Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Gastroenterology Reports 12/2021

01.12.2021 | Esophagus (J Clarke and N Ahuja, Section Editors)

Innovations in Screening Tools for Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

verfasst von: Matthew G. Bell, Prasad G. Iyer

Erschienen in: Current Gastroenterology Reports | Ausgabe 12/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a lethal disease with rapidly rising incidence. Screening for EAC and its metaplastic precursor, Barrett’s esophagus (BE), followed by endoscopic surveillance and endoscopic treatment of dysplasia or early EAC are promising approaches to decreasing EAC incidence and EAC mortality. Historically, screening for EAC has been completed with a traditional per-oral esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD); however, this method has limitations including cost, tolerability, and accessibility. For this reason, much effort has been put forward to develop more effective, minimally invasive, and accessible BE and EAC screening tools. The purpose of this review is to describe recent developments of these novel tools.

Recent Findings

While endoscopic alternatives such as transnasal endoscopy are cheaper and well tolerated, they have not gained acceptance. Non-endoscopic modalities namely, swallowable cell collection devices coupled with biomarker analysis have been found to have excellent performance characteristics, tolerability, and cost effectiveness.

Summary

In this article, we provide an update on innovative developments in EAC/BE screening modalities including transnasal endoscopy, capsule endomicroscopy, swallowable cell collection devices, and exhaled volatile organic compound analyses.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.CrossRef Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Njei B, McCarty TR, Birk JW. Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(6):1141–6.CrossRef Njei B, McCarty TR, Birk JW. Trends in esophageal cancer survival in United States adults from 1973 to 2009: A SEER database analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(6):1141–6.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat American Cancer Society Cancer Statistics 2021 Report. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(3):12N. American Cancer Society Cancer Statistics 2021 Report. J Nucl Med. 2021;62(3):12N.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasad GA, Wu TT, Wigle DA, Buttar NS, Wongkeesong LM, Dunagan KT, et al. Endoscopic and surgical treatment of mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(3):815–23.CrossRef Prasad GA, Wu TT, Wigle DA, Buttar NS, Wongkeesong LM, Dunagan KT, et al. Endoscopic and surgical treatment of mucosal (T1a) esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(3):815–23.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Codipilly DC, Chandar AK, Singh S, Wani S, Shaheen NJ, Inadomi JM, et al. The Effect of Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(8):2068–86 e5. Codipilly DC, Chandar AK, Singh S, Wani S, Shaheen NJ, Inadomi JM, et al. The Effect of Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(8):2068–86 e5.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhat SK, McManus DT, Coleman HG, Johnston BT, Cardwell CR, McMenamin U, et al. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and prior diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus: a population-based study. Gut. 2015;64(1):20–5.CrossRef Bhat SK, McManus DT, Coleman HG, Johnston BT, Cardwell CR, McMenamin U, et al. Oesophageal adenocarcinoma and prior diagnosis of Barrett’s oesophagus: a population-based study. Gut. 2015;64(1):20–5.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sami SS, Subramanian V, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J, Saeed A, Singh S, Guha IN, et al. Performance characteristics of unsedated ultrathin video endoscopy in the assessment of the upper GI tract: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(5):782–92.CrossRef Sami SS, Subramanian V, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J, Saeed A, Singh S, Guha IN, et al. Performance characteristics of unsedated ultrathin video endoscopy in the assessment of the upper GI tract: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(5):782–92.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Peery AF, Hoppo T, Garman KS, Dellon ES, Daugherty N, Bream S, et al. Feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of office-based, screening transnasal esophagoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(5):945–53 e2. Peery AF, Hoppo T, Garman KS, Dellon ES, Daugherty N, Bream S, et al. Feasibility, safety, acceptability, and yield of office-based, screening transnasal esophagoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75(5):945–53 e2.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shariff MK, Varghese S, O’Donovan M, Abdullahi Z, Liu X, Fitzgerald RC, et al. Pilot randomized crossover study comparing the efficacy of transnasal disposable endosheath with standard endoscopy to detect Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy. 2016;48(2):110–6.PubMed Shariff MK, Varghese S, O’Donovan M, Abdullahi Z, Liu X, Fitzgerald RC, et al. Pilot randomized crossover study comparing the efficacy of transnasal disposable endosheath with standard endoscopy to detect Barrett’s esophagus. Endoscopy. 2016;48(2):110–6.PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sami SS, Iyer PG, Pophali P, Halland M, di Pietro M, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J, et al. Acceptability, Accuracy, and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):638–46 e1. Sami SS, Iyer PG, Pophali P, Halland M, di Pietro M, Ortiz-Fernandez-Sordo J, et al. Acceptability, Accuracy, and Safety of Disposable Transnasal Capsule Endoscopy for Barrett's Esophagus Screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):638–46 e1.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Park J, Cho YK, Kim JH. Current and Future Use of Esophageal Capsule Endoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2018;51(4):317–22.CrossRef Park J, Cho YK, Kim JH. Current and Future Use of Esophageal Capsule Endoscopy. Clin Endosc. 2018;51(4):317–22.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhardwaj A, Hollenbeak CS, Pooran N, Mathew A. A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy for Barrett’s esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(6):1533–9.CrossRef Bhardwaj A, Hollenbeak CS, Pooran N, Mathew A. A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy for Barrett’s esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(6):1533–9.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen WS, Zhu LH, Li DZ, Chen L, Wu YL, Wang W. String esophageal capsule endoscopy with real-time viewing improves visualization of the distal esophageal Z-line: a prospective, comparative study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26(3):309–12.CrossRef Chen WS, Zhu LH, Li DZ, Chen L, Wu YL, Wang W. String esophageal capsule endoscopy with real-time viewing improves visualization of the distal esophageal Z-line: a prospective, comparative study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26(3):309–12.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Beg S, Card T, Warburton S, Rahman I, Wilkes E, White J, et al. Diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal varices using a magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(4):773–81 e1. Beg S, Card T, Warburton S, Rahman I, Wilkes E, White J, et al. Diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal varices using a magnetically assisted capsule endoscopy system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(4):773–81 e1.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubenstein JH, Inadomi JM, Brill JV, Eisen GM. Cost utility of screening for Barrett’s esophagus with esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(3):312–8.CrossRef Rubenstein JH, Inadomi JM, Brill JV, Eisen GM. Cost utility of screening for Barrett’s esophagus with esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(3):312–8.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gora MJ, Sauk JS, Carruth RW, Gallagher KA, Suter MJ, Nishioka NS, et al. Tethered capsule endomicroscopy enables less invasive imaging of gastrointestinal tract microstructure. Nat Med. 2013;19(2):238–40.CrossRef Gora MJ, Sauk JS, Carruth RW, Gallagher KA, Suter MJ, Nishioka NS, et al. Tethered capsule endomicroscopy enables less invasive imaging of gastrointestinal tract microstructure. Nat Med. 2013;19(2):238–40.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Gora MJ, Queneherve L, Carruth RW, Lu W, Rosenberg M, Sauk JS, et al. Tethered capsule endomicroscopy for microscopic imaging of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum without sedation in humans (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88(5):830–40 e3. Gora MJ, Queneherve L, Carruth RW, Lu W, Rosenberg M, Sauk JS, et al. Tethered capsule endomicroscopy for microscopic imaging of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum without sedation in humans (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88(5):830–40 e3.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gora MJ, Simmons LH, Queneherve L, Grant CN, Carruth RW, Lu W, et al. Tethered capsule endomicroscopy: from bench to bedside at a primary care practice. J Biomed Opt. 2016;21(10):104001. Gora MJ, Simmons LH, Queneherve L, Grant CN, Carruth RW, Lu W, et al. Tethered capsule endomicroscopy: from bench to bedside at a primary care practice. J Biomed Opt. 2016;21(10):104001.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong J, Grant C, Vuong B, Nishioka N, Gao AH, Beatty M, et al. Feasibility and Safety of Tethered Capsule Endomicroscopy in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus in a Multi-Center Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. Dong J, Grant C, Vuong B, Nishioka N, Gao AH, Beatty M, et al. Feasibility and Safety of Tethered Capsule Endomicroscopy in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus in a Multi-Center Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang CP, Dong J, Ford T, Reddy R, Hosseiny H, Farrokhi H, et al. Optical coherence tomography-guided laser marking with tethered capsule endomicroscopy in unsedated patients. Biomed Opt Express. 2019;10(3):1207–22.CrossRef Liang CP, Dong J, Ford T, Reddy R, Hosseiny H, Farrokhi H, et al. Optical coherence tomography-guided laser marking with tethered capsule endomicroscopy in unsedated patients. Biomed Opt Express. 2019;10(3):1207–22.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Januszewicz W, Tan WK, Lehovsky K, Debiram-Beecham I, Nuckcheddy T, Moist S, et al. Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):647–56 e1. Januszewicz W, Tan WK, Lehovsky K, Debiram-Beecham I, Nuckcheddy T, Moist S, et al. Safety and Acceptability of Esophageal Cytosponge Cell Collection Device in a Pooled Analysis of Data From Individual Patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):647–56 e1.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadri SR, Lao-Sirieix P, O'Donovan M, Debiram I, Das M, Blazeby JM, et al. Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c4372. Kadri SR, Lao-Sirieix P, O'Donovan M, Debiram I, Das M, Blazeby JM, et al. Acceptability and accuracy of a non-endoscopic screening test for Barrett's oesophagus in primary care: cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c4372.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Ross-Innes CS, Debiram-Beecham I, O'Donovan M, Walker E, Varghese S, Lao-Sirieix P, et al. Evaluation of a minimally invasive cell sampling device coupled with assessment of trefoil factor 3 expression for diagnosing Barrett's esophagus: a multi-center case-control study. PLoS Med. 2015;12(1):e1001780. Ross-Innes CS, Debiram-Beecham I, O'Donovan M, Walker E, Varghese S, Lao-Sirieix P, et al. Evaluation of a minimally invasive cell sampling device coupled with assessment of trefoil factor 3 expression for diagnosing Barrett's esophagus: a multi-center case-control study. PLoS Med. 2015;12(1):e1001780.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chettouh H, Mowforth O, Galeano-Dalmau N, Bezawada N, Ross-Innes C, MacRae S, et al. Methylation panel is a diagnostic biomarker for Barrett’s oesophagus in endoscopic biopsies and non-endoscopic cytology specimens. Gut. 2018;67(11):1942–9.CrossRef Chettouh H, Mowforth O, Galeano-Dalmau N, Bezawada N, Ross-Innes C, MacRae S, et al. Methylation panel is a diagnostic biomarker for Barrett’s oesophagus in endoscopic biopsies and non-endoscopic cytology specimens. Gut. 2018;67(11):1942–9.CrossRef
26.•
Zurück zum Zitat Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, O'Donovan M, Maroni R, Muldrew B, Debiram-Beecham I, et al. Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3 versus usual care to identify Barrett's oesophagus in a primary care setting: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10247):333–44. This multicenter study utilized the Cytosponge swallowable device coupled with TFF3 analysis specifically in the primary care setting in patients with a diagnosis of GERD. This novel screening modality displayed improved detection of BE in comparison to standard of care. Cytosponge/TFF3 utilization also showed potential for earlier stage diagnosis of both dysplasia and EAC that were more amenable to intervention. Fitzgerald RC, di Pietro M, O'Donovan M, Maroni R, Muldrew B, Debiram-Beecham I, et al. Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3 versus usual care to identify Barrett's oesophagus in a primary care setting: a multicentre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10247):333–44. This multicenter study utilized the Cytosponge swallowable device coupled with TFF3 analysis specifically in the primary care setting in patients with a diagnosis of GERD. This novel screening modality displayed improved detection of BE in comparison to standard of care. Cytosponge/TFF3 utilization also showed potential for earlier stage diagnosis of both dysplasia and EAC that were more amenable to intervention.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Benaglia T, Sharples LD, Fitzgerald RC, Lyratzopoulos G. Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(1):62–73 e6. Benaglia T, Sharples LD, Fitzgerald RC, Lyratzopoulos G. Health benefits and cost effectiveness of endoscopic and nonendoscopic cytosponge screening for Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(1):62–73 e6.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Heberle CR, Omidvari AH, Ali A, Kroep S, Kong CY, Inadomi JM, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Screening Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease for Barrett's Esophagus With a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(9):1397–404 e7. Heberle CR, Omidvari AH, Ali A, Kroep S, Kong CY, Inadomi JM, et al. Cost Effectiveness of Screening Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease for Barrett's Esophagus With a Minimally Invasive Cell Sampling Device. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(9):1397–404 e7.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Offman J, Muldrew B, O’Donovan M, Debiram-Beecham I, Pesola F, Kaimi I, et al. Barrett’s oESophagus trial 3 (BEST3): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing the Cytosponge-TFF3 test with usual care to facilitate the diagnosis of oesophageal pre-cancer in primary care patients with chronic acid reflux. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):784.CrossRef Offman J, Muldrew B, O’Donovan M, Debiram-Beecham I, Pesola F, Kaimi I, et al. Barrett’s oESophagus trial 3 (BEST3): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial comparing the Cytosponge-TFF3 test with usual care to facilitate the diagnosis of oesophageal pre-cancer in primary care patients with chronic acid reflux. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):784.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyer PG, Taylor WR, Johnson ML, Lansing RL, Maixner KA, Yab TC, et al. Highly Discriminant Methylated DNA Markers for the Non-endoscopic Detection of Barrett’s Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(8):1156–66.CrossRef Iyer PG, Taylor WR, Johnson ML, Lansing RL, Maixner KA, Yab TC, et al. Highly Discriminant Methylated DNA Markers for the Non-endoscopic Detection of Barrett’s Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(8):1156–66.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaz AM, Grady WM, Stachler MD, Bass AJ. Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations in Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44(2):473–89.CrossRef Kaz AM, Grady WM, Stachler MD, Bass AJ. Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations in Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44(2):473–89.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Zou H, Molina JR, Harrington JJ, Osborn NK, Klatt KK, Romero Y, et al. Aberrant methylation of secreted frizzled-related protein genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus. Int J Cancer. 2005;116(4):584–91.CrossRef Zou H, Molina JR, Harrington JJ, Osborn NK, Klatt KK, Romero Y, et al. Aberrant methylation of secreted frizzled-related protein genes in esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett’s esophagus. Int J Cancer. 2005;116(4):584–91.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Kambhampati S, Cheng Y, Ma K, Simsek C, Tieu AH, et al. Methylation Biomarker Panel Performance in EsophaCap Cytology Samples for Diagnosing Barrett’s Esophagus: A Prospective Validation Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(7):2127–35.CrossRef Wang Z, Kambhampati S, Cheng Y, Ma K, Simsek C, Tieu AH, et al. Methylation Biomarker Panel Performance in EsophaCap Cytology Samples for Diagnosing Barrett’s Esophagus: A Prospective Validation Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(7):2127–35.CrossRef
34.•
Zurück zum Zitat Iyer PG, Taylor WR, Slettedahl SW, Lansing RL, Hemminger LL, Cayer FK, et al. Validation of a methylated DNA marker panel for the nonendoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus in a multi-site case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021. This multicenter case-control analysis of the EsophaCap swallowable device coupled with a 5-MDM analysis displayed BE diagnosis sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 90%. This study shows promising accuracy for utilization of EsophaCap and panel-based MDM analyses for BE detection. Iyer PG, Taylor WR, Slettedahl SW, Lansing RL, Hemminger LL, Cayer FK, et al. Validation of a methylated DNA marker panel for the nonendoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus in a multi-site case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021. This multicenter case-control analysis of the EsophaCap swallowable device coupled with a 5-MDM analysis displayed BE diagnosis sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 90%. This study shows promising accuracy for utilization of EsophaCap and panel-based MDM analyses for BE detection.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyer PG, Taylor WR, Johnson ML, Lansing RL, Maixner KA, Hemminger LL, et al. Accurate Nonendoscopic Detection of Barrett’s Esophagus by Methylated DNA Markers: A Multisite Case Control Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(8):1201–9.CrossRef Iyer PG, Taylor WR, Johnson ML, Lansing RL, Maixner KA, Hemminger LL, et al. Accurate Nonendoscopic Detection of Barrett’s Esophagus by Methylated DNA Markers: A Multisite Case Control Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115(8):1201–9.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Moinova HR, LaFramboise T, Lutterbaugh JD, Chandar AK, Dumot J, Faulx A, et al. Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers for non-endoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(424). Moinova HR, LaFramboise T, Lutterbaugh JD, Chandar AK, Dumot J, Faulx A, et al. Identifying DNA methylation biomarkers for non-endoscopic detection of Barrett's esophagus. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(424).
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan DK, Zakko L, Visrodia KH, Leggett CL, Lutzke LS, Clemens MA, et al. Breath Testing for Barrett’s Esophagus Using Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profiling With an Electronic Nose Device. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(1):24–6.CrossRef Chan DK, Zakko L, Visrodia KH, Leggett CL, Lutzke LS, Clemens MA, et al. Breath Testing for Barrett’s Esophagus Using Exhaled Volatile Organic Compound Profiling With an Electronic Nose Device. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(1):24–6.CrossRef
38.•
Zurück zum Zitat Peters Y, Schrauwen RWM, Tan AC, Bogers SK, de Jong B, Siersema PD. Detection of Barrett's oesophagus through exhaled breath using an electronic nose device. Gut. 2020;69(7):1169–72. This proof of concept study utilized a E-nose device to analyze exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOC) of 402 patients (129 with BE, 141 with GERD, and 132 healthy controls). Overall, VOC analysis displayed a BE diagnosis sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 74% and did not show variation based on PPI use, GERD history, or presence/absence of a hiatal hernia. Peters Y, Schrauwen RWM, Tan AC, Bogers SK, de Jong B, Siersema PD. Detection of Barrett's oesophagus through exhaled breath using an electronic nose device. Gut. 2020;69(7):1169–72. This proof of concept study utilized a E-nose device to analyze exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOC) of 402 patients (129 with BE, 141 with GERD, and 132 healthy controls). Overall, VOC analysis displayed a BE diagnosis sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 74% and did not show variation based on PPI use, GERD history, or presence/absence of a hiatal hernia.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou Z, Kalatskaya I, Russell D, Marcon N, Cirocco M, Krzyzanowski PM, et al. Combined EsophaCap cytology and MUC2 immunohistochemistry for screening of intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and carcinoma. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019;12:219–29.CrossRef Zhou Z, Kalatskaya I, Russell D, Marcon N, Cirocco M, Krzyzanowski PM, et al. Combined EsophaCap cytology and MUC2 immunohistochemistry for screening of intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and carcinoma. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2019;12:219–29.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Innovations in Screening Tools for Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
verfasst von
Matthew G. Bell
Prasad G. Iyer
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2021
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Gastroenterology Reports / Ausgabe 12/2021
Print ISSN: 1522-8037
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-312X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-021-00821-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2021

Current Gastroenterology Reports 12/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Nutrition and Obesity (S McClave and E Omer, Section Editors)

When Pandemics Collide: the Interplay of Obesity and COVID-19

Nutrition and Obesity (S McClave and E Omer, Section Editors)

Processed Foods – Getting Back to The Basics

Liver (S Cotler and E Kallwitz, Section Editors)

Portal Vein Thrombosis In Cirrhosis: Interventional Treatment Options

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.