Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1/2011

01.01.2011 | Cataract

Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer

verfasst von: Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević, Mladen Bušić, Ivan Čima, Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer, Damir Bosnar, Daliborka Miletić

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The purpose of the study was to assess intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of eight ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using the optical low-coherence reflectometer Lenstar LS 900®.

Methods

Five consecutive measurements of ocular components were taken by two examiners using the Lenstar. Components analyzed were: central corneal thickness, lens thickness, anterior chamber depth, axial length, retinal thickness, keratometry, white-to-white distance, and pupillometry. Within-subject standard deviation and the coefficient of variation were calculated for evaluation of intraobserver repeatability. Bland–Altman analysis was used for assessment of interobserver repeatability.

Results

Thirty-two eyes of 22 patients were included. For both observers, the smallest intraobserver coefficient of variation was obtained for axial length, while the largest was found for corneal steepest meridian position. Interobserver repeatability demonstrated less repeatable results for white-to-white distance and corneal steepest meridian position. Considering axial length and anterior chamber depth values, predicted refractive error was 0 ± 0.05 D and 0.02 ± 0.19 D respectively in 95% of observations.

Conclusion

The Lenstar LS 900® evidenced excellent repeatability and observers´ independent results of all components analyzed except white-to-white distance and corneal steepest meridian position measurements. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on interobserver repeatability of optical low-coherence reflectometry in cataract eyes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Leaming DV (2004) Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members—2003 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:892–900CrossRefPubMed Leaming DV (2004) Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members—2003 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:892–900CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMed
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Myles PS, Cui J (2007) Using Bland–Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 99:309–311CrossRefPubMed Myles PS, Cui J (2007) Using Bland–Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. Br J Anaesth 99:309–311CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ (2009) A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol 93:949–953CrossRefPubMed Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, Naroo SA, Davies LN, Berrow EJ (2009) A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol 93:949–953CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Cruysberg LP, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TTJM, De Brabander J, Nuijts RMMA (2010) Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 all-in-one non contact biometry meter. Br J Ophthalmol 94:106–110CrossRefPubMed Cruysberg LP, Doors M, Verbakel F, Berendschot TTJM, De Brabander J, Nuijts RMMA (2010) Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 all-in-one non contact biometry meter. Br J Ophthalmol 94:106–110CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Wälti R, Clemetson IA, Tappeiner C, Goldblum D (2009) Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer. Ophthalmology 116:2087–2092CrossRefPubMed Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Wälti R, Clemetson IA, Tappeiner C, Goldblum D (2009) Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer. Ophthalmology 116:2087–2092CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Liampa Z, Kynigopoulos M, Pallas G, Gerding H (2010) Comparison of two partial coherence interferometry devices for ocular biometry. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 227:285–288CrossRefPubMed Liampa Z, Kynigopoulos M, Pallas G, Gerding H (2010) Comparison of two partial coherence interferometry devices for ocular biometry. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 227:285–288CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Auffarth GU (2009) Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol 93:807–810CrossRefPubMed Holzer MP, Mamusa M, Auffarth GU (2009) Accuracy of a new partial coherence interferometry analyser for biometric measurements. Br J Ophthalmol 93:807–810CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G (2010) Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:644–648, Erratum in: J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1066CrossRefPubMed Hoffer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G (2010) Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:644–648, Erratum in: J Cataract Refract Surg 36:1066CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tappainer C, Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Waelti R, Goldblum D (2010) Clinical comparison of biometry using the non-contact optical low coherence reflectometer (Lenstar LS 900) and contact ultrasound biometer (Tomey AL-3000) in cataract eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 94:666–667CrossRef Tappainer C, Rohrer K, Frueh BE, Waelti R, Goldblum D (2010) Clinical comparison of biometry using the non-contact optical low coherence reflectometer (Lenstar LS 900) and contact ultrasound biometer (Tomey AL-3000) in cataract eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 94:666–667CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumeister M, Terzi E, Ekici Y, Kohnen T (2004) Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:374–380CrossRefPubMed Baumeister M, Terzi E, Ekici Y, Kohnen T (2004) Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:374–380CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Piñero DP, Plaza Puche AB, Alió JL (2007) Corneal diameter measurements by corneal topography and angle to angle measurements by optical coherence tomography: Evaluation of equivalence. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:126–131CrossRef Piñero DP, Plaza Puche AB, Alió JL (2007) Corneal diameter measurements by corneal topography and angle to angle measurements by optical coherence tomography: Evaluation of equivalence. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:126–131CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen T (2007) Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:472–485CrossRefPubMed Olsen T (2007) Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:472–485CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Petternel V, Drexler W, Rainer G, Georgopoulos M, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF (2002) Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry. Clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:230–234CrossRefPubMed Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Petternel V, Drexler W, Rainer G, Georgopoulos M, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF (2002) Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry. Clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:230–234CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Coffman PG, Brown LK (2002) Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry. Outcomes analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:239–242CrossRefPubMed Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Coffman PG, Brown LK (2002) Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry. Outcomes analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 28:239–242CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Narváez J, Cherwek DH, Stulting RD, Waldron R, Zimmerman GJ, Wessels IF, Waring GO 3rd (2008) Comparing immersion ultrasound with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 39:30–34CrossRefPubMed Narváez J, Cherwek DH, Stulting RD, Waldron R, Zimmerman GJ, Wessels IF, Waring GO 3rd (2008) Comparing immersion ultrasound with partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens power calculation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 39:30–34CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Olsen T (2007) Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:84–87CrossRefPubMed Olsen T (2007) Improved accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation with the Zeiss IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 85:84–87CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA (2002) Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculation. Eye 16:552–556CrossRefPubMed Rajan MS, Keilhorn I, Bell JA (2002) Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculation. Eye 16:552–556CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:765–773CrossRefPubMed Haigis W, Lege B, Miller N, Schneider B (2000) Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238:765–773CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer
verfasst von
Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević
Mladen Bušić
Ivan Čima
Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer
Damir Bosnar
Daliborka Miletić
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-010-1546-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.