Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 5/2017

24.02.2017 | Original Article

Intervention Mediators in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Colonoscopy Uptake Among Individuals at Increased Risk of Familial Colorectal Cancer

verfasst von: Barbara H. Brumbach, PhD, Wendy C. Birmingham, PhD, Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat, PhD, Scott Walters, PhD, Anita Y. Kinney, PhD, RN

Erschienen in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Understanding the pathways by which interventions achieve behavioral change is important for optimizing intervention strategies.

Purpose

We examined mediators of behavior change in a tailored-risk communication intervention that increased guideline-based colorectal cancer screening among individuals at increased familial risk.

Methods

Participants at increased familial risk for colorectal cancer (N = 481) were randomized to one of two arms: (1) a remote, tailored-risk communication intervention (Tele-Cancer Risk Assessment and Evaluation (TeleCARE)) or (2) a mailed educational brochure intervention.

Results

Structural equation modeling showed that participants in TeleCARE were more likely to get a colonoscopy. The effect was partially mediated through perceived threat (β = 0.12, p < 0.05), efficacy beliefs (β = 0.12, p < 0.05), emotions (β = 0.22, p < 0.001), and behavioral intentions (β = 0.24, p < 0.001). Model fit was very good: comparative fit index = 0.95, root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.05, and standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.08.

Conclusion

Evaluating mediating variables between an intervention (TeleCARE) and a primary outcome (colonoscopy) contributes to our understanding of underlying mechanisms that lead to health behavior change, thus leading to better informed and designed future interventions.

Trial Registration Number

ClinicalTrials.​gov, NCT01274143.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Society AC. Cancer Facts and Figures 2016, 2016. Society AC. Cancer Facts and Figures 2016, 2016.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Butterworth AS, Higgins JP, Pharoah P: Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: A meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2006, 42:216–227.CrossRefPubMed Butterworth AS, Higgins JP, Pharoah P: Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: A meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2006, 42:216–227.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Johns LE, Houlston RS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001, 96:2992–3003.CrossRefPubMed Johns LE, Houlston RS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of familial colorectal cancer risk. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001, 96:2992–3003.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Samadder NJ, Cannon-Albright LA, Burt RW: The impact of family history on the risk of colorectal neoplasia: Don’t change the guidelines just yet! Dig Dis Sci. 2012, 57:3047–3049.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Samadder NJ, Cannon-Albright LA, Burt RW: The impact of family history on the risk of colorectal neoplasia: Don’t change the guidelines just yet! Dig Dis Sci. 2012, 57:3047–3049.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network I: NCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Colorectal Cancer Screening. Jenkintown, PA, 2007. National Comprehensive Cancer Network I: NCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Colorectal Cancer Screening. Jenkintown, PA, 2007.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al.: Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008, 134:1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al.: Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008, 134:1570–1595.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al.: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale—Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003, 124:544–560.CrossRefPubMed Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al.: Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale—Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003, 124:544–560.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Courtney RJ, Paul CL, Carey ML, et al.: A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2013, 13:13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Courtney RJ, Paul CL, Carey ML, et al.: A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2013, 13:13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rubinstein WS, Acheson LS, O’Neill SM, et al.: Clinical utility of family history for cancer screening and referral in primary care: A report from the Family Healthware Impact Trial. Genet Med. 2011, 13:956–965.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rubinstein WS, Acheson LS, O’Neill SM, et al.: Clinical utility of family history for cancer screening and referral in primary care: A report from the Family Healthware Impact Trial. Genet Med. 2011, 13:956–965.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruthotto F, Papendorf F, Wegener G, et al.: Participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives from patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2007, 18:1518–1522.CrossRefPubMed Ruthotto F, Papendorf F, Wegener G, et al.: Participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives from patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2007, 18:1518–1522.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Honein-AbouHaidar GN, Kastner M, Vuong V, et al. Systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies evaluating facilitators and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016. Honein-AbouHaidar GN, Kastner M, Vuong V, et al. Systematic review and meta-study synthesis of qualitative studies evaluating facilitators and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Burt R, Winawer S, Bond J, Levin B, Sandler R. Preventing colorectal cancer: A clinician’s guide: American Gastroenterological Association., 2004. Burt R, Winawer S, Bond J, Levin B, Sandler R. Preventing colorectal cancer: A clinician’s guide: American Gastroenterological Association., 2004.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler CV, Jr., Snyder CW: Cancer risk assessment: Examining the family physician’s role. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006, 19:468–477.CrossRefPubMed Tyler CV, Jr., Snyder CW: Cancer risk assessment: Examining the family physician’s role. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006, 19:468–477.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones RM, Woolf SH, Cunningham TD, et al.: The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2010, 38:499–507.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jones RM, Woolf SH, Cunningham TD, et al.: The relative importance of patient-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2010, 38:499–507.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson AE, Henry KA, Samadder NJ, Merrill RM, Kinney AY: Rural vs urban residence affects risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013, 11:526–533.CrossRefPubMed Anderson AE, Henry KA, Samadder NJ, Merrill RM, Kinney AY: Rural vs urban residence affects risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013, 11:526–533.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al.: National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010, 152:663–667.CrossRefPubMed Steinwachs D, Allen JD, Barlow WE, et al.: National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010, 152:663–667.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinney AY, Boonyasiriwat W, Walters ST, et al.: Telehealth personalized cancer risk communication to motivate colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: The family CARE randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014, 32:654–662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kinney AY, Boonyasiriwat W, Walters ST, et al.: Telehealth personalized cancer risk communication to motivate colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: The family CARE randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014, 32:654–662.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Steffen LE, Boucher KM, Damron BH, et al.: Efficacy of a telehealth intervention on colonoscopy uptake when cost is a barrier: The family CARE cluster randomized controlled trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015, 24:1311–1318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Steffen LE, Boucher KM, Damron BH, et al.: Efficacy of a telehealth intervention on colonoscopy uptake when cost is a barrier: The family CARE cluster randomized controlled trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015, 24:1311–1318.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen JD, King AJ, Carcioppolo N, Davis L: Why are tailored messages more effective? A multiple mediation analysis of a breast cancer screening intervention. J Commun. 2012, 62:851–868.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jensen JD, King AJ, Carcioppolo N, Davis L: Why are tailored messages more effective? A multiple mediation analysis of a breast cancer screening intervention. J Commun. 2012, 62:851–868.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreuter MW, Wray RJ: Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003, 27 Suppl 3:S227–232.CrossRefPubMed Kreuter MW, Wray RJ: Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003, 27 Suppl 3:S227–232.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lustria ML, Noar SM, Cortese J, et al.: A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun. 2013, 18:1039–1069.CrossRefPubMed Lustria ML, Noar SM, Cortese J, et al.: A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun. 2013, 18:1039–1069.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS: Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007, 133:673–693.CrossRefPubMed Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS: Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull. 2007, 133:673–693.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM: Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer. 2004, 101:1239–1250.CrossRefPubMed Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM: Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer. 2004, 101:1239–1250.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pengchit W, Walters ST, Simmons RG, et al.: Motivation-based intervention to promote colonoscopy screening: An integration of a fear management model and motivational interviewing. J Health Psychol. 2011, 16:1187–1197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pengchit W, Walters ST, Simmons RG, et al.: Motivation-based intervention to promote colonoscopy screening: An integration of a fear management model and motivational interviewing. J Health Psychol. 2011, 16:1187–1197.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Witte K: Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs. 1992, 59:329–349.CrossRef Witte K: Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs. 1992, 59:329–349.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Witte K: Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs. 1994, 61:113–134.CrossRef Witte K: Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs. 1994, 61:113–134.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Witte K, Meyer G, Martell D: Effective Health Risk Messages: A Step-by-Step Guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2001. Witte K, Meyer G, Martell D: Effective Health Risk Messages: A Step-by-Step Guide, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc, 2001.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gollwitzer P: Implementation intentions—Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist. 1999, 54:493–503.CrossRef Gollwitzer P: Implementation intentions—Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist. 1999, 54:493–503.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwasnicka D, Presseau J, White M, Sniehotta F: Does planning how to cope with anticipated barriers facilitate health-related behaviour change? A systematic review. Health Psychology Review. 2013, 7:129–145.CrossRef Kwasnicka D, Presseau J, White M, Sniehotta F: Does planning how to cope with anticipated barriers facilitate health-related behaviour change? A systematic review. Health Psychology Review. 2013, 7:129–145.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Ziegelmann J: Health action process approach—A research agenda at the Freie Universitat Berlin to examine and promote health behavior change. Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitspsychologie. 2008, 16:157–160.CrossRef Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Ziegelmann J: Health action process approach—A research agenda at the Freie Universitat Berlin to examine and promote health behavior change. Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitspsychologie. 2008, 16:157–160.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheeran P: Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology. 2002, 12:1–36.CrossRef Sheeran P: Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology. 2002, 12:1–36.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Gollwitzer P, Sheeran P: Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2006, 38:69–119.CrossRef Gollwitzer P, Sheeran P: Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2006, 38:69–119.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Schweiger Gallo I, Gollwitzer PM: Implementation intentions: Control of fear despite cognitive load. Psicothema. 2007, 19:280–285.PubMed Schweiger Gallo I, Gollwitzer PM: Implementation intentions: Control of fear despite cognitive load. Psicothema. 2007, 19:280–285.PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheeran P, Orbell S: Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol. 2000, 19:283–289.CrossRefPubMed Sheeran P, Orbell S: Using implementation intentions to increase attendance for cervical cancer screening. Health Psychol. 2000, 19:283–289.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheeran P, Silverman M: Evaluation of three interventions to promote workplace health and safety: Evidence for the utility of implementation intentions. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56:2153–2163.CrossRefPubMed Sheeran P, Silverman M: Evaluation of three interventions to promote workplace health and safety: Evidence for the utility of implementation intentions. Soc Sci Med. 2003, 56:2153–2163.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ, Stacey D: An evidence-based approach to managing women’s decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002, 31:570–581.CrossRefPubMed O’Connor AM, Jacobsen MJ, Stacey D: An evidence-based approach to managing women’s decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002, 31:570–581.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Greiner KA, Daley CM, Epp A, et al.: Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: A randomized trial in safety-net clinics. Am J Prev Med. 2014, 47:703–714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greiner KA, Daley CM, Epp A, et al.: Implementation intentions and colorectal screening: A randomized trial in safety-net clinics. Am J Prev Med. 2014, 47:703–714.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller MW, Rollnick S: Motivational Interviewing : Helping People Change (3rd Ed.). New York: Guilford Press, 2013. Miller MW, Rollnick S: Motivational Interviewing : Helping People Change (3rd Ed.). New York: Guilford Press, 2013.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall K, Gibbie T, Lubman DI: Motivational interviewing techniques—Facilitating behaviour change in the general practice setting. Aust Fam Physician. 2012, 41:660–667.PubMed Hall K, Gibbie T, Lubman DI: Motivational interviewing techniques—Facilitating behaviour change in the general practice setting. Aust Fam Physician. 2012, 41:660–667.PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall K, Staiger PK, Simpson A, Best D, Lubman DI: After 30 years of dissemination, have we achieved sustained practice change in motivational interviewing? Addiction. 2016, 111:1144–1150.CrossRefPubMed Hall K, Staiger PK, Simpson A, Best D, Lubman DI: After 30 years of dissemination, have we achieved sustained practice change in motivational interviewing? Addiction. 2016, 111:1144–1150.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller WR, Rollnick S: The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of complex behavioral interventions: Impact of treatment fidelity. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014, 37:234–241.CrossRefPubMed Miller WR, Rollnick S: The effectiveness and ineffectiveness of complex behavioral interventions: Impact of treatment fidelity. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014, 37:234–241.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Kreuter MW, Chheda SG, Bull FC: How does physician advice influence patient behavior? Evidence for a priming effect. Arch Fam Med. 2000, 9:426–433.CrossRefPubMed Kreuter MW, Chheda SG, Bull FC: How does physician advice influence patient behavior? Evidence for a priming effect. Arch Fam Med. 2000, 9:426–433.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Madlensky L, Esplen MJ, Gallinger S, McLaughlin JR, Goel V: Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: Factors associated with screening behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2003, 25:187–194.CrossRefPubMed Madlensky L, Esplen MJ, Gallinger S, McLaughlin JR, Goel V: Relatives of colorectal cancer patients: Factors associated with screening behavior. Am J Prev Med. 2003, 25:187–194.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Bastani R, Glenn BA, Taylor VM, et al.: Integrating theory into community interventions to reduce liver cancer disparities: The Health Behavior Framework. Prev Med. 2010, 50:63–67.CrossRefPubMed Bastani R, Glenn BA, Taylor VM, et al.: Integrating theory into community interventions to reduce liver cancer disparities: The Health Behavior Framework. Prev Med. 2010, 50:63–67.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Rothman AJ: “Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?”: Why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004, 1:11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rothman AJ: “Is there nothing more practical than a good theory?”: Why innovations and advances in health behavior change will arise if interventions are used to test and refine theory. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2004, 1:11.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Glanz K, Bishop DB: The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010, 31:399–418.CrossRefPubMed Glanz K, Bishop DB: The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010, 31:399–418.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan YY, McGaughran J, Ferguson K, et al.: Improving identification of lynch syndrome patients: A comparison of research data with clinical records. Int J Cancer. 2013, 132:2876–2883.CrossRefPubMed Tan YY, McGaughran J, Ferguson K, et al.: Improving identification of lynch syndrome patients: A comparison of research data with clinical records. Int J Cancer. 2013, 132:2876–2883.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Boonyasiriwat W, Hung M, Hon SD, et al.: Intention to undergo colonoscopy screening among relatives of colorectal cancer cases: A theory-based model. Ann Behav Med. 2014, 47:280–291.CrossRefPubMed Boonyasiriwat W, Hung M, Hon SD, et al.: Intention to undergo colonoscopy screening among relatives of colorectal cancer cases: A theory-based model. Ann Behav Med. 2014, 47:280–291.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmons RG, Lee YC, Stroup AM, et al.: Examining the challenges of family recruitment to behavioral intervention trials: Factors associated with participation and enrollment in a multi-state colonoscopy intervention trial. Trials. 2013, 14:116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Simmons RG, Lee YC, Stroup AM, et al.: Examining the challenges of family recruitment to behavioral intervention trials: Factors associated with participation and enrollment in a multi-state colonoscopy intervention trial. Trials. 2013, 14:116.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Birmingham WC, Hung M, Boonyasiriwat W, et al.. Effectiveness of the extended parallel process model in promoting colorectal cancer screening. Psychooncology. 2015. Birmingham WC, Hung M, Boonyasiriwat W, et al.. Effectiveness of the extended parallel process model in promoting colorectal cancer screening. Psychooncology. 2015.
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Mack LA, Cook LS, Temple WJ, et al.: Colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: Benefits and barriers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009, 16:2092–2100.CrossRefPubMed Mack LA, Cook LS, Temple WJ, et al.: Colorectal cancer screening among first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients: Benefits and barriers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009, 16:2092–2100.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S, et al.: Understanding intention to undergo colonoscopy among intermediate-risk siblings of colorectal cancer patients: A test of a mediational model. Prev Med. 2003, 36:71–84.CrossRefPubMed Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S, et al.: Understanding intention to undergo colonoscopy among intermediate-risk siblings of colorectal cancer patients: A test of a mediational model. Prev Med. 2003, 36:71–84.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Gili M, Roca M, Ferrer V, Obrador A, Cabeza E: Psychosocial factors associated with the adherence to a colorectal cancer screening program. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006, 30:354–360.CrossRefPubMed Gili M, Roca M, Ferrer V, Obrador A, Cabeza E: Psychosocial factors associated with the adherence to a colorectal cancer screening program. Cancer Detect Prev. 2006, 30:354–360.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S, et al.: Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer. Health Psychol. 2002, 21:3–15.CrossRefPubMed Manne S, Markowitz A, Winawer S, et al.: Correlates of colorectal cancer screening compliance and stage of adoption among siblings of individuals with early onset colorectal cancer. Health Psychol. 2002, 21:3–15.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Sifri R, Rosenthal M, Hyslop T, et al.: Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening decision stage. Prev Med. 2010, 51:329–331.CrossRefPubMed Sifri R, Rosenthal M, Hyslop T, et al.: Factors associated with colorectal cancer screening decision stage. Prev Med. 2010, 51:329–331.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Greiner KA, Engelman KK, Hall MA, Ellerbeck EF: Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care. Prev Med. 2004, 38:269–275.CrossRefPubMed Greiner KA, Engelman KK, Hall MA, Ellerbeck EF: Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care. Prev Med. 2004, 38:269–275.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Klabunde CN, Schenck AP, Davis WW: Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Medicare consumers. Am J Prev Med. 2006, 30:313–319.CrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN, Schenck AP, Davis WW: Barriers to colorectal cancer screening among Medicare consumers. Am J Prev Med. 2006, 30:313–319.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Shokar NK, Carlson CA, Shokar GS: Physician and patient influences on the rate of colorectal cancer screening in a primary care clinic. J Cancer Educ. 2006, 21:84–88.CrossRefPubMed Shokar NK, Carlson CA, Shokar GS: Physician and patient influences on the rate of colorectal cancer screening in a primary care clinic. J Cancer Educ. 2006, 21:84–88.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheah W, Zimmerman R: Self-Construal and Fear Appeals: An Empirical Examination of College Students’ Gonorrhea Risk Perceptions. International Communication Association. New York, 2005. Cheah W, Zimmerman R: Self-Construal and Fear Appeals: An Empirical Examination of College Students’ Gonorrhea Risk Perceptions. International Communication Association. New York, 2005.
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Gurmankin Levy A, Shea J, Williams SV, Quistberg A, Armstrong K: Measuring perceptions of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006, 15:1893–1898.CrossRefPubMed Gurmankin Levy A, Shea J, Williams SV, Quistberg A, Armstrong K: Measuring perceptions of breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006, 15:1893–1898.CrossRefPubMed
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawl SM, Menon U, Champion VL, et al.: Do benefits and barriers differ by stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening? Health Educ Res. 2005, 20:137–148.CrossRefPubMed Rawl SM, Menon U, Champion VL, et al.: Do benefits and barriers differ by stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening? Health Educ Res. 2005, 20:137–148.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinrich SP, Weinrich MC, Boyd MD, Johnson E, Frank-Stromborg M: Knowledge of colorectal cancer among older persons. Cancer Nurs. 1992, 15:322–330.CrossRefPubMed Weinrich SP, Weinrich MC, Boyd MD, Johnson E, Frank-Stromborg M: Knowledge of colorectal cancer among older persons. Cancer Nurs. 1992, 15:322–330.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W: Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979, 41:209–218.CrossRefPubMed Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W: Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979, 41:209–218.CrossRefPubMed
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Hay J, Primavera L, Levy A, Shuk E, Ostroff J: Development and validation of a scale assessing novel cancer-related risk perceptions. Ann Behav Med. 2006, 31:S190. Hay J, Primavera L, Levy A, Shuk E, Ostroff J: Development and validation of a scale assessing novel cancer-related risk perceptions. Ann Behav Med. 2006, 31:S190.
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Hay J, Shuk E, Cruz G, Ostroff J: Thinking through cancer risk: Characterizing smokers’ process of risk determination. Qual Health Res. 2005, 15:1074–1085.CrossRefPubMed Hay J, Shuk E, Cruz G, Ostroff J: Thinking through cancer risk: Characterizing smokers’ process of risk determination. Qual Health Res. 2005, 15:1074–1085.CrossRefPubMed
70.
Zurück zum Zitat MacCallum R, Browne M, Sugawara H: Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods. 1996, 1:130–149.CrossRef MacCallum R, Browne M, Sugawara H: Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods. 1996, 1:130–149.CrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Thoemmes F, Mackinnon DP, Reiser MR: Power analysis for complex mediational designs using Monte Carlo methods. Struct Equ Modeling. 2010, 17:510–534.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thoemmes F, Mackinnon DP, Reiser MR: Power analysis for complex mediational designs using Monte Carlo methods. Struct Equ Modeling. 2010, 17:510–534.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW: Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013, 76:913–934.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wolf EJ, Harrington KM, Clark SL, Miller MW: Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educ Psychol Meas. 2013, 76:913–934.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR: Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2008, 6:53–60. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR: Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2008, 6:53–60.
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Savalei V, Falk CF: Robust two-stage approach outperforms robust full information maximum likelihood with incomplete nonnormal data. Struct Equ Modeling. 2014, 21:280–302.CrossRef Savalei V, Falk CF: Robust two-stage approach outperforms robust full information maximum likelihood with incomplete nonnormal data. Struct Equ Modeling. 2014, 21:280–302.CrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham JW: Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009, 60:549–576.CrossRefPubMed Graham JW: Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009, 60:549–576.CrossRefPubMed
76.
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Laiyemo AO, Adebogun AO, Doubeni CA, et al.: Influence of provider discussion and specific recommendation on colorectal cancer screening uptake among U.S. adults. Prev Med. 2014, 67:1–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laiyemo AO, Adebogun AO, Doubeni CA, et al.: Influence of provider discussion and specific recommendation on colorectal cancer screening uptake among U.S. adults. Prev Med. 2014, 67:1–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Blase K, Fixsen D. Core intervention components: Identifying and operationalizing what makes programs work: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2013. Blase K, Fixsen D. Core intervention components: Identifying and operationalizing what makes programs work: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 2013.
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Rabin B, Glasgow RE: An implementation science perspective on psychological science and cancer: What is known and opportunities for research, policy, and practice. Am Psychol. 2015, 70:211–220.CrossRefPubMed Rabin B, Glasgow RE: An implementation science perspective on psychological science and cancer: What is known and opportunities for research, policy, and practice. Am Psychol. 2015, 70:211–220.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Almario CV, May FP, Ponce NA, Spiegel BM: Racial and ethnic disparities in colonoscopic examination of individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015, 13:1487–1495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Almario CV, May FP, Ponce NA, Spiegel BM: Racial and ethnic disparities in colonoscopic examination of individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015, 13:1487–1495.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
81.
Zurück zum Zitat Bromley EG, May FP, Federer L, Spiegel BM, van Oijen MG: Explaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2015, 71:40–48.CrossRefPubMed Bromley EG, May FP, Federer L, Spiegel BM, van Oijen MG: Explaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2015, 71:40–48.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarthy AM, Bristol M, Domchek SM, et al.. Health care segregation, physician recommendation, and racial disparities in BRCA1/2 testing among women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016. McCarthy AM, Bristol M, Domchek SM, et al.. Health care segregation, physician recommendation, and racial disparities in BRCA1/2 testing among women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016.
83.
Zurück zum Zitat Gil A, Wagner E, Vega W: Acculturation, familism, and alcohol use among Latino adolescent males: Longitudinal relations. Journal of Community Psychology. 2000, 28:443–458.CrossRef Gil A, Wagner E, Vega W: Acculturation, familism, and alcohol use among Latino adolescent males: Longitudinal relations. Journal of Community Psychology. 2000, 28:443–458.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Intervention Mediators in a Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Colonoscopy Uptake Among Individuals at Increased Risk of Familial Colorectal Cancer
verfasst von
Barbara H. Brumbach, PhD
Wendy C. Birmingham, PhD
Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat, PhD
Scott Walters, PhD
Anita Y. Kinney, PhD, RN
Publikationsdatum
24.02.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Elektronische ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-017-9893-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu in den Fachgebieten Neurologie und Psychiatrie