Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2017

10.06.2016

Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?

verfasst von: Aimee K. Gardner, Daniel J. Scott, Ross E. Willis, Kent Van Sickle, Michael S. Truitt, John Uecker, Kimberly M. Brown, Jeffrey M. Marks, Brian J. Dunkin

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to assess the adequacy of current surgical residency and gastroenterology (GI) fellowship flexible endoscopy training as measured by performance on the FES examination.

Methods

Fifth-year general surgery residents and GI fellows across six institutions were invited to participate. All general surgery residents had met ACGME/ABS case volume requirements as well as additional institution-specific requirements for endoscopy. All participants completed FES testing at the end of their respective academic year. Procedure volumes were obtained from ACGME case logs. Curricular components for each specialty and institution were recorded.

Results

Forty-eight (28 surgery and 20 GI) trainees completed the examination. Average case numbers for residents were 76 ± 26 colonoscopies and 45 ± 12 EGDs. Among GI fellows, PGY4 s (N = 10) reported 99 ± 64 colonoscopies and 147 ± 79 EGDs. PGY5 s (N = 3) reported 462 ± 307 colonoscopies and 411 ± 260 EGDs. PGY6 GI fellows (N = 7) reported 515 ± 111 colonoscopies and 418 ± 146 EGDs. The overall pass rate for all participants was 75 %, with 68 % of residents and 85 % of fellows passing both the cognitive and skills components. For surgery residents, pass rates were 75 % for manual skills and 85.7 % for cognitive. On the skills examination, Task 2 (loop reduction) was associated with the lowest performance. Skills scores correlated with both colonoscopy (r = 0.46, p < 0.001) and EGD experience (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics curves were examined among the resident cohort. The minimum number of total cases associated with passing the FES skills component was 103. Significant variability existed in curricular components across institutions.

Discussion

These data suggest that current flexible endoscopy training may not be sufficient for all trainees to pass the examination. Implementing additional components of the FEC may prove beneficial in achieving more uniform pass rates on the FES examination.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Valentine RJ, Jones A, Biester TW, Cogbill TH, Borman KR, Rhodes RS (2011) General surgery workloads and practice patterns in the United States, 2007–2009: a 10-year update from the American Board of Surgery. Ann Surg 254:520–525CrossRefPubMed Valentine RJ, Jones A, Biester TW, Cogbill TH, Borman KR, Rhodes RS (2011) General surgery workloads and practice patterns in the United States, 2007–2009: a 10-year update from the American Board of Surgery. Ann Surg 254:520–525CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Halverson AL, Hughes TG, Borgstrom DC, Sachdeva AK, DaRosa DA, Hoyt DB (2013) What surgical skills rural surgeons need to master. J Am Coll Surg 217:919–923CrossRefPubMed Halverson AL, Hughes TG, Borgstrom DC, Sachdeva AK, DaRosa DA, Hoyt DB (2013) What surgical skills rural surgeons need to master. J Am Coll Surg 217:919–923CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nimeri AA, Hussein SA, Panzeter E et al (2005) The economic impact of incorporating flexible endoscopy into a community general surgery practice. Surg Endosc 19:702–704CrossRefPubMed Nimeri AA, Hussein SA, Panzeter E et al (2005) The economic impact of incorporating flexible endoscopy into a community general surgery practice. Surg Endosc 19:702–704CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Malangoni MA, Biester TW, Jones AT, Klingensmith ME, Lewis FR (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70:783–788CrossRefPubMed Malangoni MA, Biester TW, Jones AT, Klingensmith ME, Lewis FR (2013) Operative experience of surgery residents: trends and challenges. J Surg Educ 70:783–788CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehran A, Jaffe P, Efron J (2003) et al Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded? Surg Endosc 17:1971–1973CrossRefPubMed Mehran A, Jaffe P, Efron J (2003) et al Colonoscopy: why are general surgeons being excluded? Surg Endosc 17:1971–1973CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hazey JW, Marks JM, Mellinger JD et al (2014) Why fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES)? Surg Endosc 28:701–703CrossRefPubMed Hazey JW, Marks JM, Mellinger JD et al (2014) Why fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES)? Surg Endosc 28:701–703CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Fonseca AL, Reddy V, Yoo PS, Gusberg RJ, Longo WE (2016) Senior surgical resident confidence in performing flexible endoscopy: what can we do differently? J Surg Educ 73(2):311–316. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.09.014. Fonseca AL, Reddy V, Yoo PS, Gusberg RJ, Longo WE (2016) Senior surgical resident confidence in performing flexible endoscopy: what can we do differently? J Surg Educ 73(2):311–316. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jsurg.​2015.​09.​014.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Subhas G, Gupta A, Mittal VK (2010) Necessity for improvement in endoscopy training during surgical residency. Am J Surg 199:331–334CrossRefPubMed Subhas G, Gupta A, Mittal VK (2010) Necessity for improvement in endoscopy training during surgical residency. Am J Surg 199:331–334CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Poulose BK, Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ et al (2014) Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery cognitive examination: development and validity evidence. Surg Endosc 28:631–638CrossRefPubMed Poulose BK, Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ et al (2014) Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery cognitive examination: development and validity evidence. Surg Endosc 28:631–638CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Fried GM et al (2014) Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc 28:704–711CrossRefPubMed Vassiliou MC, Dunkin BJ, Fried GM et al (2014) Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc 28:704–711CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mueller CL, Kavena P, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC (2014) Colonoscopy performance correlates with scores on the FES manual skills test. Surg Endosc 28:3081–3085CrossRefPubMed Mueller CL, Kavena P, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC (2014) Colonoscopy performance correlates with scores on the FES manual skills test. Surg Endosc 28:3081–3085CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK et al (2010) Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc 24:1834–1841CrossRefPubMed Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Poulose BK et al (2010) Global Assessment of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Skills (GAGES): a valid measurement tool for technical skills in flexible endoscopy. Surg Endosc 24:1834–1841CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat King N, Kunac A, Merchant AM (2015) A review of endoscopic simulation: current evidence on simulators and curricula. J Surg Educ 73:12–23CrossRefPubMed King N, Kunac A, Merchant AM (2015) A review of endoscopic simulation: current evidence on simulators and curricula. J Surg Educ 73:12–23CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC (2015) Current status of endoscopic simulation in gastroenterology fellowship training programs. Surg Endosc 29:1913–1919CrossRefPubMed Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC (2015) Current status of endoscopic simulation in gastroenterology fellowship training programs. Surg Endosc 29:1913–1919CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?
verfasst von
Aimee K. Gardner
Daniel J. Scott
Ross E. Willis
Kent Van Sickle
Michael S. Truitt
John Uecker
Kimberly M. Brown
Jeffrey M. Marks
Brian J. Dunkin
Publikationsdatum
10.06.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.