nach oben

01.07.2019 | Intravascular Imaging (A Truesdell, Section Editor) | Ausgabe 7/2019

IVUS and OCT: Current State-of-the-Art in Intravascular Coronary Imaging

Zeitschrift:: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports > Ausgabe 7/2019

Autoren:: Michael F. Bode, Farouc A. Jaffer

» Jetzt Zugang zum Volltext erhalten

Wichtige Hinweise

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Intravascular Imaging

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Purpose of Review

To summarize the current state-of-the-art of intracoronary imaging with a focus on clinical outcomes, novel approaches, and anticipated future developments.

Recent Findings

Multiple randomized trials have demonstrated that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) significantly reduces major cardiac adverse events (MACE), and in particular, rates of target lesion failure or clinical restenosis. High-definition IVUS enhances the ability to visualize stent struts and plaque components. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) offers a greater resolution and can image many plaque morphology and stent characteristics that are not visualized with IVUS. Image guidance should be considered strongly in complex PCI lesions and potentially in all-comers. Multimodality imaging using near-infrared spectroscopy or fluorescence, combined with IVUS or OCT, is an exciting new approache to image plaque lipid, intraplaque hemorrhage, inflammation, and fibrin deposition.

Summary

Intravascular imaging guidance of PCI utilizing IVUS or OCT definitively improves outcomes in many patient subsets but remains heavily underutilized. Emerging intravascular imaging modalities, such as near-infrared spectroscopy and near-infrared fluorescence imaging, will allow for improved plaque and stent characterization. As cath lab integration, automated image segmentation, and x-ray co-registration evolve further, we envision that intravascular imaging will become a routine for the vast majority of PCI patients, with resultant benefits in clinical outcomes.

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Jetzt einloggen Kostenlos registrieren

★ PREMIUM-INHALT

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag als Mediziner

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Alle e.Med Abos bis 30. April 2021 zum halben Preis!

Jetzt gratis testen * Jetzt kaufen

Sie können e.Med Interdisziplinär 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Alle e.Med Abos bis 30. April 2021 zum halben Preis!

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Jetzt testen ¹

e.Med Radiologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Radiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Radiologie, den Premium-Inhalten der radiologischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Radiologie-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Alle e.Med Abos bis 30. April 2021 zum halben Preis!

Jetzt e.Med zum Sonderpreis bestellen!

Jetzt testen ²

Gao X-F, Wang Z-M, Wang F, Gu Y, Ge Z, Kong X-Q, et al. Intravascular ultrasound guidance reduces cardiac death and coronary revascularization in patients undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation: results from a meta-analysis of 9 randomized trials and 4724 patients. Int J Card Imaging. 2019;35:239–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-019-01555-3. CrossRef

•• Zhang J, Gao X, Kan J, Ge Z, Han L, Lu S, et al. Intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: the ULTIMATE trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2018;72:3126–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.013. This is a very recent randomized controlled trial of IVUS in an all-comers population. It showed that DES implantation guided by IVUS decreased MACE by approximately 50%, primarily driven by reduced rates of target-vessel failure. CrossRef

• Hong S-J, Kim B-K, Shin D-H, Nam C-M, Kim J-S, Ko Y-G, et al. Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314:2155–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.15454. First large randomized controlled trial of PCI of long lesions using ≥ 28-mm stents that demonstrated a reduction in MACE after IVUS-guided DES implantation, due to decreased need for target lesion revascularization. CrossRefPubMed

Chen S-L, Ye F, Zhang J-J, Tian N-L, Liu Z-Z, Santoso T, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided systematic two-stent techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions and reduced late stent thrombosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81:456–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.24601. CrossRef

Koskinas KC, Nakamura M, Räber L, Colleran R, Kadota K, Capodanno D, et al. Current use of intracoronary imaging in interventional practice - results of a European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) and Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Interventions and Therapeutics (CVIT) clinical practice Sur Circ J. 2018;82:1360–8. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1144. CrossRefPubMed

Potkin BN, Bartorelli AL, Gessert JM, Neville RF, Almagor Y, Roberts WC, et al. Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound. Circulation. 1990;81:1575–85. CrossRef

Jakabcin J, Spacek R, Bystron M, Kvasnák M, Jager J, Veselka J, et al. Long-term health outcome and mortality evaluation after invasive coronary treatment using drug eluting stents with or without the IVUS guidance. Randomized control trial. HOME DES IVUS. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;75:578–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22244. CrossRefPubMed

Kim J-S, Kang T-S, Mintz GS, Park B-E, Shin D-H, Kim B-K, et al. Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:369–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.11.009. PubMed

Chieffo A, Latib A, Caussin C, Presbitero P, Galli S, Menozzi A, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial. Am Heart J [ Internet]. 2013;165:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.09.017. CrossRef

10.

Kim B-K, Shin D-H, Hong M-K, Park HS, Rha S-W, Mintz GS, et al. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e002592. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002592. CrossRefPubMed

11.

Tian N-L, Gami S-K, Ye F, Zhang J-J, Liu Z-Z, Lin S, et al. Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study. EuroIntervention. 2015;10:1409–17. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV10I12A245. CrossRef

12.

di Mario C, Koskinas KC, Räber L. Clinical benefit of IVUS guidance for coronary stenting: the ULTIMATE step toward definitive evidence? J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2018;72:3138–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.029. CrossRef

13.

de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernández Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M, et al. Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:351–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064. CrossRefPubMed

14.

Andell P, Karlsson S, Mohammad MA, Götberg M, James S, Jensen J, et al. Intravascular ultrasound guidance is associated with better outcome in patients undergoing unprotected left main coronary artery stenting compared with angiography guidance alone. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004813.

15.

Tan Q, Wang Q, Liu D, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Li Y. Intravascular ultrasound-guided unprotected left main coronary artery stenting in the elderly. Saudi Med J. 2015;36:549–53. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.5.11251. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Liu XM, Yang ZM, Liu XK, Zhang Q, Liu CQ, Le HQ, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions: a single-center randomized trial. Anatol J Cardiol. 2019;21:83–90. https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2018.21447. CrossRefPubMed

17.

Wang Y, Mintz GS, Gu Z, Qi Y, Wang Y, Liu M, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug eluting stent implantation in left main coronary disease in 4592 patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-018-0843-z.

18.

Romagnoli E, De Servi S, Tamburino C, Colombo A, Burzotta F, Presbitero P, et al. Real-world outcome of coronary bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era: results from the 4,314-patient Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology (SICI-GISE) Italian Multicenter Registry on Bifurcations (I-BIGIS). Am Heart J. 2010;160:535–542.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.028. CrossRefPubMed

19.

Chen L, Xu T, Xue X-J, Zhang J-J, Ye F, Tian N-L, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with unstable angina and complex coronary artery true bifurcation lesions. Int J Card Imaging. 2018;34:1685–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1393-2. CrossRef

20.

Gaster AL, Slothuus Skjoldborg U, Larsen J, Korsholm L, von Birgelen C, Jensen S, et al. Continued improvement of clinical outcome and cost effectiveness following intravascular ultrasound guided PCI: insights from a prospective, randomised study. Heart. 2003;89:1043–9. CrossRef

21.

Alberti A, Giudice P, Gelera A, Stefanini L, Priest V, Simmonds M, et al. Understanding the economic impact of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Eur J Health Econ. 2016;17:185–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-015-0670-4. CrossRefPubMed

22.

Gaster AL, Slothuus U, Larsen J, Thayssen P, Haghfelt T. Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravascular ultrasound guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2001;35:80–5. CrossRef

23.

Chin CY, Maehara A, Fall K, Mintz GS, Ali ZA. Imaging comparisons of coregistered native and stented coronary segments by high-definition 60-MHz intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1305–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.011. CrossRefPubMed

24.

Okada K, Kitahara H, Mitsutake Y, Tanaka S, Kimura T, Yock PG, et al. Assessment of bioresorbable scaffold with a novel high-definition 60 MHz IVUS imaging system: comparison with 40-MHz IVUS referenced to optical coherence tomography. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91:874–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27197. CrossRefPubMed

25.

Ataka R, Saito N, Tsujimura A, Kato ET, Kimura T. Direct comparison of optical coherence tomography and high-definition 60-MHz intravascular ultrasound imaging of intra-procedural stent thrombosis in a patient with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018;20:365–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2018.10.011. CrossRefPubMed

26.

Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, Bailey SR, Erbel R, Fitzgerald PJ, et al. American College of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology task force on clinical expert consensus do. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1478–92. CrossRef

27.

Mintz GS, Garcia-Garcia HM, Nicholls SJ, Weissman NJ, Bruining N, Crowe T, et al. Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound regression/progression studies. EuroIntervention. 2011;6(9):1123–30. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV6I9A195. CrossRefPubMed

28.

Safian RD, Goldstein JA. Expert consensus statement on FFR, IVUS, and OCT: focus on physiology and luminology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;83:519–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25399. CrossRefPubMed

29.

•• Räber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC, Johnson TW, Holm NR, Onuma Y, et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3281–300. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy285 Recent consensus document comparing IVUS and OCT with many specific examples for each technique. CrossRefPubMed

30.

Hong M-K, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Park D-W, Choi B-R, Park K-H, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of angiographic restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1305–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi882. CrossRefPubMed

31.

Calvert PA, Brown AJ, Hoole SP, Obaid DR, West NEJ, Bennett MR. Geographical miss is associated with vulnerable plaque and increased major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;88:340–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26275. CrossRefPubMed

32.

Choi S-Y, Maehara A, Cristea E, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Brodie B, et al. Usefulness of minimum stent cross sectional area as a predictor of angiographic restenosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction (from the HORIZONS-AMI Trial IVUS substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2012;109:455–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.10.005. CrossRefPubMed

33.

Tearney GJ, Regar E, Akasaka T, Adriaenssens T, Barlis P, Bezerra HG, et al. Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;59:1058–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.079. CrossRef

34.

Prati F, Guagliumi G, Mintz GS, Costa M, Regar E, Akasaka T, et al. Expert review document part 2: methodology, terminology and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography for the assessment of interventional procedures. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2513–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs095. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Hu S, Yonetsu T, Jia H, Karanasos A, Aguirre AD, Tian J, et al. Residual thrombus pattern in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction caused by plaque erosion versus plaque rupture after successful fibrinolysis: an optical coherence tomography study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1336–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.11.025. CrossRefPubMed

36.

Higuma T, Soeda T, Abe N, Yamada M, Yokoyama H, Shibutani S, et al. A combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound study on plaque rupture, plaque Erosion, and calcified nodule in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: incidence, morphologic characteristics, and outcomes after perc. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1166–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.02.026. CrossRefPubMed

37.

• Jia H, Dai J, Hou J, Xing L, Ma L, Liu H, et al. Effective anti-thrombotic therapy without stenting: intravascular optical coherence tomography-based management in plaque erosion (the EROSION study). Eur Heart J. 2017;38:792–800. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw381 This study demonstred that OCT-detected plaque erosions underlying acute coronary syndromes might be able to be managed without stenting. CrossRefPubMed

38.

Bezerra HG, Attizzani GF, Sirbu V, Musumeci G, Lortkipanidze N, Fujino Y, et al. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:228–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.017. CrossRefPubMed

39.

Kim I-C, Nam C-W, Cho Y-K, Park H-S, Yoon H-J, Kim H, et al. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model. Int J Cardiol. 2016;221:860–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.080. CrossRefPubMed

40.

Maehara A, Matsumura M, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Stone GW. IVUS-guided versus OCT-guided coronary stent implantation: a critical appraisal. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:1487–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.09.008. CrossRefPubMed

41.

Meneveau N, Souteyrand G, Motreff P, Caussin C, Amabile N, Ohlmann P, et al. Optical coherence tomography to optimize results of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: results of the multicenter, randomized DOCTORS study does optical coherence tomography optimize results of S. Circulation. 2016;134:906–17. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024393. CrossRefPubMed

42.

• Kubo T, Shinke T, Okamura T, Hibi K, Nakazawa G, Morino Y, et al. Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:3139–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx351 This trial of OCT vs IVUS guidance vs PCI showed similar MACE rates between IVUS and OCT. There was also no difference in post-PCI minimum lumen diameter. This was an important finding as most other trials showed that OCT undersizes stents compared to IVUS. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Ali ZA, Maehara A, Généreux P, Shlofmitz RA, Fabbiocchi F, Nazif TM, et al. Optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation (ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2016;388:2618–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31922-5. CrossRef

44.

ILUMIEN IV [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jan 17].

45.

Libby P, Pasterkamp G, Crea F, Jang I-K. Reassessing the mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes. Circ Res. 2019;124:150–60. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.311098. CrossRefPubMed

46.

Xing L, Yamamoto E, Sugiyama T, Jia H, Ma L, Hu S, et al. EROSION study (effective anti-thrombotic therapy without stenting: intravascular optical coherence tomography-based management in plaque erosion): a 1-year follow-up report. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005860.

47.

Sugiyama T, Xing L, Yamamoto E, Fracassi F, Lee H, Yu B, et al. Thrombus resolution with tirofiban in the conservative management of patients presenting with plaque erosion. Coron Artery Dis. 2018;29:301–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000614. CrossRefPubMed

48.

Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1002358. CrossRef

49.

Bourantas CV, Jaffer FA, Gijsen FJ, van Soest G, Madden SP, Courtney BK, et al. Hybrid intravascular imaging: recent advances, technical considerations, and current applications in the study of plaque pathophysiology. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:400–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw097. CrossRefPubMed

50.

Stone PH, Saito S, Takahashi S, Makita Y, Nakamura S, Kawasaki T, et al. Prediction of progression of coronary artery disease and clinical outcomes using vascular profiling of endothelial shear stress and arterial plaque characteristics: the PREDICTION study. Circulation. 2012;126:172–81. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.096438. CrossRef

51.

Gardner CM, Tan H, Hull EL, Lisauskas JB, Sum ST, Meese TM, et al. Detection of lipid core coronary plaques in autopsy specimens with a novel catheter-based near-infrared spectroscopy system. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:638–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.06.001. CrossRefPubMed

52.

Madder RD, Husaini M, Davis AT, VanOosterhout S, Harnek J, Götberg M, et al. Detection by near-infrared spectroscopy of large lipid cores at culprit sites in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:1014–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25754. CrossRefPubMed

53.

Madder RD, Goldstein JA, Madden SP, Puri R, Wolski K, Hendricks M, et al. Detection by near-infrared spectroscopy of large lipid core plaques at culprit sites in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:838–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.04.012. CrossRefPubMed

54.

Oemrawsingh RM, Cheng JM, García-García HM, van Geuns R-J, de Boer SPM, Simsek C, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy predicts cardiovascular outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2510–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.998. CrossRefPubMed

55.

Kini AS, Baber U, Kovacic JC, Limaye A, Ali ZA, Sweeny J, et al. Changes in plaque lipid content after short-term intensive versus standard statin therapy: the YELLOW trial (reduction in yellow plaque by aggressive lipid-lowering therapy). J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2013;62:21–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.058. CrossRef

56.

Calfon Press MA, Mallas G, Rosenthal A, Hara T, Mauskapf A, Nudelman RN, et al. Everolimus-eluting stents stabilize plaque inflammation in vivo: assessment by intravascular fluorescence molecular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18:510–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew228. CrossRefPubMed

57.

Dixon AJ, Hossack JA. Intravascular near-infrared fluorescence catheter with ultrasound guidance and blood attenuation correction. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18:56009. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.18.5.056009. CrossRefPubMed

58.

Yoo H, Kim JW, Shishkov M, Namati E, Morse T, Shubochkin R, et al. Intra-arterial catheter for simultaneous microstructural and molecular imaging in vivo. Nat Med. 2011;17:1680–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2555. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Verjans JW, Osborn EA, Ughi GJ, Calfon Press MA, Hamidi E, Antoniadis AP, et al. Targeted near-infrared fluorescence imaging of atherosclerosis: clinical and intracoronary evaluation of indocyanine green. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1087–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.01.034. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Osborn EA, Jaffer FA. The advancing clinical impact of molecular imaging in CVD. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:1327–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.09.014. CrossRefPubMed

61.

• Hara T, Ughi GJ, McCarthy JR, Erdem SS, Mauskapf A, Lyon SC, et al. Intravascular fibrin molecular imaging improves the detection of unhealed stents assessed by optical coherence tomography in vivo. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:447–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv677 This experimental study demonstrated specific molecular imaging of fibrin to understand unhealed stents using NIRF-OCT. DES exhibited greater fibrin compared to BMS. Further standalone OCT could not distinguish fibrin coverage from endothelial coverage; NIRF molecular imaging was required. CrossRefPubMed

62.

Kolodgie FD, Gold HK, Burke AP, Fowler DR, Kruth HS, Weber DK, et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2316–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa035655. CrossRefPubMed

63.

Saam T, Hetterich H, Hoffmann V, Yuan C, Dichgans M, Poppert H, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of the predictive value of carotid plaque hemorrhage on cerebrovascular events by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1081–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.06.015. CrossRefPubMed

64.

Ughi GJ, Wang H, Gerbaud E, Gardecki JA, Fard AM, Hamidi E, et al. Clinical characterization of coronary atherosclerosis with dual-modality OCT and near-infrared autofluorescence imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1304–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.11.020. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Htun NM, Chen YC, Lim B, Schiller T, Maghzal GJ, Huang AL, et al. Near-infrared autofluorescence induced by intraplaque hemorrhage and heme degradation as marker for high-risk atherosclerotic plaques. Nat Commun. 2017;8:75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00138-x. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Yin J, Li X, Jing J, Li J, Mukai D, Mahon S, et al. Novel combined miniature optical coherence tomography ultrasound probe for in vivo intravascular imaging. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16:060505. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3589097. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Sheth TN, Pinilla-Echeverri N, Mehta SR, Courtney BK. First-in-human images of coronary atherosclerosis and coronary stents using a novel hybrid intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomographic catheter. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:2427–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.09.022. CrossRefPubMed

68.

Liang S, Ma T, Jing J, Li X, Li J, Shung KK, et al. Trimodality imaging system and intravascular endoscopic probe: combined optical coherence tomography, fluorescence imaging and ultrasound imaging. Opt Lett. 2014;39:6652–5. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.39.006652. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Fard AM, Vacas-Jacques P, Hamidi E, Wang H, Carruth RW, Gardecki JA, et al. Optical coherence tomography--near infrared spectroscopy system and catheter for intravascular imaging. Opt Express. 2013;21:30849–58. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.030849. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: IVUS and OCT: Current State-of-the-Art in Intravascular Coronary Imaging
Autoren:: Michael F. Bode
Farouc A. Jaffer
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-019-9503-7
Verlag: Springer US
Zeitschrift: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports
Ausgabe 7/2019
Print ISSN: 1941-9066
Elektronische ISSN: 1941-9074

Sie können e.Med Innere Medizin 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.
Sie können e.Med Radiologie 14 Tage kostenlos testen (keine Print-Zeitschrift enthalten). Der Test läuft automatisch und formlos aus. Es kann nur einmal getestet werden.