nach oben

Erschienen in:

03.05.2020 | Original Article

Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation on the healing of mini-implants: a randomized clinical trial

verfasst von: Atsuya Hirota, Giovanna Iezzi, Adriano Piattelli, Mauro Ferri, Kazushige Tanaka, Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman, Daniele Botticelli

Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate histologically the healing of mini-implants installed after sinus floor elevation using a lateral approach and placing the antrostomy at different level from the sinus floor.

Material and methods

Sinus floor elevation using a lateral approach was performed in 24 healthy volunteers. The antrostomy was randomly placed either close to the base of the sinus floor (group base) or at about 3–4 mm cranially to it (group standard).

After 6 months of healing, mini-implants were installed within the grafted region, through the alveolar crest. Three months later, biopsies were collected.

Results

Sixteen biopsies from 16 patients were available for histological analyses. The new bone reached fractions of 40.9 ± 11.9% and 48.5 ± 20.1% at the base and standard groups, respectively (p = 0.208). Xenograft particles were found in contact with the implant surface at percentages of 12.1 ± 11.0% in the base group, and 15.9 ± 23.7% in the standard group (p = 0.674).

Conclusions

Based on the present study, the choice of one or the other position of antrostomy did not influence significantly the outcome and, therefore, should be left to the preference of the surgeon.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP (2008) A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 35(8 Suppl):216–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x CrossRefPubMed

Corbella S, Taschieri S, Weinstein R, Del Fabbro M (2016) Histomorphometric outcomes after lateral sinus floor elevation procedure: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(9):1106–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12702 CrossRefPubMed

Cricchio G, Palma VC, Faria PE, de Oliveira JA, Lundgren S, Sennerby L, Salata LA (2009) Histological findings following the use of a space-making device for bone reformation and implant integration in the maxillary sinus of primates. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 11(Suppl 1):e14–e22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00158.x CrossRefPubMed

Cricchio G, Palma VC, Faria PE, de Olivera JA, Lungren S, Sennerby L, Salata LA (2011) Histological outcomes on the development of new space-making devices for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 13(3):224–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00208.x CrossRefPubMed

Johansson LÅ, Isaksson S, Adolfsson E, Lindh C, Sennerby L (2012) Bone regeneration using a hollow hydroxyapatite space-maintaining device for maxillary sinus floor augmentation--a clinical pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14(4):575–584. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00293.x CrossRefPubMed

Lundgren S, Andersson S, Gualini F, Sennerby L (2004) Bone reformation with sinus membrane elevation: a new surgical technique for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 6(3):165–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00217.x CrossRefPubMed

Scala A, Botticelli D, Faeda RS, Garcia Rangel I Jr, Américo de Oliveira J, Lang NP (2012) Lack of influence of the Schneiderian membrane in forming new bone apical to implants simultaneously installed with sinus floor elevation: an experimental study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:175–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02227.x CrossRefPubMed

Cricchio G, Sennerby L, Lundgren S (2011) Sinus bone formation and implant survival after sinus membrane elevation and implant placement: a 1- to 6-year follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(10):1200–1212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02096.x CrossRefPubMed

Jungner M, Cricchio G, Salata LA, Sennerby L, Lundqvist C, Hultcrantz M, Lundgren S (2015) On the early mechanisms of bone formation after maxillary sinus membrane elevation: an experimental histological and immunohistochemical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17(6):1092–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12218 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Asai S, Shimizu Y, Ooya K (2002 Aug) Maxillary sinus augmentation model in rabbits: effect of occluded nasal ostium on new bone formation. Clin Oral Implants Res 13(4):405–409. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130409.x CrossRefPubMed

11.

Caneva M, Lang NP, Garcia Rangel IJ, Ferreira S, Caneva M, De Santis E, Botticelli D (2017) Sinus mucosa elevation using Bio-Oss(®) or Gingistat(®) collagen sponge: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(7):e21–e30. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12850 CrossRefPubMed

12.

De Santis E, Lang NP, Ferreira S, Rangel Garcia I Jr, Caneva M, Botticelli D (2017) Healing at implants installed concurrently to maxillary sinus floor elevation with Bio-Oss(®) or autologous bone grafts. A histo-morphometric study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(5):503–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12825 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Iida T, Carneiro Martins Neto E, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Lang NP, Xavier SP (2017) Influence of a collagen membrane positioned subjacent the sinus mucosa following the elevation of the maxillary sinus. A histomorphometric study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(12):1567–1576. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13027 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Omori Y, Ricardo Silva E, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Lang NP, Xavier SP (2018) Reposition of the bone plate over the antrostomy in maxillary sinus augmentation: A histomorphometric study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 29(8):821–834. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13292 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Masuda K, Silva ER, Botticelli D, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Xavier SP (2019) Antrostomy preparation for maxillary sinus floor augmentation using drills or a sonic instrument: a microcomputed tomography and histomorphometric study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(4):819–827. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7350 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Cosso MG, de Brito RB Jr, Piattelli A, Shibli JA, Zenóbio EG (2014) Volumetric dimensional changes of autogenous bone and the mixture of hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone graft in humans maxillary sinus augmentation. A multislice tomographic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(11):1251–1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12261 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Gorla LF, Spin-Neto R, Boos FB, Pereira Rdos S, Garcia-Junior IR, Hochuli-Vieira E (2015) Use of autogenous bone and beta-tricalcium phosphate in maxillary sinus lifting: a prospective, randomized, volumetric computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44(12):1486–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.003 CrossRefPubMed

18.

Kawakami S, Lang NP, Iida T, Ferri M, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D (2018) Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed with cone-beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial. J Investig Clin Dent 9(4):e12362. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12362 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Kawakami S, Lang NP, Ferri M, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D (2019) Influence of the height of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed by cone beam computed tomography- a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 34(1):223–232. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7112 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Shanbhag S, Shanbhag V, Stavropoulos A (2014) Volume changes of maxillary sinus augmentations over time: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 29(4):881–892. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3472 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Barone A, Ricci M, Grassi RF, Nannmark U, Quaranta A, Covani U (2013) A 6-month histological analysis on maxillary sinus augmentation with and without use of collagen membranes over the osteotomy window: randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 24(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02340.x CrossRefPubMed

22.

Busenlechner D, Huber CD, Vasak C, Dobsak A, Gruber R, Watzek G (2009) Sinus augmentation analysis revised: the gradient of graft consolidation. Clin Oral Implants Res 20(10):1078–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01733.x CrossRefPubMed

23.

Scala A, Botticelli D, Rangel IG Jr, de Oliveira JA, Okamoto R, Lang NP (2010) Early healing after elevation of the maxillary sinus floor applying a lateral access: a histological study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 21(12):1320–1326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01964.x CrossRefPubMed

24.

Iida T, Silva ER, Lang NP, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D, Xavier SP (2018) Histological and micro-computed tomography evaluations of newly formed bone after maxillary sinus augmentation using a xenograft with similar density and mineral content of bone: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Exp Dent Res 4(6):284–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.146 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Caneva M, Lang NP, Calvo Guirado JL, Spriano S, Iezzi G, Botticelli D (2015) Bone healing at bicortically installed implants with different surface configurations. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 26(3):293–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12475 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Beolchini M, Lang NP, Gómez Moreno G, Iezzi G, Botticelli D, Calvo Guirado JL (2016) Bone healing at implants with different surface configurations: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(2):196–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12562 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Schroeder HE, Münzel-Pedrazzoli S (1973) Correlated morphometric and biochemical analysis of gingival tissue. Morphometric model, tissue sampling and test of stereologic procedures. J Microsc 99(3):301–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1973.tb04629.x CrossRefPubMed

28.

Ferri M, Lang NP, Angarita Alfonso EE, Bedoya Quintero ID, Burgos EM, Botticelli D (2015) Use of sonic instruments for implant biopsy retrieval. Clin Oral Implants Res 26(11):1237–1243. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12466 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S (2002) A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17(5):635–643PubMed

30.

Chiu TS, Lee CT, Bittner N, Prasad H, Tarnow DP, Schulze-Späte U (2018) Histomorphometric Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Studying Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Two Different Biomaterials and Simultaneous Implant Placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 33(6):1320–1330. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.6778 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Lindgren C, Sennerby L, Mordenfeld A, Hallman M (2009) Clinical histology of microimplants placed in two different biomaterials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24(6):1093–1100PubMed

32.

Rossi F, Lang NP, De Santis E, Morelli F, Favero G, Botticelli D (2014) Bone-healing pattern at the surface of titanium implants: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(1):124–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12097 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J (2003) Appositional bone formation in marginal defects at implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 14(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140101.x CrossRefPubMed

34.

Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J (2003) The jumping distance revisited: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 14(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.x CrossRefPubMed

35.

Akimoto K, Becker W, Persson R, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB (1999) Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14(3):351–360PubMed

36.

Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Persson LG, Lindhe J (2005) Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 32(5):448–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00693.x CrossRefPubMed

37.

Jensen OT, Sennerby L (1998) Histologic analysis of clinically retrieved titanium microimplants placed in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13(4):513–521PubMed

38.

Mainetti T, Lang NP, Bengazi F, Favero V, Soto Cantero L, Botticelli D (2016) Sequential healing at implants installed immediately into extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(1):130–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12533 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Favero R, Botticelli D, Antunes AA, Martinez Sanchez R, Caroprese M, Salata LA (2016) Sequential healing at calcium- versus calcium phosphate-modified titanium implant surfaces: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 18(2):369–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12311 CrossRefPubMed

40.

Favero R, Lang NP, Salata LA, Martins Neto EC, Caroprese M, Botticelli D (2016) Sequential healing events of osseointegration at UnicCa(®) and SLActive(®) implant surfaces: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(2):203–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12591 CrossRefPubMed

41.

Favero V, Lang NP, Rossi F, Favero R, Baffone D, Botticelli D (2016) Peri-implant tissues morphometry at SLActive surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(8):993–998. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12719 CrossRefPubMed

42.

Favero V, Lang NP, Favero R, Antunes AA, Salata LA, Botticelli D (2017) Sequential morphometric evaluation at UnicCa(®) and DCD(®) implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(7):833–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12888 CrossRefPubMed

43.

Schweikert MT, Botticelli D, Sbricoli L, Antunes A, Favero V, Salata LA (2016) Sequential healing at implants with different configuration and modified surfaces: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 18(3):439–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12330 CrossRefPubMed

44.

Favero V, Lang NP, Favero R, Carneiro Martins Neto E, Salata LA, Botticelli D (2017) Sequential morphometric evaluation at UnicCa(®) and SLActive(®) implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(9):1023–1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12906 CrossRefPubMed

45.

Caroprese M, Lang NP, Rossi F, Ricci S, Favero R, Botticelli D (2017) Morphometric evaluation of the early stages of healing at cortical and marrow compartments at titanium implants: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 28(9):1030–1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12913 CrossRefPubMed

46.

Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Lang NP (2011) The role of bone debris in early healing adjacent to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in man. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:357–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02107.x CrossRefPubMed

47.

Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Bosshardt DD (2011) Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 22(4):349–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02172.x CrossRefPubMed

48.

Omori Y, Iezzi G, Perrotti V, Piattelli A, Ferri M, Nakajima Y, Botticelli D (2018) Influence of the buccal bone crest width on peri-implant hard and soft tissues dimensions: a histomorphometric study in humans. Implant Dent 27:415–423. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000772 CrossRefPubMed

49.

Yonezawa D, Piattelli A, Favero R et al (2018) Bone healing at functionally loaded and unloaded screw-shaped implants supporting single crowns: a histomorphometric study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 33:181–187. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5928 CrossRefPubMed

50.

Nakajima Y, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Fortich Mesa N, Ferri M, Botticelli D (2018) Influence of the presence of alveolar mucosa at implants: a histological study in humans. Implant Dent. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000723

51.

Botticelli D, Lang NP (2017) Dynamics of osseointegration in various human and animal models - a comparative analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 28:742–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12872 CrossRefPubMed

52.

Tanaka K Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Mauro Ferri M, Fortich Mesa N, Apaza Alccayhuaman KA, Botticelli D. Sinus floor elevation and antrostomy healing: A histomorphometric clinical study in humans. Accepted for publication in Implant Dentistry

Titel: Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation on the healing of mini-implants: a randomized clinical trial
verfasst von: Atsuya Hirota
Giovanna Iezzi
Adriano Piattelli
Mauro Ferri
Kazushige Tanaka
Karol Alí Apaza Alccayhuaman
Daniele Botticelli
Publikationsdatum: 03.05.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-020-00846-7

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

23.04.2024 | Ablationstherapie | Nachrichten

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 | Appendizitis | Nachrichten

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 | Operationsvorbereitung | Nachrichten

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

19.04.2024 | EAU 2024 | Kongressbericht | Nachrichten

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Aim

Material and methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

A suggested protocol to increase the accuracy of prosthetic phases in case of full-arch model-free fully guided computer-aided implant placement and immediate loading

Reply to Letter to the Editor commenting on the article “Myeloid sarcoma on the temporal region before the onset of the acute myeloid leukemia: an extremely rare case report”

Key factors influencing short implant success

Don’t call me “Lymphangioma!”

Impact of orthognathic surgery on the treatment of gummy smile: an integrative review

Reduction genioplasty for mandibular prognathism and long chin

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“