Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 5/2021

24.11.2020 | Original Article

Interobserver agreement between interpretations of acute changes after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

verfasst von: Dr. Meltem Dağdelen, MD, Dr. Emine Sedef Akovalı, MD, Dr. Ceren Barlas, MD, Dr., Assoc. Prof. Günay Can, MD, Dr., Prof. Fazilet Öner Dinçbaş, MD

Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment modality for inoperable early-stage lung cancer or metastatic lung lesions. Post-SBRT, acute radiological lung changes sometimes mimic tumor progression, so over-investigation may be applied. We aimed to reveal the interobserver agreement among physicians regarding acute radiographic changes on CT of the thorax obtained shortly after SBRT

Materials and methods

Radiologic images of 20 lesions treated with SBRT were evaluated for acute lung changes. Two physicians, one senior and one junior, from diagnostic radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, and chest disease departments reviewed these images. The final interpretations were categorized as stable, regression/consolidation, progressive disease, and SBRT-related changes. The evaluations of the physicians were compared with the experienced reference radiation oncologist. The gold standard was accepted as the reference physician’s final score. Unweighted Cohen’s kappa (κ) coefficient was used for assessing interobserver agreement between physicians.

Results

The evaluations of the physicians were compared with the reference radiation oncologist. The strongest coherence coefficient was found with the senior radiation oncologist (κ: 0.72). The kappa coefficients between the junior radiation oncologist, junior nuclear medicine physician, and the reference physician were 0.61 and 0.55, respectively. The disciplines with the lowest kappa coefficients were junior chest disease and senior radiologist, and the kappa values were 0.37 and 0.44, respectively.

Conclusion

Disciplines dealing with lung cancer treatment may not be aware of the various radiologic changes after SBRT or inexperienced in interpreting them from recurrence. Therefore, physicians must have detailed radiotherapy information such as planning target volume (PTV), dose/fractionation, etc. In addition, final evaluations should be performed in the multidisciplinary team dealing with the treatment of the patient
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Beitler JJ et al (2006) Stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonmetastatic lung cancer: an analysis of 75 patients treated over 5 years. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(1):100–106CrossRef Beitler JJ et al (2006) Stereotactic body radiation therapy for nonmetastatic lung cancer: an analysis of 75 patients treated over 5 years. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65(1):100–106CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagata Y et al (2005) Clinical outcomes of a phase I/II study of 48 Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for primary lung cancer using a stereotactic body frame. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(5):1427–1431CrossRef Nagata Y et al (2005) Clinical outcomes of a phase I/II study of 48 Gy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in 4 fractions for primary lung cancer using a stereotactic body frame. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 63(5):1427–1431CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Onishi H et al (2004) Clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer using a novel irradiation technique: patient self-controlled breath-hold and beam switching using a combination of linear accelerator and CT scanner. Cancer Treat Res 45(1):45–55 Onishi H et al (2004) Clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer using a novel irradiation technique: patient self-controlled breath-hold and beam switching using a combination of linear accelerator and CT scanner. Cancer Treat Res 45(1):45–55
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wulf J et al (2004) Stereotactic radiotherapy for primary lung cancer and pulmonary metastases: a noninvasive treatment approach in medically inoperable patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(1):186–196CrossRef Wulf J et al (2004) Stereotactic radiotherapy for primary lung cancer and pulmonary metastases: a noninvasive treatment approach in medically inoperable patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60(1):186–196CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Zimmermann FB et al (2005) Stereotactic hypofractionated radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res 48(1):107–114 Zimmermann FB et al (2005) Stereotactic hypofractionated radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res 48(1):107–114
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahele M et al (2011) Radiological changes after stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6(7):1221–1228CrossRef Dahele M et al (2011) Radiological changes after stereotactic radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6(7):1221–1228CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Palma DA et al (2011) Radiological and clinical pneumonitis after stereotactic lung radiotherapy: a matched analysis of three-dimensional conformal and volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80(2):506–513CrossRef Palma DA et al (2011) Radiological and clinical pneumonitis after stereotactic lung radiotherapy: a matched analysis of three-dimensional conformal and volumetric-modulated arc therapy techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80(2):506–513CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Trovo M et al (2010) Early and late lung radiographic injury following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Cancer Treat Res 69(1):77–85 Trovo M et al (2010) Early and late lung radiographic injury following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Cancer Treat Res 69(1):77–85
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyas I et al (2007) Prediction of radiation-induced changes in the lung after stereotactic body radiation therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(3):768–774CrossRef Kyas I et al (2007) Prediction of radiation-induced changes in the lung after stereotactic body radiation therapy of non-small-cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 67(3):768–774CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimura T et al (2006) CT appearance of radiation injury of the lung and clinical symptoms after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancers: are patients with pulmonary emphysema also candidates for SBRT for lung cancers? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(2):483–491CrossRef Kimura T et al (2006) CT appearance of radiation injury of the lung and clinical symptoms after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for lung cancers: are patients with pulmonary emphysema also candidates for SBRT for lung cancers? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(2):483–491CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Guckenberger M et al (2007) Pulmonary injury and tumor response after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): results of a serial follow-up CT study. Radiother Oncol 85(3):435–442CrossRef Guckenberger M et al (2007) Pulmonary injury and tumor response after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT): results of a serial follow-up CT study. Radiother Oncol 85(3):435–442CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Senthi S et al (2012) Patterns of disease recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 13(8):802–809CrossRef Senthi S et al (2012) Patterns of disease recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 13(8):802–809CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Guckenberger M et al (2014) Definition of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 190(1):26–33CrossRef Guckenberger M et al (2014) Definition of stereotactic body radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 190(1):26–33CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Palma D et al (2012) Curative treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with severe COPD: stereotactic radiotherapy outcomes and systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(3):1149–1156CrossRef Palma D et al (2012) Curative treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung cancer in patients with severe COPD: stereotactic radiotherapy outcomes and systematic review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(3):1149–1156CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang K et al (2012) Radiographic changes after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)—can we distinguish recurrence from fibrosis? A systematic review of the literature. Radiother Oncol 102(3):335–342CrossRef Huang K et al (2012) Radiographic changes after lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)—can we distinguish recurrence from fibrosis? A systematic review of the literature. Radiother Oncol 102(3):335–342CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoopes DJ et al (2007) FDG-PET and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res 56(2):229–234 Hoopes DJ et al (2007) FDG-PET and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Treat Res 56(2):229–234
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang K et al (2013) High-risk CT features for detection of local recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 109(1):51–57CrossRef Huang K et al (2013) High-risk CT features for detection of local recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung cancer. Radiother Oncol 109(1):51–57CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattonen SA et al (2016) Detection of local cancer recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for lung cancer: physician performance versus radiomic assessment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 94(5):1121–1128CrossRef Mattonen SA et al (2016) Detection of local cancer recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for lung cancer: physician performance versus radiomic assessment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 94(5):1121–1128CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lofgren J et al (2017) Clinical importance of re-interpretation of PET/CT scanning in patients referred to a tertiary care medical centre. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 37(2):143–147CrossRef Lofgren J et al (2017) Clinical importance of re-interpretation of PET/CT scanning in patients referred to a tertiary care medical centre. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 37(2):143–147CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamjeedi B et al (2015) Interobserver agreement between on-call radiology resident and general radiologist interpretations of CT pulmonary angiograms and CT venograms. PLoS ONE 10(5):e126116CrossRef Tamjeedi B et al (2015) Interobserver agreement between on-call radiology resident and general radiologist interpretations of CT pulmonary angiograms and CT venograms. PLoS ONE 10(5):e126116CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Interobserver agreement between interpretations of acute changes after lung stereotactic body radiotherapy
verfasst von
Dr. Meltem Dağdelen, MD
Dr. Emine Sedef Akovalı, MD
Dr. Ceren Barlas, MD
Dr., Assoc. Prof. Günay Can, MD
Dr., Prof. Fazilet Öner Dinçbaş, MD
Publikationsdatum
24.11.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-020-01711-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.