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1044–50.PubMed Beaulieu S, Kinahan P, Tseng J, Dunnwald LK, Schubert EK, Pham P, et al. SUV varies with time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:1044–50.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Srinivas SM, Dhurairaj T, Basu S, Bural G, Surti S, Alavi A. A recovery coefficient method for partial volume correction of PET images. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:341–8.CrossRefPubMed Srinivas SM, Dhurairaj T, Basu S, Bural G, Surti S, Alavi A. A recovery coefficient method for partial volume correction of PET images. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:341–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:932–45.CrossRefPubMed Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:932–45.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S–50S.CrossRefPubMed Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(Suppl 1):122S–50S.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitajima K, Doi H, Kuribayashi K, Hashimoto M, Tsuchitani T, Tanooka M, et al. Prognostic value of pretreatment volume-based quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Radiol. 2017;86:176–83.CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Doi H, Kuribayashi K, Hashimoto M, Tsuchitani T, Tanooka M, et al. Prognostic value of pretreatment volume-based quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur J Radiol. 2017;86:176–83.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitajima K, Miyoshi Y, Yamano T, Odawara S, Higuchi T, Yamakado K. Prognostic value of FDG-PET and DWI in breast cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2018;32:44–53.CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Miyoshi Y, Yamano T, Odawara S, Higuchi T, Yamakado K. Prognostic value of FDG-PET and DWI in breast cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 2018;32:44–53.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Geets X, Lee JA, Bol A, Lonneux M, Grégoire V. A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1427–38.CrossRefPubMed Geets X, Lee JA, Bol A, Lonneux M, Grégoire V. A gradient-based method for segmenting FDG-PET images: methodology and validation. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1427–38.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner-Wasik M, Nelson AD, Choi W, Arai Y, Faulhaber PF, Kang P, et al. What is the best way to contour lung tumors on PET scans? Multiobserver validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC digital PET phantom. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:1164–71.CrossRefPubMed Werner-Wasik M, Nelson AD, Choi W, Arai Y, Faulhaber PF, Kang P, et al. What is the best way to contour lung tumors on PET scans? Multiobserver validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC digital PET phantom. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:1164–71.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Foster B, Bagci U, Mansoor A, Xu Z, Mollura DJ. A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images. Comput Biol Med. 2014;50:76–96.CrossRefPubMed Foster B, Bagci U, Mansoor A, Xu Z, Mollura DJ. A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images. Comput Biol Med. 2014;50:76–96.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Surti S, Kuhn A, Werner ME, et al. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:471–80.PubMed Surti S, Kuhn A, Werner ME, et al. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:471–80.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong R, Halama J, Bova D, Sethi A, Emami B. Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:720–6.CrossRefPubMed Hong R, Halama J, Bova D, Sethi A, Emami B. Correlation of PET standard uptake value and CT window-level thresholds for target delineation in CT-based radiation treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:720–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Ling CC, Rosenzweig KE, Schoder H, Larson SM, et al. Effect of respiratory gating on quantifying PET images of lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:876–81.PubMed Nehmeh SA, Erdi YE, Ling CC, Rosenzweig KE, Schoder H, Larson SM, et al. Effect of respiratory gating on quantifying PET images of lung cancer. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:876–81.PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of image noise and object size on segmentation accuracy of FDG-PET imaging: a phantom experiment
verfasst von
Yoshiyuki Takahashi
Tatsuya Tsuchitani
Noriko Kotoura
Kazuhiro Kitajima
Publikationsdatum
25.07.2019
Verlag
Springer Singapore
Erschienen in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-019-00525-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Radiological Physics and Technology 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.