Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2016

06.10.2016 | Original Article

Interventional EUS Using a Flexible 19-Gauge Needle: An International Multicenter Experience in 162 Patients

verfasst von: Vivek Kumbhari, Irene Peñas, Alan H. Tieu, Carlos De la Serna-Higuera, Manie Juneja, Fuad Maufa, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Mohamad H. El-Zein, Nadim Haddad, Sandeep Krishnan, Susana Gonzalez, Peter V. Renny, Payal Saxena, Linda Howard, Christopher J. DiMaio, Jonathan M. Buscaglia, Manuel Perez-Miranda, Mouen A. Khashab

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 12/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background and Aims

To facilitate access for interventional EUS, flexible (nitinol) 19-G needles have been introduced to permit needle puncture even when the echoendoscope is in an angulated position, such as in the second part of the duodenum. The aims of the study were to evaluate the performance of a flexible 19-G needle during interventional EUS procedures and compare outcomes when the echoendoscope was in the straight versus angulated position.

Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken of 162 consecutive patients that underwent a variety of interventional EUS procedures with a flexible 19-G needle across five centers. Patients were subdivided into categories (straight or angulated) depending on the echoendoscope position used for obtaining access to the area of interest (Fig. 1).

Results

In the entire cohort, needle-specific technical success was achieved in 93.2 %, procedural success in 85.2 %, and overall clinical success in 76.5 % of cases at a mean follow-up of 3.1 months. Needle-specific technical success was similar between the straight and angulated cohorts (94.0 vs. 91.2 %, p = 0.74). Procedural success (86.7 vs. 77.2 %, p = 0.05), and rate of clinical success was similar between the cohorts (83.3 vs. 86.4 %, p = 0.79), respectively. Overall adverse events were noted in 14.2 % of patients with no difference between the straight and angulated cohorts (p = 0.48).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates equivalent technical success, clinical success and safety of using a flexible 19-G needle in straight and angulated endoscope positions for interventional EUS. Therefore, a flexible needle may be considered where an angulated echoendoscope position is encountered.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, et al. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:583–590.CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, et al. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:583–590.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishiwatari H, Hayashi T, Yoshida M, et al. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis by using highly viscous phenol-glycerol as a neurolytic agent (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:479–483.CrossRefPubMed Ishiwatari H, Hayashi T, Yoshida M, et al. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis by using highly viscous phenol-glycerol as a neurolytic agent (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:479–483.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Doi S, Yasuda I, Kawakami H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac ganglia neurolysis vs. celiac plexus neurolysis: a randomized multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2013;45:362–369. Doi S, Yasuda I, Kawakami H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac ganglia neurolysis vs. celiac plexus neurolysis: a randomized multicenter trial. Endoscopy 2013;45:362–369.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat LeBlanc JK, Al-Haddad M, McHenry L, et al. A prospective, randomized study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer: one injection or two? Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1300–1307.CrossRefPubMed LeBlanc JK, Al-Haddad M, McHenry L, et al. A prospective, randomized study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer: one injection or two? Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1300–1307.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Musumba C, Tutticci N, Nanda K, et al. Endosonography-guided drainage of malignant fluid collections using lumen-apposing, fully covered self-expanding metal stents. Endoscopy. 2014;46:690–692.CrossRefPubMed Musumba C, Tutticci N, Nanda K, et al. Endosonography-guided drainage of malignant fluid collections using lumen-apposing, fully covered self-expanding metal stents. Endoscopy. 2014;46:690–692.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahaleh M, Artifon E, Perez-Miranda M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography guided drainage: Summary of consortium meeting, May 21, 2012, San Diego, California. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:726–741.PubMedPubMedCentral Kahaleh M, Artifon E, Perez-Miranda M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography guided drainage: Summary of consortium meeting, May 21, 2012, San Diego, California. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:726–741.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Khashab MA, Dewitt J. EUS-guided biliary drainage: is it ready for prime time? Yes! Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:102–105.CrossRefPubMed Khashab MA, Dewitt J. EUS-guided biliary drainage: is it ready for prime time? Yes! Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:102–105.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi JH, Lee SS. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: from evidence to practice. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:1–7.CrossRefPubMed Choi JH, Lee SS. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: from evidence to practice. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:1–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoi T, Sofuni A, Tsuchiya T, et al. Initial evaluation of a new plastic pancreatic duct stent for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided placement. Endoscopy. 2015;47:462–465.CrossRefPubMed Itoi T, Sofuni A, Tsuchiya T, et al. Initial evaluation of a new plastic pancreatic duct stent for endoscopic ultrasonography-guided placement. Endoscopy. 2015;47:462–465.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Holt B, Varadarajulu S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic abscess drainage (with video). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:12–15.CrossRefPubMed Holt B, Varadarajulu S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic abscess drainage (with video). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:12–15.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Khashab MA, Valeshabad AK, Afghani E, et al. A comparative evaluation of EUS-guided biliary drainage and percutaneous drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:557–565.CrossRefPubMed Khashab MA, Valeshabad AK, Afghani E, et al. A comparative evaluation of EUS-guided biliary drainage and percutaneous drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:557–565.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Artifon EL, Aparicio D, Paione JB, et al. Biliary drainage in patients with unresectable, malignant obstruction where ERCP fails: endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:768–774.CrossRefPubMed Artifon EL, Aparicio D, Paione JB, et al. Biliary drainage in patients with unresectable, malignant obstruction where ERCP fails: endoscopic ultrasonography-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus percutaneous drainage. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:768–774.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Romero-Castro R, Ellrichmann M, Ortiz-Moyano C, et al. EUS-guided coil versus cyanoacrylate therapy for the treatment of gastric varices: a multicenter study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:711–721.CrossRefPubMed Romero-Castro R, Ellrichmann M, Ortiz-Moyano C, et al. EUS-guided coil versus cyanoacrylate therapy for the treatment of gastric varices: a multicenter study (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:711–721.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Storm AC, Kumbhari V, Saxena P, et al. EUS-guided angiotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:164–165.CrossRefPubMed Storm AC, Kumbhari V, Saxena P, et al. EUS-guided angiotherapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:164–165.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Katanuma A, Itoi T, Baron TH, et al. Bench-top testing of suction forces generated through endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration needles. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:379–385.CrossRefPubMed Katanuma A, Itoi T, Baron TH, et al. Bench-top testing of suction forces generated through endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration needles. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22:379–385.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:336–343.CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:336–343.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramesh J, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, et al. Randomized trial comparing the flexible 19G and 25G needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Pancreas. 2015;44:128–133.CrossRefPubMed Ramesh J, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, et al. Randomized trial comparing the flexible 19G and 25G needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Pancreas. 2015;44:128–133.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.CrossRefPubMed Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyberg A, Karia K, Zerbo S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided jejunojejunostomy to facilitate endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a minimally invasive option. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:506–507.CrossRefPubMed Tyberg A, Karia K, Zerbo S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided jejunojejunostomy to facilitate endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a minimally invasive option. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:506–507.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogura T, Sano T, Onda S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for right hepatic bile duct obstruction: novel technical tips. Endoscopy. 2015;47:72–75.PubMed Ogura T, Sano T, Onda S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for right hepatic bile duct obstruction: novel technical tips. Endoscopy. 2015;47:72–75.PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739–1745.CrossRefPubMed Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739–1745.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bang JY, Ramesh J, Trevino J, et al. Objective assessment of an algorithmic approach to EUS-guided FNA and interventions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:739–744.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bang JY, Ramesh J, Trevino J, et al. Objective assessment of an algorithmic approach to EUS-guided FNA and interventions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:739–744.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chavalitdhamrong D, Draganov PV. Performance characteristics of a new flexible nitinol 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration needle. Gut Liver. 2013;7:756.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chavalitdhamrong D, Draganov PV. Performance characteristics of a new flexible nitinol 19-gauge endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration needle. Gut Liver. 2013;7:756.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Park do H, Jeong SU, Lee BU, et al. Prospective evaluation of a treatment algorithm with enhanced guidewire manipulation protocol for EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:91–101. Park do H, Jeong SU, Lee BU, et al. Prospective evaluation of a treatment algorithm with enhanced guidewire manipulation protocol for EUS-guided biliary drainage after failed ERCP (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:91–101.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Artifon EL, Marson FP, Gaidhane M, et al. Hepaticogastrostomy or choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: is there any difference? Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:950–959.CrossRefPubMed Artifon EL, Marson FP, Gaidhane M, et al. Hepaticogastrostomy or choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: is there any difference? Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:950–959.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Phadnis MA, et al. Endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: outcomes and predictors of treatment success in 211 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:2080–2088.CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Phadnis MA, et al. Endoscopic transmural drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections: outcomes and predictors of treatment success in 211 consecutive patients. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:2080–2088.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Frequency of complications during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in 148 consecutive patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:1504–1508.CrossRefPubMed Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Frequency of complications during EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections in 148 consecutive patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:1504–1508.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Interventional EUS Using a Flexible 19-Gauge Needle: An International Multicenter Experience in 162 Patients
verfasst von
Vivek Kumbhari
Irene Peñas
Alan H. Tieu
Carlos De la Serna-Higuera
Manie Juneja
Fuad Maufa
Saowanee Ngamruengphong
Mohamad H. El-Zein
Nadim Haddad
Sandeep Krishnan
Susana Gonzalez
Peter V. Renny
Payal Saxena
Linda Howard
Christopher J. DiMaio
Jonathan M. Buscaglia
Manuel Perez-Miranda
Mouen A. Khashab
Publikationsdatum
06.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4327-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2016

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2016 Zur Ausgabe

PROFILES AND PERSPECTIVES

Profiles: Raymond S. Koff, MD

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.