Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2016

23.04.2016 | How-I-Do-It Articles

Intestinal autotransplantation for neoplasms originating in the pancreatic head with involvement of the superior mesenteric artery

verfasst von: Guosheng Wu, Xin Wang, Qingchuan Zhao, Weizhong Wang, Hai Shi, Mian Wang, Jingson Zhang, Zengshan Li, Daiming Fan

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We describe the operative techniques and perioperative morbidity of intestinal autotransplantation (IATx) for neoplasms originating in the pancreatic head with involvement of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), particularly focusing on oncological outcomes of patients with ductal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

Six patients with pancreatic head neoplasms aged 20 to 67 years underwent IATx in our center from January 2012 to January 2016. The operative procedure involves (1) selection and procurement of a segment of small intestine as the autograft, (2) completion of an en bloc resection of the tumor along with involved organs, and (3) autotransplantation of the autograft.

Results

In all six patients, the median operative time was 12.1 h (range, 9.5–16.5) with a median blood transfusion of 7 units (range, 4–10). All patients had margin-negative resections. Complications occurred in three of six patients with no perioperative mortality. The median duration of hospital stay was 19 days (range, 15–26). These six patients have had a well-functioning autograft and have not required any intravenous fluid hydration since discharge. At 5.9-, 10.9-, and 12.4-month follow-ups, serum levels of CA19-9 remained normal in two and elevated in one of three patients with ductal adenocarcinoma. At a median follow-up of 12.1 months (range, 4.9–42.9), all patients have remained alive without evidence of local recurrence and gross metastatic disease.

Conclusion

IATx combined with extensive pancreaticoduodenectomy and SMA resection can be performed in highly selected patients with an acceptable morbidity and mortality. Careful preoperative assessment and planning are the keys to the success of this aggressive operation.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Werner J, Combs SE, Springfeld C, Hartwig W, Hackert T, Buchler MW (2013) Advanced-stage pancreatic cancer: therapy options. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10:323–333CrossRefPubMed Werner J, Combs SE, Springfeld C, Hartwig W, Hackert T, Buchler MW (2013) Advanced-stage pancreatic cancer: therapy options. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 10:323–333CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gluth A, Werner J, Hartwig W (2015) Surgical resection strategies for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:757–765CrossRefPubMed Gluth A, Werner J, Hartwig W (2015) Surgical resection strategies for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:757–765CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M, Hartwig W, Hoeger Y, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 254:882–893CrossRefPubMed Mollberg N, Rahbari NN, Koch M, Hartwig W, Hoeger Y, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 254:882–893CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin RC 2nd, Scoggins CR, Egnatashvili V, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Kooby DA (2009) Arterial and venous resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: operative and long-term outcomes. Arch Surg 144:154–159CrossRefPubMed Martin RC 2nd, Scoggins CR, Egnatashvili V, Staley CA, McMasters KM, Kooby DA (2009) Arterial and venous resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: operative and long-term outcomes. Arch Surg 144:154–159CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Christians KK, Pilgrim CH, Tsai S et al (2014) Arterial resection at the time of pancreatectomy for cancer. Surgery 155:919–926CrossRefPubMed Christians KK, Pilgrim CH, Tsai S et al (2014) Arterial resection at the time of pancreatectomy for cancer. Surgery 155:919–926CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Capussotti L, Massucco P, Ribero D, Vigano L, Muratore A, Calgaro M (2003) Extended lymphadenectomy and vein resection for pancreatic head cancer: outcomes and implications for therapy. Arch Surg 138:1316–1322CrossRefPubMed Capussotti L, Massucco P, Ribero D, Vigano L, Muratore A, Calgaro M (2003) Extended lymphadenectomy and vein resection for pancreatic head cancer: outcomes and implications for therapy. Arch Surg 138:1316–1322CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua TC, Saxena A (2010) Extended pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1442–1452CrossRefPubMed Chua TC, Saxena A (2010) Extended pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1442–1452CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Li B, Xu D (2012) Pancreatectomy combined with superior mesenteric vein-portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 36:884–891CrossRefPubMed Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Li B, Xu D (2012) Pancreatectomy combined with superior mesenteric vein-portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg 36:884–891CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Noto M, Miwa K, Kitagawa H, Kayahara M, Takamura H, Shimizu K, Ohta T (2005) Pancreas head carcinoma: frequency of invasion to soft tissue adherent to the superior mesenteric artery. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1056–1061PubMed Noto M, Miwa K, Kitagawa H, Kayahara M, Takamura H, Shimizu K, Ohta T (2005) Pancreas head carcinoma: frequency of invasion to soft tissue adherent to the superior mesenteric artery. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1056–1061PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Donahue TR, Reber HA (2015) Surgical management of pancreatic cancer—pancreaticoduodenectomy. Semin Oncol 42:98–109CrossRefPubMed Donahue TR, Reber HA (2015) Surgical management of pancreatic cancer—pancreaticoduodenectomy. Semin Oncol 42:98–109CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M et al (2014) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 155:977–988CrossRefPubMed Bockhorn M, Uzunoglu FG, Adham M et al (2014) Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 155:977–988CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMahon MJ, Guillou PJ, Anthoney A (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237CrossRefPubMed Verbeke CS, Leitch D, Menon KV, McMahon MJ, Guillou PJ, Anthoney A (2006) Redefining the R1 resection in pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 93:1232–1237CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lad NL, Squires MH, Maithel SK et al (2013) Is it time to stop checking frozen section neck margins during pancreaticoduodenectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 20:3626–3633CrossRefPubMed Lad NL, Squires MH, Maithel SK et al (2013) Is it time to stop checking frozen section neck margins during pancreaticoduodenectomy? Ann Surg Oncol 20:3626–3633CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu L, Katz MH, Lee SM et al (2015) Superior mesenteric artery margin of posttherapy pancreaticoduodenectomy and prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 39:1395–1403CrossRefPubMed Liu L, Katz MH, Lee SM et al (2015) Superior mesenteric artery margin of posttherapy pancreaticoduodenectomy and prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 39:1395–1403CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzakis AG, De Faria W, Angelis M, Verzaro R, Pinna A (2000) Partial abdominal exenteration, ex vivo resection of a large mesenteric fibroma, and successful orthotopic intestinal autotransplantation. Surgery 128:486–489CrossRefPubMed Tzakis AG, De Faria W, Angelis M, Verzaro R, Pinna A (2000) Partial abdominal exenteration, ex vivo resection of a large mesenteric fibroma, and successful orthotopic intestinal autotransplantation. Surgery 128:486–489CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzakis AG, Tryphonopoulos P, De Faria W et al (2003) Partial abdominal evisceration, ex vivo resection, and intestinal autotransplantation for the treatment of pathologic lesions of the root of the mesentery. J Am Coll Surg 197:770–776CrossRefPubMed Tzakis AG, Tryphonopoulos P, De Faria W et al (2003) Partial abdominal evisceration, ex vivo resection, and intestinal autotransplantation for the treatment of pathologic lesions of the root of the mesentery. J Am Coll Surg 197:770–776CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Quintini C, Di Benedetto F, Diago T et al (2007) Intestinal autotransplantation for adenocarcinoma of pancreas involving the mesenteric root: our experience and literature review. Pancreas 34:266–268CrossRefPubMed Quintini C, Di Benedetto F, Diago T et al (2007) Intestinal autotransplantation for adenocarcinoma of pancreas involving the mesenteric root: our experience and literature review. Pancreas 34:266–268CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Amano H, Miura F, Toyota N et al (2009) In situ surgical procedures for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: partial abdominal evisceration and intestinal autotransplantation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:771–776CrossRefPubMed Amano H, Miura F, Toyota N et al (2009) In situ surgical procedures for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: partial abdominal evisceration and intestinal autotransplantation. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 16:771–776CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kato T, Lobritto SJ, Tzakis A et al (2012) Multivisceral ex vivo surgery for tumors involving celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. Am J Transplant 12:1323–1328CrossRefPubMed Kato T, Lobritto SJ, Tzakis A et al (2012) Multivisceral ex vivo surgery for tumors involving celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. Am J Transplant 12:1323–1328CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tzvetanov IG, Bhati CS, Jeon H, Glover AE, Oberholzer J, Benedetti E (2012) Segmental intestinal autotransplantation after extensive enterectomy for removal of large intra-abdominal desmoid tumors of the mesentery root: initial experience. Surgery 151:621–624CrossRefPubMed Tzvetanov IG, Bhati CS, Jeon H, Glover AE, Oberholzer J, Benedetti E (2012) Segmental intestinal autotransplantation after extensive enterectomy for removal of large intra-abdominal desmoid tumors of the mesentery root: initial experience. Surgery 151:621–624CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bachellier P, Rosso E, Lucescu I, Oussoultzoglou E, Tracey J, Pessaux P, Ferreira N, Jaeck D (2011) Is the need for an arterial resection a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A case-matched controlled study. J Surg Oncol 103:75–84CrossRefPubMed Bachellier P, Rosso E, Lucescu I, Oussoultzoglou E, Tracey J, Pessaux P, Ferreira N, Jaeck D (2011) Is the need for an arterial resection a contraindication to pancreatic resection for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma? A case-matched controlled study. J Surg Oncol 103:75–84CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez F, Zou Y, Lopez G et al (2005) Is portal venous outflow better than systemic venous outflow in small bowel transplantation? Experimental study in syngeneic rats. J Pediatr Surg 40:336–340CrossRefPubMed Hernandez F, Zou Y, Lopez G et al (2005) Is portal venous outflow better than systemic venous outflow in small bowel transplantation? Experimental study in syngeneic rats. J Pediatr Surg 40:336–340CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Berney T, Kato T, Nishida S et al (2002) Portal versus systemic drainage of small bowel allografts: comparative assessment of survival, function, rejection, and bacterial translocation. J Am Coll Surg 195:804–813CrossRefPubMed Berney T, Kato T, Nishida S et al (2002) Portal versus systemic drainage of small bowel allografts: comparative assessment of survival, function, rejection, and bacterial translocation. J Am Coll Surg 195:804–813CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Nikeghbalian S, Aliakbarian M, Kazemi K, Shamsaeefar AR, Mehdi SH, Bahreini A, Malek-Hosseini SA (2014) Ex-vivo resection and small-bowel auto-transplantation for the treatment of tumors at the root of the mesentery. Int J Organ Transplant Med 5:120–124PubMedPubMedCentral Nikeghbalian S, Aliakbarian M, Kazemi K, Shamsaeefar AR, Mehdi SH, Bahreini A, Malek-Hosseini SA (2014) Ex-vivo resection and small-bowel auto-transplantation for the treatment of tumors at the root of the mesentery. Int J Organ Transplant Med 5:120–124PubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Payne RF, Pain JA (2006) Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy is a safe anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93:73–77CrossRefPubMed Payne RF, Pain JA (2006) Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticogastrostomy is a safe anastomosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 93:73–77CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiong JJ, Tan CL, Szatmary P et al (2014) Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101:1196–1208CrossRefPubMed Xiong JJ, Tan CL, Szatmary P et al (2014) Meta-analysis of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 101:1196–1208CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, Mantovani W, Pederzoli P (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242:767–771, discussion 771–763CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, Mantovani W, Pederzoli P (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242:767–771, discussion 771–763CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, Alves A, Lubrano J (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 261:882–887CrossRefPubMed Menahem B, Guittet L, Mulliri A, Alves A, Lubrano J (2015) Pancreaticogastrostomy is superior to pancreaticojejunostomy for prevention of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 261:882–887CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M et al (2016) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 263:440–449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Keck T, Wellner UF, Bahra M et al (2016) Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction After PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC, DRKS 00000767): perioperative and long-term results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 263:440–449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Intestinal autotransplantation for neoplasms originating in the pancreatic head with involvement of the superior mesenteric artery
verfasst von
Guosheng Wu
Xin Wang
Qingchuan Zhao
Weizhong Wang
Hai Shi
Mian Wang
Jingson Zhang
Zengshan Li
Daiming Fan
Publikationsdatum
23.04.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1437-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.