Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1/2018

14.10.2017 | Glaucoma

Influence of LASEK on Schiøtz, Goldmann and dynamic contour Tonometry

verfasst von: Marco Sales-Sanz, Esther Arranz-Marquez, Carolina Arruabarrena, Miguel A. Teus

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Our purpose was to assess the effect of LASEK surgery on ocular rigidity and to compare its effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) readings with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), Schiøtz indentation tonometry (ST) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT).

Methods

Prospective, observational, single-masked cohort study. One eye per patient from 31 consecutive subjects who underwent LASEK refractive surgery to correct myopia, as well as from 108 non-operated myopic patients, were included. IOP was measured using GAT, DCT, and ST. The coefficient of ocular rigidity (Ko) was obtained from the regression line of the three readings obtained with each weight of the ST. Linear multiple regression analysis was performed with dummy variables to assess the effect of age, central corneal thickness (CCT), and previous refractive surgery on IOP values.

Results

Age, CCT, and LASEK surgery explained 23% of the IOP readings with GAT, 11% with DCT, and had no significant influence on ST readings. The IOP readings obtained with GAT and DCT, but not with ST, were significantly different between LASEK and control groups. Significant differences in Ko were observed between LASEK (0.014 mmHg/μL ±0.007) and control groups (0.021 mmHg/μL ±0.013) (P = 0.001). Ko values were not related with age or CCT, in either LASEK or control groups.

Conclusions

ST readings seems to be less affected by LASEK surgery than the other tonometers evaluated. There is a difference in the ocular rigidity between the control and the LASEK eyes that it is not correlated with CCT, so it seems that ST can detect changes in the biomechanical behavior of the LASEK operated corneas.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1–30CrossRefPubMed Whitacre MM, Stein R (1993) Sources of error with use of Goldmann-type tonometers. Surv Ophthalmol 38:1–30CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367–408CrossRefPubMed Doughty MJ, Zaman ML (2000) Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 44:367–408CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang DH, Stulting RD (2005) Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK: the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap. Ophthalmology 112:1009–1016CrossRefPubMed Chang DH, Stulting RD (2005) Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK: the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap. Ophthalmology 112:1009–1016CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schallhorn JM, Schallhorn SC, Ou Y (2015) Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study. Ophthalmology 122:471–479CrossRefPubMed Schallhorn JM, Schallhorn SC, Ou Y (2015) Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study. Ophthalmology 122:471–479CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Teus MA, De Benito-Llopis L, Sanchez-Pina JM (2007) LASEK versus LASIK for the correction of moderate myopia. Optom Vis Sci 84:605–610CrossRefPubMed Teus MA, De Benito-Llopis L, Sanchez-Pina JM (2007) LASEK versus LASIK for the correction of moderate myopia. Optom Vis Sci 84:605–610CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jòhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Koskela T, Lindèn C (2012) Change in intraocular pressure measurement 2 years after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1637–1642CrossRefPubMed Jòhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Koskela T, Lindèn C (2012) Change in intraocular pressure measurement 2 years after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:1637–1642CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2003) Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3790–3794CrossRefPubMed Kaufmann C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA (2003) Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44:3790–3794CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Han KE, Kim H, Kim NR, Jun I, Kim EK, Kim TI (2013) Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:888–897CrossRefPubMed Han KE, Kim H, Kim NR, Jun I, Kim EK, Kim TI (2013) Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:888–897CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Aristeidou AP, Labiris G, Katsanos A, Fanariotis M, Foudoulakis NC, Kozobolis VP (2011) Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:767–773CrossRefPubMed Aristeidou AP, Labiris G, Katsanos A, Fanariotis M, Foudoulakis NC, Kozobolis VP (2011) Comparison between Pascal dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer after different types of refractive surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:767–773CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel H, Gilmartin B, Cubbidge RP, Logan NS (2011) In vivo measurement of regional variation in anterior scleral resistance to Schiotz indentation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31:437–443CrossRefPubMed Patel H, Gilmartin B, Cubbidge RP, Logan NS (2011) In vivo measurement of regional variation in anterior scleral resistance to Schiotz indentation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 31:437–443CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen MJ, Wertheim GJ (1963) A technique for the use of the Schiotz tonometer on the sclera. J Am Optom Assoc 34:956–960 Allen MJ, Wertheim GJ (1963) A technique for the use of the Schiotz tonometer on the sclera. J Am Optom Assoc 34:956–960
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedenwald JS (1937) Contribution to the theory and practice of tonometry. Am J Ophththalmol 20:985–1024CrossRef Friedenwald JS (1937) Contribution to the theory and practice of tonometry. Am J Ophththalmol 20:985–1024CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Regev G, Harris A, Siesky B et al (2011) Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and dynamic contour Tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 20:282–286CrossRefPubMed Regev G, Harris A, Siesky B et al (2011) Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and dynamic contour Tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma 20:282–286CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu J, Roberts CJ (2005) Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:146–155CrossRefPubMed Liu J, Roberts CJ (2005) Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 31:146–155CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Mahmoud AM, Yoon EY, Roberts CJ, Pepose JS (2009) Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1774–1788CrossRefPubMed Qazi MA, Sanderson JP, Mahmoud AM, Yoon EY, Roberts CJ, Pepose JS (2009) Postoperative changes in intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical metrics. Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:1774–1788CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rehany U, Bersudsky V, Rumelt S (2000) Paradoxical hypotony after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1823–1826CrossRefPubMed Rehany U, Bersudsky V, Rumelt S (2000) Paradoxical hypotony after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:1823–1826CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Stepanik J (1980) Why is the Schiötz tonometer not suitable for measuring intraocular pressure? Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 176:61–66CrossRefPubMed Stepanik J (1980) Why is the Schiötz tonometer not suitable for measuring intraocular pressure? Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 176:61–66CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Wheeler NC, Lee D, Cheng Q, Ross WF, Hadjiaghai L (1998) Reproducibility of intraocular pressure and outflow facility measured by pneumatic tonography and Schiotz tonography. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 14:5–13CrossRefPubMed Wheeler NC, Lee D, Cheng Q, Ross WF, Hadjiaghai L (1998) Reproducibility of intraocular pressure and outflow facility measured by pneumatic tonography and Schiotz tonography. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 14:5–13CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Huseynova T, Waring GO 4th, Roberts C, Krueger RR, Tomita M (2014) Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and Pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 157:885–893CrossRefPubMed Huseynova T, Waring GO 4th, Roberts C, Krueger RR, Tomita M (2014) Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and Pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 157:885–893CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X (2014) Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg 30:310–318CrossRefPubMed Shen Y, Chen Z, Knorz MC, Li M, Zhao J, Zhou X (2014) Comparison of corneal deformation parameters after SMILE, LASEK, and Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. J Refract Surg 30:310–318CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Ginis HS, Kounis GA, Tsilimbaris MK (2005) Ocular rigidity in living human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:409–414CrossRefPubMed Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Ginis HS, Kounis GA, Tsilimbaris MK (2005) Ocular rigidity in living human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46:409–414CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Piñero DP, Alcón N (2014) In vivo characterization of corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:870–887CrossRefPubMed Piñero DP, Alcón N (2014) In vivo characterization of corneal biomechanics. J Cataract Refract Surg 40:870–887CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I (2007) Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3026–3031CrossRefPubMed Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Bhojwani R, Mantry S, Cunliffe I (2007) Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48:3026–3031CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong J, Xu J, Wei A et al (2013) A new Tonometer the Corvis ST Tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann Applanation Tonometers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:659–665CrossRefPubMed Hong J, Xu J, Wei A et al (2013) A new Tonometer the Corvis ST Tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann Applanation Tonometers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:659–665CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedenwald JS (1949) Clinical significance of ocular rigidity in relation to the tonometric measurement. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 53:262–264PubMed Friedenwald JS (1949) Clinical significance of ocular rigidity in relation to the tonometric measurement. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 53:262–264PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bayerle-Eder M, Kolodjaschna J, Wolzt M, Polska E, Gasic S, Schmetterer L (2005) Effect of a nifedipine induced reduction in blood pressure on the association between ocular pulse amplitude and ocular fundus pulsation amplitude in systemic hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 89:704–708CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bayerle-Eder M, Kolodjaschna J, Wolzt M, Polska E, Gasic S, Schmetterer L (2005) Effect of a nifedipine induced reduction in blood pressure on the association between ocular pulse amplitude and ocular fundus pulsation amplitude in systemic hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 89:704–708CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF (2008) Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-Bowman’s keratomileusis? J Refract Surg 24:S90–S96PubMed Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF (2008) Biomechanical and wound healing characteristics of corneas after excimer laser keratorefractive surgery: is there a difference between advanced surface ablation and sub-Bowman’s keratomileusis? J Refract Surg 24:S90–S96PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Detorakis ET, Pallikaris IG (2013) Ocular rigidity: biomechanical role, in vivo measurements and clinical significance. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 41:73–81CrossRefPubMed Detorakis ET, Pallikaris IG (2013) Ocular rigidity: biomechanical role, in vivo measurements and clinical significance. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 41:73–81CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of LASEK on Schiøtz, Goldmann and dynamic contour Tonometry
verfasst von
Marco Sales-Sanz
Esther Arranz-Marquez
Carolina Arruabarrena
Miguel A. Teus
Publikationsdatum
14.10.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3825-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.