Background
Objectives
Methods
Eligibility criteria
Study characteristic | Inclusion criteria | Exclusion criteria |
---|---|---|
Study designs | • Randomised controlled trials (RCT) (both efficacy and effectiveness trials) • Crossover designs where data from before the cross-over are extractable to avoid the potential for a carry-over phenomenon | • Cluster randomised RCTs • Non-randomised trials • Repeated measures designs (pre- and post-intervention) unless this is for the long term outcomes after group cross- over has taken place or control conditions are no longer available • Quasi-experimental controlled trials • Case studies • Observational studies • Purely qualitative studies • Expert options • Cross-sectional studies • Trials were participants have not been randomly assigned |
Participants | All adults (aged ≥ 18 years) from both clinical and non-clinical samples (self-referred due to response from study advertisement) with acute or chronic complaints of hearing loss, tinnitus and/or vestibular disorders and meeting the Intervention studies’ eligibility criteria. Adults with significant levels of disability as defined by the individual studies’ inclusion criteria to include: - A significant global score on a multi-item questionnaire (Table 3) - Presenting with hearing loss of at least a mild degree as measured by an audiologist using pure tone audiometric testing -Significant levels of hearing loss, tinnitus and/or dizziness diagnosed by an Ear Nose and Throat consultant, audiologist or clinical psychologist following clinical examination This assumes that those with significant co-existing conditions and undertaking co-interventions (excluding hearing aid fittings) will be excluded. All ethnic and social-economic groups will be included | • Data focused on children and adolescents • Studies not defining the eligibility criteria to undertake the Internet interventions for hearing handicap, tinnitus distress and vestibular difficulties, such as tinnitus of at least 3 months duration of moderate severity as measured by a self-reported assessment measure |
Interventions | • Internet-based interventions as a structured form of self-help aimed at reducing difficulties related to hearing loss, vestibular disorders, and tinnitus • Both guided and self-guided interventions will be included • An element of blending may be involved such as introducing the intervention during a face-to-face consultation. However, the Internet-intervention part needs to be 70% or greater than the face-to-face part • There are no limitations based on the starting point of interventions or their durations • There should be a minimum of at least one Internet-intervention • Internet interventions running concurrently with hearing aid fittings will be included as this forms part of standard audiological care | • Predominantly app-based interventions • Solely computer-based programmes not accessed via the Internet (e.g. provided on disks/DVDs) • Interventions using a predominantly blended approach with 30% or more face-to-face input • Online discussion forums provided in isolation and not as part of a structured programme • Internet interventions running concurrently with additional treatments (excluding hearing aid fittings) will be excluded as the effects of the Internet intervention will not be isolated. |
Comparators | At least one comparator is required this may be either an inactive control (e.g. no treatment, standard care, waiting list control, discussion forum, information only, usual care) or active control (e.g. different variant of the same intervention, a different kind of therapy) | • No comparison (single group designs) unless this is for the long term outcomes after group cross-over has taken place or control conditions are no longer available • Comparators comparing the role of guidance using the same Internet-based intervention in both the experimental and the control groups |
Outcomes | Reporting results from a self-reported outcome measure related to the main difficulty targeted e.g. hearing loss, tinnitus, or vestibular difficulties | • Primary outcome reported not related to hearing loss, tinnitus, or vestibular difficulties • Primary outcome, not a self-reported measure |
Timings | At least two data points are required for pre and post-intervention or follow-up (e.g. baseline and 1 year post-intervention) endpoint outcomes | No post-intervention follow-up period |
Additional inclusion criteria | ||
Language | English only | |
Setting | All settings including clinics, hospitals (private, public, university) and/or home-treatments in all geographic locations |
Information sources
Electronic databases
-
EBSCOhost including Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)
-
PubMed (including MEDLINE)
-
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database
-
Embase
Other resources
-
Trial registers and trial result registers at clinical.gov and Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register for completed trials that may be accepted for publication
-
Hand-searching key journals and the reference lists from the included studies
-
Grey literature will be searched in Google Scholar
-
Contacting stakeholders such as researchers and experts in the field if any further records were outstanding or they have any manuscripts that have been accepted for publication
Search strategy
Condition | Search strategy |
---|---|
For hearing loss | (hearing loss OR deafness OR hearing impairment OR deaf* OR hard of hearing OR hear*) AND (intervention OR treatment OR therapy OR program OR strategy OR self-help OR rehabilitation) AND (Internet* OR online* or web*) |
For tinnitus | (tinnitus*) AND (intervention OR treatment OR therapy OR program OR strategy OR self-help OR rehabilitation) AND (Internet* OR online* or web*) |
For vestibular disorders | (vestibular* OR dizziness* OR balance* OR Ménière* OR labyrinthitis OR neuritis OR benign paroxysmal positional vertigo OR BPPV OR endolymphatic hydrops) AND (intervention OR treatment OR therapy OR program OR strategy OR self-help OR rehabilitation) AND (Internet* OR online* or web*) |
Limiters | English Language; Human Search modes: Boolean/ phrase |
Study records
Data management
Selection process
Data collection
Data items
Outcomes and prioritisation
Primary outcomes
Measurement instrument (author, year) | Number of items and subscales | Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha for the global score) |
---|---|---|
Hearing handicap | ||
Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly [85] | 25 items, 2 subscales | a = 0.93 |
Hearing Handicap Questionnaire [86] | 27 item, 3 subscales | a = 0.94 |
Tinnitus distress/severity | ||
Tinnitus Handicap Inventory [87] | 25 items, 3 subscales | a = 0.93 |
Tinnitus Questionnaire [88] | 52 items, 5 subscales | a = 0.94 |
Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire [89] | 26 items, 4 subscales | a = 0.96 |
Tinnitus Functional Index [90] | 25 items, 8 subscales | a = 0.97 |
Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaire [91] | 27 items, 3 subscales | a = 0.94 |
Vertigo/dizziness | ||
Vertigo Symptom Scale-Short Form [92] | 36 items, 2 subscales | a = 0.90 |
Vestibular Rehabilitation Benefit Questionnaire [93] | 36 item, 4 subscales | a = 0.73 |
Dizziness Handicap Inventory [94] | 25 items, 3 subscales | a = 0.89 |
Vertigo Handicap Questionnaire [95] | 25 items, 4 subscales | a = 0.93 |
Secondary outcomes
-
Insomnia as measured by a validated instrument such as the Insomnia Severity Index [67]
Long-term outcomes
Risk of bias in the individual studies
Data synthesis
Summary measures
Unit of analysis issues
Missing data
Clinical heterogeneity
Statistical heterogeneity
Additional analyses
-
Study designs: effectiveness and efficacy, separating those with inactive and active comparators.
-
ParticipantsAge: young adult, adults, the elderly.Populations: veteran versus non-veteran
-
Intervention type: hearing loss, tinnitus, vestibular
-
Outcomes: primary and secondary (anxiety, depression, insomnia, quality of life) at post-intervention and long-term outcomes for the primary outcomes (≥ 1 year outcomes)