Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Neuroradiology 4/2016

28.11.2016 | Editorial

Intracranial Stenting in Germany

The Reimbursement Decision has been made, but the Scientific Debate Continues

verfasst von: Bernd Eckert

Erschienen in: Clinical Neuroradiology | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The results of the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) [1] and the Vitesse Stent Ischemic Therapy trial (VISSIT) [2] have changed the current clinical and reimbursement practice in the endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) for stroke prevention. After the initial clinical alert, due to the termination of the SAMMPRIS trial on 11 April 2011 the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) restricted reimbursement of intracranial stenting with the Wingspan stent to patients:
  • between 22 and 80 years of age,
  • who have had two or more strokes despite aggressive medical treatment, if the most recent stroke occurred more than 7 days prior to a planned Wingspan treatment,
  • who have a stenosis >70% and have shown a recovery from previous stroke (modified Rankin scale [mRS] ≤ 3).
  • Furthermore, the Wingspan Stent System should not be used for the treatment of transient ischemic attacks (TIA).
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Fiorella D, Turan TN, Janis LS, Montgomery J, Nizam A, Lane BF, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Lynch JR, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ. Stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in Intracranial stenosis trial investigators. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9914):333–41.CrossRefPubMed Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Fiorella D, Turan TN, Janis LS, Montgomery J, Nizam A, Lane BF, Lutsep HL, Barnwell SL, Waters MF, Hoh BL, Hourihane JM, Levy EI, Alexandrov AV, Harrigan MR, Chiu D, Klucznik RP, Clark JM, McDougall CG, Johnson MD, Pride GL Jr, Lynch JR, Zaidat OO, Rumboldt Z, Cloft HJ. Stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in Intracranial stenosis trial investigators. Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9914):333–41.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF, Woodward BK, Wang Z, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Wakhloo A, Gupta R, Kirshner H, Megerian JT, Lesko J, Pitzer P, Ramos J, Castonguay AC, Barnwell S, Smith WS, Gress DR, VISSIT Trial Investigators. Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(12):1240–8.CrossRefPubMed Zaidat OO, Fitzsimmons BF, Woodward BK, Wang Z, Killer-Oberpfalzer M, Wakhloo A, Gupta R, Kirshner H, Megerian JT, Lesko J, Pitzer P, Ramos J, Castonguay AC, Barnwell S, Smith WS, Gress DR, VISSIT Trial Investigators. Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis: the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(12):1240–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat FDA. Neurological Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee Meeting Announcement. March 23. Silver Spring: FDA; 2012. FDA. Neurological Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory Committee Meeting Announcement. March 23. Silver Spring: FDA; 2012.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Makin SD, Doubal FN, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM, Makin SD, Doubal FN, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM. Clinically confirmed stroke with negative diffusion-weighted imaging magnetic resonance imaging: longitudinal study of clinical outcomes, stroke recurrence, and systematic review. Stroke. 2015;46(11):3142–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Makin SD, Doubal FN, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM, Makin SD, Doubal FN, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM. Clinically confirmed stroke with negative diffusion-weighted imaging magnetic resonance imaging: longitudinal study of clinical outcomes, stroke recurrence, and systematic review. Stroke. 2015;46(11):3142–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Maier IL, Karch A, Lipke C, Behme D, Mpotsaris A, Kabbasch C, Liebig T, Faymonville A, Reich A, Nikoubashman O, Buhk JH, von Schoenfeld P, Weber W, Mikolajczyk RT, Bähr M, Knauth M, Kallenberg K, Liman J. Transluminal angioplasty and stenting versus conservative treatment in patients with symptomatic basilar artery stenosis: Perspective for future clinical trials. Clin Neuroradiol. 2016; doi:10.1007/s00062-016-0528-x.PubMed Maier IL, Karch A, Lipke C, Behme D, Mpotsaris A, Kabbasch C, Liebig T, Faymonville A, Reich A, Nikoubashman O, Buhk JH, von Schoenfeld P, Weber W, Mikolajczyk RT, Bähr M, Knauth M, Kallenberg K, Liman J. Transluminal angioplasty and stenting versus conservative treatment in patients with symptomatic basilar artery stenosis: Perspective for future clinical trials. Clin Neuroradiol. 2016; doi:10.​1007/​s00062-016-0528-x.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat IQWiG. Stents zur Behandlung intrakranieller arterieller Stenosen – Rapid Report. 2014, p N14–01. IQWiG. Stents zur Behandlung intrakranieller arterieller Stenosen – Rapid Report. 2014, p N14–01.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao HH, Gao LB. Stent implantation combined with drug therapy versus pure drug therapy for symptomatic severe stenosis of middle cerebral artery: a randomized and comparative study. J Interv Radiol (China). 2013;22(2):89–92. Gao HH, Gao LB. Stent implantation combined with drug therapy versus pure drug therapy for symptomatic severe stenosis of middle cerebral artery: a randomized and comparative study. J Interv Radiol (China). 2013;22(2):89–92.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiehler J. Evidenzbasierte Medizin in der interventionellen Neuroradiologie. Clin Neuroradiol. 2015;25(Suppl 2):103–8.CrossRefPubMed Fiehler J. Evidenzbasierte Medizin in der interventionellen Neuroradiologie. Clin Neuroradiol. 2015;25(Suppl 2):103–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Möhlenbruch MA, Pfaff J, Herweh C, Bösel J, Rizos T, Nagel S, Ringleb PA, Bendszus M, Pham M. One-pass endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with a novel PTA balloon and self-expanding microstent. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(9):893–9.CrossRefPubMed Möhlenbruch MA, Pfaff J, Herweh C, Bösel J, Rizos T, Nagel S, Ringleb PA, Bendszus M, Pham M. One-pass endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with a novel PTA balloon and self-expanding microstent. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(9):893–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Intracranial Stenting in Germany
The Reimbursement Decision has been made, but the Scientific Debate Continues
verfasst von
Bernd Eckert
Publikationsdatum
28.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Neuroradiology / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 1869-1439
Elektronische ISSN: 1869-1447
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-016-0550-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Clinical Neuroradiology 4/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.