Introduction
Iodine is a trace element located mainly in the thyroid gland and is essential for thyroid hormone production [
1,
2]. Worldwide, iodine deficiency is a continuing public health concern even though salt iodization programs have had a large impact on global iodine nutrition [
3]. The iodine content of most foods is low. The only good natural source of iodine is seawater fish and other marine products. However, the main sources of iodine in Norway are milk and dairy products [
4,
5]. Europe is still the continent with the highest prevalence of iodine deficiency and 44% of schoolchildren have inadequate iodine status, defined as median urinary iodine concentration (UIC) < 100 µg/L according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [
6]. When iodine intakes are inadequate, the body may respond with impaired thyroid hormone synthesis, which can result in several functional and developmental abnormalities [
7]. In preschool children, mild-to-moderate iodine deficiency may induce adverse health effects, including impaired intellectual function and physical growth [
8,
9].
A high consumption of milk and dairy products have led to eradication of endemic goiter in Norway and Britain since the start of iodine fortification of cow feed in the 1950s [
4,
10]. Until recently, Norway has been considered to have an overall adequate iodine status [
3]. In a previous study on the iodine content of Norwegian foods along with assessment of iodine intakes in subgroups of the Norwegian population, the iodine intakes among 4-year-old girls and boys were calculated to 98 and 101 µg/day, respectively [
5]. This indicates iodine intakes slightly above the recommended intake level for this age group (2–5 years; 90 µg/day) [
5]. Recent studies indicate that subgroups within the Norwegian population, including pregnant women and adolescent girls, may suffer from mild iodine deficiency due to inadequate intakes of dietary iodine [
4,
5,
11,
12].
UIC in spot urine samples is recommended by WHO, UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund) and IGN (Iodine Global Network) for assessing a population’s iodine status. To obtain a more accurate indicator of iodine levels than spot urinary iodine concentration, the urine iodine-to-creatinine ratio (I/Cr) is often used. Creatinine is a breakdown product of creatine and is steadily excreted through urine in 24 h if fluid intake is regular [
13]. Excretion of creatinine is constant at ~ 1 g/day, but can vary according to factors such as gender, age and nutritional status [
13,
14]. Thus, the iodine concentration measured in spot urine samples can be expressed as µg iodine/g creatinine.
The main aims of this study were to evaluate the iodine status by UIC, I/Cr and estimated 24 h urinary iodine excretion (UIE), and to investigate possible associations between UIC and estimated 24 h UIE and iodine-rich food sources in Norwegian preschool children aged 4–6 years.
Discussion
In this study, we have examined iodine status of preschool children in Bergen, Norway. This population was found to be iodine sufficient with a median UIC of 132 µg/L. Low intake of sweet milk and dairy products were significant predictors of low iodine status.
According to WHO, median UIC between 100 and 199 µg/L in school-aged children defines a population with no iodine deficiency, in addition not more than 20% should have UIC below 50 µg/L [
23]. Even though the median of the UIC is in the sufficiency range, 30% of the children had UIC below 100 µg/L and 17% had I/Cr ratio below 100 µg/g. Our UIC results are in accordance with other studies. In a recent Norwegian study including 47 children (aged 3–9 years), the median UIC was 148 µg/L [
11]. In a study performed in 279 Australian preschool children (aged 1–5 years), the median UIC was 129 µg/L [
24]. In addition, in a Portuguese study in school children (aged 6–12 years) the median UIC was 129 µg/L. However, in the latter study the median UIC in boys was significantly higher than in girls, which was partially explained by a higher energy intake among boys [
25]. Similarly, in 857 school-age children (6–12 years old) from Sweden, the median UIC was 125 µg/L and no gender differences were found [
26]. In the present study, the energy intake could unfortunately not be estimated. Further, our values are in agreement with a study from Denmark examining the iodine status of pregnant women, their partners and their children (
N = 51, age 6 years), were the children had a median UIC of 126 µg/L [
27]. These agreements are interesting considering that, in contrast to Norway, the largest dietary source of iodine in the Swedish diet is iodized salt [
26], and in Denmark, salt and bread have been fortified with iodine for the last 15 years [
28]. However, the analytical methods in the Danish study were different, and the results may therefore not be directly comparable. Iodization of salt is not mandatory in Norway. In the present study, UIC < 100 µg/L was associated with low intake of sweet milk and estimated 24 h UIE < 65 µg/day with low intake of both sweet milk and dairy products in general. The role of dairy products in relation to adequate UIC is also in agreement with studies conducted in Norwegian adults [
4,
16]. Studies from other countries have also found milk and dairy products to be important predictors of iodine status in children [
29]. We did not find any associations between UIC and intake of seafood as dinner or spread, nor with cheese, eggs or cultured milk and yoghurt. Even though we did not find any associations between UIC or estimated 24 h UIE and seafood it is well known that lean fish, in general, is a good source of iodine if consumed. Fatty fish and most seafood spreads do not have such a high content of iodine. Nevertheless, fish is consumed less frequent than milk and other dairy products, and thus we do not necessarily expect to find an association with iodine measured in spot samples as such samples will contain iodine excreted only from the most recent intake. Still, a weekly intake of lean fish in concordance with the Norwegian recommendations will be expected to be an important contribution for individual iodine status.
Due to traditionally higher iodine content in milk and dairy products during winter, the children’s iodine concentration may have been affected, and consequently resulted in a somewhat higher iodine status than summer spot urine samples might have. Further, low intakes and/or the large variations in iodine content in different foods may be a possible explanation for the lack of further associations. Iodine content between dairy products, and between and within different fish species varies [
30,
31]. However, regarding seasonal variation in milk, more recent data indicate less variation throughout the year [
31].
The UIC measured in spot urine samples is a reflection of recent dietary iodine intake and is still the recommended biomarker for assessing iodine status in a population [
22]. However, there is an ongoing debate on whether this is the best estimate for measuring iodine status, especially on an individual level [
13]. The I/Cr ratio aims to reduce the effect of hydration in urinary iodine analysis [
13,
32]. It has been discussed whether the method of relating urinary iodine to creatinine is too burdensome, expensive and unnecessary [
22]. Urinary I/Cr ratios may be unreliable especially when protein intake is low, and loss of muscle mass will lead to reduced creatinine excretion in urine [
13,
22]. However, it has also been considered a more reliable measure of iodine status, due to the day-to-day variations of iodine intake and water consumption [
13]. Norwegian reference intervals for urinary creatinine concentration measured in spot urine samples in children (4–6 years) are not established [
33].
The relatively large sample size from the current study is recognized as a strength, and according to Andersen et al., a sample size of this magnitude makes it possible to estimate (with 95% CI) the iodine status from spot urine samples within a precision range of ± 7–10% [
34]. However, data on the latest consumed meal and time of collection of urine samples were not registered, which possibly could affect the iodine content of the urine sample. Furthermore, both publicly and privately owned kindergartens were included in the present study, but adjustment for parental education (socioeconomic status) did not materially affect the results (Table
3), further, the response rate of 90% (from the FFQ), knowing that participation in the study was voluntary, is considered to be high [
35,
36]. However, one cannot exclude a difference between included individuals and those who declined participation in the present study.
The FFQ method largely depends on the memory and perceptions of the respondents [
37], and self-reported dietary data may be subject to memory lapses, misinterpretations and modifications to more socially desirable responses [
38]. However, of healthy foods, over reporting is most common and therefore it should strengthen our findings between iodine and milk and dairy products.