Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2013

01.10.2013 | Breast Oncology

Is Postexcision, Preradiation Mammogram Necessary in Patients After Breast-Conserving Surgery with Negative Margins

verfasst von: Cameron D. Adkisson, MD, Sarah A. McLaughlin, MD, FACS, Laura A. Vallow, MD, Michael G. Heckman, HS, Nancy N. Diehl, BS, Sanjay P. Bagaria, MD, Nicholas Howe, BS, Tammeza Gibson, PA, Barbara Pockaj, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In women with breast cancer and calcifications, controversy exists over the need for postexcision/lumpectomy, preradiation mammogram (PEM) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Further, the need for excision of remaining or suspicious calcifications after PEM when surgical margins are negative is unclear. We sought to characterize the utility of PEM hypothesizing that its value in directing the need for additional surgery is minimized after achieving negative surgical margins.

Methods

We identified 524 women with breast cancer and calcifications treated with BCS with negative margins between 1996 and 2011.

Results

PEM was performed in 112 of 524 (21 %) women, with residual calcifications identified in 10 of 112 (9 %); of these, 2 of 112 (1.8 %) had residual disease. Local recurrence occurred in 4 of 112 (4 %) patients, none of whom had residual calcifications identified on PEM. The remaining 412 of 524 (79 %) women did not have PEM but had a postradiation mammogram 6 to 12 months after treatment identifying calcifications in 19 (5 %) women. Tissue diagnosis was benign in 14 women and was not pursued in the remaining 5. Local recurrence occurred in 13 (3 %) patients, none of whom had calcifications on the new post radiation baseline mammogram.

Conclusions

Mammographically apparent calcifications representing residual disease occur infrequently after BCS with negative margins. The value of PEM may be to document the new radiographic baseline but should not be required to ensure adequate surgery. Radiation plays an integral role in sterilization of the remaining breast tissue after BCS.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aref A, Youssef E, Washington T, Segel M, Grigorian C, Bongers S et al. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspicious microcalcifications. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6:25–7.PubMed Aref A, Youssef E, Washington T, Segel M, Grigorian C, Bongers S et al. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspicious microcalcifications. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6:25–7.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dershaw D. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:309–16.PubMedCrossRef Dershaw D. Mammography in patients with breast cancer treated by breast conservation (lumpectomy with or without radiation). AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:309–16.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dershaw DD. Evaluation of the breast undergoing lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:1147–60.PubMed Dershaw DD. Evaluation of the breast undergoing lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:1147–60.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Winchester D, Strom E. Standards for diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast—American College of Radiology—American College of Surgeons—College of American Pathologists. Society of Surgical Oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48:108–28.PubMedCrossRef Winchester D, Strom E. Standards for diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast—American College of Radiology—American College of Surgeons—College of American Pathologists. Society of Surgical Oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48:108–28.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Grann A, Abdou C, Dragman N, Goodman R. The value of postexcision preradiation mammography in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2004;27:285–8.PubMedCrossRef Grann A, Abdou C, Dragman N, Goodman R. The value of postexcision preradiation mammography in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2004;27:285–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin K, Eradat J, Mehta N, Bent C, Lee S, Apple S et al. Is a short-interval postradiation mammogram necessary after conservative surgery and radiation in breast cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:1041–7.PubMedCrossRef Lin K, Eradat J, Mehta N, Bent C, Lee S, Apple S et al. Is a short-interval postradiation mammogram necessary after conservative surgery and radiation in breast cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:1041–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Katipamula R, Degnim A, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim A, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Habermann E, Abbott A, Parsons H, Virnig B, Al-Refaie W, Tuttle T. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3437–41.PubMedCrossRef Habermann E, Abbott A, Parsons H, Virnig B, Al-Refaie W, Tuttle T. Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3437–41.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Adkisson C, Bagaria S, Parker A, et al. Which eligible breast conservation patients choose mastectomy in the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1129–36.PubMedCrossRef Adkisson C, Bagaria S, Parker A, et al. Which eligible breast conservation patients choose mastectomy in the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1129–36.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Khatcheressian J, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow–up and management after primary treatment: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1–6.CrossRef Khatcheressian J, Hurley P, Bantug E, et al. Breast cancer follow–up and management after primary treatment: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1–6.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Breast Cancer. Version 3.2013. 2013;National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN Guidelines). Breast Cancer. Version 3.2013. 2013;National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasselgren P, Hummel R, Georgian-Smith D, Fieler M. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery. 1993;114:836–40.PubMed Hasselgren P, Hummel R, Georgian-Smith D, Fieler M. Breast biopsy with needle localization: accuracy of specimen x-ray and management of missed lesions. Surgery. 1993;114:836–40.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Waddell B, Stomper P, DeFazio J, Hurd T, Edge S. Postexcision mammography is indicated after resection of ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:665–8.PubMedCrossRef Waddell B, Stomper P, DeFazio J, Hurd T, Edge S. Postexcision mammography is indicated after resection of ductal carcinoma-in-situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:665–8.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Teixidor H, Chu F, Kim Y, Levin T. The value of mammography after limited breast surgery and before definitive radiation therapy. Cancer. 1992;69:1418–23.PubMedCrossRef Teixidor H, Chu F, Kim Y, Levin T. The value of mammography after limited breast surgery and before definitive radiation therapy. Cancer. 1992;69:1418–23.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gluck B, Dershaw D, Liberman L, Deutch B. Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision. Radiology. 1993;188:469–72.PubMed Gluck B, Dershaw D, Liberman L, Deutch B. Microcalcifications on postoperative mammograms as an indicator of adequacy of tumor excision. Radiology. 1993;188:469–72.PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland R, Veling S, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90.PubMedCrossRef Holland R, Veling S, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multifocality of tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 1985;56(5):979–90.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunne C, Burke J, Morrow M, Kell M. Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1615–20.PubMedCrossRef Dunne C, Burke J, Morrow M, Kell M. Effect of margin status on local recurrence after breast conservation and radiation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1615–20.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rudloff U, Brogi E, Reiner A, et al. The influence of margin width and volume of disease near margin on benefit of radiation therapy for women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg. 2010;251:583–91.PubMedCrossRef Rudloff U, Brogi E, Reiner A, et al. The influence of margin width and volume of disease near margin on benefit of radiation therapy for women with DCIS treated with breast-conserving therapy. Ann Surg. 2010;251:583–91.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverstein M, Lagios M, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1455–61.PubMedCrossRef Silverstein M, Lagios M, Groshen S, et al. The influence of margin width on local control of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1455–61.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Is Postexcision, Preradiation Mammogram Necessary in Patients After Breast-Conserving Surgery with Negative Margins
verfasst von
Cameron D. Adkisson, MD
Sarah A. McLaughlin, MD, FACS
Laura A. Vallow, MD
Michael G. Heckman, HS
Nancy N. Diehl, BS
Sanjay P. Bagaria, MD
Nicholas Howe, BS
Tammeza Gibson, PA
Barbara Pockaj, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2013
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3148-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.