Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 2/2021

24.01.2021 | Original Article

Intra-pancreatic distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a common short and long-term prognosis?

verfasst von: Théophile Guilbaud, Edouard Girard, Coralie Lemoine, Ghislain Schlienger, Oyekashopefoluw Alao, Olivier Risse, Stéphane Berdah, Mircea Chirica, Vincent Moutardier, David Jérémie Birnbaum

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare histological features, postoperative outcomes, and long-term prognostic factors after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. From 2005 to 2017, 188 pancreaticoduodenectomies (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma n = 151, distal cholangiocarcinoma n = 37) were included. Postoperative outcomes were compared after matching on pancreatic gland texture and main pancreatic duct size. Matching according to tumor size, lymph node invasion and resection margin was used to compare overall and disease-free survival. Distal cholangiocarcinoma patients had more often “soft” pancreatic gland (P = 0.002) and small size main pancreatic duct (P = 0.001). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients had larger tumors (P = 0.009), and higher lymph node ratio (P = 0.017). Severe morbidity (P = 0.023) and clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (P = 0.018) were higher in distal cholangiocarcinoma patients. After matching on gland texture and main pancreatic duct diameter, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula was still more frequent in distal cholangiocarcinoma patients (P = 0.007). Tumor size > 20 mm was predictive of impaired overall survival (P = 0.024) and disease-free survival (P = 0.003), tumor differentiation (P = 0.027) was predictive of impaired overall survival. Survival outcomes for distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal cholangiocarcinoma were similar after matching patients according to tumor size, lymph node invasion and resection margin. Long-term outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients are similar. Postoperative course is more complicated after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma than pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. After pancreaticoduodenectomy, patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma have similar long-term oncological outcomes.

Graphic abstract

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatzaras I, George N, Muscarella P et al (2010) Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 17:991–997CrossRef Hatzaras I, George N, Muscarella P et al (2010) Predictors of survival in periampullary cancers following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 17:991–997CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron JL, He J (2015) Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 220:530–536CrossRef Cameron JL, He J (2015) Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg 220:530–536CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 66:7–30CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 66:7–30CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Courtin-Tanguy L, Rayar M, Bergeat D et al (2016) The true prognosis of resected distal cholangiocarcinoma: prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 113:575–580CrossRef Courtin-Tanguy L, Rayar M, Bergeat D et al (2016) The true prognosis of resected distal cholangiocarcinoma: prognosis of distal cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 113:575–580CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ethun CG, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Pawlik TM et al (2017) Distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreas adenocarcinoma: are they really the same disease? a 13-institution study from the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium and the central pancreas consortium. J Am Coll Surg 224:406–413CrossRef Ethun CG, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Pawlik TM et al (2017) Distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreas adenocarcinoma: are they really the same disease? a 13-institution study from the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium and the central pancreas consortium. J Am Coll Surg 224:406–413CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gonzalez RS, Bagci P, Basturk O et al (2016) Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 29:1358–1369CrossRef Gonzalez RS, Bagci P, Basturk O et al (2016) Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 29:1358–1369CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou Y, Liu S, Wu L, Wan T (2017) Survival after surgical resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors. Asian J Surg 40:129–138CrossRef Zhou Y, Liu S, Wu L, Wan T (2017) Survival after surgical resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors. Asian J Surg 40:129–138CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Malleo G et al (2017) Does size matter in pancreatic cancer? reappraisal of tumour dimension as a predictor of outcome beyond the TNM. Ann Surg 266:142–148CrossRef Marchegiani G, Andrianello S, Malleo G et al (2017) Does size matter in pancreatic cancer? reappraisal of tumour dimension as a predictor of outcome beyond the TNM. Ann Surg 266:142–148CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Saka B, Balci S, Basturk O et al (2016) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is spread to the peripancreatic soft tissue in the majority of resected cases, rendering the AJCC t-stage protocol (7th edition) inapplicable and insignificant: a size based staging system (pT1: ≤ 2, pT2: > 2 ≤ 4, pT3: > 4 cm). Ann Surg Oncol 23:2010–2018CrossRef Saka B, Balci S, Basturk O et al (2016) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is spread to the peripancreatic soft tissue in the majority of resected cases, rendering the AJCC t-stage protocol (7th edition) inapplicable and insignificant: a size based staging system (pT1: ≤ 2, pT2: > 2 ≤ 4, pT3: > 4 cm). Ann Surg Oncol 23:2010–2018CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF et al (2017) Multi-institutional validation study of the American joint commission on cancer (8th edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 265:185–191CrossRef Allen PJ, Kuk D, Castillo CF et al (2017) Multi-institutional validation study of the American joint commission on cancer (8th edition) changes for T and N staging in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 265:185–191CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243CrossRef Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) et al (2017) The 2016 update of the international study group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MD, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRef Wente MD, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the international study group of pancreatic surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (2010) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, pp 227–230 Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (2010) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, pp 227–230
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho D, Imai K, King G et al (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Anal 15:199–236CrossRef Ho D, Imai K, King G et al (2007) Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Anal 15:199–236CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergeat D, Turrini O, Courtin-Tanguy L et al (2018) Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis from a French multicentric cohort. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:701–709CrossRef Bergeat D, Turrini O, Courtin-Tanguy L et al (2018) Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy after pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis from a French multicentric cohort. Langenbecks Arch Surg 403:701–709CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jun SY, Sung YN, Lee JH et al (2019) Validation of the eighth american joint committee on cancer staging system for distal bile duct carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 51:98–111CrossRef Jun SY, Sung YN, Lee JH et al (2019) Validation of the eighth american joint committee on cancer staging system for distal bile duct carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 51:98–111CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat He J, Ahuja N, Makary MA et al (2014) 2564 resected periampullary adenocarcinomas at a single institution: trends over three decades. HPB (Oxford) 16:83–90CrossRef He J, Ahuja N, Makary MA et al (2014) 2564 resected periampullary adenocarcinomas at a single institution: trends over three decades. HPB (Oxford) 16:83–90CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Riall TS, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2006) Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up. Surgery 140:764–772CrossRef Riall TS, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2006) Resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: 5-year survivors and their 6- to 10-year follow-up. Surgery 140:764–772CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, Offerhaus GJ et al (2001) Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: an update. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:549–557CrossRef van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM, Offerhaus GJ et al (2001) Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: an update. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:549–557CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams JL, Chan CK, Toste PA et al (2017) Association of histopathologic phenotype of periampullary adenocarcinomas with survival. JAMA Surg 152:82–88CrossRef Williams JL, Chan CK, Toste PA et al (2017) Association of histopathologic phenotype of periampullary adenocarcinomas with survival. JAMA Surg 152:82–88CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiergens TS, Reu S, Neumann J et al (2015) Histomorphologic and molecular phenotypes predict gemcitabine response and overall survival in adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Surgery 158:151–161CrossRef Schiergens TS, Reu S, Neumann J et al (2015) Histomorphologic and molecular phenotypes predict gemcitabine response and overall survival in adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Surgery 158:151–161CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Perysinakis I, Margaris I, Kouraklis G (2019) Ampullary cancer—a separate clinical entity? Histopathology 64:759–768CrossRef Perysinakis I, Margaris I, Kouraklis G (2019) Ampullary cancer—a separate clinical entity? Histopathology 64:759–768CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ang DC, Shia J, Tang LH et al (2014) The utility of immunohistochemistry in subtyping adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1371–1379CrossRef Ang DC, Shia J, Tang LH et al (2014) The utility of immunohistochemistry in subtyping adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1371–1379CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Perysinakis I, Minaidou E, Leontara V et al (2017) Differential expression of β-catenin, EGFR, CK7, CK20, MUC1, MUC2, and CDX2 in intestinal and pancreatobiliary-type ampullary carcinomas. Int J Surg Pathol 251:31–40CrossRef Perysinakis I, Minaidou E, Leontara V et al (2017) Differential expression of β-catenin, EGFR, CK7, CK20, MUC1, MUC2, and CDX2 in intestinal and pancreatobiliary-type ampullary carcinomas. Int J Surg Pathol 251:31–40CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrone CR, Marchegiani G, Hong TS et al (2015) Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 261:12–17CrossRef Ferrone CR, Marchegiani G, Hong TS et al (2015) Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg 261:12–17CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbeke CS, Gladhaug IP (2012) Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer. Br J Surg 99:1036–1049CrossRef Verbeke CS, Gladhaug IP (2012) Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer. Br J Surg 99:1036–1049CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Pomianowska E, Grzyb K, Westgaard A et al (2012) Reclassification of tumour origin in resected periampullary adenocarcinomas reveals underestimation of distal bile duct cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1043–1050CrossRef Pomianowska E, Grzyb K, Westgaard A et al (2012) Reclassification of tumour origin in resected periampullary adenocarcinomas reveals underestimation of distal bile duct cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1043–1050CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Intra-pancreatic distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a common short and long-term prognosis?
verfasst von
Théophile Guilbaud
Edouard Girard
Coralie Lemoine
Ghislain Schlienger
Oyekashopefoluw Alao
Olivier Risse
Stéphane Berdah
Mircea Chirica
Vincent Moutardier
David Jérémie Birnbaum
Publikationsdatum
24.01.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-00981-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Updates in Surgery 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.