The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
AA participated in the design of the study, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. AMA and MAA collected the data. ASA designed the study and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Orthodontic patients show high prevalence of tooth-size discrepancy. This study investigates the possible association between arch form, clinically significant tooth-size discrepancy, and sagittal molar relationship.
Pretreatment orthodontic casts of 230 Saudi patients were classified into one of three arch form types (tapered, ovoid, and square) using digitally scanned images of the mandibular arches. Bolton ratio was calculated, sagittal molar relationship was defined according to Angle classification, and correlations were analyzed using ANOVA, chi-square, and t-tests.
No single arch form was significantly more common than the others. Furthermore, no association was observed between the presence of significant Bolton discrepancy and the sagittal molar relationship or arch form. Overall Bolton discrepancy is significantly more prevalent in males.
Arch form in a Saudi patient group is independent of gender, sagittal molar relationship, and Bolton discrepancy.
Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 2006.
Araujo E, Souki M. Bolton anterior tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod. 2003;73(3):307–13. PubMed
Uysal T, Sari Z, Basciftci FA, Memili B. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and malocclusion: is there a relation? Angle Orthod. 2005;75(2):208–13. PubMed
Santoro M, Ayoub ME, Pardi VA, Cangialosi TJ. Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans. Angle Orthod. 2000;70(4):303–7. PubMed
Sameshima GT. Bolton tooth size variation among four ethnic groups. In: 84th IADR General Session & Exhibition. Brisbane. 2006.
Akyalcin S, Dogan S, Dincer B, Erdinc AM, Oncag G. Bolton tooth size discrepancies in skeletal Class I individuals presenting with different dental angle classifications. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(4):637–43. PubMed
Basaran G, Selek M, Hamamci O, Akkus Z. Intermaxillary Bolton tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Angle Orthod. 2006;76(1):26–30. PubMed
Al-Tamimi T, Hashim HA. Bolton tooth-size ratio revisited. World J Orthod. 2005;6(3):289–95. PubMed
Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1958;28:113–30.
Hickey J, Zarb G, Bolender C. Boucher’s prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. St Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1985.
Nojima K, McLaughlin RP, Isshiki Y, Sinclair PM. A comparative study of Caucasian and Japanese mandibular clinical arch forms. Angle Orthod. 2001;71(3):195–200. PubMed
Haralabakis NB, Sifakakis I, Papagrigorakis M, Papadakis G. The correlation of sexual dimorphism in tooth size and arch form. World J Orthod. 2006;7(3):254–60. PubMed
Andrews L. Straight wire—the concept and appliance. San Diego, Calif: L.A. Wells; 1989.
Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod. 1962;48(7):504–29. CrossRef
Enlow DH. Handbook of facial growth. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1990.
Kasai K, Kanazawa E, Aboshi H, Richards LC, Matsuno M. Dental arch form in three Pacific populations: a comparison with Japanese and Australian aboriginal samples. J Nihon University School of Dentistry. 1997;39(4):196–201. CrossRef
Collins BP, Harris EF. Arch form in American blacks and whites with malocclusions. J Tennessee Dental Association. 1998;78(1):15–8.
Tong H, Chen D, Xu L, Liu P. The effect of premolar extractions on tooth size discrepancies. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(4):508–11. PubMed
- Is arch form influenced by sagittal molar relationship or Bolton tooth-size discrepancy?
Abdullah M. Aldrees
Abdulmajeed M. Al-Shujaa
Mohammad A. Alqahtani
Ali S. Aljhani
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin
Mail Icon II