Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2016

16.09.2016 | Clinical trial

Initial experience of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module

verfasst von: Rachel L. O’Connell, Rosa DiMicco, Komel Khabra, Elizabeth A. O’Flynn, Nandita deSouza, Nicola Roche, Peter A. Barry, Anna M. Kirby, Jennifer E. Rusby

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The most recently developed module of the BREAST-Q, a validated patient outcome measure, is for patients who have undergone breast-conserving therapy (BCT) for cancer. This aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life after BCT using BREAST-Q, investigate clinical risk factors for lower satisfaction and explore the relationship between patient satisfaction with the appearance of their breasts and the other domains of the BREAST-Q.

Methods

Women who had undergone unilateral BCT in the preceding 1–6 years were invited to participate at the time of their annual surveillance mammogram. Clinicopathological data were collected from an electronic database. Linear regression was used to evaluate risk factors for lower satisfaction. Spearman’s rho correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the relationship between domains.

Results

200 women completed the questionnaire. Mean age was 60 years (SD 11.1). Time from surgery was 35.5 months (SD 17.8). Median score for ‘Satisfaction with breasts’ was 68 (interquartile range 55–80). Lowest scores were for ‘sexual wellbeing’ (57, IQR 45–66). On multivariate analysis, BMI at the time of surgery (p = 0.002), delayed wound healing (p = 0.001) and axillary surgery (p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for lower satisfaction. There was significant correlation between ‘Satisfaction with breasts’ and all other BREAST-Q domains.

Conclusion

High BMI, delayed wound healing and axillary surgery are risk factors for lower patient satisfaction. This first publication reporting the whole dataset for the BREAST-Q BCT will serve as a benchmark for future studies of patient satisfaction following BCT.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Pusic AL et al (2009) Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(2):345–353PubMedCrossRef Pusic AL et al (2009) Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(2):345–353PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Aaronson N et al (2002) Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11(3):193–205PubMedCrossRef Aaronson N et al (2002) Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11(3):193–205PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fosh B et al (2014) Cosmesis outcomes for sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Ann Surg Oncol 21(4):1271–1275PubMedCrossRef Fosh B et al (2014) Cosmesis outcomes for sector resection for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Ann Surg Oncol 21(4):1271–1275PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Atisha DM et al (2015) A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol 22(2):361–369PubMedCrossRef Atisha DM et al (2015) A national snapshot of satisfaction with breast cancer procedures. Ann Surg Oncol 22(2):361–369PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kummerow KL et al (2015) Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 150(1):9–16PubMedCrossRef Kummerow KL et al (2015) Nationwide trends in mastectomy for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg 150(1):9–16PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Heil J et al (2010) Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the breast cancer treatment outcome scale (BCTOS). Breast 19(6):470–474PubMedCrossRef Heil J et al (2010) Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the breast cancer treatment outcome scale (BCTOS). Breast 19(6):470–474PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Waljee JF et al (2008) Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 26(20):3331–3337PubMedCrossRef Waljee JF et al (2008) Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 26(20):3331–3337PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Al- Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (1999) Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol 25(6):571–573PubMedCrossRef Al- Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (1999) Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol 25(6):571–573PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeevan R et al (2014) Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(10):1333–1344PubMedCrossRef Jeevan R et al (2014) Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(10):1333–1344PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hack TF et al (2006) Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 15(1):9–19PubMedCrossRef Hack TF et al (2006) Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 15(1):9–19PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Street RL, Voigt B (1997) Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Mak 17(3):298–306CrossRef Street RL, Voigt B (1997) Patient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life. Med Decis Mak 17(3):298–306CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Street RL et al (1995) Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer 76(11):2275–2285PubMedCrossRef Street RL et al (1995) Increasing patient involvement in choosing treatment for early breast cancer. Cancer 76(11):2275–2285PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei CH et al (2016) Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J 22(1):10–17PubMedCrossRef Wei CH et al (2016) Psychosocial and sexual well-being following nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction. Breast J 22(1):10–17PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Sinha S et al (2016) Are overweight and obese patients who receive autologous free-flap breast reconstruction satisfied with their postoperative outcome? A single-centre study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(1):30–36PubMedCrossRef Sinha S et al (2016) Are overweight and obese patients who receive autologous free-flap breast reconstruction satisfied with their postoperative outcome? A single-centre study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(1):30–36PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Maiorino MI et al (2015) Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies using the female sexual function index. Endocrine. doi:10.1007/s12020-015-0812-6 Maiorino MI et al (2015) Sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of studies using the female sexual function index. Endocrine. doi:10.​1007/​s12020-015-0812-6
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Aerts L et al (2014) Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast 23(5):629–636PubMedCrossRef Aerts L et al (2014) Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast 23(5):629–636PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Coriddi M et al (2013) Analysis of satisfaction and well-being following breast reduction using a validated survey instrument: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(2):285–290PubMedCrossRef Coriddi M et al (2013) Analysis of satisfaction and well-being following breast reduction using a validated survey instrument: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(2):285–290PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Coriddi M et al (2013) Analysis of satisfaction and well-being in the short follow-up from breast augmentation using the BREAST-Q, a validated survey instrument. Aesthet Surg J 33(2):245–251PubMedCrossRef Coriddi M et al (2013) Analysis of satisfaction and well-being in the short follow-up from breast augmentation using the BREAST-Q, a validated survey instrument. Aesthet Surg J 33(2):245–251PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen WA et al (2016) The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(2):149–162PubMedCrossRef Cohen WA et al (2016) The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(2):149–162PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cano SJ et al (2014) Interpreting clinical differences in BREAST-Q scores: minimal important difference. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1):173e–175ePubMedCrossRef Cano SJ et al (2014) Interpreting clinical differences in BREAST-Q scores: minimal important difference. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1):173e–175ePubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592PubMed Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW (2003) Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 41(5):582–592PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardoso MJ et al (2007) Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J 13(2):140–146PubMedCrossRef Cardoso MJ et al (2007) Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J 13(2):140–146PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Steeves RA et al (1989) Cosmesis and local control after irradiation in women treated conservatively for breast cancer. Arch Surg 124(12):1369–1373PubMedCrossRef Steeves RA et al (1989) Cosmesis and local control after irradiation in women treated conservatively for breast cancer. Arch Surg 124(12):1369–1373PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Taylor ME et al (1995) Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(4):753–764PubMedCrossRef Taylor ME et al (1995) Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(4):753–764PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang HT et al (2008) Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthet Surg J 28(2):165–170PubMedCrossRef Wang HT et al (2008) Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy. Aesthet Surg J 28(2):165–170PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke D, Martinez A, Cox RS (1983) Analysis of cosmetic results and complications in patients with stage I and II breast cancer treated by biopsy and irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 9(12):1807–1813PubMedCrossRef Clarke D, Martinez A, Cox RS (1983) Analysis of cosmetic results and complications in patients with stage I and II breast cancer treated by biopsy and irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 9(12):1807–1813PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Dewar JA et al (1988) Cosmetic results following lumpectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy for small breast cancers. Radiother Oncol 12(4):273–280PubMedCrossRef Dewar JA et al (1988) Cosmetic results following lumpectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy for small breast cancers. Radiother Oncol 12(4):273–280PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose MA et al (1989) Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer: long-term cosmetic results. Arch Surg 124(2):153–157PubMedCrossRef Rose MA et al (1989) Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer: long-term cosmetic results. Arch Surg 124(2):153–157PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Fedorcik GG, Sachs R, Goldfarb MA (2006) Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm margins in 100 consecutive patients. Breast J 12(3):208–211PubMedCrossRef Fedorcik GG, Sachs R, Goldfarb MA (2006) Oncologic and aesthetic results following breast-conserving therapy with 0.5 cm margins in 100 consecutive patients. Breast J 12(3):208–211PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozmen T et al (2015) Factors affecting cosmesis after breast conserving surgery without oncoplastic techniques in an experienced comprehensive breast center. Surgeon 13(3):139–144PubMedCrossRef Ozmen T et al (2015) Factors affecting cosmesis after breast conserving surgery without oncoplastic techniques in an experienced comprehensive breast center. Surgeon 13(3):139–144PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Wazer DE et al (1992) Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 10(3):356–363PubMed Wazer DE et al (1992) Factors influencing cosmetic outcome and complication risk after conservative surgery and radiotherapy for early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 10(3):356–363PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Vrieling C et al (2000) The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost’ trial. EORTC radiotherapy and breast cancer cooperative groups. Radiother Oncol 55(3):219–232PubMedCrossRef Vrieling C et al (2000) The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost’ trial. EORTC radiotherapy and breast cancer cooperative groups. Radiother Oncol 55(3):219–232PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Hennigs A et al (2016) Change of patient-reported aesthetic outcome over time and identification of factors characterizing poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy: long-term results of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 23(5):1744–1751PubMedCrossRef Hennigs A et al (2016) Change of patient-reported aesthetic outcome over time and identification of factors characterizing poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving therapy: long-term results of a prospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 23(5):1744–1751PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Sarin R et al (1993) Therapeutic factors influencing the cosmetic outcome and late complications in the conservative management of early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27(2):285–292PubMedCrossRef Sarin R et al (1993) Therapeutic factors influencing the cosmetic outcome and late complications in the conservative management of early breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27(2):285–292PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Olivotto IA et al (1996) Late cosmetic results of short fractionation for breast conservation. Radiother Oncol 41(1):7–13PubMedCrossRef Olivotto IA et al (1996) Late cosmetic results of short fractionation for breast conservation. Radiother Oncol 41(1):7–13PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Olfatbakhsh A et al (2015) Evaluation of factors impacting cosmetic outcome of breast conservative surgery—a study in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16(6):2203–2207PubMedCrossRef Olfatbakhsh A et al (2015) Evaluation of factors impacting cosmetic outcome of breast conservative surgery—a study in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 16(6):2203–2207PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hille-Betz U et al (2016) Late radiation side effects, cosmetic outcomes and pain in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy: risk-modifying factors. Strahlenther Onkol 192(1):8–16PubMedCrossRef Hille-Betz U et al (2016) Late radiation side effects, cosmetic outcomes and pain in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy: risk-modifying factors. Strahlenther Onkol 192(1):8–16PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Goffman TE et al (2004) Lymphedema of the arm and breast in irradiated breast cancer patients: risks in an era of dramatically changing axillary surgery. Breast J 10(5):405–411PubMedCrossRef Goffman TE et al (2004) Lymphedema of the arm and breast in irradiated breast cancer patients: risks in an era of dramatically changing axillary surgery. Breast J 10(5):405–411PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Pezner RD et al (1985) Breast edema in patients treated conservatively for stage I and II breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11(10):1765–1768PubMedCrossRef Pezner RD et al (1985) Breast edema in patients treated conservatively for stage I and II breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 11(10):1765–1768PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Sisco M et al (2015) The quality-of-life benefits of breast reconstruction do not diminish with age. J Surg Oncol 111(6):663–668PubMedCrossRef Sisco M et al (2015) The quality-of-life benefits of breast reconstruction do not diminish with age. J Surg Oncol 111(6):663–668PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Rauh C et al (2013) Factors influencing breast changes after pregnancy. Eur J Cancer Prev 22(3):259–261PubMedCrossRef Rauh C et al (2013) Factors influencing breast changes after pregnancy. Eur J Cancer Prev 22(3):259–261PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson D et al (2015) Predictors of adverse cosmetic outcome in the RAPID trial: an exploratory analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91(5):968–976PubMedCrossRef Peterson D et al (2015) Predictors of adverse cosmetic outcome in the RAPID trial: an exploratory analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91(5):968–976PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernanz F et al (2011) Long-term results of breast conservation and immediate volume replacement with myocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap. World J Surg Oncol 9:159PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hernanz F et al (2011) Long-term results of breast conservation and immediate volume replacement with myocutaneous latissimus dorsi flap. World J Surg Oncol 9:159PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Immink JM et al (2012) Long-term cosmetic changes after breast-conserving treatment of patients with stage I-II breast cancer and included in the EORTC ‘boost versus no boost’ trial. Ann Oncol 23(10):2591–2598PubMedCrossRef Immink JM et al (2012) Long-term cosmetic changes after breast-conserving treatment of patients with stage I-II breast cancer and included in the EORTC ‘boost versus no boost’ trial. Ann Oncol 23(10):2591–2598PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Chao LF et al (2014) Monitoring patient-centered outcomes through the progression of breast reconstruction: a multicentered prospective longitudinal evaluation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 146(2):299–308PubMedCrossRef Chao LF et al (2014) Monitoring patient-centered outcomes through the progression of breast reconstruction: a multicentered prospective longitudinal evaluation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 146(2):299–308PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Initial experience of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module
verfasst von
Rachel L. O’Connell
Rosa DiMicco
Komel Khabra
Elizabeth A. O’Flynn
Nandita deSouza
Nicola Roche
Peter A. Barry
Anna M. Kirby
Jennifer E. Rusby
Publikationsdatum
16.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3966-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.