Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2017 | Research | Ausgabe 1/2017 Open Access

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017

International consultation on long-term global health research priorities, research capacity and research uptake in developing countries

Zeitschrift:
Health Research Policy and Systems > Ausgabe 1/2017
Autoren:
David Mc Conalogue, Sue Kinn, Jo-Ann Mulligan, Malcolm McNeil

Abstract

Background

In recognition of the need for long-term planning for global health research, and to inform future global health research priorities, the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DfID) carried out a public consultation between May and June 2015. The consultation aimed to elicit views on the (1) the long-term future global health research priorities; (2) areas likely to be less important over time; (3) how to improve research uptake in low-income countries; and (4) how to build research capacity in low-income countries.

Methods

An online consultation was used to survey a wide range of participants on global health research priorities. The qualitative data was analysed using a thematic analysis, with frequency of codes in responses tabulated to approximate relative importance of themes and sub-themes.

Results

The public consultation yielded 421 responses. The survey responses confirmed the growing importance of non-communicable disease as a global health research priority, being placed above infectious diseases. Participants felt that the key area for reducing funding prioritisation was infectious diseases. The involvement of policymakers and other key stakeholders was seen as critical to drive research uptake, as was collaboration and partnership. Several methods to build research capacity in low-income countries were described, including capacity building educational programmes, mentorship programmes and research institution collaboration and partnership.

Conclusions

The outcomes from this consultation survey provide valuable insights into how DfID stakeholders prioritise research. The outcomes from this survey were reviewed alongside other elements of a wider DfID consultation process to help inform long-term research prioritisation of global health research. There are limitations in this approach; the opportunistic nature of the survey’s dissemination means the findings presented may not be representative of the full range of stakeholders or views.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe