Background
Multiple sclerosis is a neurodegenerative disease that damages the myelin sheath within the central nervous system. Axonal demyelination, particularly in the corpus callosum, impacts communication between the brain’s hemispheres in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Changes in interhemispheric communication may impair gait coordination which is modulated by communication across the corpus callosum to excite and inhibit specific muscle groups. To further evaluate the functional role of interhemispheric communication in gait and mobility, this study assessed the ipsilateral silent period (iSP), an indirect marker of interhemispheric inhibition and how it relates to gait adaptation in PwMS.
Methods
Using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we assessed interhemispheric inhibition differences between the more affected and less affected hemisphere in the primary motor cortices in 29 PwMS. In addition, these same PwMS underwent a split-belt treadmill walking paradigm, with the faster paced belt moving under their more affected limb. Step length asymmetry (SLA) was the primary outcome measure used to assess gait adaptability during split-belt treadmill walking. We hypothesized that PwMS would exhibit differences in iSP inhibitory metrics between the more affected and less affected hemispheres and that increased interhemispheric inhibition would be associated with greater gait adaptability in PwMS.
Results
No statistically significant differences in interhemispheric inhibition or conduction time were found between the more affected and less affected hemisphere. Furthermore, SLA aftereffect was negatively correlated with both average percent depth of silent period (dSP%AVE) (r = -0.40, p = 0.07) and max percent depth of silent period (dSP%MAX) r = -0.40, p = 0.07), indicating that reduced interhemispheric inhibition was associated with greater gait adaptability in PwMS.
Conclusion
The lack of differences between the more affected and less affected hemisphere indicates that PwMS have similar interhemispheric inhibitory capacity irrespective of the more affected hemisphere. Additionally, we identified a moderate correlation between reduced interhemispheric inhibition and greater gait adaptability. These findings may indicate that interhemispheric inhibition may in part influence responsiveness to motor adaptation paradigms and the need for further research evaluating the neural mechanisms underlying the relationship between interhemispheric inhibition and motor adaptability.