Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2020

12.03.2020 | New Technology

Initial experience of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a French hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) expert center

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new intraabdominal technique to approach non-resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). PIPAC can be performed alone or alternated with systemic chemotherapy to increase tumor regression. We describe our initial experience performed in an expert hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) French center to demonstrate the safety and the feasibility of PIPAC.

Methods

Between January 2016 and March 2019, PIPAC was proposed to 43 consecutive patients affected by digestive, ovarian, peritoneal and mammary carcinomatosis. Initially PIPAC was proposed to patients non eligible for cytoreductive surgery for palliative purposes.
In five patients we associated PIPAC to systemic chemotherapy to improve tumor regression and enhance the chance of patients to undergo HIPEC.
Three PIPAC treatments were supposed to be performed for each patient with an interval of 6 weeks in between each procedure. Peritoneal biopsies were always performed to evaluate microscopic tumor regression.
In case of postoperative clinical deterioration or quick tumor progression during the cycles, PIPAC was interrupted. Depending on the primary tumor, chemotherapies used were oxaliplatin or a combination of cisplatin and doxorubicin.

Results

Twenty-six (60.4%) patients have already had a surgical resection or intervention of primary cancer removal. In 5 patients abdominal access was impossible. Of the 38 patients operated, seventy-one procedures were performed. In the series, one patient died because of tumor progression. Only one major complication occurred intraoperatively. Two of thirteen patients receiving oxaliplatin had postoperative abdominal pain and needed more drugs assumption and a longer hospitalization. Three patients after a three cycles procedure underwent HIPEC.
Nine of the patients who had at least two PIPACs had last biopsies showing a major or complete tumor response.

Conclusion

PIPAC is a safe and feasible procedure that can be performed in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis initially not eligible for surgery to reduce tumor invasion or for palliation to reduce symptoms. Contraindications are bowel obstruction and multiple intraabdominal adhesions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lambert LA (2015) Looking up: recent advances in understanding and treating peritoneal carcinomatosis. CA Cancer J Clin 65(4):284–298CrossRef Lambert LA (2015) Looking up: recent advances in understanding and treating peritoneal carcinomatosis. CA Cancer J Clin 65(4):284–298CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chakraborty A, Selby D, Gardiner K, Myers J, Moravan V, Wright F (2011) Malignant bowel obstruction: naturalhistory ofaheterogeneouspatient population followed prospectively overtwoyears. J Pain Symptom Manag 41:412–420CrossRef Chakraborty A, Selby D, Gardiner K, Myers J, Moravan V, Wright F (2011) Malignant bowel obstruction: naturalhistory ofaheterogeneouspatient population followed prospectively overtwoyears. J Pain Symptom Manag 41:412–420CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chia CS, You B, Decullier E, Vaudoyer D, Lorimier G, Abboud K, Bereder JM, Arvieux C, Boschetti G, Glehen O, BIG RENAPE Group (2016) Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: is cure a possibility? Ann Surg Oncol 23:1971–1979CrossRef Chia CS, You B, Decullier E, Vaudoyer D, Lorimier G, Abboud K, Bereder JM, Arvieux C, Boschetti G, Glehen O, BIG RENAPE Group (2016) Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: is cure a possibility? Ann Surg Oncol 23:1971–1979CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Solass W, Kerb R, Murdter T, Giger-Pabst U, Strumberg D, Tempfer C et al (2014) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis using pressurized aerosol as an alternative to liquid solution: first evidence for efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:553–559CrossRef Solass W, Kerb R, Murdter T, Giger-Pabst U, Strumberg D, Tempfer C et al (2014) Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis using pressurized aerosol as an alternative to liquid solution: first evidence for efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol 21:553–559CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Giger-Pabst U, Demtröder C, Falkenstein TA, Ouaissi M, Götze TO, Rezniczek GA et al (2018) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for the treatment of malignant mesothelioma. BMC Cancer 18:442CrossRef Giger-Pabst U, Demtröder C, Falkenstein TA, Ouaissi M, Götze TO, Rezniczek GA et al (2018) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for the treatment of malignant mesothelioma. BMC Cancer 18:442CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Solass W, Detlefsen S, Carr N et al (2016) Peritoneal sampling and histological assessment of therapeutic response in peritoneal metastasis: proposal of the peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS). Pleura Peritoneum 1(2):99–107CrossRef Solass W, Detlefsen S, Carr N et al (2016) Peritoneal sampling and histological assessment of therapeutic response in peritoneal metastasis: proposal of the peritoneal regression grading score (PRGS). Pleura Peritoneum 1(2):99–107CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurtz F, Struller F, Horvath P, Solass W, Bösmüller H, Königsrainer A, Reymond MA (2018) Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis: a registry study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018:2743985CrossRef Kurtz F, Struller F, Horvath P, Solass W, Bösmüller H, Königsrainer A, Reymond MA (2018) Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastasis: a registry study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018:2743985CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Odendahl K, Solass W, Demtröder C, Giger-Pabst U et al (2015) Quality of life of patients with end-stage peritoneal metastasis treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Eur J Surg Oncol 41:1379–1385CrossRef Odendahl K, Solass W, Demtröder C, Giger-Pabst U et al (2015) Quality of life of patients with end-stage peritoneal metastasis treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Eur J Surg Oncol 41:1379–1385CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Teixeira Frainha H, Grass F, Kefleyesus A, Achtari C et al (2017) Impact of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy on quality of life and symptoms in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a retrospective cohort analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017:4596176 Teixeira Frainha H, Grass F, Kefleyesus A, Achtari C et al (2017) Impact of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy on quality of life and symptoms in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a retrospective cohort analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017:4596176
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Grass F, Vuagniaux A, Teixeira-Farinha H, Lehmann K, Demartines N, Hübner M (2017) Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. Br J Surg 104(6):669–678CrossRef Grass F, Vuagniaux A, Teixeira-Farinha H, Lehmann K, Demartines N, Hübner M (2017) Systematic review of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced peritoneal carcinomatosis. Br J Surg 104(6):669–678CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Tempfer C, Giger-Pabst U, Hilal Z, Dogan A, Rezniczek GA (2018) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of clinical and experimental evidence with special emphasis on ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298(2):243–257CrossRef Tempfer C, Giger-Pabst U, Hilal Z, Dogan A, Rezniczek GA (2018) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal carcinomatosis: systematic review of clinical and experimental evidence with special emphasis on ovarian cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 298(2):243–257CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Graversen M, Detlefsen S, Bjerregaard JK, Pfeiffer P, Bau MM (2017) Peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Clin Exp Metastasis 34(5):309–314CrossRef Graversen M, Detlefsen S, Bjerregaard JK, Pfeiffer P, Bau MM (2017) Peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Clin Exp Metastasis 34(5):309–314CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gockel I, Jansen-Winkeln B, Haase L, Rhode P, Mehdorn M, Niebisch S, Moulla Y, Lyros O, Lordick F, Schierle K, Wittekind C, Thieme R (2018) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM): results of a single-center experience and register study. J Gastric Cancer 18(4):379–391CrossRef Gockel I, Jansen-Winkeln B, Haase L, Rhode P, Mehdorn M, Niebisch S, Moulla Y, Lyros O, Lordick F, Schierle K, Wittekind C, Thieme R (2018) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM): results of a single-center experience and register study. J Gastric Cancer 18(4):379–391CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tempfer CB, Winnekendonk G, Solass W et al (2015) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in women with recurrent ovarian cancer: a phase 2 study. Gynecol Oncol 137(2):223–228CrossRef Tempfer CB, Winnekendonk G, Solass W et al (2015) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in women with recurrent ovarian cancer: a phase 2 study. Gynecol Oncol 137(2):223–228CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Girshally R, Demtröder C, Albayrak N, Zieren J, Tempfer C, Reymond MA (2016) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) as a neoadjuvant therapy before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. World J Surg Oncol 14:253CrossRef Girshally R, Demtröder C, Albayrak N, Zieren J, Tempfer C, Reymond MA (2016) Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) as a neoadjuvant therapy before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. World J Surg Oncol 14:253CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Initial experience of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in a French hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) expert center
Publikationsdatum
12.03.2020
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07488-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2020

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.