Isolated acute lupus pneumonitis as the initial presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus in an 8-year-old girl

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune connective tissue disease and commonly presents with arthritis, serositis, cutaneous manifestations, glomerulonephritis, and hematological and central nervous system involvement [1, 2]. Pulmonary involvement in SLE includes pulmonary hemorrhage, pulmonary hypertension, acute lupus pneumonitis, chronic interstitial pneumonitis, shrinking lung syndrome, pulmonary vasculitis, pulmonary embolism, bronchiolitis obliterans, cavitating pulmonary nodules, opportunistic pulmonary infections, and pleuritis, the most common [1, 3, 4]. Childhood onset SLE constitutes 20% of all lupus patients and pulmonary involvement has been reported in up to 80% of cases [5‐8]. Acute lupus pneumonitis is rare in SLE and can be very difficult to diagnose in patients without any previous diagnosis of SLE. Herein, we report an 8-year-old girl with isolated acute lupus pneumonitis as the initial presentation.

An 8-year-old female patient was referred to the pediatric pulmonology department with fever, dry cough, and weight loss for a duration of 1 month. She had been previously treated with intravenous antibiotic therapy and diagnosed with pneumonia at another hospital. Due to the lack of improvement despite standard treatment, she was referred for further investigation. She had no history of recurrent infection, exposure to birds or feathers, and reported no medication use. Physical examination revealed mild dyspnea and crepitant crackles on both lungs. There was no hypoxia. Diffuse fibrotic changes and parenchymal consolidation were present on chest X-ray. Thorax CT revealed that common fibrotic changes, interlobular septal thickening, and subpleural parenchymal consolidation were congruent with organising pneumonia (Fig. 1). Pulmonary function tests were compatible with restrictive pattern [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1): 0.70 L (42%), forced vital capacity (FVC): 0.94 L (47%), FEV1/FVC: 86%, forced expiratory flow (FEF) 25–75: 0.52 L/m (25%), all results are given as volume or flows and percentage of predicted]. Distance for the 6-min walk test was 394 m (52% of predicted). Her blood analysis showed hemoglobin of 13.8 g/dl, total white cell count of 7.08 × 10³/μL, and platelets at 277.5 × 10³/μL. Renal and liver function tests were within normal limits. Acute phase reactants were negative. All microbiological cultures including tuberculosis were negative. ANA++ and antiphospholipid antibodies IgM and repeated anti-dsDNA were positive [125–134 ıu/ml (normal: < 100)], whereas C3–C4 values were within normal limits. She had no proteinuria, hematuria, arthritis, rash, or hematological abnormalities. Her eye examination was normal. Echocardiography was normal without pulmonary hypertension. Bronchoscopy was performed and neutrophilic dominance was found in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL); microbiological cultures were negative. Lung biopsy revealed that NSIP-like areas additionally showed inflammatory cell infiltration with superfluous plasma cells besides patchy consolidated areas with increased interstitial fibrosis and chronic pleuritis. She was diagnosed as acute lupus pneumonitis according to the SLICC 2012 criteria [9] and systemic steroid treatment was started. During the first 3 days, 15 mg/kg pulse steroid was given and continued with oral prednisolon (1 mg/kg/day). On the fourth month of treatment, although her ANA and anti-dsDNA were mostly negative, she had a cushingoid appearance, common stria on legs and back, osteoporosis (BMD − 4.2), and mild glaucoma. As a result, steroid treatment was tapered back and azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil were started. After the steroid began being reduced, ANA and anti-dsDNA became positive once again. Because there was no improvement in pulmonary function tests and radiological findings after reducing steroid treatment, hydroxychloroquine treatment was added. Following addition of hydroxychloroquine to the treatment regimen, her radiological findings and pulmonary function tests were improved. Fibrotic changes decreased both on chest X-ray and thorax CT (Fig. 2); improvement of pulmonary function tests and 6-min walking distance are shown below (Fig. 3). To date, she is being followed continuously without complaints such as cough, dyspnea, and exercise intolerance for 2 years.

Acute lupus pneumonitis is a rare manifestation of SLE which is reported in 1–4% of SLE patients with a high mortality rate [4, 10]. Therefore, early diagnosis and treatment are essential in these patients. Our patient had many difficulties for an accurate diagnosis. She had only pulmonary involvement without any other systemic symptoms, resulting in an initial diagnosis of SLE. In this case, the major concern was preventing pulmonary infections. Infections are the main cause of death in SLE patients [11]. All microbiological cultures were negative including tuberculosis. The incidence of pulmonary tuberculosis is higher in SLE patients with a 6–15-fold higher risk than in the normal population [12‐14]. BAL cultures were sterile and pulmonary infections were excluded. Viral pneumonias such as CMV were also excluded. Pulmonary hemorrhage was the other differential diagnose but was eventually excluded as she had no hemoptysis, anemia and was without hemosiderin-laden macrophages in BAL. Systemic vasculitis was another possibility but was excluded as there was no vasculitic rash, glomerulonephritis, or positive antibodies supporting vasculitis. Lung biopsy was required to fulfill the SLE criteria and is an invasive procedure in childhood.

High-dose steroids, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, and other immunosuppressive agents can be used in the treatment of acute lupus pneumonitis [4, 15, 16]. There are no clinical trials for this treatment and current treatment regimens are based solely on case reports and small investigative series [4]. Pulmonary function tests and radiological findings of our patient were improved and immunological markers became negative following steroid treatment. Due to the side effects of steroids, a reduced dosage was necessary, resulting in a deterioration of pulmonary functions and radiological findings concurrent with positive immunological markers. This was another finding that confirmed our diagnosis. Azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil were added, but a significant improvement was observed only after the addition of hydroxychloroquine treatment. Hydroxychloroquine treatment is used for long-term protective effects against SLE-related organ damage; however, the percentage of SLE patients receiving hydroxychloroquine treatment was reported to be very low [16, 17]. Although hydroxychloroquine is not mentioned as a first-line therapy option, it can be use safely in acute lupus pneumonitis in children. We did not observe any side effects due to hydroxychloroquine treatment in this patient. Another explanation may be for failure of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil and success of hydroxychloroquine as hydroxychloroquine is a weak immunomodulator compared to other two agents or it was just delayed effect of azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil which lead to success.

In the English literature, patients presenting with acute lupus pneumonitis as the initial presentation have other manifestations of SLE such as photosensitivity, alopecia, oral ulcers, malar rash, and glomerulonephritis [2, 4, 13]. Our patient had only pulmonary manifestation which made the diagnostic difficult and had to be diagnosed in accordance with other organ involvement.

In conclusion, interstitial lung involvement as the sole symptom in SLE is very rare, especially in childhood. Acute lupus pneumonitis is a rare and mortal manifestation of SLE that sometimes necessitates invasive procedures such as lung biopsy for a diagnosis. Hydroxychloroquine treatment can be used in children with acute lupus pneumonitis when steroid treatment is contraindicated due to side effects.