Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022

26.10.2021 | Innovative Techniques

Influence of Marker Number and Position on Accuracy of Breast Measurement With Three-Dimensional Camera

verfasst von: Mayu Nakamura, Hiroki Mori, Masashi Kubota, Noriko Uemura, Kentaro Tanaka

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The VECTRA H1 three-dimensional (3D) imaging system (Canfield Scientific, Parsippany, NJ) enables easy 3D image construction and measurement. Although the number and positions of markers on the skin for image synthesis might affect accuracy of measurements, few studies have mentioned the possibility. This study investigated the accuracy and reproducibility of distance measurements using VECTRA H1, focusing on the number and positions of markers.

Methods

A total of 3, 5, or 7 markers were attached to a female breast model including lateral markers 6 cm from the midline and photographed with VECTRA. Five markers were configured in more two ways, with the lateral markers either positioned 3 cm outside the midline (narrow interval) or 9 cm outside the midline (wide interval). 3D models were created three times under each condition, for a total of 15 models. Differences (measurement error) between measured values on 3D models and actual measured values were verified for six distances, such as distance between the nipples.

Results

The average difference was 11.1 mm with 3 markers (95% confidence interval (CI), 4.38–17.7 mm, p = 0.0028). In comparison, average difference was −0.395 mm (−0.866 to 0.0763 mm, p = 0.095) with 5 markers, and 0.139 mm (−0186 to 0.465 mm, p = 0.379) with 7 markers, all less than 1 mm. Average difference with narrow interval 5 markers was larger than one with wide interval.

Conclusions

In 3D imaging of the breast using VECTRA H1, distance measurements offering clinically satisfactory accuracy can be made by setting appropriate marker conditions.

Level of Evidence V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tepper OM, Karp NS, Small K et al (2008) Three-dimensional imaging provides valuable clinical data to aid in unilateral tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction. Breast J 14:543–550CrossRef Tepper OM, Karp NS, Small K et al (2008) Three-dimensional imaging provides valuable clinical data to aid in unilateral tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction. Breast J 14:543–550CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70CrossRef Galdino GM, Nahabedian M, Chiaramonte M, Geng JZ, Klatsky S, Manson P (2002) Clinical applications of three-dimensional photography in breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:58–70CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54:471–478CrossRef Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA Jr, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54:471–478CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kovacs L, Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E (2005) Validating 3-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 55:695–696CrossRef Kovacs L, Eder M, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E (2005) Validating 3-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 55:695–696CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomita K, Yano K, Hata Y, Nishibayashi A, Hosokawa K (2015) DIEP flap breast reconstruction using 3-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e316 Tomita K, Yano K, Hata Y, Nishibayashi A, Hosokawa K (2015) DIEP flap breast reconstruction using 3-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e316
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wesselius TS, Verhulst AC, Vreeken RD, Xi T, Maal TJJ, Ulrich DJO (2018) Accuracy of three software applications for breast volume calculations from three-dimensional surface images. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:853–865CrossRef Wesselius TS, Verhulst AC, Vreeken RD, Xi T, Maal TJJ, Ulrich DJO (2018) Accuracy of three software applications for breast volume calculations from three-dimensional surface images. Plast Reconstr Surg 142:853–865CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Camison L, Bykowski M, Lee WW, Carlson JC, Roosenboom J, Goldstein JA et al (2018) Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:403–410CrossRef Camison L, Bykowski M, Lee WW, Carlson JC, Roosenboom J, Goldstein JA et al (2018) Validation of the Vectra H1 portable three-dimensional photogrammetry system for facial imaging. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47:403–410CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Savoldelli C, Benat G, Castillo L, Chamorey E, Lutz JC (2019) Accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of a handheld three-dimensional facial imaging device: The Vectra H1. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 120:289–296CrossRef Savoldelli C, Benat G, Castillo L, Chamorey E, Lutz JC (2019) Accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of a handheld three-dimensional facial imaging device: The Vectra H1. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 120:289–296CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood KL, Zoghbi Y, Margulies I, Ashikari AY, Jacobs J, Salzberg CA (2020) Is the Vectra 3D Imaging System a Reliable Tool for Predicting Breast Mass? Ann Plast Surg 85:S109–S113CrossRef Wood KL, Zoghbi Y, Margulies I, Ashikari AY, Jacobs J, Salzberg CA (2020) Is the Vectra 3D Imaging System a Reliable Tool for Predicting Breast Mass? Ann Plast Surg 85:S109–S113CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connell RL, Khabra K, Bamber JC et al (2018) Validation of the Vectra XT three-dimensional imaging system for measuring breast volume and symmetry following oncological reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat 171:391–398CrossRef O’Connell RL, Khabra K, Bamber JC et al (2018) Validation of the Vectra XT three-dimensional imaging system for measuring breast volume and symmetry following oncological reconstruction. Breast Cancer Res Treat 171:391–398CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of Marker Number and Position on Accuracy of Breast Measurement With Three-Dimensional Camera
verfasst von
Mayu Nakamura
Hiroki Mori
Masashi Kubota
Noriko Uemura
Kentaro Tanaka
Publikationsdatum
26.10.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02629-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.