Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2022

16.07.2021 | Original article

Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment—an assessment of content, quality, and readability

verfasst von: Mehmed Taha Alpaydın, Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk, Nehir Canigur Bavbek

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Sonderheft 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The goal was to evaluate the content, quality, and readability of the information available about clear aligner treatment on the Internet.

Materials and methods

The search terms “aligner,” “clear aligner,” and “Invisalign” (Align Technology, Tempe, AZ, USA) were analyzed in three search engines (Google [Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA], Bing [Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA], and Yahoo [Yahoo, Sunnyvale, CA, USA]). The first 50 websites for each keyword in each search engine were screened. Duplicate websites, advertisements, links to scientific articles, videos, and other irrelevant websites were excluded. The quality of the remaining websites was analyzed using the DISCERN and Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark instruments together with the Health on the Net code (HONcode, Health On the Net Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland). The readability of the websites was evaluated by the Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Statistical analyses were performed by one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal–Wallis and Fischer’s exact tests, with p < 0.05 accepted to be statistically significant.

Results

Among 111 evaluated websites, most belonged to multidisciplinary dental clinics (n = 49; 44.2%), followed by aligner companies (n = 26; 23.4%), orthodontists (n = 26; 23.4%), and professional organizations (n = 10; 9%). The mean DISCERN score (sections 1 and 2) for all websites was 29.95/75. The average FRES and FKGL were 55.77 and 9.74, respectively. Professional organization websites had significantly higher DISCERN scores than others (p< 0.001), and together with multidisciplinary dental clinic websites, they showed better compliance with JAMA benchmark criteria. Professional organization websites’ FRES and FKGL were also higher than other websites (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Overall, the quality of web-based information about clear aligners was poor and the readability of the data was insufficient. Websites presenting high-quality data with better readability are needed for potential aligner patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aldairy T, Laverick S, McIntyre G (2012) Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid? Eur J Orthod 34:466–469PubMedCrossRef Aldairy T, Laverick S, McIntyre G (2012) Orthognathic surgery: is patient information on the Internet valid? Eur J Orthod 34:466–469PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE et al (2007) European citizens’ use of E‑health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 7:53PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Andreassen HK, Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Chronaki CE et al (2007) European citizens’ use of E‑health services: a study of seven countries. BMC Public Health 7:53PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Arun M, Usman Q, Johal A (2017) Orthodontic treatment modalities: a qualitative assessment of Internet information. J Orthod 44:82–89PubMedCrossRef Arun M, Usman Q, Johal A (2017) Orthodontic treatment modalities: a qualitative assessment of Internet information. J Orthod 44:82–89PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Best AD, Shroff B, Carrico CK, Lindauer SJ (2016) Treatment management between orthodontists and general practitioners performing clear aligner therapy. Angle Orthod 87:432–439PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Best AD, Shroff B, Carrico CK, Lindauer SJ (2016) Treatment management between orthodontists and general practitioners performing clear aligner therapy. Angle Orthod 87:432–439PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Breese P, Burman W (2005) Readability of notice of privacy forms used by major health care institutions. JAMA 293:1588–1594CrossRef Breese P, Burman W (2005) Readability of notice of privacy forms used by major health care institutions. JAMA 293:1588–1594CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Buschang PH, Shaw SG, Ross M, Crosby D, Campbell PM (2014) Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthod 84:391–396PubMedCrossRef Buschang PH, Shaw SG, Ross M, Crosby D, Campbell PM (2014) Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces. Angle Orthod 84:391–396PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bylund CL, Gueguen JA, Sabee CM, Imes RS, Li Y, Sanford AA (2007) Provider-patient dialogue about Internet health information: an exploration of strategies to improve the provider-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns 66:346–352PubMedCrossRef Bylund CL, Gueguen JA, Sabee CM, Imes RS, Li Y, Sanford AA (2007) Provider-patient dialogue about Internet health information: an exploration of strategies to improve the provider-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns 66:346–352PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Chambers DW, Zitterkopf JG (2019) How people make decisions about whether or not to seek orthodontic care: upstream in the treatment chain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 155:826–831PubMedCrossRef Chambers DW, Zitterkopf JG (2019) How people make decisions about whether or not to seek orthodontic care: upstream in the treatment chain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 155:826–831PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Charnock D, Shepperd S (2004) Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res 19:440–446PubMedCrossRef Charnock D, Shepperd S (2004) Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. Health Educ Res 19:440–446PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:105–111PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:105–111PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Chu JT, Wang MP, Shen C, Viswanath K, Lam TH, Chan SSC (2017) How, when and why people seek health information online: qualitative study in Hong Kong. Interact J Med Res 6:e24PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chu JT, Wang MP, Shen C, Viswanath K, Lam TH, Chan SSC (2017) How, when and why people seek health information online: qualitative study in Hong Kong. Interact J Med Res 6:e24PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cline RJW, Haynes KM (2001) Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 16:671–692PubMedCrossRef Cline RJW, Haynes KM (2001) Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 16:671–692PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen RA, Stussman B (2010) Health information technology use among men and women aged 18–64: early release of estimates from the national health interview survey, january–June 2009. National Center for Health Statistics, Cohen RA, Stussman B (2010) Health information technology use among men and women aged 18–64: early release of estimates from the national health interview survey, january–June 2009. National Center for Health Statistics,
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Corcelles R, Daigle CR, Talamas HR, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR (2015) Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:539–544PubMedCrossRef Corcelles R, Daigle CR, Talamas HR, Brethauer SA, Schauer PR (2015) Assessment of the quality of Internet information on sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:539–544PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Couper MP, Singer E, Levin CA, Fowler FJ Jr, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2010) Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 30:106–114CrossRef Couper MP, Singer E, Levin CA, Fowler FJ Jr, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ (2010) Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 30:106–114CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat d’Apuzzo F, Perillo L, Carrico CK et al (2019) Clear aligner treatment: different perspectives between orthodontists and general dentists. Prog Orthod 20:10PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef d’Apuzzo F, Perillo L, Carrico CK et al (2019) Clear aligner treatment: different perspectives between orthodontists and general dentists. Prog Orthod 20:10PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH (1996) Teaching patients with low literacy skills, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH (1996) Teaching patients with low literacy skills, 2nd edn. Lippincott,
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Doğramacı EJ, Rossi-Fedele G (2016) The quality of information on the Internet on orthodontic retainer wear: a cross-sectional study. J Orthod 43:47–58PubMedCrossRef Doğramacı EJ, Rossi-Fedele G (2016) The quality of information on the Internet on orthodontic retainer wear: a cross-sectional study. J Orthod 43:47–58PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Edmunds MR, Denniston AK, Boelaert K, Franklyn JA, Durrani OM (2014) Patient information in Graves’ disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: readability assessment of online resources. Thyroid 24:67–72PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Edmunds MR, Denniston AK, Boelaert K, Franklyn JA, Durrani OM (2014) Patient information in Graves’ disease and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy: readability assessment of online resources. Thyroid 24:67–72PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa E‑R (2002) Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 287:2691–2700PubMedCrossRef Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa E‑R (2002) Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA 287:2691–2700PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanmaz B, Buduneli N (2021) Evaluation of information quality on the internet for periodontal disease patients. Oral Dis 27:348–356PubMedCrossRef Kanmaz B, Buduneli N (2021) Evaluation of information quality on the internet for periodontal disease patients. Oral Dis 27:348–356PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, Chissom BS (1975) Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Institute for Simulation and Training, CrossRef Kincaid JP, Fishburne RP Jr, Rogers RL, Chissom BS (1975) Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Institute for Simulation and Training, CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kutner M, Greenburg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C (2006) The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. National Center for Education Statistics, Kutner M, Greenburg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C (2006) The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy. National Center for Education Statistics,
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Livas C, Delli K, Pandis N (2018) “My Invisalign experience”: content, metrics and comment sentiment analysis of the most popular patient testimonials on YouTube. Prog Orthod 19:3PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Livas C, Delli K, Pandis N (2018) “My Invisalign experience”: content, metrics and comment sentiment analysis of the most popular patient testimonials on YouTube. Prog Orthod 19:3PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Livas C, Delli K, Ren Y (2013) Quality evaluation of the available Internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 83:500–506PubMedCrossRef Livas C, Delli K, Ren Y (2013) Quality evaluation of the available Internet information regarding pain during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 83:500–506PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu X, Zhang R, Wu W, Shang X, Liu M (2018) Relationship between internet health information and patient compliance based on trust: empirical study. J Med Internet Res 20:e253PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lu X, Zhang R, Wu W, Shang X, Liu M (2018) Relationship between internet health information and patient compliance based on trust: empirical study. J Med Internet Res 20:e253PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat McMorrow SM, Millett DT (2016) Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information. J Orthod 43:186–192PubMedCrossRef McMorrow SM, Millett DT (2016) Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information. J Orthod 43:186–192PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Meade MJ, Dreyer CW (2021) An assessment of the treatment information contained within the websites of direct-to-consumer orthodontic aligner providers. Aust Dent J 66:77–84PubMedCrossRef Meade MJ, Dreyer CW (2021) An assessment of the treatment information contained within the websites of direct-to-consumer orthodontic aligner providers. Aust Dent J 66:77–84PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Meade MJ, Dreyer CW (2020) Web-based information on orthodontic clear aligners: a qualitative and readability assessment. Aust Dent J 65:225–232PubMedCrossRef Meade MJ, Dreyer CW (2020) Web-based information on orthodontic clear aligners: a qualitative and readability assessment. Aust Dent J 65:225–232PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Meade MJ, Dreyer CW (2020) Orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a qualitative evaluation of Internet information available to the general public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 158:612–620PubMedCrossRef Meade MJ, Dreyer CW (2020) Orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a qualitative evaluation of Internet information available to the general public. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 158:612–620PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Nghiem A, Mahmoud Y, Som R (2016) Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer. Breast 25:34–37PubMedCrossRef Nghiem A, Mahmoud Y, Som R (2016) Evaluating the quality of internet information for breast cancer. Breast 25:34–37PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Noll D, Mahon B, Shroff B, Carrico C, Lindauer SJ (2017) Twitter analysis of the orthodontic patient experience with braces vs invisalign. Angle Orthod 87:377–383PubMedCrossRef Noll D, Mahon B, Shroff B, Carrico C, Lindauer SJ (2017) Twitter analysis of the orthodontic patient experience with braces vs invisalign. Angle Orthod 87:377–383PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Olkun HK, Demirkaya AA, Aras B (2019) The quality of Internet information on lingual orthodontics in the English language, with DISCERN and JAMA. J Orthod 46:20–26PubMedCrossRef Olkun HK, Demirkaya AA, Aras B (2019) The quality of Internet information on lingual orthodontics in the English language, with DISCERN and JAMA. J Orthod 46:20–26PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Olson JC, Shroff B, Carrico C, Boyle J, Lindauer SJ (2020) Comparison of patient factors influencing the selection of an orthodontist, general dentist, or direct-to-consumer aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 157:526–532.e2PubMedCrossRef Olson JC, Shroff B, Carrico C, Boyle J, Lindauer SJ (2020) Comparison of patient factors influencing the selection of an orthodontist, general dentist, or direct-to-consumer aligners. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 157:526–532.e2PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel A, Cobourne MT (2015) The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking. Eur J Orthod 37:447–452PubMedCrossRef Patel A, Cobourne MT (2015) The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking. Eur J Orthod 37:447–452PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA (1997) Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277:1244–1245PubMedCrossRef Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA (1997) Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA 277:1244–1245PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Svider PF, Agarwal N, Choudhry OJ et al (2013) Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am J Otolaryngol 34:31–35PubMedCrossRef Svider PF, Agarwal N, Choudhry OJ et al (2013) Readability assessment of online patient education materials from academic otolaryngology-head and neck surgery departments. Am J Otolaryngol 34:31–35PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Jamart J, Gustin T, Leveque M (2014) Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg 82:e31–39PubMedCrossRef Weil AG, Bojanowski MW, Jamart J, Gustin T, Leveque M (2014) Evaluation of the quality of information on the Internet available to patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. World Neurosurg 82:e31–39PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Weiss BD, Coyne C (1997) Communicating with patients who cannot read. N Engl J Med 337:272–274PubMedCrossRef Weiss BD, Coyne C (1997) Communicating with patients who cannot read. N Engl J Med 337:272–274PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Womack WR, Ahn JH, Ammari Z, Castillo A (2002) A new approach to correction of crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122:310–316PubMedCrossRef Womack WR, Ahn JH, Ammari Z, Castillo A (2002) A new approach to correction of crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122:310–316PubMedCrossRef
47.
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang H, Zhang R, Lu X, Zhu X (2020) Impact of personal trust tendency on patient compliance based on Internet health information seeking. Telemed J E Health 26:294–303PubMedCrossRef Zhang H, Zhang R, Lu X, Zhu X (2020) Impact of personal trust tendency on patient compliance based on Internet health information seeking. Telemed J E Health 26:294–303PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Information on the Internet about clear aligner treatment—an assessment of content, quality, and readability
verfasst von
Mehmed Taha Alpaydın
Suleyman Kutalmış Buyuk
Nehir Canigur Bavbek
Publikationsdatum
16.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Medizin
Erschienen in
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe Sonderheft 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00331-0

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 1/2022

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.