Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 1/2019

12.12.2017 | Original Article

Injury severity in polytrauma patients is underestimated using the injury severity score: a single-center correlation study in air rescue

verfasst von: C. Schröter, F. Urbanek, C. Frömke, M. Winkelmann, P. Mommsen, C. Krettek, C. Zeckey

Erschienen in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Prehospital estimation of injury severity is essential for prehospital therapy, deciding on the destination hospital and the associated emergency room care. The aim of this study was to compare prehospital estimates of the abbreviated injury scale (AIS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) by emergency physicians with the values of AIS and ISS of injury severity determined at the conclusion of diagnostics.

Methods

In this prospective study, the ISS was determined prehospital by emergency physicians. The validated AIS and ISS were analyzed based on final diagnoses. A Bland–Altman plot was used in analyzing the agreement between two different assays as well as sensitivity and specificity were determined. Confidence intervals were calculated for a Wilson score. Significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

The prehospital ISS was estimated at 26.0 ± 13.0 and was 34.7 ± 16.3 (p < 0.001) after in-hospital validation. In addition, most of the AIS subgroups were significantly higher in the final calculation than preclinically estimated (p < 0.05). When analyzing subgroups of trauma patients (ISS < 16 vs. ISS ≥ 16), we were able to demonstrate a sensitivity of > 90% to identify a multiple-trauma patient. Diagnosing a higher injury severity group (ISS ≥ 25), sensitivity dropped to 61.1%. The Bland–Altman plot demonstrates that injury severity is underestimated in higher injury levels.

Conclusion

Multiple-trauma patients can be identified using the ISS. Anatomic scores might be used for transport decisions; however, an accurate estimation of the injury severity should also be based on other criteria such as patient status, mechanism of injury, and other triage criteria.
Literatur
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Knudson P, Frecceri CA, DeLateur SA. Improving the field triage of major trauma victims. J Trauma. 1988;28(5):602–6. CrossRefPubMed Knudson P, Frecceri CA, DeLateur SA. Improving the field triage of major trauma victims. J Trauma. 1988;28(5):602–6. CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14(3):187–96. CrossRefPubMed Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974;14(3):187–96. CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma. 1997;43(6):922–5 ( discussion 5–6) CrossRefPubMed Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma. 1997;43(6):922–5 ( discussion 5–6) CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Balogh Z, Offner PJ, Moore EE, Biffl WL. NISS predicts postinjury multiple organ failure better than the ISS. J Trauma. 2000;48(4):624–7 ( discussion 7-8) CrossRefPubMed Balogh Z, Offner PJ, Moore EE, Biffl WL. NISS predicts postinjury multiple organ failure better than the ISS. J Trauma. 2000;48(4):624–7 ( discussion 7-8) CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10. CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10. CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sasser SM, Hunt RC, Faul M, Sugerman D, Pearson WS, Dulski T, et al. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012;61(RR-1):1–20. PubMed Sasser SM, Hunt RC, Faul M, Sugerman D, Pearson WS, Dulski T, et al. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2012;61(RR-1):1–20. PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Injury severity in polytrauma patients is underestimated using the injury severity score: a single-center correlation study in air rescue
verfasst von
C. Schröter
F. Urbanek
C. Frömke
M. Winkelmann
P. Mommsen
C. Krettek
C. Zeckey
Publikationsdatum
12.12.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-017-0888-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, DICOM-Daten, Videos und Abbildungen. » Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.