Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2020

23.03.2020 | Clinical Study

Initial experience with scalp sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and tumor treatment fields (SPARE) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

verfasst von: Andrew Song, Voichita Bar-Ad, Nina Martinez, Jon Glass, David W. Andrews, Kevin Judy, James J. Evans, Christopher J. Farrell, Maria Werner-Wasik, Inna Chervoneva, Michele Ly, Joshua D. Palmer, Haisong Liu, Wenyin Shi

Erschienen in: Journal of Neuro-Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Standard of care for glioblastoma includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide with tumor treatment fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. We report our initial experience evaluating toxicity and tolerability of scalp-sparing radiation with concurrent TTFields.

Methods

This is a single arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with KPS ≥ 60 with newly diagnosed glioblastoma were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions), standard concurrent temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily), and TTFields. Maintenance therapy included standard temozolomide and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. The primary endpoint was safety and toxicity for concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Results

We report the first ten patients on the trial. Eight were male, and two were female, with median age 61 years (range 49 to 73 years). Median KPS was 90 (range 70–90). Median follow-up was 7.9 months (2.8 to 17.9 months). Nine (90%) patients with unmethylated MGMT promotor, and one with methylated. Median time from surgery to radiation was 33 days (28 to 49 days). All patients completed concurrent chemoradiation plus TTFields without radiation or TTFields treatment interruption or discontinuation. Scalp dose constraints were achieved for all patients, with mean dose having a median value of 7.7 Gy (range 4.9 to 13.2 Gy), D20cc median 22.6 Gy (17.7 to 36.8 Gy), and D30cc median 19.8 Gy (14.8 to 33.4 Gy). Average daily use during concurrent phase had median value of 83.5% and 77% for maintenance. There was no related ≥ Grade 3 toxicity. Skin toxicity (erythema, dermatitis, pruritus) was noted in 80% of patients, however, these were limited to Grade 1 or 2 events which resolved spontaneously or responded to topical medications. Eight patients (80%) had progression, with median PFS of 6.9 months (range 2.8 to 9.6 months).

Conclusions

Concurrent TTFields with scalp-sparing chemoradiation is a safe and feasible treatment option with limited toxicity. Future randomized prospective trial is warranted to define therapeutic advantages of concurrent TTFields with chemoradiation.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT03477110
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRef Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:987–996CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRef Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol 10:459–466CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA et al (2015) Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:2535–2543CrossRef Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner AA et al (2015) Maintenance therapy with tumor-treating fields plus temozolomide vs temozolomide alone for glioblastoma a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:2535–2543CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A et al (2017) Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:2306–2316CrossRef Stupp R, Taillibert S, Kanner A et al (2017) Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:2306–2316CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R et al (2004) Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res 64:3288–3295CrossRef Kirson ED, Gurvich Z, Schneiderman R et al (2004) Disruption of cancer cell replication by alternating electric fields. Cancer Res 64:3288–3295CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirson ED, Dbalý V, Tovaryš F et al (2007) Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10152–10157CrossRef Kirson ED, Dbalý V, Tovaryš F et al (2007) Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10152–10157CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Giladi M, Munster M, Schneiderman RS et al (2017) Tumor treating fields (TTFields) delay DNA damage repair following radiation treatment of glioma cells. Radiat Oncol 12:206CrossRef Giladi M, Munster M, Schneiderman RS et al (2017) Tumor treating fields (TTFields) delay DNA damage repair following radiation treatment of glioma cells. Radiat Oncol 12:206CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim EH, Kim YJ, Song HS et al (2016) Biological effect of an alternating electric field on cell proliferation and synergistic antimitotic effect in combination with ionizing radiation. Oncotarget 7:62267–62279CrossRef Kim EH, Kim YJ, Song HS et al (2016) Biological effect of an alternating electric field on cell proliferation and synergistic antimitotic effect in combination with ionizing radiation. Oncotarget 7:62267–62279CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Grossman R, Bokstein F, Ben Harosh C et al (2019) Tumor-treating fields combined with radiotherapy and temzolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: final results from a pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol 105:E99CrossRef Grossman R, Bokstein F, Ben Harosh C et al (2019) Tumor-treating fields combined with radiotherapy and temzolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: final results from a pilot study. Int J Radiat Oncol 105:E99CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Li T, Shukla G, Peng C et al (2018) Dosimetric impact of a tumor treating fields device for glioblastoma patients undergoing simultaneous radiation therapy. Front Oncol 8:51CrossRef Li T, Shukla G, Peng C et al (2018) Dosimetric impact of a tumor treating fields device for glioblastoma patients undergoing simultaneous radiation therapy. Front Oncol 8:51CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacouture ME, Davis ME, Elzinga G et al (2014) Characterization and management of dermatologic adverse events with the NovoTTF-100A System, a novel anti-mitotic electric field device for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Semin Oncol 41(Suppl 4):S1–S14CrossRef Lacouture ME, Davis ME, Elzinga G et al (2014) Characterization and management of dermatologic adverse events with the NovoTTF-100A System, a novel anti-mitotic electric field device for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Semin Oncol 41(Suppl 4):S1–S14CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972CrossRef Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA et al (2010) Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol 28:1963–1972CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Glas M, Scheffler B, Lazaridis L et al (2018) P01.060 PriCoTTF: a phase I/II trial of tumor treating fields prior and concomitant to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 20:243CrossRef Glas M, Scheffler B, Lazaridis L et al (2018) P01.060 PriCoTTF: a phase I/II trial of tumor treating fields prior and concomitant to radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol 20:243CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Onken J, Staub-Bartelt F, Vajkoczy P et al (2018) Acceptance and compliance of TTFields treatment among high grade glioma patients. J Neurooncol 139:177–184CrossRef Onken J, Staub-Bartelt F, Vajkoczy P et al (2018) Acceptance and compliance of TTFields treatment among high grade glioma patients. J Neurooncol 139:177–184CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA et al (2012) NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer 48:2192–2202CrossRef Stupp R, Wong ET, Kanner AA et al (2012) NovoTTF-100A versus physician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent glioblastoma: a randomised phase III trial of a novel treatment modality. Eur J Cancer 48:2192–2202CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bender E, Kozak K, Howard S et al (2017) The effect of OptuneTM tumor treating fields transducer arrays on skin radiation dose during radiotherapy. J Clin Neurosci 42:172–175CrossRef Bender E, Kozak K, Howard S et al (2017) The effect of OptuneTM tumor treating fields transducer arrays on skin radiation dose during radiotherapy. J Clin Neurosci 42:172–175CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Witek M, Vahknenko Y, Siglin J et al (2014) Dose Reduction to the Scalp with Hippocampal Sparing Is Achievable with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy. Int J Med Physics, Clin Eng Radiat Oncol 03:176–182CrossRef Witek M, Vahknenko Y, Siglin J et al (2014) Dose Reduction to the Scalp with Hippocampal Sparing Is Achievable with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy. Int J Med Physics, Clin Eng Radiat Oncol 03:176–182CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat De Puysseleyr A, Van De Velde J, Speleers B et al (2014) Hair-sparing whole brain radiotherapy with volumetric arc therapy in patients treated for brain metastases: Dosimetric and clinical results of a phase II trial. Radiat Oncol 9:170CrossRef De Puysseleyr A, Van De Velde J, Speleers B et al (2014) Hair-sparing whole brain radiotherapy with volumetric arc therapy in patients treated for brain metastases: Dosimetric and clinical results of a phase II trial. Radiat Oncol 9:170CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS et al (2014) A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370:699–708CrossRef Gilbert MR, Dignam JJ, Armstrong TS et al (2014) A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 370:699–708CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chinot OL, De La Motte RT, Moore N et al (2011) AVAglio: phase 3 trial of bevacizumab plus temozolomide and radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Adv Ther 28:334–340CrossRef Chinot OL, De La Motte RT, Moore N et al (2011) AVAglio: phase 3 trial of bevacizumab plus temozolomide and radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Adv Ther 28:334–340CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao YH, Wang ZF, Cao CJ et al (2018) The clinical significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status in adult patients with glioblastoma: a meta-analysis. Front Neurol 9:127CrossRef Zhao YH, Wang ZF, Cao CJ et al (2018) The clinical significance of O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status in adult patients with glioblastoma: a meta-analysis. Front Neurol 9:127CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003CrossRef Hegi ME, Diserens AC, Gorlia T et al (2005) MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352:997–1003CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Initial experience with scalp sparing radiation with concurrent temozolomide and tumor treatment fields (SPARE) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma
verfasst von
Andrew Song
Voichita Bar-Ad
Nina Martinez
Jon Glass
David W. Andrews
Kevin Judy
James J. Evans
Christopher J. Farrell
Maria Werner-Wasik
Inna Chervoneva
Michele Ly
Joshua D. Palmer
Haisong Liu
Wenyin Shi
Publikationsdatum
23.03.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-594X
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7373
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03466-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Journal of Neuro-Oncology 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.