nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.03.2013 | Main topic

Is percutaneous coronary intervention as effective as bypass surgery in left main stem coronary artery stenosis?

verfasst von: Dr. T. Stiermaier, G. Schuler, E. Boudriot, S. Desch, H. Thiele

Erschienen in: Herz | Ausgabe 2/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have rekindled interest in this treatment modality also in the setting of unprotected left main stenosis. Randomized trials reported a similar risk of death or myocardial infarction between PCI and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, rates of stroke were higher after CABG, whereas patients undergoing PCI had a higher risk of repeat revascularization. Although CABG remains the standard of care for left main stenosis in current guideline recommendations, PCI is considered a reasonable alternative in patients with low to intermediate anatomical complexity and at increased surgical risk. An interdisciplinary assessment is indispensable in order to choose the best treatment option for each individual patient.

Brennan J, Dai D, Patel MR, Rao SV et al (2012) Characteristics and long-term outcomes of percutaneous revascularization of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:648–654PubMedCrossRef

Ragosta M, Dee S, Sarembock IJ, Lipson LC et al (2006) Prevalence of unfavorable angiographic characteristics for percutaneous intervention in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67:357–362CrossRef

Conley MJ, Ely RL, Kisslo J, Lee KL et al (1982) The prognostic spectrum of left main stenosis. Circulation 57:947–952CrossRef

Takaro T, Peduzzi P, Detre KM, Hultgren HN et al (1982) Survival in subgroups of patients with left main coronary artery disease. Veterans administration cooperative study of surgery for coronary arterial occlusive disease. Circulation 66:14–22PubMedCrossRef

Caracciolo EA, Davis KB, Sopko G, Kaiser GC et al (1995) Comparison of surgical and medical group survival in patients with left main coronary artery disease. Circulation 91:2325–2334PubMedCrossRef

Yusuf S, Zucker D, Passamani E, Peduzzi P et al (1994) Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 344:563–570PubMedCrossRef

Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di Mario C et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 31:2501–2555PubMedCrossRef

Levine GN, Bates ER, Chair V, Blankenship JC et al (2011) ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:e44–122PubMedCrossRef

O’Keefe JH, Hartzler GO, Rutherford BD, McConahay DR et al (1989) Left main coronary angioplasty: early and late results of 127 acute and elective procedures. Am J Cardiol 64:144–147CrossRef

10.

Stertzer SH, Myler RK, Insel H, Wallsh E et al (1985) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in left main stem coronary stenosis: a 5-year appraisal. Int J Cardiol 9:149–159PubMedCrossRef

11.

Silvestri M, Barragan P, Sainsous J, Bayet G et al (2000) Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: immediate and medium-term outcomes of 140 elective procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1543–1550PubMedCrossRef

12.

Buszman PE, Kiesz SR, Bochenek A, Peszek-Przybyla E et al (2008) Acute and late outcomes of unprotected left main stenting in comparison with surgical revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:538–545PubMedCrossRef

13.

Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A et al (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360:961–972PubMedCrossRef

14.

Morice MC, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE et al (2010) Outcomes in patients with de novo left main disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass graft treatment in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Circulation 121:2645–2653PubMedCrossRef

15.

Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, Morice MC et al (2011) Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 32:2125–2134PubMedCrossRef

16.

Boudriot E, Thiele H, Walther T, Liebetrau C et al (2011) Randomized comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in unprotected left main stem stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:538–545PubMedCrossRef

17.

Park SJ, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC et al (2011) Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 264:1718–1727CrossRef

18.

Desch S, Boudriot E, Rastan A, Buszman PE et al (2012) Bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention for the treatment of unprotected left main disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Herz (epub ahead of print)

19.

Capodanno D, Stone GW, Morice MC, Bass TA et al (2011) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical data. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1426–1432PubMedCrossRef

20.

Ferrante G, Presbitero P, Valgimigli M, Morice MC et al (2011) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. EuroIntervention 7:738–746PubMedCrossRef

21.

Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC, Lee JY et al (2010) Long-term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease 10-year results of bare-metal stents and 5-year results of drug-eluting stents from the ASAN–MAIN (ASAN Medical Center–Left MAIN Revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1366–1375PubMedCrossRef

22.

Chang K, Koh YS, Jeong SH, Lee JM (2012) Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease in the drug-eluting stent era. Heart 98:799–805PubMedCrossRef

23.

Park DW, Kim YH, Yun SC, Song HG et al (2011) Complexity of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease and long-term outcomes in patients with unprotected left main disease treated with drug-eluting stents or coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol 57:2152–2159PubMedCrossRef

24.

Capodanno D, Di Salvo ME, Cincotta G, Miano M et al (2009) Usefulness of the SYNTAX score for predicting clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:302–308PubMedCrossRef

25.

Capodanno D, Miano M, Cincotta G, Caggegi A et al (2010) EuroSCORE refines the predictive ability of SYNTAX score in patients undergoing left main percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 159:103–109PubMedCrossRef

26.

Valgimigli M, Malagutti P, Rodriguez-Granillo GA, Garcia-Garcia HM et al (2006) Distal left main coronary disease is a major predictor of outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1530–1537PubMedCrossRef

27.

Palmerini T, Sangiorgi D, Marzocchi A, Tamburino C et al (2009) Ostial and midshaft lesions vs. bifurcation lesions in 1111 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated withvdrug-eluting stents: results of the survey fromvthe Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology. Eur Heart J 30:2087–2094PubMedCrossRef

28.

Cameron A, Kemp HG, Fisher LD, Gosselin A et al (1983) Left main coronary artery stenosis: angiographic determination. Circulation 68:484–489PubMedCrossRef

29.

Hamilos M, Muller O, Cuisset T, Ntalianis A et al (2009) Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 120:1505–1512PubMedCrossRef

30.

Suemaru S, Iwasaki K, Yamamoto K, Kusachi S et al (2005) Coronary pressure measurement to determine treatment strategy for equivocal left main coronary artery lesions. Heart Vessels 20:271–277PubMedCrossRef

31.

Jasti V, Ivan E, Yalamanchili V, Wongpraparut N et al (2004) Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation 110:2831–2836PubMedCrossRef

32.

Torre Hernandez JM de la, Hernández Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR et al (2011) Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:251–258

33.

Pandya SB, Kim YH, Meyers SN, Davidson CJ et al (2010) Drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents in unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:602–6011PubMedCrossRef

34.

Lee JY, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee SW et al (2009) Long-term clinical outcomes of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: analysis of the MAIN-COMPARE (revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis: comparison of percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus surgical revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:853–859PubMedCrossRef

35.

Mehilli J, Kastrati A, Byrne RA, Bruskina O et al (2009) Paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:1760–1768.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Song PS, Ryu DR, Song YB, Hahn JY et al (2011) Long-term outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents vs paclitaxel-eluting stents in unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions. Clin Cardiol 34:378–383PubMedCrossRef

37.

Song YB, Hahn JY, Choi SH, Choi JH et al (2010) Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary bifurcations results: from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1743–1750PubMedCrossRef

38.

Kim YH, Park DW, Ahn JM, Yun SC et al (2012) Everolimus-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv 5:708–717CrossRef

39.

Erglis A, Kumsars I, Niemelä M, Kervinen K et al (2009) Randomized comparison of coronary bifurcation stenting with the crush versus the culotte technique using sirolimus eluting stents: the Nordic stent technique study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:27–34PubMedCrossRef

40.

Palmerini T, Marzocchi A, Tamburino C, Sheiban I et al (2008) Impact of bifurcation technique on 2-year clinical outcomes in 773 patients with distal unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated sith drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 1:185–192PubMedCrossRef

41.

Meliga E, Garcia-Garcia HM, Valgimigli M, Chieffo A et al (2008) Longest available clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: the DELFT (Drug Eluting stent for LeFT main) Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:2212–2219PubMedCrossRef

42.

Chieffo A, Park SJ, Meliga E, Sheiban I et al (2008) Late and very late stent thrombosis following drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected left main coronary artery: a multicentre registry. Eur Heart J 29:2108–2115PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Is percutaneous coronary intervention as effective as bypass surgery in left main stem coronary artery stenosis?
verfasst von: Dr. T. Stiermaier
G. Schuler
E. Boudriot
S. Desch
H. Thiele
Publikationsdatum: 01.03.2013
Verlag: Urban and Vogel
Erschienen in: Herz / Ausgabe 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0340-9937
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6692
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-012-3745-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Is percutaneous coronary intervention as effective as bypass surgery in left main stem coronary artery stenosis?

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Sind Betablocker auch für ältere herzschwache Personen nützlich?

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Update Kardiologie

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2013

Mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure

Unprotected left main coronary artery disease

Platelet distribution width and saphenous vein disease in patients after CABG

Fächergrenzen in Bewegung: Intervention oder Operation?

The acute effect of percutaneous mitral balloon valvuloplasty on atrial electromechanical delay and P-wave dispersion in patients with mitral stenosis

Aortenklappenstenose bei erhöhtem Risiko

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Sind Betablocker auch für ältere herzschwache Personen nützlich?

Stillende Frauen haben geringeres kardiovaskuläres Risiko

Update Kardiologie