Background
Theoretical background
Methods
Study design and procedures
Description of the sample
Ward-I | ED | Ward-II | Overall | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Source | T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 | T1 | T2 |
Response rate | 68 | 64 | 56 | 64 | 59 | 54 | 58 | 62 |
Same respondentsa
| 50 | 47 | 36 | 43 | ||||
Women | 82 | 63 | 84 | 83 | 94 | 92 | 86 | 81 |
Age | ||||||||
Under 30 | 30 | 13 | 30 | 10 | 28 | 24 | 29 | 13 |
31-45 | 47 | 56 | 55 | 67 | 38 | 44 | 50 | 61 |
Over 45 | 23 | 31 | 15 | 23 | 34 | 32 | 21 | 26 |
Education | ||||||||
School/College | 35 | 13 | 55 | 34 | 28 | 24 | 46 | 30 |
University | 65 | 87 | 45 | 66 | 72 | 76 | 54 | 70 |
Profession | ||||||||
Nurse aid | 41 | 31 | 59 | 40 | 41 | 44 | 52 | 40 |
Nurse | 59 | 69 | 41 | 60 | 59 | 56 | 48 | 60 |
Experience | ||||||||
< 5 year | 88 | 75 | 54 | 46 | 47 | 60 | 57 | 52 |
5 – 20 years | 12 | 13 | 39 | 51 | 41 | 24 | 36 | 41 |
> 20 years | 0 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 7 |
Measure – the research instrument
Domain | Scale name | Sample items |
---|---|---|
Demands at work | Quantitative demands | Do you get behind with your work? |
Tempo at work | Do you have to work very fast? | |
Cognitive demands | Do you have to keep your eyes on lots of things while you work? | |
Emotional demands | Does your work put you in emotionally disturbing situations? | |
Demands for hiding emotions* | Does your work require that you hide your feelings? | |
Work organization and job content | Influence at work | Can you influence the amount of work assigned to you? |
Possibilities for development | Does your work require you to take the initiative? | |
Meaning of work | Do you feel that the work you do is important? | |
Commitment to the workplace | Do you feel that your place of work is of great importance to you? | |
Rewards at work | Is your work recognised and appreciated by the management? | |
Interpersonal relations and leadership | Predictability* | Do you receive all the information you need in order to do your work well? |
Role clarity | Does your work have clear objectives? | |
Role conflicts* | Are contradictory demands placed on you at work? | |
Social support from colleagues | How often do you get help and support from your colleagues? | |
Social support from supervisors | How often is your nearest superior willing to listen to your problems at work? | |
Social community at work* | Is there a good atmosphere between you and your colleagues? | |
Values at the workplace | Horizontal trust* | Do the employees in general trust each other? |
Vertical trust | Does the management trust the employees to do their work well? | |
Justice and respect | Are conflicts resolved in a fair way? |
Analysis
Lean intervention | Ward-I | Ward-II | ED |
---|---|---|---|
Education/Training
| 2 days training for the whole staff by external consultant | 2 days training for the whole staff by external consultant | Only Lean coaches were trained by the hospital’s Quality Development Group |
5S
| Executed with keen employee involvement | Executed with the support of Lean coaches | Executed with the support of Lean coaches |
Value Stream Map
| Executed by Lean coaches including employee discussions | Executed by Lean coaches | Executed by the flow group |
Continuous Improvement & Visual Management
| Executed through employee discussions and sustained | Started by Lean coaches but couldn’t be sustained | Planned by the flow group but couldn’t be implemented |
Work Redesign
| A joint working station for physicians and nurses, nurse aides equipped with trolleys having laptops, colored magnets for patient status, patients seen one by one. | One working station for physicians and nurses, nurse aides equipped with trolleys having laptops, colored magnets for patient status, patients seen one by one. | One working station for physicians and nurses, one part-time junior physician now full-time, ECG machine stationed in preliminary care room, heart coordinator to admit patients from ED to wards |
Teamwork
| 2 care teams; in each team, physicians and nurses started working in pairs | 3 care teams; in each team, physicians and nurses started working in pairs | Team for preliminary care consisting of a nurse and a junior physician led by a specialist |
Results
Scale | Change | Motivation | |
---|---|---|---|
Ward-I
| Quantitative Demands | -1 | Better work design due to Lean intervention |
Tempo | -1 | -do- | |
Cognitive Demands | +1 | CI work and use of VM | |
Emotional Demands | 0 | No related to Lean or some other change | |
Demands for Hiding Emotions | 0 | Not related to Lean intervention at Ward-I | |
Influence at Work | +1 | Lean with CI activity | |
Possibilities for Development | +1 | -do- | |
Meaning of Work | +1 | Steady Lean intervention with CI | |
Commitment to Workplace | +1 | -do- | |
Predictability | +1 | CI with VM | |
Rewards at Work | +1 | Lean with a supportive leadership | |
Role Clarity | +1 | Improved work organization as a result of Lean | |
Role Conflicts | -1 | Lean generally | |
Social support from Colleagues | +1 | Teamwork, CI and new seating plan | |
Social support from Supervisors | +1 | Supportive leadership | |
Social Community at Work | +1 | Steady Lean having teamwork | |
Horizontal Trust | 0 | Already good enough at T1 | |
Vertical Trust | 0 | -do- | |
Justice and Respect | +1 | Physicians and nurses working in pairs may lead to feeling of fair work distribution | |
Ward-II
| Quantitative Demands | -1 | High value at T1 due to high patient volume and Lean work |
Tempo | -1 | -do- | |
Cognitive Demands | -1 | CI and VM being tried at T1 but couldn’t work | |
Emotional Demands | +1 | Bad Lean perception increased dissatisfaction | |
Demands for Hiding Emotions | 0 | Not related to Lean intervention at Ward-II | |
Influence at Work | +1 | VSM, work redesign and teamwork | |
Possibilities for Development | 0 | No CI activity | |
Meaning of Work | 0 | No CI activity mean no employee involvement | |
Commitment to Workplace | +1 | High turnover implies very low value at T1 | |
Predictability | 0 | Limited information dissemination as no VM | |
Rewards at Work | 0 | Not related to Lean intervention at Ward-II | |
Role Clarity | 0 | No CI to make roles clearer | |
Role Conflicts | 0 | No other changes to increase role conflicts | |
Social support from Colleagues | +1 | Teamwork and new seating plan | |
Social support from Supervisors | +1 | Staff welcomed leadership change before T2 | |
Social Community at Work | +1 | Teamwork and new seating plan | |
Horizontal Trust | 0 | The scale item regarding management will cancel the effect of teamwork | |
Vertical Trust | 0 | Distrust at T1due to Lean likely to be cancelled by trust in new leadership at T2 | |
Justice and Respect | +1 | Physicians and nurses working in pairs may lead to feeling of fair work distribution | |
ED
| Quantitative Demands | +1 | Deterioration of Lean |
Tempo | +1 | -do- | |
Cognitive Demands | -1 | Morning meetings with whiteboard being held at T1 but abandoned till T2 | |
Emotional Demands | 0 | Not related to Lean intervention at ED | |
Demands for Hiding Emotions | 0 | -do- | |
Influence at Work | 0 | Likely poor at T1 and remain poor at T2 | |
Possibilities for Development | -1 | Deterioration of Lean | |
Meaning of Work | -1 | -do- | |
Commitment to Workplace | -1 | -do- | |
Predictability | 0 | Not related to Lean intervention at ED | |
Rewards at Work | -1 | Deterioration of Lean | |
Role Clarity | -1 | -do- | |
Role Conflicts | +1 | -do- | |
Social support from Colleagues | -1 | Less teamwork as morning meetings abandoned | |
Social support from Supervisors | -1 | Withering leadership | |
Social Community at Work | -1 | Less teamwork | |
Horizontal Trust | 0 | No Lean or other changes likely to change this | |
Vertical Trust | -1 | Deterioration of Lean | |
Justice and Respect | 0 | -do- |
Scale | ED | Ward-I | Ward-II | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 (n =80) | T2 (n =87) | Diff | Hyp | T1 (n =17) | T2 (n =16) | Diff | Hyp | T1 (n = 32) | T2 (n = 25) | Diff | Hyp | |
Quantitative demands | 44.9 (15.8) | 52.6 (16.4) | 7.7 | 1 | 38.2 (15.0) | 36.7 (15.3) | -1.6 | -1 | 45.7 (21.0) | 40.5 (15.8) | -5.2 | -1 |
Tempo at work | 75.2 (13.4) | 74.0 (15.8) | -1.2 | 1 | 59.6 (13.6) | 64.2 (18.8) | 4.6 | -1 | 70.3 (18.7) | 64.1 (12.9) | -6.3 | -1 |
Cognitive demands | 78.5 (12.4) | 69.4 (18.7) | -9.1 | -1 | 66.7 (16.4) | 69.4 (14.3) | 2.8 | 1 | 70.6 (13.0) | 69.8 (18.4) | -0.8 | -1 |
Emotional demands | 52.4 (21.3) | 60.1 (16.6) | 7.7 | 0 | 55.1 (23.0) | 56.3 (22.8) | 1.1 | 0 | 50.0 (19.1) | 55.0 (21.7) | 5 | 1 |
Hiding emotions* | 74.6 (13.0) | 67.1 (16.5) | -7.5 | 0 | 71.1 (13.2) | 70.6 (15.1) | -0.5 | 0 | 67.4 (12.6) | 69.1 (14.8) | 1.6 | 0 |
Influence at work | 39.6 (18.7) | 38.5 (17.7) | -1.1 | 0 | 40.4 (13.6) | 50.0 (20.4) | 9.6 | 1 | 33.6 (16.3) | 45.5 (18.4) | 11.9 | 1 |
Possibilities for development | 72.9 (22.9) | 70.8 (18.5) | -2.1 | -1 | 65.4 (15.6) | 66.7 (20.4) | 1.2 | 1 | 69.1 (14.5) | 72.4 (18.4) | 3.3 | 0 |
Meaning of work | 86.9 (15.2) | 76.2 (16.5) | -10.7 | -1 | 79.4 (13.2) | 89.2 (10.4) | 9.8 | 1 | 81.3 (13.5) | 84.5 (11.6) | 3.3 | 0 |
Commitment to the workplace | 69.5 (20.2) | 61.0 (20.1) | -8.4 | -1 | 59.6 (21.4) | 74.2 (16.0) | 14.6 | 1 | 51.6 (19.5) | 60.0 (17.7) | 8.4 | 1 |
Rewards at work | 62.2 (18.7) | 60.4 (15.5) | -1.7 | 0 | 58.8 (20.6) | 75.9 (16.6) | 17.1 | 1 | 60.2 (18.9) | 66.7 (12.6) | 6.5 | 1 |
Predictability* | 57.0 (15.7) | 52.4 (15.7) | -4.5 | -1 | 53.7 ( 9.6) | 65.8 (16.7) | 12.2 | 1 | 49.2 (13.8) | 51.5 (19.2) | 2.3 | 0 |
Role clarity | 75.0 (14.7) | 67.2 (15.9) | -7.8 | -1 | 64.0 ( 9.8) | 80.8 (10.4) | 16.9 | 1 | 62.5 (15.9) | 68.5 (14.5) | 6 | 0 |
Role conflicts* | 48.7 (13.5) | 52.2 (13.0) | 3.5 | -1 | 41.9 ( 9.3) | 46.3 (20.2) | 4.3 | 1 | 48.8 (12.1) | 54.1 ( 7.4) | 5.2 | 0 |
Social support from colleagues | 80.6 (10.5) | 80.8 (13.3) | 0.2 | -1 | 73.1 (11.4) | 79.3 ( 9.6) | 6.2 | 1 | 76.5 (12.0) | 74.2 (12.1) | -2.3 | 1 |
Social support from supervisors | 56.2 (29.7) | 62.1 (23.2) | 5.9 | -1 | 64.7 (22.6) | 78.1 (16.8) | 13.4 | 1 | 60.5 (21.3) | 58.2 (20.2) | -2.4 | 1 |
Social community at work* | 82.2 (8.7) | 79.5 (11.5) | -2.7 | -1 | 77.3 (14.2) | 85.3 ( 8.4) | 8.1 | 1 | 80.2 (12.0) | 81.9 (10.1) | 1.7 | 1 |
Horizontal trust* | 32.0 (14.8) | 43.0 (15.9) | 11 | 0 | 29.9 (17.4) | 26.1 (13.7) | -3.8 | 0 | 26.8 (14.2) | 25.4 (14.2) | -1.4 | 0 |
Vertical trust | 66.0 (17.0) | 64.9 (18.0) | -1.0 | -1 | 69.1 (12.6) | 64.3 (21.3) | -4.8 | 0 | 56.3 (20.3) | 63.5 (12.7) | 7.3 | 0 |
Justice and respect | 55.4 (15.6) | 57.9 (17.4) | 2.5 | 0 | 64.7 (14.1) | 60.0 (18.4) | -4.7 | 1 | 51.6 (15.5) | 63.5 (14.2) | 12 | 1 |