The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Both authors contributed equally to the development of the ideas and the writing of this review. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
At the beginning of the 21st century cancer research has reached an impasse similar to that experienced in developmental biology in the first decades of the 20th century when conflicting results and interpretations co-existed for a long time until these differences were resolved and contradictions were eliminated. In cancer research, instead of this healthy "weeding-out" process, there have been attempts to reach a premature synthesis, while no hypothesis is being rejected. Systems Biology could help cancer research to overcome this stalemate by resolving contradictions and identifying spurious data. First, in silico experiments should allow cancer researchers to be bold and a priori reject sets of data and hypotheses in order to gain a deeper understanding of how each dataset and each hypothesis contributes to the overall picture. In turn, this process should generate novel hypotheses and rules, which could be explored using these in silico approaches. These activities are significantly less costly and much faster than "wet-experiments". Consequently, Systems Biology could be advantageously used both as a heuristic tool to guide "wet-experiments" and to refine hypotheses and test predictions.
Ayala FJ: Biology as an autonomous science. Am Sci. 1968, 56: 207-221. PubMed
Competing epistemologies and developmental biology. Biology and Epistemology, Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology. Edited by: Creath R, Maienschein J. 2000, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 122-137.
Triolo VA: Nineteenth century foundations of cancer research advances in tumor pathology, nomenclature, and theories of oncogenesis. Cancer Res. 1965, 25: 76-98.
Moss L: What Genes Can't Do. 2003, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Smithers DW: Cancer: an attack of cytologism. Lancet. 1962, 279: 493-499. 10.1016/S0140-6736(62)91475-7. CrossRef
Orr JW, Spencer AT: Transplantation studies of the role of the stroma in epidermal carcinogenesis. Tissue Interactions in Carcinogenesis. Edited by: Tarin D. 1972, London: Academic Press, 291-304.
Pierce GB, Shikes R, Fink LM: Cancer: A Problem of Developmental Biology. 1978, Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Fujimura J: Crafting Science. 1996, Cambridge: Harvard University Press CrossRef
van Helvoort T: A century of research into the cause of cancer: Is the new oncogenes paradigm revolutionary?. Hist Phil Life Sci. 1999, 21: 293-330.
Proto-oncogenes to oncogenes to cancer. [ http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/proto-oncogenes-to-oncogenes-to-cancer-883]
Tumor suppressor (TS) genes and the two-hit hypothesis. [ http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/tumor-suppressor-ts-genes-and-the-two-887]
Nguyen DH, Oketch-Rabah HA, Illa-Bochaca I, Geyer FC, Reis-Filho JS, Mao JH, Ravani SA, Zavadil J, Borowsky AD, Jerry DJ: Radiation acts on the microenvironment to affect breast carcinogenesis by distinct mechanisms that decrease cancer latency and affect tumor type. Cancer Cell. 2011, 19: 640-651. 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.03.011. PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Sonnenschein C, Soto AM: The Society of Cells: Cancer and Control of Cell Proliferation. 1999, New York: Springer Verlag
- Is systems biology a promising approach to resolve controversies in cancer research?
Ana M Soto
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie
e.Med Kampagnen-Visual, Mail Icon II