Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 7/2019

14.05.2019 | Original Article – Clinical Oncology

Invasive ductal carcinoma with coexisting ductal carcinoma in situ (IDC/DCIS) versus pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): a comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, molecular subtypes, and clinical outcomes

verfasst von: Chih Wan Goh, Jiayi Wu, Shuning Ding, Caijin Lin, Xiaosong Chen, Ou Huang, Weiguo Chen, Yafen Li, Kunwei Shen, Li Zhu

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 7/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is widely recognized as the precursor of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of coexisting DCIS component in IDC and its clinical significance according to molecular subtypes.

Methods

Data from 3001 patients with IDC (79.4%) and IDC/DCIS (20.6%) who underwent surgery from January 2009 to June 2016 were retrospectively assessed. The clinical outcomes of IDC with coexistent DCIS in different molecular subtypes were evaluated.

Results

IDC/DCIS patients were more likely to be younger (P < 0.001), had low tumor grade (P = 0.001), had less lymph node involvement (P = 0.038) and received more mastectomy (P = 0.002) than IDC patients. In the comparison of molecular subtype prevalence, IDC/DCIS patients were more frequently presented with luminal B/HER2 positive (12.5% vs 11.0%, P < 0.001) and HER2 positive subtypes (20.9% vs 9.8%, P < 0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS, 90.9% vs 87.5%, P = 0.021) and 5-year overall survival (OS 96.1% vs 94.0%, P = 0.018) were significantly improved in IDC/DCIS patients compared to IDC patients. In multivariate analysis, the presence of coexisting DCIS (P = 0.048), tumor size (P < 0.001), lymph node status (P < 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.007) and molecular subtypes (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. Furthermore, coexistence of DCIS component in IDC significantly improved DFS in HER2 positive (94.8% vs 78.5%, P = 0.003), but had no association in luminal and triple negative subtypes.

Conclusions

IDC with coexisting DCIS was associated with improved prognosis. Patients with IDC/DCIS presented with more HER2 positive expression and might improve DFS in HER2 positive breast cancer.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410CrossRefPubMed Elston CW, Ellis IO (1991) Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 19:403–410CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta SK, Douglas-Jones AG, Fenn N, Morgan JM, Mansel RE (1997) The clinical behavior of breast carcinoma is probably determined at the preinvasive stage (ductal carcinoma in situ). Cancer 80:1740–1745CrossRefPubMed Gupta SK, Douglas-Jones AG, Fenn N, Morgan JM, Mansel RE (1997) The clinical behavior of breast carcinoma is probably determined at the preinvasive stage (ductal carcinoma in situ). Cancer 80:1740–1745CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kornelia PJ (2011) Heterogeneity in breast cancer. JoCI 121:3786–3788 Kornelia PJ (2011) Heterogeneity in breast cancer. JoCI 121:3786–3788
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JS, Oh M, Ko SS, Min HP, Oh SJ, Song JY, Kim SWJ (2016) IHC-breast cancer subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma with predominant intraductal component as an insignificant prognostic factor: a register-based study from Korea. CTC 7:52–57 Lee JS, Oh M, Ko SS, Min HP, Oh SJ, Song JY, Kim SWJ (2016) IHC-breast cancer subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma with predominant intraductal component as an insignificant prognostic factor: a register-based study from Korea. CTC 7:52–57
Zurück zum Zitat Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Landenberger M (1982) Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only. Cancer 49:751–758CrossRefPubMed Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, Landenberger M (1982) Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only. Cancer 49:751–758CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Tavassoli FA (1998) Ductal carcinoma in situ: introduction of the concept of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia. Modern Pathol Off J US Canadian Acad Pathol Inc 11:140–154 Tavassoli FA (1998) Ductal carcinoma in situ: introduction of the concept of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia. Modern Pathol Off J US Canadian Acad Pathol Inc 11:140–154
Zurück zum Zitat Virnig BA, Shamliyan T, Tuttle TM, Kane RL, Wilt TJ (2009) Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evid Rep/Technol Assess 185:1–549 Virnig BA, Shamliyan T, Tuttle TM, Kane RL, Wilt TJ (2009) Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evid Rep/Technol Assess 185:1–549
Metadaten
Titel
Invasive ductal carcinoma with coexisting ductal carcinoma in situ (IDC/DCIS) versus pure invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC): a comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, molecular subtypes, and clinical outcomes
verfasst von
Chih Wan Goh
Jiayi Wu
Shuning Ding
Caijin Lin
Xiaosong Chen
Ou Huang
Weiguo Chen
Yafen Li
Kunwei Shen
Li Zhu
Publikationsdatum
14.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-019-02930-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2019

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 7/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.