Skip to main content
Erschienen in:

06.09.2018 | Clinical Study Protocol

Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy assisted by laparoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

verfasst von: J. Bollo, P. Salas, M. C. Martinez, P. Hernandez, A. Rabal, E. Carrillo, E. Targarona

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer diagnosed in men and the second in women. Laparoscopic surgery has been a technical revolution in colorectal surgery, facilitating a better recovery of patients with lower morbidity and better esthetic results, compared to traditional surgery via laparotomy, without compromising safety and long-term oncological results.

Purpose

The trial is a randomized controlled trial indented to evaluate the two interventions with thorough measurements of the postoperative variables and complications to improve the evaluation of the surgical technique. The primary endpoint is to compare the hospital stay, which will be measured in days between both groups. The purpose of the study at secondary endpoints is to compare intraoperative and postoperative events between both groups in terms of operating time, anastomotic performance time, intraoperative complications, number of harvested lymph nodes, need for blood transfusion, length of the surgical wound, start and tolerance of oral intake, beginning of digestive functionality, postoperative pain, need for analgesic administration, surgical wound infection, paralytic ileus, anastomosis leakage or dehiscence, need for surgical reintervention, and hospital readmission within the first 30 days after surgery.

Methods

This trial is a prospective, randomized, single-blind, and single-center clinical trial comparing intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis for right laparoscopic hemicolectomy.

Conclusions

Nowadays, there are several retrospective trials comparing the benefits for extracorporeal anastomosis versus intracorporeal anastomosis in right colon cancer patients. Considering the impact for laparoscopic surgery, we think it is necessary to do a randomized trial comparing extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis modalities.

Trial registration

www.​clinicaltrials.​gov No. NCT02667860 and Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Research Institute No. IIBSP-AIE-2015-01
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Torre L, Bray F, Siegel R, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRef Torre L, Bray F, Siegel R, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global Cancer Statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat El-Shami K, Oeffinger K, Erb N, Willis A, Bretsch J, Pratt-Chapman M, Cannady R, Wong S, Rose J, Barbour A, Stein K, Sharpe K, Brooks D, Cowens-Alvarado R (2015) American Cancer Society colorectal cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 65:428–455CrossRef El-Shami K, Oeffinger K, Erb N, Willis A, Bretsch J, Pratt-Chapman M, Cannady R, Wong S, Rose J, Barbour A, Stein K, Sharpe K, Brooks D, Cowens-Alvarado R (2015) American Cancer Society colorectal cancer survivorship care guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin 65:428–455CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pâlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COLOR study group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Pâlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COLOR study group (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou P, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne D, Smith A, Heath R, Brown J (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSICC trial): multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef Guillou P, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne D, Smith A, Heath R, Brown J (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASSICC trial): multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Simillis C, Purkayastha S, Yamamoto T, Strong SA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2007) A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1674–1687CrossRef Simillis C, Purkayastha S, Yamamoto T, Strong SA, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2007) A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1674–1687CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ, West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group (1995) Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 221:176–184CrossRef Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ, West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group (1995) Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 221:176–184CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kracht M, Hay J-M, Fagniez P-L, Fingerhut A (1993) Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? Int J Colon Dis 8:29–33CrossRef Kracht M, Hay J-M, Fagniez P-L, Fingerhut A (1993) Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? Int J Colon Dis 8:29–33CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat MacRae HM, McLeod RS (1998) Handsewn vs stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 41(2):180–189CrossRef MacRae HM, McLeod RS (1998) Handsewn vs stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 41(2):180–189CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Frasson M, Granero-Castro P, Ramos J, Flor-Lorente B, Braithwaite M, Martínez E, Álvarez J, Codina A, Espí A, García-Granero E (2016) Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients. Int J Color Dis 31:105–114CrossRef Frasson M, Granero-Castro P, Ramos J, Flor-Lorente B, Braithwaite M, Martínez E, Álvarez J, Codina A, Espí A, García-Granero E (2016) Risk factors for anastomotic leak and postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective right colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective, multicentric study of 1102 patients. Int J Color Dis 31:105–114CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibañez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, Hernández Q, Parrilla P (2017) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis after right laparoscopic hemicolectomy for cancer (ISOVANTI) trial: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Int J Color Dis 32:1349–1356CrossRef Ibañez N, Abrisqueta J, Luján J, Hernández Q, Parrilla P (2017) Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis after right laparoscopic hemicolectomy for cancer (ISOVANTI) trial: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Int J Color Dis 32:1349–1356CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Guarino S, Desiderio J, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G, Slim K (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy – systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1–13CrossRef Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E, Guarino S, Desiderio J, Boselli C, Parisi A, Noya G, Slim K (2013) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy – systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 22:1–13CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A, Vannucchi A, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2013) Inracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 28:1177–1186CrossRef Feroci F, Lenzi E, Garzi A, Vannucchi A, Cantafio S, Scatizzi M (2013) Inracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis 28:1177–1186CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tarta C, Bishawi M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis: a review. Tech Coloproctol 17:479–485CrossRef Tarta C, Bishawi M, Bergamaschi R (2013) Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis: a review. Tech Coloproctol 17:479–485CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Carnuccio P, Jimeno J, Pares D (2014) Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 18:5–12CrossRef Carnuccio P, Jimeno J, Pares D (2014) Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol 18:5–12CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Q, Jin C, Hu T, Wei M, Wang Z (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:348–357CrossRef Wu Q, Jin C, Hu T, Wei M, Wang Z (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27:348–357CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W, Schoonmade L, Sietses C, Meijerink J, Tuynman J (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:64–77CrossRef van Oostendorp S, Elfrink A, Borstlap W, Schoonmade L, Sietses C, Meijerink J, Tuynman J (2017) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:64–77CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchesi F, Pinna F, Percalli L, Cecchini S, Ricco M, Costi R, Pattonieri V, Roncoroni L (2013) Totally laparoscopic right colectomy: theoretical and practical advantages over the laparo-assited approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:418–424CrossRef Marchesi F, Pinna F, Percalli L, Cecchini S, Ricco M, Costi R, Pattonieri V, Roncoroni L (2013) Totally laparoscopic right colectomy: theoretical and practical advantages over the laparo-assited approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23:418–424CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergis AS, Steigerwald SN, Bhojani FD, Sullivan PA, Hardy KM (2015) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Can J Surg 58:63–68CrossRef Vergis AS, Steigerwald SN, Bhojani FD, Sullivan PA, Hardy KM (2015) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Can J Surg 58:63–68CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, Piagnerelli R, Annecchiarico M, Coratti F, Di Marino M, Ricci F, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Parisi A (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 29:1512–1521CrossRef Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, Piagnerelli R, Annecchiarico M, Coratti F, Di Marino M, Ricci F, Desiderio J, Cirocchi R, Parisi A (2015) Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 29:1512–1521CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Anania G, Santini M, Scagliarini L, Marzetti A, Vedana L, Marino S, Gregorio C, Resta G, Cavallesco G (2012) A totally mini-invasive approach for colorectal laparoscopic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 18:3869–3874CrossRef Anania G, Santini M, Scagliarini L, Marzetti A, Vedana L, Marino S, Gregorio C, Resta G, Cavallesco G (2012) A totally mini-invasive approach for colorectal laparoscopic surgery. World J Gastroenterol 18:3869–3874CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaves JA, Idoate CP, Fons JB, Oliver MB, Rodriguez NP, Delgado AB, Lizoain JLH (2011) A case-control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Cir Esp 89:24–30CrossRef Chaves JA, Idoate CP, Fons JB, Oliver MB, Rodriguez NP, Delgado AB, Lizoain JLH (2011) A case-control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy. Cir Esp 89:24–30CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kisielinski K, Conze J, Murken H, Lenzen NN, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2004) The Pfannenstiel or so called “bikini cut”: still effective more than 100 years after first description. Hernia 8:177–181CrossRef Kisielinski K, Conze J, Murken H, Lenzen NN, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2004) The Pfannenstiel or so called “bikini cut”: still effective more than 100 years after first description. Hernia 8:177–181CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600CrossRef Singh R, Omiccioli A, Hegge S, McKinley C (2008) Does the extraction-site location in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have an impact on incisional hernia rates? Surg Endosc 22:2596–2600CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Blunt LM (2002) Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1420–1425CrossRef Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Blunt LM (2002) Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy. Surg Endosc 16:1420–1425CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Scatizzi M, Kroning KC, Borrelli A et al (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study. World J Surg 34:2902–2908 21CrossRef Scatizzi M, Kroning KC, Borrelli A et al (2010) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study. World J Surg 34:2902–2908 21CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Roscio F, Bertoglio C, De Luca A et al (2012) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer. Int J Surg 10:290–295 22CrossRef Roscio F, Bertoglio C, De Luca A et al (2012) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer. Int J Surg 10:290–295 22CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Magistro C, Lernia SD, Ferrari G, Zullino A, Mazzola M, de Martini P, de Carli S, Forgione A, Bertoglio CL, Pugliese R (2013) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term out- comes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center. Surg Endosc 27:2613–2618CrossRef Magistro C, Lernia SD, Ferrari G, Zullino A, Mazzola M, de Martini P, de Carli S, Forgione A, Bertoglio CL, Pugliese R (2013) Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy for colon cancer: is there any advantage in short-term out- comes? A prospective comparative assessment in our center. Surg Endosc 27:2613–2618CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A (2009) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 13:312–317PubMedPubMedCentral Hellan M, Anderson C, Pigazzi A (2009) Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. JSLS 13:312–317PubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee KH, Ho J, Akmal Y, Nelson R, Pigazzi A (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1986–1990CrossRef Lee KH, Ho J, Akmal Y, Nelson R, Pigazzi A (2013) Short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 27:1986–1990CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Miter DB et al (2004) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: 11-year experience. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 69(Suppl 1):65–72 30PubMed Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Miter DB et al (2004) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: 11-year experience. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 69(Suppl 1):65–72 30PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Milone M, Elmore U, Di Salvo E et al (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc 29:2314–2320CrossRef Milone M, Elmore U, Di Salvo E et al (2015) Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc 29:2314–2320CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabozzi M, Allieta R, Contul RB, Grivon M, Millo P, Lale-Murix E, Nardi M (2010) Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 24:2085–2091CrossRef Fabozzi M, Allieta R, Contul RB, Grivon M, Millo P, Lale-Murix E, Nardi M (2010) Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 24:2085–2091CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught C, Macfie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. World J Surg 37(2):259–284CrossRef Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught C, Macfie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. World J Surg 37(2):259–284CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy assisted by laparoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
verfasst von
J. Bollo
P. Salas
M. C. Martinez
P. Hernandez
A. Rabal
E. Carrillo
E. Targarona
Publikationsdatum
06.09.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3157-9

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Verbände und Cremes gegen Dekubitus: „Wir wissen nicht, was sie bringen!“

Die Datenlage zur Wirksamkeit von Verbänden oder topischen Mitteln zur Prävention von Druckgeschwüren sei schlecht, so die Verfasser einer aktuellen Cochrane-Studie. Letztlich bleibe es unsicher, ob solche Maßnahmen den Betroffenen nutzen oder schaden.

Nackenschmerzen nach Bandscheibenvorfall: Muskeltraining hilft!

Bei hartnäckigen Schmerzen aufgrund einer zervikalen Radikulopathie schlägt ein Team der Universität Istanbul vor, lokale Steroidinjektionen mit einem speziellen Trainingsprogramm zur Stabilisierung der Nackenmuskulatur zu kombinieren.

US-Team empfiehlt Gastropexie nach Hiatushernien-Op.

Zur Vermeidung von Rezidiven nach Reparatur einer paraösophagealen Hiatushernie sollte einem US-Team zufolge der Magen bei der Op. routinemäßig an der Bauchwand fixiert werden. Das Ergebnis einer randomisierten Studie scheint dafür zu sprechen.

Mit Lidocain kommt der Darm nicht schneller in Schwung

Verzögertes Wiederanspringen der Darmfunktion ist ein Hauptfaktor dafür, wenn Patientinnen und Patienten nach einer Kolonresektion länger als geplant im Krankenhaus bleiben müssen. Ob man diesem Problem mit Lidocain vorbeugen kann, war Thema einer Studie.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.