Background
Definition of an ergogenic aid
Definition and regulation of dietary supplements
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA) and the safety of dietary supplements
New dietary ingredients
Adverse event reporting
Adulterated supplements
Good manufacturing practices
Marketing claims
A safer industry ahead
Product development and quality assurance
Evaluation of nutrition ergogenic aids
Does the theory make sense?
Is the supplement legal and safe?
Is there any scientific evidence supporting the ergogenic value?
-
Are the studies basic research done in animals/clinical populations or have the studies been conducted on athletes/trained subjects? For perspective, studies reporting improved performance in rats or an individual diagnosed with type 2 diabetes may be insightful, but research conducted on non-diabetic athletes is much more practical and relevant.
-
Were the studies well controlled? For ergogenic aid research, the gold standard study design is a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial. This means that neither the researcher nor the subject is aware which group received the supplement or the placebo during the study and that the subjects were randomly assigned into the placebo or supplement group. An additional element of rigor is called a cross-over design, where each subject, at different times (separated by an interval known as a “washout period”), is exposed to each of the treatments. While utilization of a cross-over design is not always feasible, it reduces the element of variability within a participant and subsequently, increases the strength of study’s findings. At times, supplement claims have been based on poorly designed studies (i.e., small groups of subjects, no control group, use of unreliable tests, etc.) or testimonials which make interpretation more difficult. Well-controlled clinical trials provide stronger evidence as to the potential ergogenic value and importantly how the findings can best be used.
-
Do the studies report statistically significant results or are claims being made on non-significant means or trends? Appropriate statistical analysis of research results allows for an unbiased interpretation of data. Although studies reporting statistical trends may be of interest and lead researchers to conduct additional research, studies reporting statistically significant results are obviously more convincing. With this said, it is important for people to understand that oftentimes the potential effect a dietary supplement or diet regimen may have above and beyond the effect seen from the exercise bout or an accepted dietary approach is quite small. In addition, many studies examining a biochemical or molecular biology mechanism can require invasive sampling techniques or the study population being recruited is unique (very highly trained) resulting in a small number of study participants. When viewed together, the combination of these two considerations can result in statistical outcomes that do not reach statistical significance even though large mean changes were observed. In these situations, the reporting of confidence intervals on the mean change, individual responses from all participants to the investigated treatment and/or effect sizes are additional pieces of information that can allow for a more accurate interpretation. In all such cases, additional research is warranted to further examine the potential ergogenic aid before conclusions can be made.
-
Do the results of the cited studies match the claims made about the supplement or do they accurately portray the response of the supplement against an appropriate placebo or control group? It is not unusual for marketing claims to greatly exaggerate the results found in the actual studies and do so by focusing upon just the outcomes within the supplement (treatment) group as opposed to how the supplement group changed in comparison to how a placebo group changed. Similarly, it is not uncommon for ostensibly compelling results, that may indeed be statistically significant, to be amplified while other relevant findings of significant consumer interest are obscured or omitted (e.g. a dietary supplement showing statistically significant increases in circulating testosterone yet changes in body composition or muscular performance were not superior to a placebo). The only way to determine this is to read the entire article versus focusing an entire study’s interpretation on the provided abstract or even the article citation, and compare results observed in the studies to the available marketing claims. Reputable companies accurately and completely report results of studies so that consumers can make informed decisions about using a product.
-
Were results of the study presented at a reputable scientific meeting and/or published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal? At times, claims are based on research that has either never been published or only published in an obscure journal. The best research is typically presented at respected scientific meetings and/or published in reputable peer-reviewed journals. Three ways to determine a journal’s reputation is either: 1) identify the publisher, 2) the “impact factor” of the journal or 3) whether or not the journal is indexed and subsequently available for review on Pub Med (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/). Many “peer-reviewed” journals are published by companies with ties to, or are actually owned by, companies that do business with various nutritional products (even though they may be available on PubMed). Therefore, we recommend looking up the publisher’s website and see how many other journals they publish. If you see only a few other journals this is a suggestion that the journal is not a reputable journal. Additionally, one can also look up how many articles have been published by the journal in the last 6–12 months and how many of these articles are well-conducted studies. Alternatively, one can also inquire about the impact factor, a qualitative ranking determined by the number of times a journal’s articles are cited. Impact factors are determined and published by Thomson Reuters under Journal Citation Reports® (a subscription service available at most university libraries). Most journals list their impact factor on the journal home page. Historically, those articles that are read and cited the most are the most impactful scientifically.
-
Have the research findings been replicated? If so, have the results only been replicated at the same laboratory? The best way to know an ergogenic aid works is to see that results have been replicated in several studies preferably by several separate, distinct research groups. The most reliable ergogenic aids are those in which multiple studies, conducted at different labs, have reported similar results of safety and efficacy. Additionally, replication of results by different, unaffiliated labs with completely different authors also removes or reduces the potentially confounding element of publication bias (publication of studies showing only positive results) and conflicts of interest. A notable number of studies on ergogenic aids are conducted in collaboration with one or more research scientists or co-authors that have a real or perceived economic interest in the outcome of the study. This could range from being a co-inventor on a patent application that is the subject of the ergogenic aid, being paid or receiving royalties from the creation of a dietary supplement formulation, providing consulting services for the company or having stock options or shares in a company that owns or markets the ergogenic aid described in the study. An increasing number of journals require disclosures by all authors of scientific articles, and including such disclosures in published articles. This is driven by the aim of providing greater transparency and research integrity. It is important to emphasize that disclosure of a conflict of interest does not alone discredit or dilute the merits of a research study. The primary thrust behind public disclosures of potential conflicts of interest is first and foremost transparency to the reader and second to prevent a later revelation of some form of confounding interest that has the potential of discrediting the study in question, the findings of the study, the authors, and even the research center or institution where the study was conducted.
Classifying and categorizing supplements
General dietary guidelines for active individuals
Energy needs
Carbohydrate
Protein
Fat
Strategic eating and refueling
Vitamins
Nutrient | RDA | Proposed ergogenic value | Summary of research findings |
---|---|---|---|
Vitamin A | Males 900 mcg/d Females 700 mcg/d | Constituent of rhodopsin (visual pigment) and is involved in night vision. Some suggest that vitamin A supplementation may improve sport vision. | No studies have shown that vitamin A supplementation improves exercise performance [139]. |
Vitamin D | 5 mcg/d (age < 51) | Promotes bone growth and mineralization. Enhances calcium absorption. Supplementation with calcium may help prevent bone loss in osteoperotic populations. | |
Vitamin E | 15 mg/d | As an antioxidant, it has been shown to help prevent the formation of free radicals during intense exercise and prevent the destruction of red blood cells, improving or maintaining oxygen delivery to the muscles during exercise. Some evidence suggests that it may reduce risk to heart disease or decrease incidence of recurring heart attack. | Numerous studies show that vitamin E supplementation can decrease exercise-induced oxidative stress [708‐710]. However, most studies show no effects on performance at sea level. At high altitudes, vitamin E may improve exercise performance [711]. Additional research is necessary to determine whether long-term supplementation may help athletes better tolerate training. |
Vitamin K | Males 120 mcg/d Females 90 mcg/d | Important in blood clotting. There is also some evidence that it may affect bone metabolism in postmenopausal women. | Vitamin K supplementation (10 mg/d) in elite female athletes has been reported to increase calcium-binding capacity of osteocalcin and promoted a 15–20% increase in bone formation markers and a 20–25% decrease in bone resorption markers suggesting an improved balance between bone formation and resorption [712]. |
Thiamin (B1) | Males 1.2 mg/d Females 1.1 mg/d | Coenzyme (thiamin pyrophosphate) in the removal of CO2 from decarboxylic reactions from pyruvate to acetyl CoA and in TCA cycle. Supplementation is theorized to improve anaerobic threshold and CO2transport. Deficiencies may decrease efficiency of energy systems. | Dietary availability of thiamin does not appear to affect exercise capacity when athletes have a normal intake [713]. |
Riboflavin (B2) | Males 1.3 mg/d Females 1.7 mg/d | Constituent of flavin nucleotide coenzymes involved in energy metabolism. Theorized to enhance energy availability during oxidative metabolism. | Dietary availability of riboflavin does not appear to affect exercise capacity when athletes have a normal intake [713]. |
Niacin (B3) | Males 16 mg/d Females 14 mg/d | Constituent of coenzymes involved in energy metabolism. Theorized to blunt increases in fatty acids during exercise, reduce cholesterol, enhance thermoregulation, and improve energy availability during oxidative metabolism. | Studies indicate that niacin supplementation (100–500 mg/d) can help decrease blood lipid levels and increase homocysteine levels in hypercholesteremic patients [714, 715]. However, niacin supplementation (280 mg) during exercise has been reported to decrease exercise capacity by blunting the mobilization of fatty acids [716]. |
Pyridoxine (B6) | 1.3 mg/d (age < 51) | Has been marketed as a supplement that will improve muscle mass, strength, and aerobic power in the lactic acid and oxygen systems. It also may have a calming effect that has been linked to an improved mental strength. | |
Cyano-cobalamin (B12) | 2.4 mcg/d | A coenzyme involved in the production of DNA and serotonin. DNA is important in protein and red blood cell synthesis. Theoretically, it would increase muscle mass, the oxygen-carrying capacity of blood, and decrease anxiety. | In well-nourished athletes, no ergogenic effect has been reported. However, when combined with vitamins B1 and B6, cyanocobalamin has been shown to improve performance in pistol shooting [718]. This may be due to increased levels of serotonin, a neurotransmitter in the brain, which may reduce anxiety. |
Folic acid (folate) | 400 mcg/d | Functions as a coenzyme in the formation of DNA and red blood cells. An increase in red blood cells could improve oxygen delivery to the muscles during exercise. Believed to be important to help prevent birth defects and may help decrease homocysteine levels. | Studies suggest that increasing dietary availability of folic acid during pregnancy can lower the incidence of birth defects [719]. Additionally, it may decrease homocysteine levels (a risk factor for heart disease) [720]. In well-nourished and folate deficient-athletes, folic acid did not improve exercise performance [721]. |
Pantothenic acid | 5 mg/d | Acts as a coenzyme for acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl CoA). This may benefit aerobic or oxygen energy systems. | Research has reported no improvements in aerobic performance with acetyl CoA supplementation. However, one study reported a decrease in lactic acid accumulation, without an improvement in performance [722]. |
Beta carotene | None | Serves as an antioxidant. Theorized to help minimize exercise-induced lipid peroxidation and muscle damage. | Research indicates that beta carotene supplementation with or without other antioxidants can help decrease exercise-induced peroxidation. Over time, this may help athletes tolerate training. However, it is unclear whether antioxidant supplementation affects exercise performance [709]. |
Vitamin C | Males 90 mg/d Females 75 mg/d | Used in a number of different metabolic processes in the body. It is involved in the synthesis of epinephrine, iron absorption, and is an antioxidant. Theoretically, it could benefit exercise performance by improving metabolism during exercise. There is also evidence that vitamin C may enhance immunity. | In well-nourished athletes, vitamin C supplementation does not appear to improve physical performance [138, 723]. However, there is some evidence that vitamin C supplementation (e.g., 500 mg/d) following intense exercise may decrease the incidence of upper respiratory tract infections [696, 724, 725]. |
Minerals
Nutrient | RDA | Proposed ergogenic value | Summary of research findings |
---|---|---|---|
Boron | None | Boron has been marketed to athletes as a dietary supplement that may promote muscle growth during resistance training. The rationale was primarily based on an initial report that boron supplementation (3 mg/d) significantly increased β-estradiol and testosterone levels in postmenopausal women consuming a diet low in boron. | Studies which have investigated the effects of 7 wk. of boron supplementation (2.5 mg/d) during resistance training on testosterone levels, body composition, and strength have reported no ergogenic value [280, 281]. There is no evidence at this time that boron supplementation during resistance-training promotes muscle growth. |
Calcium | 1000 mg/d (ages 19–50) | Involved in bone and tooth formation, blood clotting, and nerve transmission. Stimulates fat metabolism. Diet should contain sufficient amounts, especially in growing children/adole [285] scents, female athletes, and postmenopausal women. Vitamin D needed to assist absorption. | |
Chromium | Males 35 mcg/d Females 25 mcg/d (ages 19–50) | Chromium, commonly sold as chromium picolinate, has been marketed with claims that the supplement will increase lean body mass and decrease body fat levels. | Animal research indicates that chromium supplementation increases lean body mass and reduces body fat. Early research on humans reported similar results [285], however, more recent well-controlled studies reported that chromium supplementation (200 to 800 mcg/d) does not improve lean body mass or reduce body fat [287, 291]. |
Iron | Males 8 mg/d Females 18 mg/d (age 19–50) | Iron supplements are used to increase aerobic performance in sports that use the oxygen system. Iron is a component of hemoglobin in the red blood cell, which is a carrier of oxygen. | Most research shows that iron supplements do not appear to improve aerobic performance unless the athlete is iron-depleted and/or has anemia [729]. |
Magnesium | Males 420 Females 320 | Activates enzymes involved in protein synthesis. Involved in ATP reactions. Serum levels decrease with exercise. Some suggest that magnesium supplementation may improve energy metabolism/ATP availability. | |
Phosphorus (phosphate salts) | 700 mg/d | Phosphate has been studied for its ability to improve all three energy systems, primarily the oxygen system or aerobic capacity. | Recent well-controlled research studies reported that sodium phosphate supplementation (4 g/d for 3 d) improved the oxygen energy system in endurance tasks [504‐506]. There appears to be little ergogenic value of other forms of phosphate (i.e., calcium phosphate, potassium phosphate). More research is needed to determine the mechanism for improvement. |
Potassium | 2000 mg/da | An electrolyte that helps regulate fluid balance, nerve transmission, and acid-base balance. Some suggest excessive increases or decreases in potassium may predispose athletes to cramping. | Although potassium loss during intense exercise in the heat has been anecdotally associated with muscle cramping, the etiology of cramping is unknown [732, 733]. It is unclear whether potassium supplementation in athletes decreases the incidence of muscle cramping [160]. No ergogenic effects reported. |
Selenium | 55 mcg/d | Marketed as a supplement to increase aerobic exercise performance. Working closely with vitamin E and glutathione peroxidase (an antioxidant), selenium may destroy destructive free radical production of lipids during aerobic exercise. | |
Sodium | 500 mg/da | During the first several days of intense training in the heat, a greater amount of sodium is lost in sweat. Additionally, prolonged ultraendurance exercise may decrease sodium levels leading to hyponatremia. Increasing salt availability during heavy training in the heat has been shown to help maintain fluid balance and prevent hyponatremia [160, 736]. | |
Vanadyl sulfate (vanadium) | None | Vanadium may be involved in reactions in the body that produce insulin-like effects on protein and glucose metabolism. Due to the anabolic nature of insulin, this has brought attention to vanadium as a supplement to increase muscle mass, enhance strength and power. | |
Zinc | Males 11 mg/d Females 8 mg/d | Constituent of enzymes involved in digestion. Associated with immunity. Theorized to reduce incidence of upper respiratory tract infections in athletes involved in heavy training. |
Water
Dietary supplements and athletes
Convenience supplements
Muscle building supplements
Category | Muscle building supplements | Performance enhancement |
---|---|---|
I. Strong Evidence to Support Efficacy and Apparently Safe | • HMB • Creatine monohydrate • Essential amino acids (EAA) • Protein | • β-alanine • Caffeine • Carbohydrate • Creatine Monohydrate • Sodium Bicarbonate • Sodium Phosphate • Water and Sports Drinks |
II. Limited or Mixed Evidence to Support Efficacy | • Adenosine-5′-Triphosphate (ATP) • Branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) • Phosphatidic acid | • L-Alanyl-L-Glutamate • Arachidonic acid • Branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) • Citrulline • Essential amino acids (EAA) • Glycerol • HMB • Nitrates • Post-exercise carbohydrate and protein • Quercetin • Taurine |
III. Little to No Evidence to Support Efficacy and/or Safety | • Agmatine sulfate • Alpha-ketoglutarate • Arginine • Boron • Chromium • Conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) • D-Aspartic acid • Ecdysterones • Fenugreek extract • Gamma oryzanol (Ferulic acid) • Glutamine • Growth-hormone releasing peptides and Secretogogues • Isoflavones • Ornithine-alpha-ketoglutarate • Prohomones • Sulfo-polysaccharides • Tribulus terrestris • Vanadyl sulfate • Zinc-magnesium aspartate | • Arginine • Carnitine • Glutamine • Inosine • Medium-chain triglycerides (MCT) • Ribose |