Skip to main content
main-content

10.04.2019 | Original Paper | Ausgabe 1/2020

Head and Neck Pathology 1/2020

Inter-observer Variability in the Diagnosis of Proliferative Verrucous Leukoplakia: Clinical Implications for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Understanding: A Collaborative Pilot Study

Zeitschrift:
Head and Neck Pathology > Ausgabe 1/2020
Autoren:
Jasbir D. Upadhyaya, Sarah G. Fitzpatrick, Donald M. Cohen, Elizabeth A. Bilodeau, Indraneel Bhattacharyya, James S. Lewis Jr., Jinping Lai, John M. Wright, Justin A. Bishop, Marino E. Leon, Mohammed N. Islam, Raja Seethala, Ricardo J. Padilla, Roman Carlos, Susan Müller, Lester D. R. Thompson
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12105-019-01035-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This study was presented at the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (AAOMP) annual meeting in June 2018 at Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

The use of diverse terminology may lead to inconsistent diagnosis and subsequent mistreatment of lesions within the proliferative verrucous leukoplakia (PVL) spectrum. The objectives of this study were: (a) to measure inter-observer variability between a variety of pathologists diagnosing PVL lesions; and (b) to evaluate the impact of diverse terminologies on understanding, interpretation, and subsequent treatment planning by oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMFS). Six oral pathologists (OP) and six head and neck pathologists (HNP) reviewed 40 digitally scanned slides of PVL-type lesions. Inter-observer agreement on diagnoses was evaluated by Fleiss’ kappa analysis. The most commonly used diagnostic terminologies were sent to ten OMFS to evaluate their resulting interpretations and potential follow-up treatment approaches. The overall means of the surgeons’ responses were compared by Student t test. There was poor inter-observer agreement between pathologists on the diagnosis of PVL lesions (κ = 0.270), although there was good agreement (κ = 0.650) when diagnosing frankly malignant lesions. The lowest agreement was in diagnosing verrucous hyperplasia (VH) with/without dysplasia, atypical epithelial proliferation (AEP), and verrucous carcinoma (VC). The OMFS showed the lowest agreement on identical categories of non-malignant diagnoses, specifically VH and AEP. This study demonstrates a lack of standardized terminology and diagnostic criteria for the spectrum of PVL lesions. We recommend adopting standardized criteria and terminology, proposed and established by an expert panel white paper, to assist pathologists and clinicians in uniformly diagnosing and managing PVL spectrum lesions.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

★ PREMIUM-INHALT
e.Med Interdisziplinär

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Weitere Produktempfehlungen anzeigen
Zusatzmaterial
Nur für berechtigte Nutzer zugänglich
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Head and Neck Pathology 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Sine qua non Radiology-Pathology

Regional Odontodysplasia Affecting the Maxilla

  1. Das kostenlose Testabonnement läuft nach 14 Tagen automatisch und formlos aus. Dieses Abonnement kann nur einmal getestet werden.

Neu im Fachgebiet Pathologie

14.04.2021 | Schwerpunkt: Neue WHO-Klassifikationen und Digitales Lernen | Ausgabe 3/2021

Digitale Lehre im Fach Pathologie

06.04.2021 | Nierenkarzinom | Schwerpunkt: Neue WHO-Klassifikationen und Digitales Lernen | Ausgabe 3/2021

Histologische Subtypen des Nierenzellkarzinoms

Übersicht und neue Entwicklungen

06.04.2021 | Sarkome | Schwerpunkt: Neue WHO-Klassifikationen und Digitales Lernen | Ausgabe 3/2021

Neues in der aktuellen WHO-Klassifikation (2020) für Weichgewebssarkome