Ausgabe 3/2012
Inhalt (12 Artikel)
Normal urodynamic parameters in women
Wally Mahfouz, Tala Al Afraa, Lysanne Campeau, Jacques Corcos
3D analysis of cystoceles using magnetic resonance imaging assessing midline, paravaginal, and apical defects
Kindra A. Larson, Jiajia Luo, Kenneth E. Guire, Luyun Chen, James A. Ashton-Miller, John O. L. DeLancey
The impact of dispositional optimism on symptoms and treatment choices in patients with pelvic floor disorders
Lior Lowenstein, Olga Ramm, Elizabeth Mueller, Linda Brubaker, Mary Pat FitzGerald, Joel Lopez, Kimberly Kenton
Anxiety and depression associated with incontinence in middle-aged women: a large Norwegian cross-sectional study
Gunhild Felde, Ingvar Bjelland, Steinar Hunskaar
Pelvic organ prolapse and collagen-associated disorders
Karin Lammers, Sabrina L. Lince, Marian A. Spath, Léon C. L. T. van Kempen, Jan C. M. Hendriks, Mark E. Vierhout, Kirsten B. Kluivers
Comparison of late complications of retropubic and transobturator slings in stress urinary incontinence
Eckhard Petri, Kiran Ashok
Anterior sacrospinous ligament fixation associated with paravaginal repair using the Pinnacle™ device: an anatomical study
Mélanie Cayrac, Vincent Letouzey, Idir Ouzaid, Pierre Costa, Vincent Delmas, Renaud de Tayrac
Feasibility and outcome of vaginal paravaginal repair using the Capio suture-capturing device
Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Simone Ferrero, Sara Mancuso, Sergio Costantini
Comment on Kirby et al.: Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes
G. Alessandro Digesu, Alexandros Derpapas, Vik Khullar
Preoperative voiding detrusor pressures do not predict stress incontinence surgery outcomes: reply to Digesu et al.
Charles W. Nager