The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00330-017-4904-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Osteoporosis diagnosis using multidetector CT (MDCT) is limited to relatively high radiation exposure. We investigated the effect of simulated ultra-low-dose protocols on in-vivo bone mineral density (BMD) and quantitative trabecular bone assessment.
Institutional review board approval was obtained. Twelve subjects with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and 12 age- and gender-matched controls undergoing routine thoracic and abdominal MDCT were included (average effective dose: 10 mSv). Ultra-low radiation examinations were achieved by simulating lower tube currents and sparse samplings at 50%, 25% and 10% of the original dose. BMD and trabecular bone parameters were extracted in T10–L5.
Except for BMD measurements in sparse sampling data, absolute values of all parameters derived from ultra-low-dose data were significantly different from those derived from original dose images (p<0.05). BMD, apparent bone fraction and trabecular thickness were still consistently lower in subjects with than in those without fractures (p<0.05).
In ultra-low-dose scans, BMD and microstructure parameters were able to differentiate subjects with and without vertebral fractures, suggesting osteoporosis diagnosis is feasible. However, absolute values differed from original values. BMD from sparse sampling appeared to be more robust. This dose-dependency of parameters should be considered for future clinical use.
• BMD and quantitative bone parameters are assessable in ultra-low-dose in vivo MDCT scans.
• Bone mineral density does not change significantly when sparse sampling is applied.
• Quantitative trabecular bone microstructure measurements are sensitive to dose reduction.
• Osteoporosis subjects could be differentiated even at 10% of original dose.
• Radiation exposure should be considered when comparing quantitative bone parameters.
ESM 1 (DOCX 1716 kb)330_2017_4904_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Consensus NI (2001) Development panel on osteoporosis: prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Jama 285(6):785–795 CrossRef
Coursey CA, Frush DP (2008) CT and radiation: What radiologists should know. Appl Radiol 37(3):22
Noël PB, Fingerle AA, Renger B et al (2011) Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise–suppressing reconstruction algorithm for mdct. Am J Roentgenol 197(6):1404–1409 CrossRef
Marin D, Nelson RC, Schindera ST et al (2009) Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal ct: Improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience 1. Radiology 254(1):145–153 CrossRef
Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC et al (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol 193(3):764–771 CrossRef
Sidky EY, Kao CM, Pan X (2006) Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT. J Xray Sci Technol 14(2):119–139
QCT Pro Bone Mineral Densitometry Software, Phantom Module. Version 4.0, Mindways Software, 2005.
Žabić S, Wang Q, Morton T, et al. A low dose simulation tool for CT systems with energy integrating detectors. Med Phys. 2013;40(3).
Fessler JA (2000) Statistical image reconstruction methods for transmission tomography. Handb Med Imaging 2:1–70
Fehringer A, Lasser T, Zanette I, et al. A versatile tomographic forward- and back-projection approach on multi-GPUs. SPIE Medical Imaging 2014. International Society for Optics and Photonics.
Baum T, Müller D, Dobritz M et al (2011) BMD measurements of the spine derived from sagittal reformations of contrast-enhanced MDCT without dedicated software. EJR 80(2):e140–e145 CrossRef
Stamm G, Nagel HD (2002) CT-expo--a novel program for dose evaluation in CT. RoFo. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed 174(12):1570–1576 CrossRef
Damilakis J, Adams JE, Guglielmi G et al (2010) Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis. Euro Radiol 20(11):2707–2714 CrossRef
Pan X, Sidky EY, Vannier M (2009) Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? Inverse Prob 25(12):123009 CrossRef
- Is multidetector CT-based bone mineral density and quantitative bone microstructure assessment at the spine still feasible using ultra-low tube current and sparse sampling?
Felix K. Kopp
Benedikt J. Schwaiger
Alexandra S. Gersing
Ernst J. Rummeny
Jan S. Kirschke
Peter B. Noël
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie
Meistgelesene Bücher aus der Radiologie
Mail Icon II